K981939 · Bci Intl., Inc. · DQA · Aug 20, 1998 · Cardiovascular
Device Facts
Record ID
K981939
Device Name
AUTOCORR PLUS; 3404 OXIMETER/ECG MONITOR
Applicant
Bci Intl., Inc.
Product Code
DQA · Cardiovascular
Decision Date
Aug 20, 1998
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 870.2700
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Pediatric
Indications for Use
The BCI 3404 Monitor is a portable ECG and oximetry monitor with optional impedance respiration. It continuously and non-invasively monitors and displays functional oxygen saturation of arterial hemoglobin(SpO2), pulse rate, respiration rate, plethysmogram and ECG waveforms. Alarms are available for ECG and oximetry. There are no respiration rate alarms. The 3404 may be used in the hospital or clinical environment, and during emergency land transport. The device will provide fast, reliable measurements on patients ranging from pediatric to adult when using the appropriate BCI accessories. The monitor is not intended for home use. The monitor is not intended to be an apnea monitor. It was not designed or validated for use as an apnea monitor. The monitor is not intended for neonatal use.
Device Story
BCI 3404 is a portable, tabletop ECG and oximetry monitor with optional impedance respiration. Inputs include ECG cable interface and SpO2 probe. Device processes signals to display patient data and waveforms on an EL panel. Features include alarm system for ECG/oximetry, serial port for data communication/analog output, and six-key keypad. Operated by clinicians in hospitals, clinics, or emergency land transport. Provides real-time physiological monitoring to assist healthcare providers in patient assessment and clinical decision-making. Benefits include fast, reliable, non-invasive monitoring of vital signs.
Clinical Evidence
Clinical validation included a deep desaturation study (SpO2 50-100%) compared to an OSM-3 co-oximeter, showing standard deviations of 1.8 (70-100% range) and 2.4 (50-<70% range) with R-squared of 0.97. Respiration performance was validated against a BCI 9004 Capnograph in 30 volunteers across rest, exercise, and recovery states, showing a mean difference of 0.63 bpm (SD 0.80). Bench testing confirmed ECG, SpO2, and respiration accuracy against simulators.
Technological Characteristics
Tabletop monitor with EL panel display. Parameters: ECG (3/5 lead), SpO2, impedance respiration. Connectivity: Serial port for printer/computer/analog output. Standards: ANSI/AAMI EC13-1992 for ECG. Testing: EMC, electrical, mechanical durability, safety, temperature/humidity. Power: AC/Battery (implied by portable/transport use).
Indications for Use
Indicated for pediatric to adult patients in hospital, clinical, or emergency land transport settings for continuous, non-invasive monitoring of SpO2, pulse rate, respiration rate, plethysmogram, and ECG waveforms. Contraindicated for neonatal use and home use; not intended for use as an apnea monitor.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An oximeter is a device used to transmit radiation at a known wavelength(s) through blood and to measure the blood oxygen saturation based on the amount of reflected or scattered radiation. It may be used alone or in conjunction with a fiberoptic oximeter catheter.
{0}------------------------------------------------
AUG 20 1998
ATIONAL
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image shows the date August 26, 1998, in a simple, sans-serif font. The text is black against a white background. Below the date is a logo that is black and white.
K981939
# Summary of Safety and Effectiveness
Submitter: Address:
Telephone: Contact:
Prepared:
Proprietary Name: Common/Classification Name: Predicate Devices:
BCI International, Inc. W238 N1650 Rockwood Drive Waukesha, WI 53188
(414) 542-3100 VP Regulatory Affairs
May 29, 1998
BCI 3404 Oximeter / ECG Monitor Pulse Oximeter BCI 3304 Pulse Oximeter BCI 3100 Oximeter / ECG Monitor Siemens SC6000 Bedside Monitor
New Device Description:
The BCI 3404 Oximeter / ECG Monitor is a new monitor with the same parameters as existing devices legally marketed by BCI International. This device is designed to provide full featured monitoring capabilities in a table top design. The system features an ECG cable interface, an SpO2 probe interface, display of patient and waveform data via an EL panel, power status LED, and the function keypad area consisting of six keys ( on/off, waveform / trend, alarm silence, up arrow & down arrow). The monitor has a serial port that is used for data communications to a printer or computer and for analog outputs.
