The Synchro SELECT Guidewire series is intended for general intravascular use, including neurovascular and peripheral vasculatures. It can be used to selectively introduce and position catheters and other interventional devices within the peripheral and neurovasculature. This device should be used only by physicians trained in percutaneous, intravascular techniques and procedures.
Device Story
Single-use, shapeable-tip guidewire; used to gain intravascular access and facilitate positioning/exchange of interventional devices in small-diameter, tortuous vasculature. Available in Soft, Standard, and Support stiffness profiles. Physician-operated in clinical settings. Device is torqued manually to navigate vasculature. Provides mechanical support for catheter placement; benefits patient by enabling access to complex neuro/peripheral anatomy. Shipped with torque device and guidewire introducer.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. No clinical or animal studies conducted. Testing included coating lubricity/durability, torque response, tip shape-ability, tip flexibility, tensile/torsional strength, flexure, fracture, tip integrity, particulate characterization, tip-shape retention, tip prolapse, and radiopacity. All tests met acceptance criteria.
Indicated for patients undergoing endovascular treatment in neurovascular and peripheral vasculatures. For use by physicians trained in percutaneous, intravascular techniques.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A catheter guide wire is a coiled wire that is designed to fit inside a percutaneous catheter for the purpose of directing the catheter through a blood vessel.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The device, when it is a torque device that is manually operated, non-patient contacting, and intended to manipulate non-cerebral vascular guide wires, is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 870.9.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On the left is the Department of Health & Human Services logo. To the right of that is the FDA logo, which is a blue square with the letters "FDA" in white. To the right of the blue square is the text "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue.
September 25, 2020
Stryker Neurovascular Hailey Hinkle Staff Regulatory Affairs Specialist 47900 Bayside Parkway Fremont, California 94538
Re: K202522
Trade/Device Name: Synchro SELECT Guidewire Regulation Number: 21 CFR 870.1330 Regulation Name: Catheter Guide Wire Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: MOF, DQX Dated: August 31, 2020 Received: September 1, 2020
Dear Hailey Hinkle:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part
{1}------------------------------------------------
801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4. Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
Naira Muradyan, Ph.D. Assistant Director DHT5A: Division of Neurosurgical, Neurointerventional and Neurodiagnostic Devices OHT5: Office of Neurological and Physical Medicine Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K202522
Device Name Synchro SELECT Guidewire
#### Indications for Use (Describe)
The Synchro SELECT Guidewire series is intended for general intravascular use, including neurovascular and peripheral vasculatures. It can be used to selectively introduce and position catheters and other interventional devices within the peripheral and neurovasculature. This device should be used only by physicians trained in percutaneous, intravascular techniques and procedures.
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) | |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| <div> <span> </span> Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) </div> | <div> <span> </span> Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) </div> |
#### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
Premarket Notification, Special 510(k) Synchro SELECT Guidewire
## 510(k) Summary
### Submitter Name, Address and Content:
| Submitter: | Stryker Neurovascular<br>47900 Bayside Parkway<br>Fremont, CA 94538-6515<br>(FDA Registration Number: 3008853977) |
|----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Contact: | Hailey Hinkle<br>Staff Regulatory Affairs Specialist<br>Phone: 510-413-2500<br>Email: hailey.hinkle@stryker.com |
| Date Prepared: | August 31, 2020 |
## Device Name and Classification:
| Trade/Proprietary Name: | Synchro SELECT™™ Guidewire |
|-------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|
| Common Name: | Wire, Guide, Catheter |
| Classification Name: | Wire, Guide, Catheter, 21 CFR 870.1330 – Class I |
| Product Code: | MOF, DQX |
{4}------------------------------------------------
### Legally Marketed Predicate Device
| Primary Predicate Device | |
|----------------------------|-------------------------------|
| K053268* | PV 2000 Synchro2<br>Guidewire |
| Reference Predicate Device | |
| K190843 | Synchro2 Support Guidewire |
| K971254 | Transend EX Guidewire |
*K053268 was submitted to the FDA by Precision Vascular which was acquired by Boston Scientific which was then acquired by Stryker.
#### Device Description
Like the primary Predicate device, the Synchro SELECT Guidewire is a single-use product with a shapeable tip available in straight and pre-shaped configurations, used to gain intravascular access to facilitate the positioning and exchange of interventional devices in small diameter, tortuous vasculature for neuro and peripheral diagnostic and interventional procedures. The wire can be torqued to facilitate navigation through the vasculature.
