MINT Product Family (Including MINT, MINT Lift, and MINT-I Sutures), MINT Lift ML 1043, MINT Lift ML 1013, MINT Lift 1019, MINT Lift Mini 1014
K220549 · Hans Biomed Corporation · NEW · Mar 7, 2023 · General, Plastic Surgery
Device Facts
Record ID
K220549
Device Name
MINT Product Family (Including MINT, MINT Lift, and MINT-I Sutures), MINT Lift ML 1043, MINT Lift ML 1013, MINT Lift 1019, MINT Lift Mini 1014
Applicant
Hans Biomed Corporation
Product Code
NEW · General, Plastic Surgery
Decision Date
Mar 7, 2023
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 878.4840
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic, Real-World Evidence
Real-World Evidence
Submission
Device
Sponsor
RWD Sources
RWE Use Summary
Key Tags
K220549 · Mar 7, 2023
MINT Product Family (Including MINT, MINT Lift, and MINT-I Sutures), MINT Lift ML 1043, MINT Lift ML 1013, MINT Lift 1019, MINT Lift Mini 1014
Hans Biomed Corporation
Published clinical literature; Routine clinical practice data
The sponsor utilized a literature review of 10 articles to support the safety and effectiveness of expanded indications for use and additional suture models, demonstrating clinical performance in real-world settings.
Literature review; Clinical experience; Post-market clinical data
Clinical Evidence
Study Design
Population
Comparator
Key Endpoints
Literature Review of Clinical Experience; Systematic literature review of clinical experience; Follow-up/Duration: Minimum 3 months; some up to 22+ months
Patients undergoing face suspension surgery (predominantly Asian and female); Sample Size: >500 patients
Not applicable for this study
Safety, effectiveness, patient satisfaction, and complication rates
Indications for Use
MINT Product Family (Including MINT, MINT Lift, and MINT-I Sutures) are comprised of PDO and are indicated for use in soft tissue approximation where use of a barbed absorbable suture is appropriate. These sutures are also indicated for use in face suspension surgery to temporarily fixate the cheek sub dermis in an elevated position.
Device Story
MINT Product Family sutures are synthetic, absorbable, sterile, polydioxanone (PDO) monofilament sutures featuring bi-directional barbs along the long axis. These barbs hold the suture in position and exert tension throughout its length. The device is used by clinicians in surgical settings for soft tissue approximation and face suspension procedures to elevate the cheek sub dermis. The sutures are provided sterile and are designed to degrade and reabsorb over time. The system may include optional tapered/blunt needles or cannulas made of stainless steel (SUS 304) to facilitate implantation. By fixating tissue in an elevated position, the device provides a temporary aesthetic benefit to the patient. Clinical performance is supported by literature demonstrating safety and effectiveness in facial suspension, with complications being generally mild and self-resolving.
Clinical Evidence
Clinical evidence consists of a systematic review of 10 published articles involving over 500 patients with follow-up ranging from 3 to 22+ months. The literature supports the safety and effectiveness of the expanded indications for face suspension surgery. Reported outcomes indicate significant aesthetic improvement and high patient satisfaction. Complications were mild, self-resolving, and consistent with similar procedures, including edema, ecchymosis, skin dimpling, and temporary discomfort. No new clinical safety concerns were identified.
Technological Characteristics
Synthetic absorbable monofilament polydioxanone (PDO) suture with bi-directional barbs. Compliant with USP <861> (diameter), USP <881> (tensile strength), and USP <871> (suture-needle attachment). Accessories include stainless steel (SUS 304) tapered/blunt needles or cannulas. Sterilized via ethylene oxide. Implantable, absorbable, contact duration >30 days.
Indications for Use
Indicated for soft tissue approximation using barbed absorbable sutures and for face suspension surgery to temporarily fixate the cheek sub dermis in an elevated position.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An absorbable polydioxanone surgical suture is an absorbable, flexible, sterile, monofilament thread prepared from polyester polymer poly (p-dioxanone) and is intended for use in soft tissue approximation, including pediatric cardiovascular tissue where growth is expected to occur, and ophthalmic surgery. It may be coated or uncoated, undyed or dyed, and with or without a standard needle attached.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The special control for the device is FDA's “Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Surgical Sutures; Guidance for Industry and FDA.” See § 878.1(e) for the availability of this guidance document.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On the left is the Department of Health & Human Services logo. To the right of that is the FDA logo, which is a blue square with the letters "FDA" in white. To the right of the blue square is the text "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue.
March 7, 2023
Hans Biomed Corporation % Sarah Fitzgerald Senior Consultant, Quality and Regulatory Affairs Emergo by UL 2500 Bee Caves Road, Building 1 Suite 300 Austin, Texas 78746
Re: K220549
Trade/Device Name: MINT Product Family (Including MINT, MINT Lift, and MINT-I Sutures), MINT Lift ML 1043, MINT Lift ML 1013, MINT Lift 1019, MINT Lift Mini 1014 Regulation Number: 21 CFR 878.4840 Regulation Name: Absorbable Polydioxanone Surgical Suture Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: NEW Dated: February 8, 2023 Received: February 8, 2023
Dear Sarah Fitzgerald:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976. the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of
{1}------------------------------------------------
Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely.
