C-Zero Pedicle Screw System, Freedom Pedicle Screw System
Applicant
Signature Orthopaedics Pty, Ltd.
Product Code
NKB · Orthopedic
Decision Date
Dec 7, 2018
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 888.3070
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
The Signature Orthopaedic C-Zero Pedicle Screw System and Freedom Pedicle Screw System are intended to provide immobilization and stabilization of spinal segments in skeletally mature patients as an adjunct to fusion in the treatment of the following acute and chronic instabilities and deformities of the thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spine: degenerative disc disease (defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies); spondylolisthesis, trauma (i.e., fracture or dislocation); spinal stenosis; curvatures (i.e., scoliosis, kyphosis and/or lordosis); tumor; and failed previous fusion (pseudarthrosis). In addition, the C-Zero Pedicle Screw and Freedom Pedicle Systems are intended for skeletally mature patients in the treatment of severe spondylolisthesis (Grades 3 and 4) of the L5-S1 vertebra and degenerative spondylolisthesis with objective evidence of neurologic impairment.
Device Story
Pedicle screw spinal system; provides immobilization and stabilization of thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spinal segments. Components include polyaxial pedicle screws, rods, connectors, and hooks. Surgically implanted via posterior approach by surgeons. Device acts as adjunct to fusion for various spinal instabilities and deformities. Benefits include structural support for spinal segments to facilitate fusion and alleviate symptoms of instability. No software or AI components.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data. Substantial equivalence is supported by non-clinical bench testing, including static and dynamic compression bending, torsion, flexion-extension, axial gripping, screw insertion, pull-out, and torque-to-failure testing, performed in accordance with ASTM F1717, F1798-13, and F543 standards.
Technological Characteristics
Components manufactured from Ti6Al4V alloy (ISO 5832-3, ASTM F136) and wrought Cobalt-Chromium (ASTM F1537). System includes polyaxial pedicle screws, rods, connectors, and hooks. Mechanical performance verified via ASTM F1717, F1798-13, and F543. No software, electronics, or energy sources.
Indications for Use
Indicated for skeletally mature patients requiring spinal immobilization and stabilization as an adjunct to fusion for thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spine conditions including degenerative disc disease, spondylolisthesis, trauma, spinal stenosis, spinal curvatures, tumor, and pseudarthrosis. Also indicated for severe spondylolisthesis (Grades 3-4) at L5-S1 and degenerative spondylolisthesis with neurologic impairment.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
(1) Rigid pedicle screw systems are comprised of multiple components, made from a variety of materials that allow the surgeon to build an implant system to fit the patient's anatomical and physiological requirements. Such a spinal implant assembly consists of a combination of screws, longitudinal members (e.g., plates, rods including dual diameter rods, plate/rod combinations), transverse or cross connectors, and interconnection mechanisms (e.g., rod-to-rod connectors, offset connectors).(2) Semi-rigid systems are defined as systems that contain one or more of the following features (including but not limited to): Non-uniform longitudinal elements, or features that allow more motion or flexibility compared to rigid systems.
Special Controls
*Classification.* (1) Class II (special controls), when intended to provide immobilization and stabilization of spinal segments in skeletally mature patients as an adjunct to fusion in the treatment of the following acute and chronic instabilities or deformities of the thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spine: severe spondylolisthesis (grades 3 and 4) of the L5-S1 vertebra; degenerative spondylolisthesis with objective evidence of neurologic impairment; fracture; dislocation; scoliosis; kyphosis; spinal tumor; and failed previous fusion (pseudarthrosis). These pedicle screw spinal systems must comply with the following special controls:(i) Compliance with material standards;
(ii) Compliance with mechanical testing standards;
(iii) Compliance with biocompatibility standards; and
(iv) Labeling that contains these two statements in addition to other appropriate labeling information:
“Warning: The safety and effectiveness of pedicle screw spinal systems have been established only for spinal conditions with significant mechanical instability or deformity requiring fusion with instrumentation. These conditions are significant mechanical instability or deformity of the thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spine secondary to severe spondylolisthesis (grades 3 and 4) of the L5-S1 vertebra, degenerative spondylolisthesis with objective evidence of neurologic impairment, fracture, dislocation, scoliosis, kyphosis, spinal tumor, and failed previous fusion (pseudarthrosis). The safety and effectiveness of these devices for any other conditions are unknown.”
“Precaution: The implantation of pedicle screw spinal systems should be performed only by experienced spinal surgeons with specific training in the use of this pedicle screw spinal system because this is a technically demanding procedure presenting a risk of serious injury to the patient.”
