Lantern Knee Navigation Unit (406000-03);Lantern Hip Navigation Unit (502000-03)
Applicant
Orthalign, Inc.
Product Code
ONN · Neurology
Decision Date
Jul 31, 2026
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Special
Regulation
21 CFR 882.4560
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
Lantern Knee Indications for Use: The Lantern Knee is a computer-controlled system intended to assist the surgeon in determining reference alignment axes in relation to anatomical and instrumentation structures during stereotactic orthopedic surgical procedures. The Lantern Knee facilitates the accurate positioning of implants relative to these alignment axes. Ligament balancing is provided by Lantern Knee in primary or revision Total Knee Arthroplasty. Example orthopedic surgical procedures include but are not limited to: - Total Knee Arthroplasty - Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: Tibial transverse resection - Ligament Balancing Lantern Hip Indications for use: Lantern Hip is a computer-controlled system intended to assist the surgeon in determining reference alignment axes in relation to anatomical and instrumentation structures during stereotactic orthopedic surgical procedures. Lantern Hip facilitates the accurate positioning of implants relative to these alignment axes. The system aids the surgeon in controlling leg length and offset discrepancies. Lantern Hip is indicated for Total Hip Arthroplasty with the Direct Anterior Approach and the patient in the supine position, or through a posterior-based approach with the patient in the lateral position. Note, offset is only available with the Direct Anterior Approach.
Device Story
Palm-sized computer module with integrated sensors; assists surgeons in orthopedic procedures (TKA, UKA, THA). Device registers anatomical landmarks; calculates mechanical axes/reference frames; guides instrument positioning. Used in OR by surgeons. Provides real-time navigation data to assist in implant alignment, ligament balancing, and control of leg length/offset discrepancies. Benefits include improved surgical accuracy and alignment precision.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data. Bench testing included biocompatibility (ISO 10993), software V&V (IEC 62304), hardware V&V, mechanical integrity, EMC (IEC 60601-1-2), electrical safety (IEC 60601-1), accelerated aging (ASTM F1980), and distribution validation.
Technological Characteristics
Stereotaxic instrument; palm-sized computer module with integrated sensors. Materials verified per ISO 10993. Energy source: battery-powered. Connectivity: standalone navigation unit. Sterilization: AAMI/ISO TIR 28:2016. Software class: IEC 62304 compliant.
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty (primary or revision), Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty (tibial transverse resection), or Total Hip Arthroplasty (Direct Anterior Approach in supine position or posterior-based approach in lateral position).
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A stereotaxic instrument is a device consisting of a rigid frame with a calibrated guide mechanism for precisely positioning probes or other devices within a patient's brain, spinal cord, or other part of the nervous system.
{0}
**U.S. FOOD & DRUG**
ADMINISTRATION
July 31, 2026
Orthalign, Inc.
Michaela Lindemann
Sr. Regulatory Affairs Specialist
153 Technology
Irvine, California 92618
Re: K262253
Trade/Device Name: Lantern Knee Navigation Unit (406000-03);Lantern Hip Navigation Unit (502000-03)
Regulation Number: 21 CFR 882.4560
Regulation Name: Stereotaxic instrument
Regulatory Class: Class II
Product Code: ONN
Dated: July 1, 2026
Received: July 2, 2026
Dear Michaela Lindemann:
We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device"
U.S. Food & Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993
www.fda.gov
{1}
K262253 - Michaela Lindemann
Page 2
(https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).
Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR) (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, ISO 13485 clause 7.3 (Design controls), ISO 13485 clause 8.3 (Nonconforming product), ISO 13485 clause 8.5.2 (Corrective action), and ISO 13485 clause 8.5.3 (Preventative action). Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review, the QMSR requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (ISO 13485 clause 7.3 and ISO 13485 clause 7.5) and document changes and approvals in the Medical Device File (ISO 13485 clause 4.2.3).
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reporting-combination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR) (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.
All medical devices, including Class I and unclassified devices and combination product device constituent parts are required to be in compliance with the final Unique Device Identification System rule ("UDI Rule"). The UDI Rule requires, among other things, that a device bear a unique device identifier (UDI) on its label and package (21 CFR 801.20(a)) unless an exception or alternative applies (21 CFR 801.20(b)) and that the dates on the device label be formatted in accordance with 21 CFR 801.18. The UDI Rule (21 CFR 830.300(a) and 830.320(b)) also requires that certain information be submitted to the Global Unique Device Identification Database (GUDID) (21 CFR Part 830 Subpart E). For additional information on these requirements, please see the UDI System webpage at https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/unique-device-identification-system-udi-system.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reporting-mdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE
{2}
K262253 - Michaela Lindemann
Page 3
by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
Shumaya Ali -S
Shumaya Ali, M.P.H.
