K180782 · GE Medical Systems Ultrasound & Primary Care Diagnostics, LLC · KGI · Apr 20, 2018 · Radiology
Device Facts
Record ID
K180782
Device Name
Aria
Applicant
GE Medical Systems Ultrasound & Primary Care Diagnostics, LLC
Product Code
KGI · Radiology
Decision Date
Apr 20, 2018
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 892.1170
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
The bone densitometer is designed to estimate the bone mineral density of patients when medically indicated by their physicians.
Device Story
Aria is an X-ray bone densitometer consisting of a scanner (X-ray source, detector, patient table, mechanical drive) and a standard PC running enCORE software. It functions as a value-version of the Prodigy predicate. The device acquires X-ray scan data from patients; the software processes this data to estimate bone mineral density (BMD) at the spine, femur, and forearm. The system generates standardized reports including T-scores, WHO fracture risk categories, and FRAX model outputs. Used in clinical settings by healthcare professionals, the output assists physicians in assessing bone health and communicating results to patients. The device shares the same fundamental scientific technology and mechanism of action as the predicate.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical studies were conducted. Substantial equivalence is supported by bench testing, including precision and accuracy measurements on phantoms across various scan sites (AP Spine, Femur, Forearm). Precision was verified at <=1.0% and accuracy (correlation to Prodigy) at r>0.95. Design verification and validation testing confirmed safety and effectiveness.
Technological Characteristics
X-ray bone densitometer; scanner includes X-ray source, detector, and mechanical drive. Uses K-edge filter. Connectivity via standard PC. Software: enCORE (K161682). Complies with IEC 60601-1, IEC 60601-1-2, IEC 60601-2-28, IEC 60601-1-3, IEC 60601-1-8, IEC 60601-1-6, IEC 62366, ISO 10993-1/5, IEC 62304, ISO 14971, ISO 15223-1, and DICOM standards.
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients requiring bone mineral density estimation at anatomical sites including spine, femur, and forearm. Provides T-score based relative fracture risk assessment per WHO categories and 10-year fracture risk assessment using WHO FRAX model. Intended for use by physicians to assist in communicating scan results.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A bone densitometer is a device intended for medical purposes to measure bone density and mineral content by x-ray or gamma ray transmission measurements through the bone and adjacent tissues. This generic type of device may include signal analysis and display equipment, patient and equipment supports, component parts, and accessories.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image contains the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On the left is the Department of Health & Human Services logo. To the right of that is the FDA logo, which is a blue square with the letters "FDA" in white. To the right of the blue square is the text "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue.
GE Medical Systems Ultrasound & Primary Care Diagnostics, LLC % Nicole Landreville, Eng, RAC, FRAPS Regulatory Affairs Manager 3030 Ohmeda Drive MADISON WI 53718
Re: K180782
Trade/Device Name: Aria Regulation Number: 21 CFR 892.1170 Regulation Name: Bone Densitometer Regulatory Class: II Product Code: KGI Dated: March 21, 2018 Received: March 26, 2018
Dear Ms. Landreville:
We have reviewed vour Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food. Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
April 20, 2018
{1}------------------------------------------------
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/) and CDRH Learn (http://www.fda.gov/Training/CDRHLearn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (http://www.fda.gov/DICE) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone
(1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
Michael D. O'Hara For
Robert Ochs. Ph.D. Director Division of Radiological Health Office of In Vitro Diagnostics and Radiological Health Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
### Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known)
#### K180782
Device Name Aria
Indications for Use (Describe)
X-ray Bone Densitometer designed to estimate the bone mineral density of patients when medically indicated by their physicians.
- · Provides an estimate of bone mineral density at various anatomical sites (Spine, Femur, Forearm). These values can then be compared to an adult reference population at the sole discretion of the physician.
- Provides an assessment of relative risk based on the patient's T-score value using the categories of fracture risk defined by the World Health Organization (WHO).
- · Provides an assessment of 10-year fracture risk using WHO FRAX model.
- Provides a standardized bone density report using data from the densitometer and physician-generated assessments
based on the patient's demographics, which can assist the physician in communicating scan results to the patient and the patient's referring physician.
