K171966 · Medacta International S.A. · LPH · Mar 27, 2018 · Orthopedic
Device Facts
Record ID
K171966
Device Name
Mpact® 3D Metal™ Implants and Augments 3D Metal™
Applicant
Medacta International S.A.
Product Code
LPH · Orthopedic
Decision Date
Mar 27, 2018
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 888.3358
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
Mpact 3D Metal Implants The Mpact 3D Metal Implants is designed to be used in total hip arthroplasty, for primary or revision surgery. The patient should be skeletally mature. Total hip arthroplasty is indicated in the following cases: · Severely painful and/or disabled joint: as a result of osteoarthritis, post-traumatic arthritis or psoriactic arthritis, congenital hip dysplasia, ankylosing spondylitis. · Avascular necrosis of the femoral head · Acute traumatic fracture of the femoral head or neck · Failure of previous hip surgery: joint reconstruction, arthrodesis, hemiarthroplasty, surface replacement arthroplasty, or total hip replacement where sufficient bone stock is present. Augments 3D Metal The Augments 3D Metal are intended to be used in combination with the Mpact 3D Metal Multi-hole acetabular cup in hip replacement surgeries. The Augments 3D Metal are indicated in cases of: · Congenital dysplasia · Acetabular fractures · Revision of previous implants in presence of insufficient bone quality or seriously altered bone structures.
Device Story
Mpact 3D Metal Implants and Augments are orthopedic prosthetic components for total hip arthroplasty; used in primary or revision surgeries. Implants consist of hemispherical porous acetabular shells (two-hole or multi-hole) and porous metal augments. Manufactured via Electron Beam Melting (EBM) using titanium alloy powder. Augments fill bone defects in acetabulum; increase stability of acetabular component; serve as alternative to structural allograft. Used in conjunction with previously cleared cancellous bone screws and UHMWPE liners. Operated by orthopedic surgeons in clinical/hospital settings. Output is a physical structural replacement for damaged or deficient bone, restoring joint function and stability. Benefits include improved fixation and defect management in complex revision cases.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. No clinical data provided. Performance evaluations included coating characterization (ASTM F1854-15), fatigue/static shear testing (ASTM F1160-14, F1044-05), tensile strength (ASTM F1147-05), deformation testing (ISO 7206-2), locking mechanism strength (ASTM F1820-13), range of motion (ISO 21535), and dynamic compression/fatigue testing of shell/augment assemblies. Pyrogenicity testing performed per USP <151> and European Pharmacopoeia §2.6.14.
Technological Characteristics
Titanium alloy (Ti6Al4V) per ASTM F136-13 and ISO 5832-3. Manufacturing process: Electron Beam Melting (EBM). Components: hemispherical porous acetabular shells (two-hole/multi-hole) and porous metal augments. Fixation: uncemented, porous-coated. Sterilization: not specified (standard industry methods implied).
Indications for Use
Indicated for skeletally mature patients undergoing primary or revision total hip arthroplasty due to osteoarthritis, post-traumatic/psoriatic arthritis, congenital hip dysplasia, ankylosing spondylitis, avascular necrosis, acute traumatic fracture, or failed previous hip surgery. Augments indicated for congenital dysplasia, acetabular fractures, and revision with insufficient bone quality.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A hip joint metal/polymer/metal semi-constrained porous-coated uncemented prosthesis is a device intended to be implanted to replace a hip joint. The device limits translation and rotation in one or more planes via the geometry of its articulating surfaces. It has no linkage across the joint. This generic type of device has a femoral component made of a cobalt-chromium-molybdenum (Co-Cr-Mo) alloy or a titanium-aluminum-vanadium (Ti-6Al-4V) alloy and an acetabular component composed of an ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene articulating bearing surface fixed in a metal shell made of Co-Cr-Mo or Ti-6Al-4V. The femoral stem and acetabular shell have a porous coating made of, in the case of Co-Cr-Mo substrates, beads of the same alloy, and in the case of Ti-6Al-4V substrates, fibers of commercially pure titanium or Ti-6Al-4V alloy. The porous coating has a volume porosity between 30 and 70 percent, an average pore size between 100 and 1,000 microns, interconnecting porosity, and a porous coating thickness between 500 and 1,500 microns. The generic type of device has a design to achieve biological fixation to bone without the use of bone cement.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image contains the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On the left is the Department of Health & Human Services logo. To the right of that is the FDA logo, which consists of the letters "FDA" in a blue square, followed by the words "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue text.
