K203041 · Medacta International S.A. · LZO · Dec 2, 2020 · Orthopedic
Device Facts
Record ID
K203041
Device Name
SMS Cementless Stem
Applicant
Medacta International S.A.
Product Code
LZO · Orthopedic
Decision Date
Dec 2, 2020
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Special
Regulation
21 CFR 888.3353
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
The SMS system is designed for cementless use in total or partial hip arthroplasty, for primary or revision surgery. Hip replacement is indicated in the following cases: - Severely painful and/or disabled joint as a result of arthrosis, traumatic arthritis, rheumatoid polyarthritis or congenital hip dysplasia - Avascular necrosis of the femoral head - Acute traumatic fracture of the femoral head or neck - Failure of previous hip surgery: joint reconstruction, internal fixation, arthroplasty, hip resurfacing replacement or total hip arthroplasty
Device Story
SMS Cementless Stem is a femoral implant for total or partial hip arthroplasty; designed for proximal fixation. Device is a line extension of existing SMS product line, adding a collared solid version. Implants are used in primary or revision surgery; implanted by orthopedic surgeons in clinical settings. Device functions as a structural component of the hip joint replacement system, articulating with modular femoral heads and acetabular components. Provides mechanical stability and joint function restoration for patients with degenerative or traumatic hip conditions. Benefits include pain relief and improved joint mobility.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical studies were conducted. Substantial equivalence is supported by non-clinical bench testing, including range of motion (EN ISO 21535), fatigue testing (ISO 7206-4, ISO 7206-6), pull-off force (ASTM F2009-00), and coating characterization (ISO 13779-1, ASTM F1147-99).
Technological Characteristics
Cementless femoral stem; materials and coatings consistent with predicate devices. Standards: ISO 7206-4/6 (fatigue), EN ISO 21535 (ROM), ASTM F2009-00 (taper disassembly), ISO 13779-1 (hydroxyapatite), ASTM F1147-99 (coating tension). Modular design for use with CoCr or ceramic heads and UHMWPE/HXUHMWPE acetabular liners.
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients requiring total or partial hip arthroplasty (primary or revision) due to arthrosis, traumatic arthritis, rheumatoid polyarthritis, congenital hip dysplasia, avascular necrosis of the femoral head, acute traumatic fracture of the femoral head/neck, or failure of previous hip surgery.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A hip joint metal/ceramic/polymer semi-constrained cemented or nonporous uncemented prosthesis is a device intended to be implanted to replace a hip joint. This device limits translation and rotation in one or more planes via the geometry of its articulating surfaces. It has no linkage across-the-joint. The two-part femoral component consists of a femoral stem made of alloys to be fixed in the intramedullary canal of the femur by impaction with or without use of bone cement. The proximal end of the femoral stem is tapered with a surface that ensures positive locking with the spherical ceramic (aluminium oxide, A12 03 ) head of the femoral component. The acetabular component is made of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene or ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene reinforced with nonporous metal alloys, and used with or without bone cement.
{0}------------------------------------------------
December 2, 2020
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On the left is the Department of Health & Human Services logo. To the right of that is the FDA logo, which consists of the letters "FDA" in a blue square, followed by the words "U.S. FOOD & DRUG" in blue, with the word "ADMINISTRATION" underneath.
Medacta International SA % Chris Lussier Director, Quality and Regulatory Medacta USA 3973 Delp Street Memphis, Tennessee 38118
Re: K203041
Trade/Device Name: SMS Cementless Stem Regulation Number: 21 CFR 888.3353 Regulation Name: Hip Joint Metal/Ceramic/Polymer Semi-Constrained Cemented Or Nonporous Uncemented Prosthesis Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: LZO, MEH, KWY, LZY Dated: November 18, 2020 Received: November 19, 2020
Dear Chris Lussier:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal
{1}------------------------------------------------
statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
Vesa Vuniqi Assistant Director DHT6A: Division of Joint Arthroplasty Devices OHT6: Office of Orthopedic Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
## Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known)
K203041
Device Name SMS Cementless Stem
## Indications for Use (Describe)
The SMS system is designed for cementless use in total or partial hip arthroplasty, for primary or revision surgery. Hip replacement is indicated in the following cases:
- . Severely painful and/or disabled joint as a result of arthrosis, traumatic arthritis, rheumatoid polyarthritis or congenital hip dysplasia
- · Avascular necrosis of the femoral head
- · Acute traumatic fracture of the femoral head or neck
- · Failure of previous hip surgery: joint reconstruction, internal fixation, arthroplasty, hip resurfacing replacement or total hip arthroplasty
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
X Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
## CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
## *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
# 3.0 510(k) Summary
#### I. Submitter
Medacta International SA Strada Regina 6874 Castel San Pietro (CH) Switzerland Phone (+41) 91 696 60 60 Fax (+41) 91 696 60 66
Contact Person: Stefano Baj, Regulatory Affairs Director, Medacta International SA Applicant Correspondent: Chris Lussier, Senior Director of Quality and Regulatory, Medacta USA Date Prepared: October 6, 2020 Date Revised: October 22, 2020
#### II. Device
| Device Proprietary Name: | SMS Cementless Stem |
|--------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Common or Usual Name: | Femoral Stems |
| Classification Name: | Hip joint, metal/ceramic/polymer, semi-constrained, cemented or nonporous, uncemented prosthesis |
| Primary Product Code: | LZO, MEH, KWY, LZY |
| Regulation Number: | 21 CFR 888.3353, 21 CFR 888.3390, 21 CFR 888.3360 |
| Device Classification | II |
#### III. Predicate Device
Primary predicate:
- . SMS, K181693, K201673 Medacta International SA
The following device is referenced:
- . Quadra P Collared, K192827, Medacta International SA.
