K171488 · Topcon Medical Laser Systems, Inc. · HQF · Nov 27, 2017 · Ophthalmic
Device Facts
Record ID
K171488
Device Name
PSLT for PASCAL Streamline
Applicant
Topcon Medical Laser Systems, Inc.
Product Code
HQF · Ophthalmic
Decision Date
Nov 27, 2017
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 886.4390
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
Pattern Scanning Laser Trabeculoplasty (PSLT) software is intended for use with the PASCAL Streamline for procedures in trabeculoplasty in open angle glaucoma.
Device Story
PSLT is a software enhancement for the PASCAL Streamline laser system; simplifies trabeculoplasty by applying a fixed pattern of laser spots to the trabecular meshwork rather than single spots. Input: user-defined treatment parameters; Output: computer-guided, rapid, uniform, sub-visible laser treatment patterns (39 spots in 3 rows of 13). Used in clinical settings by ophthalmologists. The software enables precise alignment to the trabecular meshwork, facilitating faster, easier applications. Clinical benefit: effective intraocular pressure (IOP) control in open angle glaucoma patients with a minimally traumatic procedure.
Clinical Evidence
Prospective, randomized, controlled study (n=58 eyes) comparing PSLT to standard laser trabeculoplasty. Primary endpoint: change in IOP from baseline to 1-month post-surgery. Secondary endpoint: success at 1-month post-surgery. Statistical analysis included 2-tailed unpaired t-test, chi-square, Mann-Whitney U, and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Results showed similar safety and efficacy profiles between PSLT and predicate modalities, supporting the indications for use.
Technological Characteristics
Software-based enhancement for PASCAL Streamline laser. Frequency-doubled solid-state laser source (532nm or 577nm). Delivery via slit lamp adapter with optical fiber. Aiming beam: 635nm direct diode. Pulse duration: 5-10 ms. Spot size: 100 µm. Fluence: 42 J/cm². Connectivity: integrated software feature.
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients with open angle glaucoma, including pseudo-exfoliative and pigmentary glaucoma, requiring bilateral laser trabeculoplasty for intraocular pressure control. Contraindicated in patients with refractory glaucoma, prior ocular laser procedures (SLT, LPI) or intraocular surgery for glaucoma, corneal/conjunctival abnormality precluding contact lens adaptation, or severe dry eye syndrome.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An ophthalmic laser is an AC-powered device intended to coagulate or cut tissue of the eye, orbit, or surrounding skin by a laser beam.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image contains the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On the left is the Department of Health & Human Services logo. To the right of that is the FDA logo, which is a blue square with the letters "FDA" in white. To the right of the blue square is the text "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue.
November 27, 2017
Topcon Medical Laser Systems, Inc. Sweta Srivastava Manager, Regulatory and Clinical Affairs 606 Enterprise Ct. Livermore, CA 94550
Re: K171488
Trade/Device Name: PSLT for PASCAL Streamline Regulation Number: 21 CFR 886.4390 Regulation Name: Ophthalmic Laser Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: HQF, GEX Dated: October 11, 2017 Received: October 16, 2017
Dear Sweta Srivastava:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies.
{1}------------------------------------------------
You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical devicerelated adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/) and CDRH Learn (http://www.fda.gov/Training/CDRHLearn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (http://www.fda.gov/DICE) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
# Denise L. Hampton -S
for Malvina B. Eydelman, M.D. Director Division of Ophthalmic and Ear, Nose and Throat Devices Office of Device Evaluation
Center for Devices and Radiological Health Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
### Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K171488
Device Name PSLT for PASCAL Streamline
Indications for Use (Describe)
Pattern Scanning Laser Trabeculoplasty (PSLT) software is intended for use with the PASCAL Streamline for procedures in trabeculoplasty in open angle glaucoma.
X Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
| Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
#### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
### 510(k) Summary
## PSLT for PASCAL Streamline
#### 1. Submission Sponsor
Topcon Medical Laser Systems, Inc.
