K261228 · Brain Ultimate, Inc. · OBP · Aug 14, 2026 · Neurology
Device Facts
Record ID
K261228
Device Name
QuickVision Ultimate rTMS
Applicant
Brain Ultimate, Inc.
Product Code
OBP · Neurology
Decision Date
Aug 14, 2026
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 882.5805
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
The QuickVision Ultimate rTMS is indicated for the treatment of Major Depressive Disorder in adult patients who have failed to receive satisfactory improvement from prior antidepressant medications in the current episode. The QuickVision Ultimate rTMS includes a neuronavigation system indicated to provide navigation and location support for placement of the TMS coil on the skull in relation to a prior acquired MRI image.
Device Story
QuickVision Ultimate rTMS combines repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) with optical neuronavigation; used in clinical/research institutions by trained operators. Device discharges high-voltage capacitors through figure-of-eight coils to generate pulsed magnetic fields; induces electrical currents in prefrontal cortex neurons to treat Major Depressive Disorder. Neuronavigation system uses Polaris optical tracking (infrared cameras, tracking tools) to map TMS coil position relative to patient's pre-acquired MRI data. Real-time 3D display provides visual guidance for coil placement over target brain regions. Output consists of magnetic stimulation pulses; healthcare providers use visual navigation to ensure accurate targeting. Benefits include non-invasive treatment for MDD and improved precision in coil positioning.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. No clinical data presented. Performance testing included electrical/magnetic field characterization (SMT, field strength, waveform, spatial distribution, gradient, pulse intensity stability) and tracking accuracy (linear/angular). Results are identical to primary predicate for TMS features and equivalent to secondary predicate for navigation.
Technological Characteristics
Electromechanical rTMS system with optical neuronavigation. Components: TMS stimulator, figure-of-eight coils (BY90A, BF90A, BY90B), flexible arm, Polaris 3D optical tracking system. Energy: High-voltage capacitor discharge. Waveform: Biphasic sinusoid. Connectivity: DICOM import for MRI/fMRI/PET. Software: Semi-automated image segmentation, 3D head modeling, efield visualization. Standards: IEC 60601-1, IEC 60601-1-2, ISO 13485, ISO 14971. Sterilization: N/A (non-invasive, patient caps are textile).
Indications for Use
Indicated for treatment of Major Depressive Disorder in adults (≥22 years) who failed to receive satisfactory improvement from prior antidepressant medications in the current episode.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation system is an external device that delivers transcranial repetitive pulsed magnetic fields of sufficient magnitude to induce neural action potentials in the prefrontal cortex to treat the symptoms of major depressive disorder without inducing seizure in patients who have failed at least one antidepressant medication and are currently not on any antidepressant therapy.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The special control is FDA's “Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation System.” See § 882.1(e) for the availability of this guidance document.
{0}
FDA U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION
Friday, August 14, 2026
Brain Ultimate, Inc.
% Barry Ashar
President
Makromed, Inc.
88 Stiles Rd.
Salem, New Hampshire 03079
Re: K261228
Trade/Device Name: QuickVision Ultimate rTMS
Regulation Number: 21 CFR 882.5805
Regulation Name: Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation System
Regulatory Class: Class II
Product Code: OBP, SGE
Dated: April 14, 2026
Received: April 15, 2026
Dear Barry Ashar:
We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
U.S. Food & Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993
www.fda.gov
{1}
K261228 – Mr. Barry Ashar
Page 2
Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).
Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR) (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, ISO 13485 clause 7.3 (Design controls), ISO 13485 clause 8.3 (Nonconforming product), ISO 13485 clause 8.5.2 (Corrective action), and ISO 13485 clause 8.5.3 (Preventative action). Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review, the QMSR requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (ISO 13485 clause 7.3 and ISO 13485 clause 7.5) and document changes and approvals in the Medical Device File (ISO 13485 clause 4.2.3).
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reporting-combination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR) (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.