Intended Use:
The BCI 3404 Monitor is a portable ECG and oximetry monitor with optional impedance respiration. It continuously and non-invasively monitors and displays functional oxygen saturation of arterial hemoglobin(SpO2), pulse rate, respiration rate, plethysmogram and ECG waveforms. Alarms are available for ECG and oximetry. There are no respiration rate alarms. The 3404 may be used in the hospital or clinical environment, and during emergency land transport. The device will provide fast, reliable measurements on patients ranging from pediatric to adult when using the appropriate BCI accessories.
The monitor is not intended for home use. The monitor is not intended to be an apnea monitor. It was not designed or validated for use as an apnea monitor. The monitor is not intended for neonatal use.
{1}------------------------------------------------
# Performance Data:
The design of this device utilizes currently available technology found in many legally marketed devices. Testing was done to ensure that it would perform within the environment(s) for which it is to be marketed. The testing was performed in accordance with the guidelines found in the reviewers guide for respiratory devices and with international safety standards. This testing included EMC, electrical, mechanical durability, safety (operator and patient), and temperature/humidity. The results of the testing demonstrated that the device was in compliance with the guidelines and standards referenced in the reviewers guide and that it performed within its specifications and functional requirements.
Performance testing of the 3404 Monitor and its components were seperated into three types of testing. Bench tests using simulators were used to test each parameter. Clinical tests using volunteers were used to verify performance for respiration and oximetry. A performance standard was used for ECG (ANSI/AAMI EC13).
# Bench Tests:
Three devices were tested on simulators to determine performance over the specified range. All of the simulators are commercially available. The device reading is compared to the simulator setting.
| Parameter | Range | Mean Error | Standard Deviation |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|------------|--------------------|
| ECG Rates<br>beats per minute | 30 to 254 | 0 | 0 |
| Tested 3 lead and 5 lead modes vs all leads at multiple amplitude settings spec ±2 bpm or ±2% (greater of) | | | |
| Oximetry<br>% SpO2 | 50 to 100% | 0.25 | 0.45 |
| Oximetry<br>Pulse rate (bpm) | 30 to 250 | 1.18 | 0.90 |
| spec oximetery ±2% SpO2 (min), rate ±2 bpm or ±2% (greater of) | | | |
| Repiration<br>breaths per minute | 4 to 150 | 0 | 0 |
| spec breath rate ±1 bpm or ±5% (greater of) | | | |
As the tables show the 3404 monitors very closely tracked the simulators. The maximum mean differences was 1.18 for SpO2 pulse rate, all other values were less than one.
{2}------------------------------------------------
# Clinical Tests:
Clinical studies were done on oximetry and respiration
# Oximetry:
A deep desaturation test was run on the 3404 oximeter at the VA Medical Center in Milwaukee under an approved IRB. The oximeter values were compared to an OSM-3 co-oximeter. Over the SpO2 range of 70% - 100% the standard deviation was 1.8 (spec = +/- 2). Over the SpO2 range of 50% - < 70% the standard deviation was 2.4 (spec = +/- 3). R squared = 0.97 (measure of how true the regression line is, one being perfect).
#### Respiration:
The repiration values were collected from the 3404 and a BCI 9004 Capnograph (K970209) ( a CO2 gas monitor). The test was conducted at BCI. Thirty volunteers were tested. Three readings were recorded from each subject; at rest, right after heavy exercise (bike) and after a cool down period. The minimum breath rate was 7 bpm and the maximum was 31 bpm. The mean difference between the 9004 and the 3404 readings was 0.63 with a standard deviation of 0.80. The accuracy specification of the 3404 respiration is ±2 bpm or ±2%, whichever is greater. The 3404 agreed very closely with the 9004 respiration rate.
