CEFOTAXIME/CLAVULANIC, 30/10UG, BBL SENSI-DISC AND CEFTAZIDIME/CLAVULANIC ACID, 30/10UG, BBL SENSI-DISC
K993577 · Becton Dickinson Microbiology Systems · JTN · Dec 1, 1999 · Microbiology
Device Facts
Record ID
K993577
Device Name
CEFOTAXIME/CLAVULANIC, 30/10UG, BBL SENSI-DISC AND CEFTAZIDIME/CLAVULANIC ACID, 30/10UG, BBL SENSI-DISC
Applicant
Becton Dickinson Microbiology Systems
Product Code
JTN · Microbiology
Decision Date
Dec 1, 1999
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 866.1620
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
Antimicrobial susceptibility test discs are used for semi-quantitative susceptibility testing of bacteria by standardized agar diffusion. Cefotaxime/Clavulanic Acid, BBL™ Sensi-Disc™ and Ceftazidime/Clavulanic Acid BBL™ Sensi-Disc™ are intended for use for confirmatory tests for organisms that secrete Extended-spectrum ß-lactamases (ESBL)s as indicated in the Results section of the package insert and indicated below. Use of Cefotaxime/Clavulanic Acid, BBL™ Sensi-Disc™ and Ceftazidime/Clavulanic Acid, BBL ™ Sensi-Disc™ together with Cefotaxime and Ceftazidime susceptibility discs for in vitro agar diffusion susceptibility testing are indicated when there is a need to perform a confirmatory test for ESBLs in Klebsiella spp. and Escherichia coli.
Device Story
Device consists of absorbent paper discs impregnated with antimicrobial agents (Cefotaxime or Ceftazidime) combined with Clavulanic Acid. Used in clinical microbiology laboratories by technicians/microbiologists. Discs applied to Mueller Hinton Agar plates inoculated with pure bacterial cultures. Following incubation, zones of inhibition measured. Principle: ESBL-producing strains show ≥5mm increase in zone diameter when tested with combination disc versus single agent disc. Output: qualitative determination of ESBL production. Clinical decision-making: if ESBL-positive, organism reported as resistant to all penicillins, cephalosporins, and aztreonam. Benefit: enables accurate identification of resistant strains to guide appropriate antibiotic therapy.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Reproducibility studies performed at three sites using QC organisms and ten clinical strains across three lots and multiple operators. Accuracy testing compared production discs to laboratory-prepared discs using genotypic/phenotypic ESBL and non-ESBL strains. Overall performance accuracy was 95% (4/100+ strains failed to detect ESBL). Results met all acceptance criteria.
Technological Characteristics
Absorbent paper discs impregnated with Cefotaxime or Ceftazidime and Clavulanic Acid. Standardized agar diffusion (Bauer-Kirby method) on Mueller Hinton Agar. Dimensions: 50-disc cartridges. No energy source or software. Sterilization: not specified.
Indications for Use
Indicated for confirmatory testing of Extended-spectrum ß-lactamase (ESBL) production in Klebsiella spp. and Escherichia coli isolates using in vitro agar diffusion susceptibility testing.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An antimicrobial susceptibility test disc is a device that consists of antimicrobic-impregnated paper discs used to measure by a disc-agar diffusion technique or a disc-broth elution technique the in vitro susceptibility of most clinically important bacterial pathogens to antimicrobial agents. In the disc-agar diffusion technique, bacterial susceptibility is ascertained by directly measuring the magnitude of a zone of bacterial inhibition around the disc on an agar surface. The disc-broth elution technique is associated with an automated rapid susceptibility test system and employs a fluid medium in which susceptibility is ascertained by photometrically measuring changes in bacterial growth resulting when antimicrobial material is eluted from the disc into the fluid medium. Test results are used to determine the antimicrobial agent of choice in the treatment of bacterial diseases.
{0}------------------------------------------------
DEC - 1 1999
PREDICATE
K993577
### 510(k) SUMMARY
BECTON DICKINSON MICROBIOLOGY SYSTEMS SUBMITTED BY: 7 LOVETON CIRCLE SPARKS, MD 21152
CONTACT: Monica E. Giguere Requlatory Affairs Associate
(410) 316-4287 TELEPHONE:
PREPARED: October 18, 1999
DEVICE NAME: Cefotaxime/Clavulanic Acid, 30/10µg, BBL™ Sensi-Disc™ and Ceftazidime/Clavulanic Acid, 30/10ug, BBL™ Sensi-Disc™
DEVICE: Other BBL™ Sensi-Disc™ such as Cefotaxime, 30μg, BBL™ Sensi-Disc™ and Ceftazidime, 30μg, BBL ™ Sensi-Disc.