All medical devices, including Class I and unclassified devices and combination product device constituent parts are required to be in compliance with the final Unique Device Identification System rule ("UDI Rule"). The UDI Rule requires, among other things, that a device bear a unique device identifier (UDI) on its label and package (21 CFR 801.20(a)) unless an exception or alternative applies (21 CFR 801.20(b)) and that the dates on the device label be formatted in accordance with 21 CFR 801.18. The UDI Rule (21 CFR 830.300(a) and 830.320(b)) also requires that certain information be submitted to the Global Unique Device Identification Database (GUDID) (21 CFR Part 830 Subpart E). For additional information on these requirements, please see the UDI System webpage at https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/unique-device-identification-system-udi-system.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reporting-mdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See
{2}
K261228 – Mr. Barry Ashar
Page 3
the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
PAMELA D. SCOTT -S
Pamela D. Scott
Assistant Director
DHT5B: Division of Neuromodulation and
Physical Medicine Devices
OHT5: Office of Neurological and
Physical Medicine Devices
Office of Product Evaluation and Quality
Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{3}
| Indications for Use | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Please type in the marketing application/submission number, if it is known. This textbox will be left blank for original applications/submissions. | K261228 | ? |
| Please provide the device trade name(s). | | ? |
| QuickVision Ultimate rTMS | | |
| Please provide your Indications for Use below. | | ? |
| The QuickVision Ultimate rTMS is indicated for the treatment of Major Depressive Disorder in adult patients who have failed to receive satisfactory improvement from prior antidepressant medications in the current episode. The QuickVision Ultimate rTMS includes a neuronavigation system indicated to provide navigation and location support for placement of the TMS coil on the skull in relation to a prior acquired MRI image. | | |
| Please select the types of uses (select one or both, as applicable). | ☑ Prescription Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart D) ☐ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) | ? |
| Please select the age group(s) for which the device(s) is to be used. | ☐ Neonates/Newborns (Birth to < 29 days old) ☐ Infants (29 days old to < 2 years old) ☐ Children (2 years old to < 12 years old) ☐ Adolescents (12 years old to < 22 years old) ☑ Adults (22 years old and greater) | ? |
{4}
# 510(K) Summary
This summary is provided to support the 510(k) pre-market notification for the QuickVision Ultimate rTMS.
Date Summary Prepared: August 14, 2026
## CONTACT DETAILS
Applicant Name: Brain Ultimate, Inc.
Applicant Contact: Mr. Frank Ge, Frank.Ge@brainultimate.com
Applicant Address: 5910 Shiloh Road East Alpharetta GA 30005 United States
Correspondent Name: Makromed, Inc.
Correspondent Contact: Mr. Barry Ashar, bashar@makromed.com
Correspondent Address: 88 Stiles Road Salem NH 03079 United States
## DEVICE NAME
Device Trade Name: QuickVision Ultimate rTMS
Common Name: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation system
Classification Name: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation system
Regulation Number: 882.5805
Product Code(s): OBP, SGE
## PREDICATE DEVICES
Primary Predicate: K243460, Ultimate rTMS, OBP
Secondary Predicate: K210109, visor2 system, HAW
## PRODUCT DESCRIPTION
The QuickVision Ultimate rTMS is a repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) system coupled with a neuronavigation system. This computerized medical device produces non-invasive, repetitive pulsed magnetic fields of sufficient magnitude to induce neural action potentials in the prefrontal cortex for the treatment of Major Depressive Disorder. Its neuronavigation feature is used to aid 3D navigation for positioning of TMS coils over preselected brain regions based on data from MRI measurements or scalp landmarks.
It can be used in patient care institutions, diagnostics centers, neurosurgical hospitals and experimental laboratories of research institutions.
The Ultimate rTMS principle of operation is based on the discharge of high voltage capacitor through stimulation coil; the pulsed magnetic field generated by the discharge current penetrates through neuromuscular tissues nearby to induce electrical currents in cortical neurons. The Neuronavigator uses position data of the patient's head and the TMS coil acquired by an optical tracking system for display and navigation. The real-time display of the position of the TMS coil in the displayed MR data set provides visual support for navigation.
Area of the brain to be simulated for MDD treatment is Left Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex.
Brain Ultimate, Inc., Traditional 510 (k)
QuickVision Ultimate rTMS
Page 1 of 14
{5}
# INDICATION FOR USE
The QuickVision Ultimate rTMS is indicated for the treatment of Major Depressive Disorder in adult patients who have failed to receive satisfactory improvement from prior antidepressant medications in the current episode. The QuickVision Ultimate rTMS includes a neuronavigation system indicated to provide navigation and location support for placement of the TMS coil on the skull in relation to a prior acquired MRI image.
# INDICATIONS FOR USE COMPARISON
The subject device of this 510(k) submission has the exact same Indication for Use as that of the predicate devices put together (TMS + Neuronavigation).