Medacta International SA % Elizabeth Rose Manager, Regulatory Affairs Mapi USA, Inc. 2343 Alexandria Dirve, Suite 100 Lexington, Kentucky 40504
Re: K171966
Trade/Device Name: Mpact® 3D Metal™ Implants and Augments 3D Metal™ Regulation Number: 21 CFR 888.3358 Regulation Name: Hip Joint Metal/Polymer/Metal Semi-Constrained Porous-Coated Uncemented Prosthesis Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: LPH, LZO Dated: February 19, 2018 Received: February 20, 2018
March 27, 2018
Dear Elizabeth Rose:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820);
{1}------------------------------------------------
1000-1050.
and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/) and CDRH Learn (http://www.fda.gov/Training/CDRHLearn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (http://www.fda.gov/DICE) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
# Mark N. Melkerson -S
Mark N. Melkerson Director Division of Orthopedic Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
## Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K171966
Device Name
Mpact® 3D Metal™ Implants and Augments 3D Metal™
Indications for Use (Describe)
Mpact 3D Metal Implants
The Mpact 3D Metal Implants is designed to be used in total hip arthroplasty, for primary or revision surgery.
The patient should be skeletally mature.
Total hip arthroplasty is indicated in the following cases:
· Severely painful and/or disabled joint: as a result of osteoarthritis, post-traumatic arthritis or psoriactic arthritis, congenital hip dysplasia, ankylosing spondylitis.
· Avascular necrosis of the femoral head
· Acute traumatic fracture of the femoral head or neck
· Failure of previous hip surgery: joint reconstruction, arthrodesis, hemiarthroplasty, surface replacement arthroplasty, or total hip replacement where sufficient bone stock is present.
Augments 3D Metal
The Augments 3D Metal are intended to be used in combination with the Mpact 3D Metal Multi-hole acetabular cup in hip replacement surgeries.
The Augments 3D Metal are indicated in cases of:
· Congenital dysplasia
· Acetabular fractures
· Revision of previous implants in presence of insufficient bone quality or seriously altered bone structures.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
| <span> <span style="font-size: 16px;">☑</span> Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) </span> | <span> <span style="font-size: 16px;">☐</span> Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) </span> |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
## 3.0 510(k) Summary
#### I. Submitter
Medacta International SA Strada Regina 6874 Castel San Pietro (CH) Switzerland Phone (+41) 91 696 60 60 Fax (+41) 91 696 60 66
Contact Person: Stefano Baj, Regulatory Affairs Manager, Medacta International SA Date Prepared: March 27, 2018
#### II. Device
| Device Proprietary Name: | Mpact® 3D Metal™ Implants and Augments 3D Metal™ |
|--------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Common or Usual Name: | Total Hip Prosthesis |
| Classification Name: | Hip joint metal/polymer/metal semi-constrained porous-<br>coated uncemented prosthesis |
| Primary Product Code: | LPH, LZO |
| Regulation Number: | 21 CFR 888.3358 |
| Device Classification: | 2 |
#### III. Predicate Device
Substantial equivalence is claimed to the following devices:
- Mpact® Acetabular System, K103721, Medacta International SA
- Mpact® Extension (also referred to as Mpact Acetabular System), K122641, Medacta ● International SA
- Mpact® Extension (also referred to as Mpact Acetabular System), K132879, Medacta International SA
- DePuy Universal Gription™ TF Cones (Knee) & DePuy Gription™ TF Acetabular ● Augment System (Hip) (also referred to as DePuy Gription™ Augments), K100391, DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.
The following reference device are cited within the submission:
- 3DMetal Tibial Cones, K170149, Medacta International SA
- Delta TT Acetabular System, K112898, Limacorporate S.p.A.
- Delta TT Acetabular System, K141395, Limacorporate S.p.A. ●
{4}------------------------------------------------
#### IV. Device Description
The Mpact® 3D Metal™ Implants and Augments 3D Metal™ are a line extension to the Mpact Acetabular System (K103721) which offers different acetabular shells, liner options, a screw plug, and cancellous bone screws for primary to complex hip revision solutions. The subject devices are manufactured using an Electron Beam Melting (EBM) process with titanium alloy powder. The devices subject to this 510(k) consist of two-hole shells, multi-hole shells, and augments.
The Mpact® 3D Metal™ Acetabular Two-Hole Shells are hemispherical porous shells with multiple liner options and two screw holes to be used with previously 510(k) cleared cancellous bone screws for additional fixation.
The Mpact® 3D Metal™ Acetabular Multi-Hole Shells are hemispherical porous shells with multiple liner options with up to 17 screw holes to be used with previously 510(k) cleared cancellous bone screws for additional fixation. The Mpact® 3D Metal™ Acetabular Shells can be coupled with standard Highcross Ultra-High Molecular Weight Polyethylene (UHMWPE) liners.
The Augments 3D Metal™ are porous metal augments designed to act as a defect filling implant in cases of severe bone loss in the acetabulum to help increase the stability of the acetabular component. The Augments 3D Metal™ are intended to be used in conjunction with the Mpact® Multi-Hole Acetabular Shells and Mpact® 3D Metal™ Multi-Hole Acetabular Shells to aid with bone defects in complex acetabular surgeries and provide surgeons with a prosthetic alternative to structural allograft in cases of segmental deficiencies.
#### V. Indications for Use
## Mpact 3D Metal Implants
The Mpact 3D Metal Implants is designed to be used in total hip arthroplasty, for primary or revision surgery.
The patient should be skeletally mature.