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) |
|-------------------------------------------------|
|-------------------------------------------------|
| <span></span> Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) | <span></span> Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) |
|------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------|
|------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------|
#### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/3/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for General Electric (GE). The logo is a blue circle with the letters "GE" in a stylized font in the center. The circle is surrounded by a decorative border of swirling lines. The logo is simple and recognizable, and it is often used to represent the company's brand.
Section 5: 510(k) Summary
Aria
{4}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/4/Picture/1 description: The image shows the General Electric (GE) logo. The logo consists of the letters 'g' and 'e' intertwined in a stylized script, enclosed within a circular frame. The color of the logo is a light blue.
## 510(k) Summary
In accordance with 21 CFR 807.92 the following summary of information is provided:
| Date Submitted: | 21-Mar-2018 |
|-------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Submitter: | GE Healthcare<br>GE Medical Systems Ultrasound & Primary Care Diagnostics, LLC.<br>3030 Ohmeda Drive<br>Madison, WI, USA 53707 |
| Primary Contact<br>Person: | Nicole Landreville, Eng, RAC, FRAPS<br>Regulatory Affairs Manager<br>GE Healthcare<br>GE Medical Systems Ultrasound & Primary Care Diagnostics, LLC.<br>Telephone: (289) 208-2365<br>Email: Nicole.landreville@ge.com |
| Secondary Contact<br>Person: | Diane Uriell<br>Regulatory Affairs Director<br>GE Healthcare<br>Telephone: (262) 290-8212<br>Email: Diane.Uriell@ge.com |
| Device Trade Name: | Aria |
| Common/Usual<br>Name: | X-Ray Bone Densitometer |
| Classification Names:<br>Product Code: | Regulation Name: Bone Densitometer<br>Regulation: 21 CFR 892.1170<br>Classification: Class II<br>Product Codes: KGI |
| Predicate Device: | Prodigy (K982267 and K161682) |
| Regulation Name: | Bone Densitometer |
| Regulation: | 21 CFR 892.1170 |
| Classification: | Class II |
| Product Codes: | KGI |
| Device Description: | The Aria X-ray Bone Densitometer is designed to be a value product version of the predicate device, the Prodigy (K982267 and K161682). Like its predicate Prodigy device, the proposed Aria device is composed of a scanner and a computer that runs the software. The scanner comprises the x-ray source and detector, the patient scan table, the mechanical drive system, and the lowest level portions of the control system. The scanner is in communication with the computer, which is a standard PC. The computer runs the enCORE software, and thus controls the scanner, acquires scan data from the scanner, stores and analyzes the data, and interacts with the human operator.<br><br>Aria X-ray Bone Densitometer functions with the same software as the one that is FDA cleared under GE Lunar DXA Bone Densitometers with enCORE version 17 (K161682). |
| Intended Use: | The bone densitometer is designed to estimate the bone mineral density of patients when medically indicated by their physicians. |
| Indications for Use: | X-ray Bone Densitometer designed to estimate the bone mineral density of patients when medically indicated by their physicians.<br>Provides an estimate of bone mineral density at various anatomical sites (Spine, Femur, Forearm). These values can then be compared to an adult reference population at the sole discretion of the physician. Provides an assessment of relative fracture risk based on the patient's T-score value using the categories of fracture risk defined by the World Health Organization (WHO). Provides an assessment of 10-year fracture risk using WHO FRAX model. Provides a standardized bone density report using data from the densitometer and physician-generated assessments based on the patient's demographics, which can assist the physician in communicating scan results to the patient and the patient's referring physician. |
| Technology: | Aria employs the same fundamental scientific technology, the<br>same mechanism of action and working principle as the predicate<br>device Prodigy (K982267). |