# TECHNOLOGICAL COMPARISON
## Introduction
The subject device, the QuickVision Ultimate rTMS, and the primary predicate device, Ultimate rTMS (K243460) are used for the treatment of Major Depressive Disorder in adult patients. They are both computerized electromechanical medical devices that produce and deliver non-invasive, repetitive pulsed magnetic fields of sufficient magnitude to induce neural action potentials in the prefrontal cortex for the treatment of Major Depressive Disorder. Both devices have identical intended use / indication for use, identical hardware components, identical treatment target and use identical treatment parameters of 19-minutes, 37-minutes and iTBS protocols.
The subject device, the QuickVision Ultimate rTMS, and the secondary predicate device, visor2 System (K210109) are used to aid 3D navigation for positioning of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) coils over preselected brain regions based on data from MRI measurements or scalp landmarks. The subject device is a combination of a TMS System and a neuronavigation system, where as the secondary predicate device is a stand-alone neuronavigation system. The TMS part of the subject device is identical to the primary predicate device.
The subject device is the exact same as the primary predicate device with the neuronavigation feature added to it. The added neuronavigation feature is similar to the one provided by the secondary predicate device.
## Design
The TMS part of the design of the subject device is the exact same as that of the primary predicate device for applying transcranial magnetic stimulation by means of repetitive pulse trains at a predetermined frequency. Both use the same mechanism of action, i.e., an electromechanical instrument that produces and delivers brief duration, rapidly alternating (pulsed) magnetic fields to induce electrical currents in localized regions of the prefrontal cortex. Both use the exact same TMS coils of figure-of-eight transducer design.
The neuronavigation part of the design of the subject device is very similar to that of the secondary predicate device as their TMS coil positioning principle is based on anatomy (MRI picture) and indirect targeting of treatment target through measured distance and direction using optical stereotactic navigation. Both systems use the same fundamental technology for locating TMS coil location with regard to prior acquired MRI images, consisting of Infrared locators and 3D tracking infrared camera technology for land-marking to facial and skull features using tracking tools.
Brain Ultimate, Inc., Traditional 510 (k)
QuickVision Ultimate rTMS
Page 2 of 14
{6}
## Operational Characteristics
For the subject device and the primary predicate device, their basic operational procedures for TMS treatment, including system setup, patient preparations, motor threshold determination, coil positioning and treatment with predefined treatment stimulation parameters are exactly the same.
For the subject device and the secondary predicate device, their basic operational procedures for neuronavigation, including system setup, patient preparations, and coil position tracking are the same as they both use the exact same 3D tracking system (Polaris from Northern Digital, Inc.) and tracking tools such as patient marker, coil marker and pointer tool.
## Technological Characteristics
Both the subject and primary predicate devices have similar components consisting of TMS stimulator with software, electromagnetic coil and a flexible arm for positioning of the treatment coil. They both use the exact same figure-of-eight coils, the exact same treatment protocols (37-min, 19-min and iTBS) and the exact same treatment parameters (frequency and intensity). The coil positioning method used by the primary predicate device is based on the direct relationship of the underlying cortical brain anatomy to the patient's scalp. The subject device can use this exact same positioning method, and also offers more accurate neuronavigation-based coil positioning method similar to the one in the secondary predicate device.
Both the subject and secondary predicate devices employ optical stereotactic navigation technology and use the same or very similar components consisting of the Polaris 3D tracking system and tracking tools such as patient marker, coil marker and pointer tool. They both import MRI images in DICOM format, perform semi-automated image segmentation of skin and brain from patient MRI, and generate accurate 3D model of the patient head. They provide 3D visual guidance for positioning of the TMS coil for accurate target selection for TMS stimulation.
## Non-clinical Performance Characteristics
1. Electrical/mechanical/thermal safety and electromagnetic compatibility of both the subject and predicate devices are in compliance with the following standards:
- IEC 60601-1:2005/(R)2012
- IEC 60601-1-2:2014
2. Patient caps are the only accessory of the subject device that comes in contact with the patient's intact skin for an aggregated duration of less than 24 hours, over a period of 30 days of treatment days. As they are made of commonly used textile materials, they are exempt from ISO 10993-1:2018 Biocompatibility testing per FDA's Guidance Document 'Use of International Standard ISO 10993-1, "Biological evaluation of medical devices - Part 1: Evaluation and testing within a risk management process"', dated September 8, 2023.
3. The characteristics of the electric and magnetic fields generated by the subject device's coils (BY90A, BF90A, and BY90B), including linearity of output, biphasic sinusoidal waveform, pulse width and intensity, magnetic field spatial distribution and magnetic field strength gradient, are identical to
Brain Ultimate, Inc., Traditional 510 (k)
QuickVision Ultimate rTMS
Page 3 of 14
{7}
that of the primary predicate device. This is because the subject device is the same as the primary predicate device with a neuronavigation feature added to it, which has no impact on the electric and magnetic fields generated by the device.