606 Enterprise Ct.,
Livermore,
CA, 94550
USA
| Contact: | Sweta Srivastava |
|----------|------------------------------------------|
| Title: | Manager, Regulatory and Clinical Affairs |
| Phone: | 925.245.7721 |
2. Date Prepared
November 27, 2017
#### 3. Device Identification
| Trade/Proprietary Name: | PSLT for PASCAL Streamline |
|-------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------|
| Common/Usual Name: | Laser surgical instrument |
| Classification Name: | Ophthalmic laser/ Powered laser surgical instrument |
| Regulation Number: | 886.4390 |
| Product Code: | HQF, Ophthalmic laser |
Device Class: Class II
Classification Panel: Ophthalmic and General & Plastic Surgery
#### 4. Legally Marketed Predicate Device(s)
Predicate Device: K100019, PASCAL® Streamline Classification Name: Ophthalmic laser
{4}------------------------------------------------
Regulation Number: 886.4390 Product Code: HQF Classification: Class II
Predicate Device: K111108, PASCAL Streamline 577 (with accessories) Classification Name: Ophthalmic laser Regulation Number: 886.4390 Product Code: HQF Classification: Class II
Reference Device #1: K081704, Selecta Family of Laser Systems Classification Name: Powered Laser Surgical Instrument Regulation Number: 886.4810 Product Code: GEX, HQF Classification: Class II
Reference Device #2: K071687, IRIDEX IQ Laser Systems Classification Name: Powered Laser Surgical Instrument Regulation Number: 886.4810 Product Code: GEX Classification: Class II
#### 5. Indication for Use Statement
Pattern Scanning Laser Trabeculoplasty (PSLT) software is intended for use with the PASCAL Streamline for procedures in trabeculoplasty in open angle glaucoma.
#### 6. Device Description
Pattern Scanning Laser Trabeculoplasty (PSLT) is a software option for the currently marketed PASCAL Streamline (K100019 and K111108). It represents an enhancement intended to simplify the laser trabeculoplasty procedure by applying a fixed pattern of locations to the trabecular meshwork instead of a single spot. Additionally, this modification offers greater multi-functionality for the management of glaucoma. PSLT provides rapid, defined, uniform and minimally traumatic (sub-visible) computer-guided treatment with exact abutment of the patterns readily align to the trabecular meshwork, allowing more rapid and easier applications. Once the software is enabled, the PSLT feature is always available.
#### 7. Substantial Equivalence Discussion
The PASCAL Streamline with PSLT option has similar performance characteristics, the same environment of use and patient populations as currently marketed predicate devices. The labeling and instructional information, including warning and caution statements, is similar to that of the predicate devices. The
{5}------------------------------------------------
addition of this new feature does not raise new questions of safety and effectiveness for the PASCAL Streamline.
| Manufacturer | TopCon Medical Laser<br>Systems, Inc. | TopCon Medical Laser<br>Systems, Inc. | Device Comparison |
|---------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Trade Name | PASCAL Streamline PSLT | PASCAL Streamline | |
| 510(k) Number | K171488 | K100019 | -- |
| Product Code | HQF | HQF | -- |
| Regulation<br>Number | 886.4390 | 886.4390 | -- |
| Regulation Name | Ophthalmic laser | Ophthalmic laser | -- |
| Indications for Use | Intended for use with<br>PASCAL Streamline for<br>procedures in<br>trabeculoplasty in open<br>angle glaucoma. | Intended for use in the<br>treatment of ocular<br>pathology in the posterior<br>segment. Retinal<br>photocoagulation,<br>panretinal<br>photocoagulation, focal<br>photocoagulation and grid<br>photocoagulation for<br>vascular and structural<br>abnormalities of the<br>retina and choroid<br>including:<br>Proliferative and<br>nonproliferative<br>diabetic<br>retinopathy Macular edema Choroidal | Different; the subject<br>device has different<br>indications for use, same<br>intended use. The<br>expanded indications for<br>use was tested in a clinical<br>study. |
| Manufacturer | TopCon Medical Laser<br>Systems, Inc. | TopCon Medical Laser<br>Systems, Inc. | Device Comparison |
| Trade Name | PASCAL Streamline PSLT | PASCAL Streamline | |
| | | neovascularization Branch and central retinal vein occulusion Age-related macular degeneration Lattice degeneration Retinal tears and detachments Intended for use in the treatment of ocular pathology in the anterior segment including: Iridotomy trabeculoplasty | |
| Output<br>Wavelength (nm) | 532 (green) | 532 (green) | Same |
| Treatment Laser<br>Sources | Frequency doubled solid-state | Frequency doubled solid-state | Same |
| Treatment Laser<br>Power | Up to 2W | Up to 2W | Same |