INTENDED USE: Antimicrobial susceptibility test discs are used for semi-quantitative susceptibility testing of bacteria by standardized agar diffusion. Cefotaxime/Clavulanic Acid, BBL™ Sensi-Disc™ and Ceftazidime/Clavulanic Acid BBL™ Sensi-Disc™ are intended for use for confirmatory tests for organisms that secrete Extended-spectrum ß-lactamases (ESBL)s as indicated in the Results section of the package insert and indicated below.
INDICATIONS FOR Use of Cefotaxime/Clavulanic Acid, BBL™ Sensi-USE Disc™ and Ceftazidime/Clavulanic Acid BBL ™ Sensi-Disc™ together with Cefotaxime and Ceftazidime susceptibility discs for in vitro agar diffusion susceptibility testing are indicated when there is a need to perform a confirmatory test for ESBLs in Klebsiella spp. and Escherichia coli.
{1}------------------------------------------------
## DEVICE DESCRIPTION:
Cefotaxime/Clavulanic Acid and Ceftazidime/Clavulanic Acid susceptibility test discs are prepared by impreanating high quality absorbent paper with accurately determined amounts of Cefotaxime, supplied by Marion Roussel, Inc., Kansas City, MO, and Ceftazidime, supplied by Glaxo Wellcome Operations, Cumbria, UK, respectively. Both discs are also impregnated with specific amounts of Clavulanic Acid supplied by SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceuticals, Piscataway, NJ.
The disks are clearly marked with the agents: CTX/CLA and CAZ/CLA. Cefotaxime/Clavulanic Acid and Ceftazidime/Clavulanic Acid susceptibility test discs are provided in cartridges of 50 disks each and packaged separately.
Agar diffusion methods employing dried filter paper discs impregnated with specific concentrations of antimicrobial agents were developed in the 1940's. In order to eliminate or minimize variability in the testing, Bauer et al. developed a standardized procedure in which Mueller Hinton Agar was selected as the test medium.
Various regulatory agencies and standards-writing organizations subsequently published standardized reference procedures based on the Bauer-Kirby method. Among the earliest and most widely accepted of these standardized procedures were those published by the U. S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the World Health Organization (WHO). The procedure was adopted as a consensus standard by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) and is periodically updated. The latest NCCLS documents are M2-A6' (1/97) and M100-S92 (1/99).
Disks containing an antimicrobial agent are applied to the surface of Mueller Hinton Agar plates inoculated with pure cultures of clinical isolates. Following incubation, the plates are examined and the zones of inhibition surrounding the discs are measured and compared with established zone size ranges for the antimicrobial agents in order to determine which is most suitable for use in therapy. The determination as to whether the organism is susceptible (S), intermediate (I), or resistant (R) to an antimicrobial agent is made by comparing zone sizes to the interpretive criteria defined in the tables of NCCLS document M100-S9.
<sup>1</sup> National Committee for Clinical Laboratories Standards, 1997 NCCLS document M2-A6. (Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk Susceptibility tests" -- Sixth Edition, Approved Standard, 1/97. NCCLS, Wayne, PA.
<sup>2</sup> National Committee for Clinical Laboratories Standards. 1999. NCCLS document M100-S9. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing, 90 informational supplement, NCCLS, Wayne, PA
{2}------------------------------------------------
Strains of Klebsiella spp. and E. coli that produce extended spectrum betalactamases (ESBLs) may be clinically resistant to therapy with penicillins, cephalosporins or aztreonam, despite in vitro susceptibility to some of these agents. Some of these strains will show zones of inhibition below the normal susceptible population but above the standard breakpoints for certain extendedspectrum cepahlosporins or aztreonam; such strains may be screened for potential ESBL production by using screening breakpoints. Other strains may test intermediate or resistant by standard breakpoints to one or more of those agents. In all strains with ESBLs the zone diameters should increase in the presence of clayulanic acid. (A ≥5mm increase in zone diameter for either cefotaxime or ceftazidime tested in combination with clavulanic acid versus its zone when tested alone means the organism is an ESBL-producing strain.)