4. The subject device meets the same requirement as the primary predicate device that the actual individual stimuli of a theta burst are of equal intensity to ensure that a constant dose of stimuli is delivered during iTBS treatment (maximum 1% drop in machine output among the three stimuli in a burst). This is because the subject device is the same as the primary predicate device with a neuronavigation feature added to it, which has no impact on the stimulation intensity generated by the device.
5. The subject device’s tracking system accuracy is the same as that of the secondary predicate device as both use the exact same commercially available tracking system from a third party (Polaris from Northern Digital, Inc.).
## Conclusion
The subject device, QuickVision Ultimate rTMS, is the same as the primary predicate device (Ultimate rTMS, K243460) with a neuronavigation feature added to it that is equivalent to the secondary predicate device (Visor2, K210109).
The subject device does not introduce any new safety considerations in comparison to the primary or secondary predicate devices. All other identified differences between the subject device and the predicate devices are minor and without any known impact on safety or efficacy.
Brain Ultimate, Inc., Traditional 510 (k)
QuickVision Ultimate rTMS
Page 4 of 14
{8}
**Table 12-1. Side-by-Side Comparison of the Subject and Primary Predicate Device**
**(for comparison of TMS-related features and performance)**
| Criteria | (Subject Device) QuickVision Ultimate rTMS | (Primary Predicate) Ultimate rTMS (K243460) | Equivalence Comments |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Product Classification | OBP / 21 CFR 882.5805 Class II device | OBP / 21 CFR 882.5805 Class II device | Identical |
| Magnetic Field Intensity | 120% of the MT (iTBS, 19/37 mins protocols) | 120% of the MT (iTBS, 19/37 mins protocols) | Identical treatment protocols and parameters. |
| Repetition Rate | 50 Hz / 10 Hz (iTBS, 19/37 mins protocols) | 50 Hz / 10 Hz (iTBS, 19/37 mins protocols) | |
| Train duration | 2 sec / 4 sec (iTBS, 19/37 mins protocols) | 2 sec / 4 sec (iTBS, 19/37 mins protocols) | |
| Inter-train interval | 8 sec / 11-26 sec (iTBS, 19/37 mins protocols) | 8 sec / 11-26 sec (iTBS, 19/37 mins protocols) | |
| iTBS Burst | Burst Pulses: 3 No. of Bursts: 200 Inter-pulse: 20 msec | Burst Pulses: 3 No. of Bursts: 200 Inter-pulse: 20 msec | |
| Number of trains | 20 / 75 (iTBS, 19/37 mins protocols) | 20 / 75 (iTBS, 19/37 mins protocols) | |
| Magnetic Pulses per Session | 600 / 3000 (iTBS, 19/37 mins protocols) | 600 / 3000 (iTBS, 19/37 mins protocols) | |
| Treatment Session Duration | 3 min 12 sec / 19/37 min (iTBS, 19/37 mins protocols) | 3 min 12 sec / 19/37 min (iTBS, 19/37 mins protocols) | |
Brain Ultimate, Inc., Traditional 510 (k)
QuickVision Ultimate rTMS
Page 5 of 14
{9}
| Criteria | (Subject Device) QuickVision Ultimate rTMS | (Primary Predicate) Ultimate rTMS (K243460) | Equivalence Comments |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Treatment Schedule | 5 Sessions/Week for 6 Weeks | 5 Sessions/Week for 6 Weeks | |
| Area of brain to be stimulated | Left Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex | Left Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex | |
| Coils | BY90A BF90A BY90B | BY90A BF90A BY90B | Identical coils. |
| Configuration | BY90A : Figure-of-eight coil BF90A : Figure-of-eight coil BY90B : Figure-of-eight coil-With angle 120° | BY90A : Figure-of-eight coil BF90A : Figure-of-eight coil BY90B : Figure-of-eight coil-With angle 120° | |
| Core material | Air core | Air core | |
| Cooling | BY90A:Liquid cooling | BY90A:Liquid cooling | |