| Aiming Beam λ<br>(power output) | 635 nm; Direct diode<br>(adjustable to < 1mW) | 635 nm; Direct diode<br>(adjustable to < 1mW) | Same |
| Type of delivery<br>system | Slit lamp adapter with<br>optical fiber connected to<br>a separate laser source | Slit lamp adapter with<br>optical fiber connected to<br>a separate laser source | Same |
| Endpoint | Non-visible | Non-visible | Same |
| Spot size (μm) | 100 | 50 - 400 | Similar; The proposed<br>device is different in Spot<br>Size from the predicate,<br>the proposed devices'<br>pulse duration range is |
| Manufacturer | TopCon Medical Laser<br>Systems, Inc. | TopCon Medical Laser<br>Systems, Inc. | Device Comparison |
| Trade Name | PASCAL Streamline PSLT | PASCAL Streamline | |
| | | | cover the predicates' and<br>both proposed device and<br>predicate has same<br>Fluence, therefore, this<br>difference will not affect<br>the substantial<br>equivalence. |
| Pulse Duration | 5 ms – 10 ms | 10 ms – 1000 ms | Similar; less pulse<br>duration, both have same<br>Fluence, therefore, this<br>difference will not affect<br>the substantial<br>equivalence. |
| Number of spots<br>per pattern | 39 spots (3 rows of 13<br>spots) | Single spot | Different; total number of<br>spots more than predicate<br>device, both have same<br>Fluence, therefore, this<br>difference will not affect<br>the substantial<br>equivalence. |
| Total energy<br>delivered | 3.5J | 3.5J | Same |
| Energy per pulse | 3.3 mJ | 3.3 mJ | Same |
| Fluence | 42 J/cm² | 42 J/cm² | Same |
| % of TM covered | 63 | 63 | Same |
#### Table A – Comparison of Characteristics
{6}------------------------------------------------
{7}------------------------------------------------
#### Table B – Comparison of Characteristics
| Manufacturer | TopCon Medical Laser<br>Systems, Inc. | TopCon Medical Laser<br>Systems, Inc. | Device Comparison | Manufacturer | TopCon Medical Laser<br>Systems, Inc. | TopCon Medical Laser<br>Systems, Inc. | Device Comparison |
|----------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------|---------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|-------------------|
| Trade Name | PASCAL Streamline PSLT | PASCAL Streamline 577 | | Trade Name | PASCAL Streamline PSLT | PASCAL Streamline 577 | |
| 510(k) Number | K171488 | K111108 | -- | | | | |
| Product Code | HQF, GEX | HQF | -- | | | | |
| Regulation<br>Number | 878.4810 and 886.4390 | 886.4390 | -- | | | | |
| Regulation Name | Powered Laser Surgical<br>Instrument and<br>Ophthalmic laser | Ophthalmic laser | -- | | | | |
| Indications for Use | Intended for use with<br>PASCAL Streamline for<br>procedures in<br>trabeculopasty in open<br>angle glaucoma. | Intended for use in the<br>treatment of ocular<br>pathology in the posterior<br>segment. Retinal<br>photocoagulation,<br>panretinal<br>photocoagulation, focal<br>photocoagulation and grid<br>photocoagulation for<br>vascular and structural<br>abnormalities of the<br>retina and choroid<br>including:<br>• Proliferative and<br>nonproliferative<br>diabetic<br>retinopathy<br>• Macular edema<br>• Choroidal neovascularization<br>• Branch and<br>central retinal<br>vein occlusion<br>• Age-related<br>macular<br>degeneration | Different; the subject<br>device has different<br>indications for use, same<br>intended use. The<br>expanded indications for<br>use was tested in a clinical<br>study. | | | | |
{8}------------------------------------------------
{9}------------------------------------------------
| Manufacturer | TopCon Medical Laser<br>Systems, Inc. | TopCon Medical Laser<br>Systems, Inc. | Device Comparison |
|---------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Trade Name | PASCAL Streamline PSLT | PASCAL Streamline 577 | |
| | | ●<br>Lattice<br>degeneration<br>●<br>Retinal tears and<br>detachments<br>Intended for use in the<br>treatment of ocular<br>pathology in the anterior<br>segment including:<br>●<br>Iridotomy<br>trabeculoplasty<br>● | |
| Output<br>Wavelength (nm) | 577 | 577 (yellow) | Same |
| Treatment Laser<br>Sources | Frequency doubled solid-<br>state | Frequency doubled solid-<br>state | Same |
| Treatment Laser<br>Power | Up to 2W | Up to 2W | Same |
| Aiming Beam λ<br>(power output) | 635 nm; Direct diode<br>(adjustable to < 1mW) | 635 nm; Direct diode<br>(adjustable to < 1mW) | Same |
| Type of delivery<br>system | Slit lamp adapter with<br>optical fiber connected to<br>a separate laser source | Slit lamp adapter with<br>optical fiber connected to<br>a separate laser source | Same |
| Endpoint | Non-visible | Non-visible | Same |
| Spot size (µm) | 100 | 60 - 400 | Similar; The proposed<br>device is different in Spot<br>Size from the predicate,<br>the proposed devices'<br>pulse duration range is<br>cover the predicates' and<br>both proposed device and<br>predicate has same<br>Fluence, therefore, this<br>difference will not affect<br>the substantial<br>equivalence. |