Total hip arthroplasty is indicated in the following cases:
- Severely painful and/or disabled joint: as a result of osteoarthritis, post-traumatic arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis or psoriactic arthritis, congenital hip dysplasia, ankylosing spondylitis.
- Avascular necrosis of the femoral head
- Acute traumatic fracture of the femoral head or neck
- Failure of previous hip surgery: joint reconstruction, internal fixation, arthrodesis, hemiarthroplasty, surface replacement arthroplasty, or total hip replacement where sufficient bone stock is present.
{5}------------------------------------------------
## Augments 3D Metal
The Augments 3D Metal are intended to be used in combination with the Mpact 3D Metal Multihole acetabular cup in hip replacement surgeries.
Augments 3D Metal are indicated in cases of:
- Congenital dysplasia ●
- Acetabular fractures
- Revision of previous implants in presence of insufficient bone quality or seriously altered bone structures.
#### VI. Comparison of Technological Characteristics
The Mpact® 3D Metal™ Implants and Augments 3D Metal™ and the predicate devices share the following characteristics:
- diameter (for the Acetabular Shells);
- sizes;
- thickness;
- substrate materials;
- fixation;
- device usage;
- sterility;
- shelf life; and
- packaging.
The Mpact® 3D Metal™ Implants and Augments 3D Metal™ are technologically different from the predicate devices only by the manufacturing process. The subject devices are manufactured using the EBM process whereas the previously 510(k) cleared Mpact Acetabular System was manufactured using a turning process.
The Mpact® 3D Metal™ Implants and Augments 3D Metal™ are manufactured with a titanium alloy (Ti6Al4V) according to ASTM F136-13 Standard Specification for Wrought Titanium-6 Aluminum-4 Vanadium ELI (Extra Low Interstitial) Alloy for Surgical Implant Applications and ISO 5832-3:1996 Implants for Surgery - Metallic Materials - Part 3: Wrought Titanium 6-Aluminum 4-Vanadium Alloy). The components are manufactured using the EBM (Electron Beam Melting) process which is identical to Medacta's 3DMetal Tibial Cones (K170149).
These materials have a long history of use in implantable orthopedic devices and material information has been provided in previous Medacta's 510(k) submissions for the Mpact Acetabular Systems (K103721, K122641, and K132879).
{6}------------------------------------------------
Due to the extensive history of use in currently marketed medical devices, as well as similarities in the manufacturing processes between the subject and reference devices (K170149), additional biocompatibility testing was deemed unnecessary for the Mpact® 3D Metal™ Implants and Augments 3D Metal™.
#### VII. Performance Data
Testing was conducted according to written protocols with acceptance criteria that were based on standards. The following mechanical studies were performed in support of a substantial equivalence determination:
Non-Clinical Studies
- Performance Tests
- o coating characterization and testing:
- ASTM F1854-15 Standard Test Method For Stereological Evaluation Of Porous Coatings On Medical Implants;
- fatigue shear testing: ASTM F1160-14 Standard Test Method For Shear And Bending Fatigue Testing Of Calcium Phosphate And Metallic Medical And Composite Calcium Phosphate/Metallic Coatings;
- static shear testing: ASTM F1044-05 (Reapproved 2011) Standard Test Method For Shear Testing Of Calcium Phosphate Coatings And Metallic Coatings;
- tensile strength testing: ASTM F1147-05 (Reapproved 2011) Standard Test Method For Tension Testing Of Calcium Phosphate And Metal Coatings;
- deformation testing: ISO 7206-2:1996 Implants For Surgery Partial And Total O Hip Joint Prostheses - Part 2: Articulating Surfaces Made Of Metallic, Ceramic And Plastics Materials;
- locking mechanism strength (push-out, lever-out, and torque-out): ASTM F1820 -O 13 Standard Test Method for Determining the Forces for Disassembly of Modular Acetabular Devices
- range of motion testing: EN ISO 21535:2009 Non-Active Surgical Implants o Joint Replacement Implants - Specific Requirements for Hip-Joint Replacement Implants (ISO 21535:2007/Amendment 1:2016);
- dynamic compression testing of acetabular shell and augment assembly; and O
- fatigue testing of the acetabular shell. o
- Pyrogenicity ●
- o Bacterial Endotoxin Test (LAL test) was conducted according to European Pharmacopoeia §2.6.14 (which is equivalent to USP chapter <85>) and pyrogen test according to USP chapter <151> for pyrogenicity determination.
{7}------------------------------------------------
## VIII. Conclusion
Based on the above information, the Mpact® 3D Metal™ Implants and Augments 3D Metal™ can be considered substantially equivalent to the identified predicate devices.
Substantial equivalence has been demonstrated through a comparison of intended use, design and technological characteristics, as well as performance evaluations. The Mpact® 3D Metal™ Implants and Augments 3D Metal™ are as safe and effective as the predicate devices, Mpact Acetabular Systems (K103721, K122641 and K132879) and DePuy Gription™ Augments (K100391).
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.