For all ESBL-producing strains the test interpretation should be reported as resistant for all penicillins, cephalosporins, and aztreonam.
{3}------------------------------------------------
# DEVICE COMPARISON
Cefotaxime/Clavulanic Acid, BBL™ Sensi-Disc™ and Ceftazidime/Clavulanic Acid BBL™ Sensi-Disc™ are substantially equivalent3 to all of the other susceptibility discs that have been manufactured and marketed by Becton, Dickinson and Company for over twenty years.
These Sensi-discs are comprised of clavulanic acid and a drug agent, either cefotaxime or ceftazidime, and is used in a manner analogous to discs used for these and other antimicrobics.
| | Cefotaxime/Clavulanic Acid, BBL™<br>Sensi-Disc™ and Ceftazidime/<br>Clavulanic Acid BBL™ Sensi-Disc™ | Other BBL™ Sensi-Disc™ such as<br>Cefotaxime BBL Sensi-Disc and<br>Ceftazidime BBL Sensi-Disc |
|---------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Intended<br>Use | Antimicrobial susceptibility test disks<br>are used for semi-quantitative <i>in vitro</i><br>susceptibility testing of bacteria by<br>standardized agar diffusion. These<br>discs are used as confirmatory tests<br>for organisms that secrete Extended-<br>spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs). | Antimicrobial susceptibility test discs<br>are used for semi-quantitative <i>in vitro</i><br>susceptibility testing of bacteria<br>by standardized agar diffusion.<br>These tests are used for a wide<br>variety of gram-negative and gram-<br>positive bacteria. |
| Result | Qualitative –Interpretation based on the<br>difference in zone size between these<br>disks and disks with the drug alone.<br>(≥5mm increase in zone diameter for<br>either = ESBL) | Qualitative – S/I/R interpretation<br>based on zone size. |
| Sample<br>Procedure | Test organism grown in pure culture.<br>Disks are placed on the surface of an<br>inoculated plate; after incubation zones<br>are read and compared to the zone<br>size for the appropriate drug. ESBL-<br>producing strains are reported as<br>resistant for all penicillins,<br>cephalosporins, and aztreona per<br>NCCLS criteria. | Test organism grown in pure culture.<br>Disks are placed on the surface of<br>an inoculated plate; after incubation,<br>zones are read and compared to<br>S/I/R categories determined per<br>NCCLS criteria. |
## Table 1: Summary of Substantially Equivalent Components
<sup>3</sup> The term "substantial equivalence" as used in this 510(k) notification is limited to the definition of substantial equivalence as found in the Federal Food. Drug and Cosmetic Act, as amended and as applied under 21 CFR 807, Subpart E under which a device can be marketed without premarket approval or reclassification. A determination of substantial equivalency under this notification is not intended to have any bearing whatsoever on the resolution of patent infringement suits or any other patent matters. No statements related to, or in support of substantial equivalence herein shall be construed as an admission against interest under the US Patent Laws or their application by the courts.
{4}------------------------------------------------
### Summary of Performance Studies
A Reproducibility Study was performed at three sites to determine the reproducibility of the product using the NCCLS recommended negative and positive Quality Control organisms. The study was performed in triplicate at three test sites for ten days using three lots of disks. Zone sizes formed around the test disks were examined, recorded and compared to the zone sizes achieved with disks containing the Cefotaxime and Ceftazidime alone. Average zone sizes and the standard deviation for each single and combination disk and the difference between the two were calculated. Expected results were obtained in all cases.
An internal reproducibility study was performed to determine the reproducibility of results between different individuals performing the test. This test used ten organism strains of various resistance mechanisms. Three individuals tested the ten strains on three different days in triplicate, using one lot of test disks. All zones of inhibition were recorded. Variability between individual tests by the same person and between participants was examined. All results met the acceptance criteria.
Testing was also performed to determine the performance of the product using the Jacoby challenge set of organisms. The study followed the procedure described in the NCCLS M100-S9 document. Expected results were obtained in all cases.