| | The proposed device and the predicate device have the same<br>structural composition with minor differences. They are both<br>composed of 3 main components:<br>1. Scanner:<br>a. Scanner Table: The proposed device and the<br>predicate device share a similar design<br>architecture and similar manufacturing processes.<br>The scanners differ slightly in physical sizes (when<br>comparing the Prodigy compact with Aria<br>scanner). Both support the same maximum patient<br>weight.<br>b. Detector: Identical sensor type with different<br>number of elements.<br>c. X-Ray generator: Identical tube voltage and K-<br>edge filter with different max current output.<br>2. Computer: The same computer model is used for Aria and<br>its predicate device.<br>3. Software : The proposed device and the predicate device<br>are controlled by the same enCORE software (K161682).<br>Some high-end features are not activated when installed<br>on an Aria system (ex.: features related with body<br>composition and metabolic health).<br>Aria's intended use is a sub-set of Prodigy's intended use in that it<br>provides an estimate of the bone mineral density. |
| | Aria's indications for use are a sub-set of the predicate Prodigy<br>device indications for use. |
| | The additional IFUs on Prodigy relate with metabolic health and<br>advanced BMD features do not apply to the proposed device. |
| | These differences do not significantly affect safety and/or<br>effectiveness. |
| Determination of<br>Substantial<br>Equivalence: | Summary of Non-Clinical Tests: |
| | The Aria X-ray Bone Densitometer and its applications comply with<br>voluntary standards. |
| | • ES60601-1 Medical electrical equipment - Part 1: General<br>requirements for basic safety and essential performance;<br>• IEC 60601-1-2 Medical Electrical Equipment - Part 1-2: General<br>Requirements for Basic Safety and Essential Performance –<br>Collateral Standard: Electromagnetic Compatibility -<br>Requirements and Tests. |
{5}------------------------------------------------
# GE Healthcare
510(k) Premarket Notification Submission Aria
Image /page/5/Picture/2 description: The image shows the General Electric (GE) logo. The logo consists of the letters 'GE' in a stylized, cursive font, enclosed within a circular border. The color of the logo is blue, and the background is white.
{6}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/6/Picture/2 description: The image shows the logo for General Electric (GE). The logo is a blue circle with the letters "GE" in a stylized font in the center. There are decorative swirls around the letters and the edge of the circle. The logo is simple and recognizable.
{7}------------------------------------------------
510(k) Premarket Notification Submission Aria
Image /page/7/Picture/2 description: The image shows the General Electric (GE) logo. The logo consists of the letters 'GE' intertwined in a stylized script, enclosed within a circular frame. The color of the logo is blue, and the background is white.
IEC 60601-2-28 Medical Electrical Equipment - Part 2-28: ● Determination of Particular Requirements For The Basic Safety And Essential Substantial Performance Of X-Ray Tube Assemblies For Medical Diagnosis; Equivalence: (Cont.) IEC 60601-1-3 Medical Elec. Equipment – Part 1-3: General . Requirements for Safety. Collateral Standard: General Requirements for Radiation Protection in Diagnostic X-Ray Equipment: IEC 60601-1-8 Medical Electrical Equipment - Part 1-8: General . Requirements For Basic Safety And Essential Performance -Collateral Standard: General Requirements. Tests And Guidance For Alarm Systems In Medical Electrical Equipment And Medical Electrical Systems; IEC 60601-1-6 Medical electrical equipment - Part 1-6: General ● requirements for safety - Collateral Standard: Usability; IEC 62366 Medical devices - Application of usability . engineering to medical Devices; AAMI / ANSI / ISO 10993-1 Biological Evaluation Of Medical . Devices - Part 1: Evaluation And Testing Within A Risk Management Process; AAMI / ANSI / ISO 10993-5 Biological Evaluation Of Medical ● Devices - Part 5: Tests For In Vitro Cytotoxicity: AAMI / ANSI / IEC 62304 Medical Device Software - Software ● Life Cvcle Processes: ISO 14971 - Medical Devices - Application Of Risk Management ● To Medical Devices; ISO 15223-1 Medical Devices - Symbols To Be Used With ● Medical Device Labels, Labelling, And Information To Be Supplied - Part 1: General Requirements; ● PS 3.1 - 3.20 Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) set. (Radiology); The following quality assurance measures were applied to the development of the system: ■ Risk Analysis ■ Requirements Reviews I Design Reviews ■ Testing on unit level (Module verification) ■ Integration testing . Performance testing (Verification) ■ Safety testing (Verification) 트 Simulated use testing (Validation)
{8}------------------------------------------------
510(k) Premarket Notification Submission Aria
Image /page/8/Picture/2 description: The image shows the General Electric (GE) logo. The logo consists of the letters 'GE' intertwined in a stylized script, enclosed within a circular frame. The logo is colored in a bright blue hue, set against a white background.