The Synchro SELECT Guidewire comes in three stiffness profiles: Soft, Standard, and Support. The primary Predicate, PV 2000 Synchro2 Guidewire (K053268), is only available in the Soft and Standard profiles. Therefore, the reference device, Synchro2 Support (K190843), was included to support the similarity in technical characteristics to the Synchro SELECT Support stiffness profile. Certain design inputs and associated acceptance criteria for PV 2000 Synchro2 (K053268) and Synchro2 Support (K190843) were based on the reference device, Transend EX (K971254).
#### Accessories
The Synchro SELECT Guidewire is shipped with a Torque Device that is commercially available from Merit Medical (K936032), and a Guidewire Introducer that is commercially available from B. Braun (K760389).
{5}------------------------------------------------
### Indications for Use
The Indications for Use for the Synchro SELECT Guidewire are the same as the primary Predicate PV 2000 Synchro2 Guidewire and the reference Predicate Synchro2 Support Guidewire and are as follows:
The Synchro SELECT Guidewire series is intended for general intravascular use, including neurovascular and peripheral vasculatures. It can be used to selectively introduce and position catheters and other interventional devices within the peripheral and neuro vasculature. This device should be used only by physicians trained in percutaneous, intravascular techniques and procedures.
### Technological Characteristics and Product Feature Comparison
The Synchro SELECT Guidewire is substantially equivalent to the Predicate device, the PV 2000 Synchro2 Guidewire, cleared under K053268, based on the following:
- Same indications for use .
- Same fundamental materials and manufacturing process ●
- Same fundamental design and technology
- Same operating principles
- Same biocompatibility information
- Same materials and processes for packaging
- . Same sterilization method and process for devices
A comparison of the Subject device with the Predicate device is summarized in Table 1 below.
{6}------------------------------------------------
| | Predicate Device PV 2000<br>Synchro2 Guidewire (K053268) | Subject Device<br>Synchro SELECT Guidewire |
|-------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Classification Name: | Wire, Guide, Catheter, 21 CFR<br>870.1330 - Class II | Same |
| Product Code | DQX | MOF, DQX |
| Review Panel | Neurology | Same |
| 510(k) Submitter1: | Stryker Neurovascular<br>47900 Bayside Pkwy<br>Fremont, CA<br>94538-6515 | Same |
| Indications for Use | The PV 2000 Synchro2<br>Guidewire series of products are<br>intended for general intravascular<br>use, including the neuro and<br>peripheral vasculature. The<br>device can be used to selectively<br>introduce and position catheters<br>and other interventional devices<br>within the peripheral and<br>neurovasculature. This device<br>should be used only by<br>physicians trained in<br>percutaneous, intravascular<br>techniques and procedures. | Same |
| | Predicate Device PV 2000<br>Synchro2 Guidewire (K053268) | Subject Device<br>Synchro SELECT Guidewire |
| Device<br>Description/Principle<br>of Operation | The PV 2000 Synchro2 Guidewire<br>series is a single-use product with a<br>shapeable tip, used to gain<br>intravascular access to and facilitate<br>the positioning and exchange of<br>interventional devices in small<br>diameter, tortuous vasculature for<br>neuro and peripheral diagnostic and<br>interventional procedures. The<br>wire can be torqued to facilitate<br>navigation through the vasculature. | Same |
| Target Population | The PV 2000 Synchro2<br>Guidewire series will be used in<br>patients undergoing endovascular<br>treatment including<br>neurovascular and peripheral<br>vasculatures. | Same |
| Accessories | Guidewire Introducer, Torque<br>Device | Same |
| Core Wire | 304 Stainless Steel, PTFE Coated<br>on the proximal section | Same |
| Core Wire Length | 200cm Access Length<br>300cm Exchange Length | 215cm Access Length<br>300cm Exchange Length |
| Guidewire Tip | Nickel-Titanium,<br>Micro-Machined Nitinol | Same |
| Radiopaque Coil | Platinum, 10cm | Standard and Soft: Platinum,<br>10cm<br>Pre-shaped Support: Platinum,<br>7cm<br>Straight Support: Platinum, 6cm |
| | Predicate Device PV 2000<br>Synchro² Guidewire (K053268) | Subject Device<br>Synchro SELECT Guidewire |
| Adhesive | UV Curable Adhesive | Same |
| Primer | Parylene Dimer | Same |
| Hydrophilic Top<br>Coat | Proprietary Hydrophilic Top<br>Coat | Same |
| Hydrophilic Base<br>Coat | Proprietary Hydrophilic Base<br>Coat | Same |
| Guidewire<br>Introducer | Commercially available per<br>K760389 | Same |
| Torque Device | Commercially available per<br>K936032 | Same |
| Dispenser Hoop | High Density Polyethylene | Same |
| Accessory Card | Clay Coated Solid Bleached<br>Sulfate (CCSBS) | Same |
| Sterile Pouch | Tyvek® - Polyethylene | Same |
| Shipping Carton | Solid Bleached Sulphate (SBS) | Same |
| Sterilization Method | 100% Ethylene Oxide | Same |
| How Supplied | Single Use/Sterile | Same |
### Table 1. Product Feature Comparison of Subject Device to Predicate Device
<sup>1</sup> K053268 was submitted to the FDA by Precision Vascular which was acquired by Boston Scientific which was then acquired by Stryker.