| Manufacturer | TopCon Medical Laser<br>Systems, Inc. | TopCon Medical Laser<br>Systems, Inc. | Device Comparison |
| Trade Name | PASCAL Streamline PSLT | PASCAL Streamline 577 | |
| Pulse Duration | 5 ms – 10 ms | 5 ms – 1000 ms | Similar; less pulse<br>duration, both have same<br>Fluence, therefore, this<br>difference will not affect<br>the substantial<br>equivalence. |
| Number of spots<br>per pattern | 39 spots (3 rows of 13<br>spots) | Single spot | Different; total number of<br>spots more than predicate<br>device, both have same<br>Fluence, therefore, this<br>difference will not affect<br>the substantial<br>equivalence. |
| Total energy<br>delivered | 3.5J | 3.5J | Same |
| Energy per pulse | 3.3 mJ | 3.3 mJ | Same |
| Fluence | 42 J/cm² | 42 J/cm² | Same |
| % of TM covered | 63 | 63 | Same |
{10}------------------------------------------------
#### 8. Non-Clinical Performance Data
Software verification and validation testing was performed in accordance with FDA's Guidance for the Content of Premarket Submissions for Software contained in Medical Devices (2005). The results of all verification and validation testing demonstrate that all design and system requirements for the PASCAL Streamline with PSLT option have been met.
#### 9. Clinical Performance Data
A clinical study was conducted to evaluate safety and efficacy of the PSLT for PASCAL Streamline to for procedures in trabeculoplasty in patients with open angle glaucoma. The study was a prospective, randomized, controlled study of patients with open angle glaucoma that required bilateral laser trabeculoplasty for intraocular pressure control. The overall design of the clinical study is shown as follows:
- . Clinical Endpoints - (primary endpoint) change in IOP from baseline to 1-month post-surgery as measured by tonometry and (secondary endpoint) success at 1-month post-surgery as measured by tonometry and CLS derived parameters.
{11}------------------------------------------------
- . Subject Criteria – The target population includes subjects fulfilling the standard criteria of the investigational site, who have given informed consent to participate in the study.
- . Subject Inclusion/Exclusion – Inclusion - diagnosis of open angle glaucoma (OAG) including pseudo-exfoliative and pigmentary glaucoma; patients requiring bilateral laser trabeculoplasty for IOP control; structural glaucomatous damage and/or documented glaucomatous VF damage (in the previous 12 months with mean defect (MD) > 2.5 dB; no or stable anti-glaucomatous drug therapy since at least 3 months. Exclusion – refractory glaucoma, patients having undergone ocular laser procedures (SLT, LPI) or intraocular surgery for the treatment of glaucoma; corneal or conjunctival abnormality precluding contact lens adaptation; or severe dry eve syndrome.
- Study Monitoring - primary endpoints were evaluated at the 1, 3, 6, and 12-month endpoint
- Data Analysis – the modified intent to treat was used in the analysis to the data. Data were analyzed statistically using a 2-tailed unpaired t test, chi-square test, Mann-Whitney U test, repeated-measures analysis of variance. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis with Mantel-Cox logrank test was used to compare outcomes between groups. The sample size of 58 eyes was calculated to have sufficient power (at least 80% and two-sided alpha of 0.05) to detect to reject the null hypothesis of an inter-group IOP difference of 3 mmHg with a standard deviation of 3.5 mmHg at 1 month. The chief outcome measure was absolute change in IOP from baseline.
Results of the clinical investigation support the indications for use of the PSLT for PASCAL Streamline to for procedures in trabeculoplasty in patients with open angle glaucoma by achieving clinical endpoints. Both laser modalities had similar safety and efficacy profiles. Clinical study conclusion confirms that the device is safe and effective as used according to the instructions for use.
#### 10. Conclusion
The PSLT for PASCAL Streamline has similar intended use and technological characteristics as the predicate device, and therefore, is substantially equivalent to the predicate device. Preclinical and clinical study results demonstrate the substantial equivalence as well as the safety and effectiveness of the PSLT for PASCAL Streamline laser for use in trabeculoplasty. Additionally, the new device does not raise additional questions regarding its safety and effectiveness when compared to the predicate device(s).
The PSLT for PASCAL Streamline, as designed and manufactured, is determined to be substantially equivalent to the referenced predicate device(s).
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.