Assistant Director
DHT6C: Division of Restorative,
Repair, and Trauma Devices
OHT6: Office of Orthopedic Devices
Office of Product Evaluation and Quality
Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{3}
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
# **Indications for Use**
Form Approved: OMB No. 0910-0120
Expiration Date: 07/31/2026
See PRA Statement below.
510(k) Number (if known)
K262253
Device Name
Lantern Knee Navigation Unit (406000-03); Lantern Hip Navigation Unit (502000-03)
Indications for Use (Describe)
Lantern Knee Indications for Use:
The Lantern Knee is a computer-controlled system intended to assist the surgeon in determining reference alignment axes in relation to anatomical and instrumentation structures during stereotactic orthopedic surgical procedures. The Lantern Knee facilitates the accurate positioning of implants relative to these alignment axes. Ligament balancing is provided by Lantern Knee in primary or revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Example orthopedic surgical procedures include but are not limited to:
- Total Knee Arthroplasty
- Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: Tibial transverse resection
- Ligament Balancing
Lantern Hip Indications for use:
Lantern Hip is a computer-controlled system intended to assist the surgeon in determining reference alignment axes in relation to anatomical and instrumentation structures during stereotactic orthopedic surgical procedures. Lantern Hip facilitates the accurate positioning of implants relative to these alignment axes.
The system aids the surgeon in controlling leg length and offset discrepancies. Lantern Hip is indicated for Total Hip Arthroplasty with the Direct Anterior Approach and the patient in the supine position, or through a posterior-based approach with the patient in the lateral position. Note, offset is only available with the Direct Anterior Approach.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
☑ Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
☐ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
**CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.**
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
**\*DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.\***
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services
Food and Drug Administration
Office of Chief Information Officer
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff
PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
*"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."*
FORM FDA 3881 (8/23)
Page 1 of 1
PSC Publishing Services (301) 443-6740 EF
{4}
510(k) #: K262253
# 510(k) Summary
Prepared on: 2026-07-29
Contact Details
21 CFR 807.92(a)(1)
| Applicant Name | OrthAlign, Inc. |
| --- | --- |
| Applicant Address | 153 Technology Irvine CA 92618 United States |
| Applicant Contact Telephone | 7632226720 |
| Applicant Contact | Ms. Michaela Lindemann |
| Applicant Contact Email | mlindemann@orthalign.com |
Device Name
21 CFR 807.92(a)(2)
| Device Trade Name | Lantern Knee Navigation Unit (406000-03); Lantern Hip Navigation Unit (502000-03) |
| --- | --- |
| Common Name | Stereotaxic instrument |
| Classification Name | Intraoperative Orthopedic Joint Assessment Aid |
| Regulation Number | 882.4560 |
| Product Code(s) | ONN |
Legally Marketed Predicate Devices
21 CFR 807.92(a)(3)
| Predicate # | Predicate Trade Name (Primary Predicate is listed first) | Product Code |
| --- | --- | --- |
| K200892 | Lantern Surgical Assistant | OLO |
| K242616 | Lantern Hip | ONN |
| K140331 | OrthAlign Plus | OLO |
Device Description Summary
21 CFR 807.92(a)(4)
The Lantern system utilizes a palm sized computer module and sensor(s) to generate positional information in orthopedic procedures, providing a sequence of steps for registration of anatomical landmarks, calculation of mechanical axes and references frames, and relative positioning of instruments.
Intended Use/Indications for Use
21 CFR 807.92(a)(5)
Lantern Knee Indications for Use:
The Lantern Knee is a computer-controlled system intended to assist the surgeon in determining reference alignment axes in relation to anatomical and instrumentation structures during stereotactic orthopedic surgical procedures. The Lantern Knee facilitates the accurate positioning of implants relative to these alignment axes. Ligament balancing is provided by Lantern Knee in primary or revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Example orthopedic surgical procedures include but are not limited to:
- Total Knee Arthroplasty
- Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: Tibial transverse resection
- Ligament Balancing
Lantern Hip Indications for use:
Lantern Hip is a computer-controlled system intended to assist the surgeon in determining reference alignment axes in relation to
K262253 - Page 1 of 3
{5}
anatomical and instrumentation structures during stereotactic orthopedic surgical procedures. Lantern Hip facilitates the accurate positioning of implants relative to these alignment axes. The system aids the surgeon in controlling leg length and offset discrepancies. Lantern Hip is indicated for Total Hip Arthroplasty with the Direct Anterior Approach and the patient in the supine position, or through a posterior-based approach with the patient in the lateral position. Note, offset is only available with the Direct Anterior Approach.