{7}------------------------------------------------
Premarket Notification, Special 510(k)
Synchro SELECT Guidewire
{8}------------------------------------------------
Premarket Notification, Special 510(k) Synchro SELECT Guidewire
The differences between the devices do not raise new questions of safety and effectiveness.
{9}------------------------------------------------
#### Risk Assessment
Risk assessment of the Synchro SELECT Guidewire has been conducted in accordance with ISO 14971:2007. The risk documentation was updated to support the modifications, and Stryker Neurovascular has determined that the modifications to the primary Predicate device raise no new questions of safety or effectiveness. The modifications did not result in any new failure modes nor were there any changes to existing failure modes. Results of confirmatory testing have demonstrated the Subject device is substantially equivalent to the primary Predicate device.
#### Testing Summary
Well-established test methods were used to evaluate the Subject device. All design inputs and associated acceptance criteria are identical to that of the primary Predicate (PV 2000 Synchro2 Guidewire, K053268) and the reference device (Synchro2 Support Guidewire, K190843). Some of the design inputs and associated acceptance criteria for PV 2000 Synchro? (K053268) and Synchro2 Support (K190843) were based on the reference device, Transend EX (K971254). The results of confirmatory testing conducted on the Subject device demonstrate that it performs as designed and is suitable for its intended use. A summary of the tests performed on the Subject device is provided below in Table 2.
| Test | Test Method Summary | Conclusions |
|-------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Coating Lubricity | Hydrophilic coating lubricity<br>was assessed after 15 pull<br>cycles through silicone pads. | All Synchro SELECT<br>Guidewires met the specified<br>coating lubricity requirements. |
| Coating Durability | Coating durability was<br>assessed after repeated pull<br>cycles through silicone pads<br>(comparing degradation between<br>Cycle 1-2 and Cycles 31-45). | All Synchro SELECT<br>Guidewires met the specified<br>coating durability<br>requirements. |
| Test | Test Method Summary | Conclusions |
| Torque Response | Track the guidewire through a<br>tortuous simulated use model<br>and evaluate the steerability<br>and torque response compared<br>to the predicate. | All Synchro SELECT<br>Guidewires demonstrated<br>acceptable torque response.<br>The torque response of the<br>subject device was comparable<br>to that of the predicate device. |
| Tip Shape-ability | Shape and un-shape the<br>guidewire for a total of five<br>times then visually inspect the<br>distal tip for any fractures at<br>40x magnifications. | All Synchro SELECT<br>Guidewires met the specified<br>tip shape-ability requirements. |
| Tip Shape-ability | Shape the tip of the guidewire<br>to 90 degrees and record the<br>tip shaping rating. | All Synchro SELECT<br>Guidewires demonstrated<br>acceptable tip shape-ability.<br>The tip shape-ability of the<br>subject device was comparable<br>to that of the predicate device. |
| Tip Flexibility | Measure the force required to<br>deflect the guidewire to a<br>specified number of degrees at<br>20mm. | All Synchro SELECT<br>Guidewires met the specified<br>tip flexibility requirements. |
| Tensile Strength | Measure the force required to<br>break the guidewire tip. | All Synchro SELECT<br>Guidewires met the specified<br>tensile strength requirements. |
| Torsional Strength | Record the number of times<br>the proximal end of the wire<br>can be rotated until it exceeds<br>its maximum rotations and<br>fails. | All Synchro SELECT<br>Guidewires met the specified<br>torsional strength<br>requirements. |
| Flexure | Testing completed per ISO<br>11070:2014/A1: 2018, Annex<br>G | All Synchro SELECT<br>Guidewires met the specified<br>flexure requirements. |
| Test | Test Method Summary | Conclusions |
| Fracture | Testing completed per ISO<br>11070:2014/A1: 2018, Annex<br>F | All Synchro SELECT<br>Guidewires met the specified<br>fracture requirements. |
| Tip Integrity | Shape, straighten, and re-shape<br>the guidewire in the opposite<br>direction for a total of five<br>times. Inspect at 40X for any<br>fractures or breaks. | All Synchro SELECT<br>Guidewires met the specified<br>tip integrity requirements. |