### Deborah A. Fellhauer -S
Deborah Fellhauer RN, BSN Assistant Director DHT4B: Division of Infection Control and Plastic Surgery Devices OHT4: Office of Surgical and Infection Control Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
### Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K220549
Device Name MINT Product Family
Indications for Use (Describe)
MINT Product Family (Including MINT Lift, and MINT-I Sutures) are comprised of PDO and are indicated for use in soft tissue approximation where use of a barbed absorbable suture is appropriate.
These sutures are also indicated for use in face suspension surgery to temporarily fixate the cheek sub dermis in an elevated position.
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) | |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| <div> <span> <span style="font-size:16px">✖</span> Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) </span> </div> | <div> <span> Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) </span> </div> |
### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
# K220549 510(k) Summary
## MINT Product Family
#### 1. Submission Sponsor
Hans Biomed Corporation 64, Yuseong-Daero 1628 Beon-Gil Yuseong-Gu, Daejeon 34054 Korea Contact: Lucy Choi Title: General Manager Telephone: 82-3-5436-2436 Email: lucy@hansbiomed.com
### 2. Submission Correspondent
Emergo by UL 2500 Bee Cave Road Building 1, Suite 300 Austin, TX 78746 Contact: Sarah Marie Fitzgerald Title: Senior Consultant, Quality and Regulatory Affairs Office Phone: (512) 222-0250 x70250 Email: sarah.fitzgerald@ul.com
### 3. Date Prepared
February 23, 2023
#### 4. Device Identification
| Trade/Proprietary Name: | MINT Product Family (Including MINT, MINT Lift, and MINT-I Sutures) |
|-------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Common/Usual Name: | Polydioxanone absorbable surgical suture |
| Classification Name: | Polydioxanone absorbable surgical suture |
| Review Panel: | General & Plastic Surgery |
| Regulation Number: | 878.4840 |
| Class: | Class II |
| Product Code: | NEW |
#### 5. Device Description
MINT Product Family Sutures are synthetic, absorbable, sterile, surgical sutures comprised of polydioxanone. These sutures are available in a range of lengths and thicknesses and have bi-directional
{4}------------------------------------------------
K220549 barbs which hold the suture in position and exert tension throughout the length of the suture. These sutures are provided sterile. They degrade and reabsorb over time.
Page 2 of 4
#### 6. Indications for Use
MINT Product Family (including MINT, MINT Lift, and MINT-I Sutures) are comprised of PDO and are indicated for use in soft tissue approximation where use of a barbed absorbable suture is appropriate.
These sutures are also indicated for use in face suspension surgery to temporarily fixate the cheek sub dermis in an elevated position.
#### 7. Equivalence Claimed to Predicate Device
The MINT Product Family (including MINT, MINT Lift, and MINT-I Sutures) is equivalent to the MINT Product Family (cleared in K192423), manufactured by Hans Biomed Corporation. Miracu (K172602), PDS Barbed Suture, PDO MAXX Threads (K190245), Demetech PDO Absorbable Suture (K082097), MINT (K130191), and Silhouette InstaLift (K163676) are provided as reference devices.
| | Subject MINT Product<br>Family Sutures | Predicate MINT Product<br>Family Sutures K192423 | Reference Devices<br>(As noted below) | Comparison |
|------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Product Code<br>/ Regulation | NEW / 21 CFR 878.4840 | NEW / 21 CFR 878.4840 | NEW / 21 CFR<br>878.4840 (K082097,<br>K130191, K172602,<br>K190245) or GAM /<br>21 CFR 879.4493<br>(K163676) | Same or Equivalent<br>Both product codes<br>are for absorbable,<br>sterile, flexible<br>surgical sutures for<br>soft tissue<br>approximation. GAM<br>is simply for a<br>different material. |
| Intended Use | Absorbable surgical<br>sutures for use in soft<br>tissue | Absorbable surgical<br>sutures for use in soft<br>tissue | Absorbable surgical<br>sutures for use in<br>soft tissue (All) | Same |
| Indications for<br>Use | MINT Product Family<br>(including MINT, MINT<br>Lift, and MINT-I Sutures)<br>are comprised of PDO<br>and are indicated for use<br>in soft tissue<br>approximation where use<br>of a barbed absorbable<br>suture is appropriate.<br>These sutures are also<br>indicated for use in face<br>suspension surgery to<br>temporarily fixate the<br>cheek sub dermis in an<br>elevated position. | MINT is indicated for use<br>in mid-face suspension<br>surgery to temporarily<br>fixate the cheek<br>subcutaneous fat layer<br>and SMAS layer in an<br>elevated position for the | The Silhouette<br>Instalift device is<br>indicated for use in<br>mid-face suspension<br>surgery to<br>temporarily fixate<br>the cheek sub dermis | Equivalent<br>Slight rewording for<br>clarity. No difference<br>in meaning.<br><br>Equivalent<br>Published clinical<br>data demonstrates<br>no difference in<br>safety or<br>effectiveness. |
#### Comparison of Characteristics
{5}------------------------------------------------
| | | | K220549 | |
|--------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|
| | Subject MINT Product<br>Family Sutures | Predicate MINT Product<br>Family Sutures K192423 | Reference Devices<br>(As noted below) | Comparison |