Accuracy testing was performed to compare the performance of production Cefotaxime/Clavulanic Acid and Cetazidime/Clavulanic Acid BBL™ Sensi-Discs to disks prepared in the laboratory as described in the NCCLS M100-S9 document, for confirmatory tests for organisms secreting Extended-spectrum B-lactamases. Both the screening and confirmatory tests were performed as described in the document. Organisms tested included genotypic and phenotypic ESBL strains and non-ESBL strains. QC organisms were run each day of testing. Results from the production disks were compared to results obtained with disks made in the laboratory.
QC testing over the course of the study was acceptable. All expected outcomes were achieved during the screening test. All production disks results correlated with laboratory disks with 100% equivalency in performance. Expected outcomes were met for all of the genotypic and non-ESBL strains. The phenotypic strains performed as expected with the exception of four K. oxytoca strains. These four strains were not detected as ESBL by the reference or test disks. Overall performance accuracy was 95% and meets the acceptance criteria as outlined in the study protocol.
{5}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/5/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo is circular and contains the words "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" around the perimeter. Inside the circle is a stylized image of three human profiles facing to the right, stacked on top of each other.
Food and Drug Administration 2098 Gaither Road Rockville MD 20850
DEC - 1 1999
Ms. Monica E. Giguere, RAC Regulatory Affairs Specialist Becton Dickinson Microbiology Systems 7 Loveton Circle Sparks, Maryland 21152
K993577 Re:
> Trade Name: Cefotaxime/Clavulanic Acid, 30/10ug, BBL™ Sensi-Disc™ and Ceftazidime/Clavulanic Acid, 30/10µg, BBLTM Sensi-Disco™ Regulatory Class: II Product Code: JTN Dated: October 20, 1999 Received: October 21, 1999
Dear Ms. Giguere:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) notification of intent to market the device referenced above and we have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food. Drug. and Cosmetic Act (Act). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (Premarket Approval), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 895. A substantially equivalent determination assumes compliance with the Current Good Manufacturing Practice requirements, as set forth in the Quality System Regulation (QS) for Medical Devices: General regulation (21 CFR Part 820) and that, through periodic QS inspections, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) will verify such assumptions. Failure to comply with the GMP regulation may result in regulatory action. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register. Please note: this response to your premarket notification submission does not affect any obligation you might have under sections 531 through 542 of the Act for devices under the Electronic Product Radiation Control provisions, or other Federal laws or regulations.
{6}------------------------------------------------
Page 2
Under the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (CLIA-88), this device may require a CLIA complexity categorization. To determine if it does, you should contact the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) at (770)488-7655.
This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your 510(k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801 and additionally 809.10 for in vitro diagnostic devices), please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4588. Additionally, for questions on the promotion and advertising of your device, please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4639. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). Other general information on your responsibilities under the Act may be obtained from the Division of Small Manufacturers Assistance at its toll free number (800) 638-2041 or at (301) 443-6597 or at its internet address "http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/dsmamain.html"
Sincerely yours,
Steven Autman
Steven I. Gutman, M.D., M.B.A. Director Division of Clinical Laboratory Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{7}------------------------------------------------
Page 1 of 1
K 993577 510(k) Number (if known)
Device Name: Cefotaxime/Clavulanic Acid, 30/10ug ,BBL™ Sensi-Disc™ and Ceftazidime/Clavulanic Acid, 30/10ug, BBL ™ Sensi-Disc™
Indications For Use:
Antimicrobial susceptibility test discs are used for semi-quantitative susceptibility testing by standardized agar diffusion. Cefotaxime/Clavulanic Acid, BBL™ Sensi-Disc™ and Ceftazidime/Clavulanic Acid BBL™ Sensi-Disc™ are intended for use for confirmatory tests for organisms that secrete Extended-spectrum ß-lactamases (ESBLs) as indicated in the Results section of the package insert and indicated below.
Use of Cefotaxime/Clavulanic Acid, BBL™ Sensi-Disc™ and Ceftazidime/Clavulanic Acid, BBL ™ Sensi-Disc™ together with Cefotaxime and Ceftazidime susceptibility discs for in vitro agar diffusion susceptibility testing are indicated when there is a need to perform a confirmatory test for ESBLs in Klebsiella spp. and Escherichia coli.
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluations (ODE)
Prescription Use V Per 21 CFR 801.109
OR
Woody Dubois
inical Laboratory Devices 5100k) Number.
Over -The Counter-Use (Optional Format 3-10-98)
002
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.