## Indications for Use Comparison
21 CFR 807.92(a)(5)
The indications for use for modified Lantern Knee device contains the following changes from the indications for use cleared in the predicate 510(k) (K200892): Lantern Surgical Assistant (K200892). "Lantern Surgical Assistant" was replaced with Lantern Knee in the modified indications for use submitted in this premarket notification. The modified Lantern Knee indications for use also includes the addition of the statement "Ligament balancing is provided by Lantern Knee in primary or revision Total Knee Arthroplasty". Ligament balancing was added to the Lantern Surgical Assistant System through a document to file to K200892.
The indications for use for the modified Lantern Hip device have been modified from the predicate Lantern Hip (K242616) in the following way:
The statement "or through a posterior based approach with the patient in the lateral position. Note offset is only available with the direct Anterior Approach" has been added to the modified Lantern Hip indications for use. The posterior based approach with the patient in the lateral position was added to the Lantern Hip System through a letter to file to K242616. The posterior based approach does not include offset.
## Technological Comparison
21 CFR 807.92(a)(6)
The following technological characteristics are identical between the modified Lantern Knee and Lantern Hip Systems and the predicate Lantern Surgical Assistant System (K200892), and/or the predicate Lantern Hip System(K242616).
-Control Mechanism (identical to predicate devices)
-Operating Principals (identical to predicate devices
-Registration of Anatomy (identical to predicate devices)
-Measurement and Navigation (identical to predicate devices)
-Main System Components (identical to predicate devices)
-Energy Type (identical to predicate devices)
-Sterilization (identical to predicate devices)
-Patient interface (identical to predicate devices)
-Storage and Transportation Conditions (identical to K242616)
The following technological characteristics differ for the OrthAlign predicates:
-Materials: Replacement of the existing Enclosure Front Frame and Display module with an integrated Front-Frame Display on the modified device resulted in different patient-facing materials compared to the predicate devices. The new materials have been verified per FDA recognized consensus standards for Biocompatibility.
-User interface: The Lantern Hip workflow has been updated from what was cleared in K242616 to remove the greater trochanter workflow and add the lateral workflow. Both change were evaluated through the FDA Guidance Documents, "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k)for a Change to an Existing Device" and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device and documented to the OrthAlign file for K242616.
K200892 was submitted to the Agency with the name Harvey® Surgical Assistant (HSA). OrthAlign has modified the marketing name to the Lantern® System. This modification does not imply any marketing claims. Throughout this premarket notification the terms Harvey or HSA are interchangeable with Lantern, Lantern System, or Lantern Surgical Assistant (LSA).
## Non-Clinical and/or Clinical Tests Summary & Conclusions
21 CFR 807.92(b)
Clinical testing is not applicable
Non clinical testing included:
-System components biocompatibility assessment per ISO 10993-1 (2018)
-ISO 10993-1, ISO 10993-5, ISO 10993-10, ISO 10993-11, ISO 10993-12, ISO 10993-23
-Software verification and validation to ensure the integrity of the code and functionality and reliability of the software in various use sequences
-System hardware verification/validation testing to ensure the device meets its functional requirements
-ISO 14971
-Mechanical verification to ensure outer shell mechanical integrity(crop testing) and user interface and visual references/features (housing translucency testing)
-EMC verification and validation
-IEC/EN 61000-4-2, IEC/EN 61000-4-3, IEC/EN 61000-4-8. IEC 61000-4-39, CISPR 11/EN55011, CISPR 32/EN55032, IEC 60601-1, IEC 60601-1-2, and ANSI C63.27
K262253 - Page 2 of 3
{6}
-Electrical Safety verification and validation
-IEC 60601-1, IEC 60601-1-6, and IEC 62304
-Accelerated Aging
-ASMR F1980
-Distribution verification and validation
-ASTM D4169, ISTA 3A, ASTM F88/F88M, ASTM F2096
Battery Verification
-IEC 60086-4, IEC 60086-5
Sterilization assessment
-AAMI/ISO TIR 28:2016 (R2024) Annex A
This testing regime demonstrates that the subject device is safe and performs as well as the predicate devices.
The Lantern System has been verified to meet the design input requirements and has been shown to be substantially equivalent to the predicate devices.
K262253 - Page 3 of 3
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.