| | | treatment of moderate to<br>severe nasolabial folds. | in an elevated<br>position. (K163676) | |
| Suture<br>Material | Polydioxanone | Polydioxanone | N/A (Subject same as<br>predicate) | Same |
| Suture<br>Characteristics | Synthetic absorbable<br>monofilament with bi-<br>directional barbs along<br>the long axis | Synthetic absorbable<br>monofilament with bi-<br>directional barbs along<br>the long axis | N/A (Subject same as<br>predicate) | Same |
| Sterilization | Ethylene oxide | Ethylene oxide | N/A (Subject same as<br>predicate) | Same |
| Size (USP) | Compliant with USP<br>Standard Suture Sizes | Compliant with USP<br>Standard Suture Sizes | N/A (Subject same as<br>predicate) | Same |
| Contact Type | Implant, Absorbable | Implant, Absorbable | N/A (Subject same as<br>predicate) | Same |
| Contact<br>Duration | >30 Days | >30 Days | N/A (Subject same as<br>predicate) | Same |
| Suture<br>Diameter | Compliant with USP<br><861> requirements | Compliant with USP<br><861> requirements | N/A (Subject same as<br>predicate) | Same |
| Suture Tensile<br>Strength | Compliant with USP<br><881> requirements | Compliant with USP<br><881> requirements | N/A (Subject same as<br>predicate) | Same |
| Suture-Needle<br>Attachment | Compliant with USP<br><871> requirements | Compliant with USP<br><871> requirements | N/A (Subject same as<br>predicate) | Same |
| Accessories | Optional tapered / Blunt<br>needle or cannula | Optional tapered / blunt<br>needle | Optional sharp or<br>blunt needle /<br>cannula (K172602<br>and K190245) | Equivalent |
| Accessory<br>Material<br>(Patient<br>Contacting) | Stainless Steel (SUS 304) | Stainless Steel (SUS 304) | N/A (Subject same as<br>predicate) | Same |
This submission is to add the following to the products cleared under K192423 and K130191:
- Expanded indications for use
- Additional MINT Suture types / models
- . Additional accessory to facilitate suture implantation
#### Non-Clinical Performance Data 8.
Additional testing was conducted and relevant scientific data collated for this 510(k) in alignment with the FDA guidance "Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Surgical Sutures," confirming that the design output meets the design inputs and specifications for the sutures.
All differences form the previous cleared 510(k)s for MINT sutures are equivalent or the same as for reference devices. Testing and evaluation was conducted in alignment with "Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Surgical Sutures." Testing conducted included biocompatibility evaluation and testing per ISO 10993-1, ISO 10993-5, and ISO 10993-10; tensile strength testing to confirm USP <881> monograph strength; barb holding strength testing; suture-needle attachment strength testing to confirm USP <871>
{6}------------------------------------------------
monograph strength; needle corrosion resistance testing; needle flexural stress testing; cannula pull testing; and needle penetration testing.
Additionally, the change in terminology to cheek sub dermis is supported as the language is the same as that used for the reference device.
The results of the non-clinical performance testing demonstrate substantial equivalency between the subject and predicate device.
### 9. Animal Performance Data
No animal testing was conducted for this submission.
#### 10. Clinical Performance Data
Published clinical literature was reviewed and utilized to support his submission. A comprehensive literature search was conducted and 10 relevant articles were found and evaluated.
Published literature regarding clinical experience from regions where the additional suture types and accessories are legally available was provided to substantiate the differences from the subject and predicate device. This published literature includes the difference in indications for use, which expanded claims from the predicate and reference from use in mid-face suspension surgery to use in face suspension surgery. This consisted of published articles supporting the safety and effectiveness of the changes from the predicate, with an aggregate number of more than 500 patients with clinical follow-up of a minimum of 3 months, including some patients with follow-up of 22+ months. Patient demographics varied, and most patients were Asian and female. Most patients experienced significant improvements in appear and, when evaluated, were satisfied with the procedure. Complications were generally mild, self-resolving, and similar to those caused by similar devices and/or the procedure itself. Complications included skin dimpling, pain, edema, ecchymosis, pustule formation, swelling, tightness / discomfort, alopecia, thread exposure / extrusion, depression at entry point, irregularities of the skin, facial asymmetry, and infection.
Results of the clinical literature support that the subject sutures are substantially equivalent to the predicate device in performance, safety, and effectiveness.
#### 11. Statement of Substantial Equivalence
All testing and evidence confirms that the subject device does not raise any new questions related to the safety or effectiveness and that the device is at least as effective as the predicate device for the intended use and indications for use. Therefore, the device can be considered substantially equivalent to the predicate device.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.