| Determination of<br>Substantial<br>Equivalence: (Cont.) | Risks were reviewed and mitigated with design controls and<br>labeling. The mitigations were verified and validated as a part of<br>the design verification and validation testing that has been<br>executed with acceptable results.<br><br>The testing/documentation we provided for Aria were completed<br>according to the following FDA guidance documents:<br>Usability: Applying Human Factors And Usability Engineering<br>To Medical Devices - Guidance For Industry And Food And Drug<br>Administration Staff. Document Issued On: February 3, 2016. Guidance for the Content of Premarket Submissions for<br>Software Contained in Medical Devices, issued May 11, 2005. Guidance for Off-the-Shelf Software Use in Medical Devices,<br>September 1999. General Principles of Software Validation; Final Guidance for<br>Industry and FDA Staff, January 2002. Guidance for Industry - Cybersecurity for Networked Medical<br>Devices Containing Off-the Shelf (OTS) Software, January 2005. Guidance for Content of Premarket Submissions for<br>Management of Cybersecurity in Medical Devices, issued on<br>October 2, 2014. FDA Guidance on Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC) of<br>Electrically-Powered Medical Devices issued on July 11, 2016. |
|---------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| | In addition, Aria X-Ray bone densitometer was designed to meet<br>the applicable federal performance standards listed within 21 CFR<br>Subchapter J as follows:<br>21 CFR 1010 - Performance Standards for Electronic Products:<br>General 21 CFR 1020.30 – Diagnostic X-Ray Systems and Their Major<br>Components 21 CFR 1040.10 - Laser Products |
| | <b>Summary of Clinical Tests:</b><br>The proposed Aria device intended use / indications for use are a<br>subset of the predicate Prodigy device intended use / indications<br>for use.<br><br>The subject of this premarket submission, Aria, did not require<br>clinical studies to support substantial equivalence. |
| Determination of<br>Substantial<br>Equivalence: (Cont.) | Bench Testing: Precision and Accuracy<br>During product development, precision and accuracy tests are<br>performed over a wide range of phantoms to cover the variation in<br>human subjects. Repeat measurements on a phantom are<br>performed to verify precision using standard statistical analysis of<br>the data. Similarly, a set of phantoms with different BMD and<br>tissue composition properties is measured to verify accuracy by<br>showing an excellent correlation to previously released Prodigy<br>product. The method used consist of verifying BMD precision and<br>accuracy for various scan sites by measuring phantom set and<br>calculate mean, standard deviation, %CV, and correlation to<br>expected values to ensure clinical performance requirements are<br>met. The acceptance criteria used are as follows for all sites (AP<br>Spine BMD, Femur BMD and Forearm BMD):<br>Precision <=1.0% Accuracy r>0.95 The results of the bench testing provided in the submission<br>demonstrate that Aria can accurately and precisely estimate bone<br>density.<br>Design verification and validation testing was performed to<br>confirm that the safety and effectiveness of the device has not<br>been affected. The test plans and results have been executed with<br>acceptable results. |
| Conclusion: | The proposed Aria device intended use / indications for use are a<br>subset of the predicate Prodigy device intended use / indications<br>for use.<br>The differences in the hardware do not result in any new potential<br>safety risks.<br>Aria has the same technological characteristics, and performs as<br>well as the predicate Prodigy device currently legally marketed on<br>the US market.<br>After analyzing design verification and validation testing it is the<br>conclusion of GE Healthcare that Aria is as safe, as effective, and<br>its performance is substantially equivalent to the predicate Prodigy<br>device. |
{9}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/9/Picture/1 description: The image shows the General Electric (GE) logo. The logo consists of the letters 'GE' in a stylized, cursive font, enclosed within a circular shape. The circle is surrounded by a series of wave-like or swirling lines, giving the logo a dynamic and recognizable appearance. The color of the logo is a light blue.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.