### Performance Standards:
One performance standard was used. The ECG standard is ANSVAAMI EC13-1992 standard (American National Standard for Cardiac monitors, heart rate meters and alarms).
#### ECG
The 3404 was tested to the requirements of AAMI EC13-1992. These requirements included reviews or tests for labeling, operating conditions, overload protection (includes defib tests), risk current (leakage), auxiliary output, respiration, leads-off sensing, active noise suppression, ORS detection, range & accuracy of heart rate meter, alarm system and ECG display capability requirements (including pacemaker). The 3404 met all of the applicable requirements.
The 3404 passed all the tests.
On the basis of these results and the above-referenced testing it is our determination that the device is safe, effective, and performs as well as or better than the legally marketed predicate device(s).
This summary of 510(k) safety and effectiveness information is being submitted in accordance with the requirements of SMDA 1990 and 21 CFR 807.92.
Respectfully.
Donald Alexander
Donald Alexander VP Regulatory Affairs
{3}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/3/Picture/1 description: The image shows the seal of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The seal features the department's name encircling a symbol. The symbol consists of four stylized human profiles facing right, arranged in a stacked formation.
Food and Drug Administration 9200 Corporate Boulevard Rockville MD 20850
AUG 20 1998
Mr. Donald J. Alexander VP Requlatory Affairs BCI International W238 N1650 Rockwood Drive Waukesha, WI 53188-1199
Re: K981939 BCI Model 3404 Oximeter/ECG Monitor Requlatory Class: II (two) Product Code: DQA Dated: May 29, 1998 Received: June 2, 1998
Dear Mr. Alexander:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) notification of intent to market the device referenced above and we have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (Premarket Approval), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Requlations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 895. A substantially equivalent determination assumes compliance with the Current Good Manufacturing Practice requirements, as set forth in the Quality System Regulation (QS) for Medical Devices: General regulation (21 CFR Part 820) and that, through periodic QS inspections, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) will verify such assumptions. Failure to comply with the GMP regulation may result in regulatory action. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register. Please note: this response to your premarket notification submission does not affect any
{4}------------------------------------------------
obligation you might have under sections 531 through 542 of the Act for devices under the Electronic Product Radiation Control provisions, or other Federal laws or requlations.
This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your 510(k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801 and additionally 809.10 for in vitro diagnostic devices), please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4648. Additionally, for questions on the promotion and advertising of your device, please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4639. Also, please note the regulation entitled, 2 Misbranding by reference to premarket notification² (21CFR 807.97). Other general information on your responsibilities under the Act may be obtained from the Division of Small Manufacturers Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 443-6597 or at its internet address "http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/dsma/dsmamain.html".
Sincerely yours,
Thomas J. Callehan
Thomas J. Callahan Director Division of Cardiovascular, Respiratory, and Neurological Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{5}------------------------------------------------
# Indications For Use
K981939
510(k) Number (if known):
Device Name: BCI 3404 Monitor
Indications For Use:
Intended Use
The BCI 3404 Monitor is a portable ECG and oximetry monitor with optional impedance respiration. It continuously and non-invasively monitors and displays functional oxygen saturation of arterial hemoglobin(SpO2), pulse rate, respiration rate, plethysmogram and ECG waveforms. Alarms are available for ECG and oximetry. There are no respiration rate alarms. The 3404 may be used in the hospital or clinical environment, and during emergency land transport.
The device will provide fast, reliable measurements on patients ranging from pediatric to adult when using the appropriate BCI accessories.
The monitor is not intended for home use. The monitor is not intended to be an apnea monitor. It was not designed or validated for use as an apnea monitor. The monitor is not intended for neonatal use.
( PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE - CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED )
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (
Atual Pokey New / Stuart Ho. for DB7 3-18-1
(Division Sign-Off)
Division of Cardiovascular, Resp and Neurological Devices 510(k) Number
Prescription Use
(Per 21 CFR 801.109)
Over-The Counter Use
OR
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.