(2) Class II (special controls), when a rigid pedicle screw system is intended to provide immobilization and stabilization of spinal segments in the thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spine as an adjunct to fusion in the treatment of degenerative disc disease and spondylolisthesis other than either severe spondylolisthesis (grades 3 and 4) at L5-S1 or degenerative spondylolisthesis with objective evidence of neurologic impairment. These pedicle screw systems must comply with the following special controls:
(i) The design characteristics of the device, including engineering schematics, must ensure that the geometry and material composition are consistent with the intended use.
(ii) Non-clinical performance testing must demonstrate the mechanical function and durability of the implant.
(iii) Device components must be demonstrated to be biocompatible.
(iv) Validation testing must demonstrate the cleanliness and sterility of, or the ability to clean and sterilize, the device components and device-specific instruments.
(v) Labeling must include the following:
(A) A clear description of the technological features of the device including identification of device materials and the principles of device operation;
(B) Intended use and indications for use, including levels of fixation;
(C) Identification of magnetic resonance (MR) compatibility status;
(D) Cleaning and sterilization instructions for devices and instruments that are provided non-sterile to the end user; and
(E) Detailed instructions of each surgical step, including device removal.
(3) Class II (special controls), when a semi-rigid system is intended to provide immobilization and stabilization of spinal segments in the thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spine as an adjunct to fusion for any indication. In addition to complying with the special controls in paragraphs (b)(2)(i) through (v) of this section, these pedicle screw systems must comply with the following special controls:
(i) Demonstration that clinical performance characteristics of the device support the intended use of the product, including assessment of fusion compared to a clinically acceptable fusion rate.
(ii) Semi-rigid systems marketed prior to the effective date of this reclassification must submit an amendment to their previously cleared premarket notification (510(k)) demonstrating compliance with the special controls in paragraphs (b)(2)(i) through (v) and paragraph (b)(3)(i) of this section.
Predicate Devices
DePuy Synthes's EXPEDIUM 4.5mm Spine System (K081252)
INTERPORE CROSS International Synergy Spinal Systems (K041449)
Spinal Concepts' InCompass Spinal Fixation System (K023644)
Signature Orthopaedics CoCr Femoral Head (K121297)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}------------------------------------------------
December 7, 2018
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image contains the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On the left is the seal of the Department of Health & Human Services. To the right of that is the FDA logo, which is a blue square with the letters "FDA" in white. To the right of the blue square is the text "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue.
Signature Orthopaedics Pty Ltd. Declan Brazil Managing Director 7 Sirius Road Lane Cove, 2066 AU NSW
Re: K180754
Trade/Device Name: C-Zero Pedicle Screw System, Freedom Pedicle Screw System Regulation Number: 21 CFR 888.3070 Regulation Name: Thoracolumbosacral Pedicle Screw Systems Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: NKB Dated: October 31, 2018 Received: November 5, 2018
Dear Declan Brazil:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for
{1}------------------------------------------------
devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/CombinationProducts/GuidanceRegulatoryInformation/ucm597488.html; good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/) and CDRH Learn (http://www.fda.gov/Training/CDRHLearn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (http://www.fda.gov/DICE) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
Colin O'neill -S for MNM
Mark N. Melkerson Director Division of Orthopedic Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K180754
#### Device Name
C-Zero Pedicle Screw System, Freedom Pedicle Screw System
#### Indications for Use (Describe)
The Signature Orthopaedic C-Zero Pedicle Screw System and Freedom Pedicle Screw System are intended to provide immobilization and stabilization of spinal segments in skeletally mature patients as an adjunct to fusion in the treatment of the following acute and chronic instabilities and deformities of the thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spine: degenerative disc disease (defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies); spondylolisthesis, trauma (i.e., fracture or dislocation); spinal stenosis; curvatures (i.e., scoliosis, kyphosis and/or lordosis); tumor; and failed previous fusion (pseudarthrosis). In addition, the C-Zero Pedicle Screw and Freedom Pedicle Systems are intended for skeletally mature patients in the treatment of severe spondylolisthesis (Grades 3 and 4) of the L5-S1 vertebra and degenerative spondylolisthesis with objective evidence of neurologic impairment.
X Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
## CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
#### 2 510(K) SUMMARY
| Manufacturer: | Signature Orthopaedics Pty Ltd<br>7 Sirius Road<br>Lane Cove, NSW 2066<br>Australia |
|-----------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Device Trade<br>Name: | C-Zero Pedicle Screw System<br>Freedom Pedicle Screw System |
| Common Name: | Pedicle screw spinal system |
| Contact: | Dr. Declan Brazil<br>Managing Director of Signature Orthopaedics |
| Prepared By: | Signature Orthopaedics Pty Ltd<br>7 Sirius Road<br>Lane Cove, NSW 2066<br>Australia<br>Phone: +61 (2) 9428 5181<br>Fax: +61 (2) 8456 6065 |
| Date Prepared: | October 31st, 2018 |
| Classification: | Class II per 21 CFR 888.3070: Thoracolumbosacral Pedicle Screw<br>System (NKB) |
| Predicate Devices: | Primary Predicate<br>• DePuy Synthes's EXPEDIUM 4.5mm Spine System (K081252)<br>Additional Predicate<br>• INTERPORE CROSS International Synergy Spinal Systems (K041449)<br>• Spinal Concepts' InCompass Spinal Fixation System (K023644)<br>• K2M Mesa Spinal System (K052398)<br>• Back to Basic Dymaxeon Spine System (K150184)<br>Reference Predicate<br>• Signature Orthopaedics NOOSA ALIF Plate (K163625)<br>• Signature Orthopaedics CoCr Femoral Head (K121297) |
## Device Description:
All of the Signature Orthopaedics' C-Zero and Freedom Pedicle Screw Systems' components (except for CoCr longitudinal rods) are manufactured from Ti6Al4V alloy per ISO 5832-3 and ASTM-F136. The subject systems' CoCr longitudinal rods are manufactured from wrought Cobal-Chromium as per ASTM-F1537.
The Signature Orthopaedics' C-Zero and Freedom Pedicle Screw Systems are used to
{4}------------------------------------------------
provide immobilization and stabilization of spinal segments in the treatment of acute and chronic instabilities or deformities of the lumbar, thoracic and sacral spine. These pedicel rod and screw systems surgically implanted from a posterior approach. The device subject to this file include polyaxial pedicle screws, rods, connectors and hooks.
### Indications for Use:
The Signature Orthopaedic C-Zero Pedicle Screw and Freedom Pedicle Screw Systems are intended to provide immobilization and stabilization of spinal segments in skeletally mature patients as an adjunct to fusion in the treatment of the following acute and chronic instabilities and deformities of the thoracic, lumbar and sacral spine: degenerative disc disease (defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies); spondylolisthesis; trauma (i.e., fracture or dislocation); spinal stenosis; curvatures (i.e., scoliosis, kyphosis and/or lordosis); tumor; and failed previous fusion (pseudarthrosis). In addition, the C-Zero Pedicle Screw and Freedom Pedicle Systems are intended for skeletally mature patients in the treatment of severe spondylolisthesis (Grades 3 and 4) of the L5-S1 vertebra and degenerative spondylolisthesis with objective evidence of neurologic impairment.
#### Performance Testing:
Non-clinical testing and engineering evaluations were conducted to verify that the performance of the Signature Orthopaedic C-Zero Pedicle Screw System and Freedom Pedicle Screw System are adequate for anticipated in-vivo use. The following nonclinical testings were carried out on the worst case sizes of the subject pedicle screws:
- Static and dynamic compression bending testing
- . Static torsion testing
- Static Flexion-Extension Moment Test
- Axial Gripping Test
- . Axial Torsional Test
- . Axial Gripping Test of connector components
- . Torsional Gripping Test of connector components
- . Screw insertion testing
- Screw pull-out testing
- Screw torque to failure testing
- . Freedom Dissociation Test at the screw-tulip interface
#### Testing Standards:
- ASTM-F1717 Standard Test Methods for Spinal Implant Construct in a ● Vertebrectomy Model
- ASTM-F1798-13 Standard Test Method for Evaluating the Static and Fatigue Properties of Interconnection Mechanisms and Subassemblies Used in Spinal Arthrodesis Implants
- ASTM-F543 Standard Specification and Test Method for Metallic Medical Bone Screw
#### Substantial Equivalence:
The substantial equivalence of the subject devices to the predicate devices above is based
{5}------------------------------------------------
upon the similarity of intended use, design (fundamental scientific technology), materials and performance.
#### Comparison of technological characteristics
The Signature Orthopaedics C-Zero and Freedom Pedicle Screw Systems were biomechanically tested and compared to other predicate systems currently on the market. The design features and sizing of the components were also compared to the predicate devices and found to be substantially the same as these systems. The substantial equivalency between the subject and predicate devices were established based on the following similarities:
- The same indication for use .
- . The same range of intended surgery sites
- Manufactured from similar materials ●
- Similar in most of design features
- Similar Surgical Techniques
- Similar size range ●
The following technological differences exist between the subject and predicate devices:
- Some of design features detail .
- . Cap Screw diameters
- . Varieties of tulip offered
### Conclusion
Based upon the predicate comparison, the intended use, similar technological characteristics and the results of the various mechanical testing, the proposed devices are substantially equivalent to the predicate devices.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.