#### IV. Device Description
The SMS femoral stem is a cementless bone preserving short stem designed for proximal fixation in total or partial hip arthroplasty for primary or revision surgery.
The SMS implants are comprised of the following products:
- SMS Cementless Solid Standard Stem (available in 15 sizes from size 1 to 15); and ●
- SMS Cementless Solid Lateralized Stem (available in 15 sizes from size 1 to 15). .
{4}------------------------------------------------
Both are available on the US market via the clearance - K181693 and K201673.
SMS collared solid version, has been introduced as a product range extension to the stems currently marketed as the SMS product line (K181693 and K201673). Quadra P is the collared stem currently marked in US K192827.
The SMS implants are line extensions to Medacta's Total Hip Prosthesis - AMIStem-H, Quadra-S and Quadra-H Femoral Stems (K093944), AMIStem and Quadra - Line Extension (K121011), AMIStem-P, AMIStem-P Collared and AMIStem-H Proximal Coating Femoral Stems (K173794), Quadra-H and Quadra-R Femoral Stems (K082792), AMIStem-H Proximal Coating (K161635), MiniMAX (K170845), and SMS (K181693 and K201673).
The SMS implants are part of the Medacta Total Hip Prosthesis system. The Medacta Total Hip Prosthesis system consists of femoral stems, modular femoral heads and acetabular components. The acetabular components consist of metal cups and liners made of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) or Highcross highly crosslinked ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (HXUHMWPE). Acetabular components include the Mpact DM (K143453), VersafitCup (K083116 and K092265), VersafitCup CC Trio (K103352), Mpact (K103721 and K132879), Mpact 3D Metal (K171966) and Medacta Bipolar Head (K091967).
The SMS stems can be combined with the CoCr ball heads (K072857, K080885 and K103721), Endo Head (K111145) or with the MectaCer BIOLOX® Forte (K073337), MectaCer BIOLOX® Delta Femoral Heads (K112115) or MectaCer BIOLOX® Option Heads (K131518).
#### V. Indications for Use
The SMS system is designed for cementless use in total or partial hip arthroplasty, for primary or revision surgery.
Hip replacement is indicated in the following cases:
- Severely painful and/or disabled joint as a result of arthrosis, traumatic arthritis, rheumatoid polyarthritis or congenital hip dysplasia
- Avascular necrosis of the femoral head
- Acute traumatic fracture of the femoral head or neck ●
- Failure of previous hip surgery: joint reconstruction, internal fixation, arthrodesis, partial hip ● arthroplasty, hip resurfacing replacement or total hip arthroplasty.
#### VI. Comparison of Technological Characteristics
The SMS range extension implants and the predicate devices share the following characteristics:
- CCD angle; ●
- . cementless:
- material of construction; ●
- coatings and coatings composition; ●
{5}------------------------------------------------
- . biocompatibility:
- device usage;
- sterility; ●
- shelf life; ●
- packaging;
- sizes:
- stem lengths; .
SMS Collared is technologically different from the predicate devices as follows:
- Medial Collar Shape and Dimensions
These differences do not introduce a new worst case from a clinical point of view or with respect to the biomechanical performance of the implants.
#### Performance Data VII.
The introduction of the SMS collared version does not create a new worst case; therefore, the following performance testing from the predicate device was leveraged to support this submission:
Non-Clinical Studies:
- Performance Tests .
- o range of motion (ROM): EN ISO 21535:2009 Non-Active Surgical Implants -Joint Replacement Implants - Specific Requirements for Hip-Joint Replacement Implants;
- o fatigue testing: ISO 7206-4 Third Edition 2010-06-15 Implants for Surgery -Partial and Total Hip Joint Prostheses - Part 4: Determination of Endurance Properties and Performance of Stemmed Femoral Components [Including AMENDMENT 1 (2016)];
- fatigue testing: ISO 7206-6 Second Edition 2013-11-15 Implants for Surgery o Partial and Total Hip Joint Prostheses - Part 6: Determination of Endurance Properties of Head and Neck Region of Stemmed Femoral Components;
- pull off force testing: ASTM F2009-00 (Reapproved 2011) Standard Test Method о for Determining the Axial Disassembly Force of Taper Connections of Modular Prostheses.
- Coating Tests ●
- o ISO 13779-1 Second Edition 2008-10-01 Implants for Surgery Hydroxyapatite -Part 1: Ceramic Hydroxyapatite; and
- ASTM F1147-99 Standard Test Method for Tension Testing of Calcium Phosphate o and Metal Coatings.
- Pyrogenicity ●
- Bacterial Endotoxin Test (LAL test) was conducted according to European о Pharmacopoeia §2.6.14 (which is equivalent to USP chapter <85>) and pyrogen test according to USP chapter <151> for pyrogenicity determination; and
- the subject devices are not labeled as non-pyrogenic or pyrogen free. o
{6}------------------------------------------------
Clinical Studies:
- • No clinical studies were conducted.
## VIII. Conclusion
Based on the above information, the SMS Collared implants are substantially equivalent to the identified predicate devices. Substantial equivalence has been demonstrated through a comparison of intended use, design, and technological characteristics, as well as performance evaluations. The SMS Collared implants are as safe and effective as the predicate devices, SMS solid stem, (K181693 and K201673) and Quadra P collared (K192827).
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.