| | Inspect the guidewire for any<br>damage after tracking through<br>a tortuous simulated use<br>model. | All Synchro SELECT<br>Guidewires demonstrated<br>acceptable tip integrity after<br>being tracked through a<br>tortuous simulated use model. |
| Particulate Characterization | Count particulates of various<br>size ranges after tracking<br>through a tortuous simulated<br>use model. | Particulate counts were<br>reported and considered<br>acceptable. |
| Hydrophilic Coating Integrity | Visually inspect and compare<br>hydrophilic coating before and<br>after tracking through a<br>tortuous simulated use model.<br>Additionally, visually inspect<br>device coating after staining<br>the devices. | All Synchro SELECT<br>Guidewires met the specified<br>hydrophilic coating integrity<br>requirements. |
| Tip-shape Retention | Measure the tip shape<br>retention after tracking the<br>guidewire through a tortuous<br>simulated use model. | All Synchro SELECT<br>Guidewires demonstrated<br>acceptable tip-shape retention.<br>The tip-shape retention of the<br>subject device was comparable<br>to that of the predicate device. |
| Test | Test Method Summary | Conclusions |
| Tip Prolapse | Record the force required for<br>the wire to buckle. | All Synchro SELECT<br>Guidewires met the specified<br>tip prolapse requirements. |
| Radiopacity | Subject and predicate<br>guidewires evaluated under<br>fluoroscopy. | All Synchro SELECT<br>Guidewires demonstrated<br>acceptable radiopacity. The<br>radiopacity of the subject<br>device was comparable to that<br>of the predicate device. |
Table 2. Confirmation Testing Summary
{10}------------------------------------------------
Premarket Notification, Special 510(k)
Synchro SELECT Guidewire
{11}------------------------------------------------
Premarket Notification, Special 510(k)
Synchro SELECT Guidewire
{12}------------------------------------------------
Premarket Notification, Special 510(k) Synchro SELECT Guidewire
## Performance Data - Animal, Clinical
No animal or clinical studies were conducted as there is no change to the indications for use or the fundamental scientific technology. Substantial equivalence of the Subject device has been established to the Predicate devices through the results of bench testing.
### Sterilization and Shelf Life Testing
The device and its accessories are sterilized by 100% Ethylene Oxide and have been adopted into a validated sterilization process in accordance with the principles of ISO 11135:2014 ("Sterilization of health-care products - Ethylene oxide - Requirements for the development, validation and routine control of a sterilization process for medical devices"). This statement is supported by a standards assessment conducted by Stryker. A sterility assurance level (SAL) of 10-6 has been demonstrated.
There are no fundamental material changes compared to the predicate device. All components that are changing are metal, which are not affected by aging. There are no changes to existing shelf life. As with the Predicate device, the Synchro SELECT Guidewire is labeled with a 3-year shelf life.
{13}------------------------------------------------
Stryker Neurovascular Premarket Notification, Special 510(k) Synchro SELECT Guidewire
#### Biocompatibility
Biocompatibility testing was conducted for the Predicate device (K053268). These results apply to the Subject device because it uses the same materials and processes as previously cleared primary Predicate device. The results demonstrate that the Subject device with its accessories meet biological safety requirements per ISO 10993-1:2009 ("Biological evaluation of medical devices – Part 1: Evaluation and testing within a risk management process ") for externally communicating medical devices with circulating blood contact for less than 24 hours. This statement is supported by standards assessment conducted by Stryker.
#### Conclusion
The Subject device is substantially equivalent to the Predicate device with regards to device design, materials, intended use, and patient population. The conclusions drawn from the risk assessments and confirmatory testing conducted demonstrate that the Subject device performs as designed, is as safe, as effective, and performs as well as the Predicate device.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.