| | BF90A:Forced Air cooling | BF90A:Forced Air cooling | |
| | BY90B:Liquid cooling | BY90B:Liquid cooling | |
| Coil parameters | BY90A Inner diameter - 34 mm Outer diameter - 85 mm N = 2 wings x 2 layers x 5 turns | BY90A Inner diameter - 34 mm Outer diameter - 85 mm N = 2 wings x 2 layers x 5 turns | |
| | BF90A Inner diameter - 34 mm Outer diameter - 85 mm N = 2 wings x 2 layers x 5 turns | BF90A Inner diameter - 34 mm Outer diameter - 85 mm N = 2 wings x 2 layers x 5 turns | |
Brain Ultimate, Inc., Traditional 510 (k)
QuickVision Ultimate rTMS
Page 6 of 14
{10}
| Criteria | (Subject Device) QuickVision Ultimate rTMS | (Primary Predicate) Ultimate rTMS (K243460) | Equivalence Comments |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | BY90B Inner diameter - 30 mm Outer diameter -90 mm N = 2 wings x 2 layers x 6 turns | BY90B Inner diameter - 30 mm Outer diameter -90 mm N = 2 wings x 2 layers x 6 turns | |
| Amplitude in Standard Motor Threshold (SMT) units | 0 – 2.4 41% Intensity Setting → 1 SMT | 0 – 2.4 41% Intensity Setting → 1 SMT | Identical electric and magnetic field characteristics. |
| Waveform | Biphasic sinusoid | Biphasic sinusoid | |
| Active pulse width (μs) | 320 | 320 | |
| Pulse amplitude (V) | BY90A: 1.35 BF90A: 1.26 BY90B: 1.22 | BY90A: 1.35 BF90A: 1.26 BY90B: 1.22 | |
| Max magnetic field strength 2 cm from coil (T) | At 25% Intensity: BY90A: 0.172 BF90A: 0.182 BY90B: 0.117 At 50% Intensity: BY90A: 0.291 BF90A: 0.287 BY90B: 0.244 At 75% Intensity: BY90A: 0.403 BF90A: 0.395 BY90B: 0.369 At 100% Intensity: | At 25% Intensity: BY90A: 0.172 BF90A: 0.182 BY90B: 0.117 At 50% Intensity: BY90A: 0.291 BF90A: 0.287 BY90B: 0.244 At 75% Intensity: BY90A: 0.403 BF90A: 0.395 BY90B: 0.369 At 100% Intensity: | |
Brain Ultimate, Inc., Traditional 510 (k)
QuickVision Ultimate rTMS
Page 7 of 14
{11}
| Criteria | (Subject Device) QuickVision Ultimate rTMS | (Primary Predicate) Ultimate rTMS (K243460) | Equivalence Comments |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | BY90A: 0.498 BF90A: 0.494 BY90B: 0.481 | BY90A: 0.498 BF90A: 0.494 BY90B: 0.481 | |
| Max initial dB/dt (kT/s) near the coil surface (z = 0 cm) | BY90A: 13.44 BF90A: 13.76 BY90B: 12.10 | BY90A: 13.44 BF90A: 13.76 BY90B: 12.10 | Identical electric and magnetic field characteristics. |
| Max initial dB/dt (kT/s) 2 cm from coil surface (z = 2 cm) | BY90A: 3.59 BF90A: 4.27 BY90B: 6.78 | BY90A: 3.59 BF90A: 4.27 BY90B: 6.78 | |
| Output Intensity Stability among Pulses in a Burst (Max Change %) | BY90A: 0.563 BF90A: 0.580 BY90B: 0.679 | BY90A: 0.563 BF90A: 0.580 BY90B: 0.679 | |
| The system will automatically be disabled when the coil temperature exceeds: | 40 °C (104 °F) | 40 °C (104 °F) | Identical coil temperature control and alarm. |
Brain Ultimate, Inc., Traditional 510 (k)
QuickVision Ultimate rTMS
Page 8 of 14
{12}
| Criteria | (Subject Device) QuickVision Ultimate rTMS | (Primary Predicate) Ultimate rTMS (K243460) | Equivalence Comments |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Frequency range (Hz) | 0.1 - 100 | 0.1 - 100 | Identical system specifications. |
| Pulse train duration range (s) | Rep Rate: 0.1 ...100Hz Pulses in Train: 1,2,3,4 ... 2000 Train duration = Pulses in Train / Rep Rate | Rep Rate: 0.1 ...100Hz Pulses in Train: 1,2,3,4 ... 2000 Train duration = Pulses in Train / Rep Rate | |
| Inter-train interval range (s) | 0 - 60 | 0 - 60 | |
| Maximum trains per session | 250 | 250 | |
| Maximum number of pulses per session | 5000 (Pluses In Train:20 *Maximun Trains:250 =Maximun Number:5000) | 5000 (Pluses In Train:20 *Maximun Trains:250 =Maximun Number:5000) | |
| Electrical safety | Complies with IEC 60601-1, IEC 60601-1-2. | Complies with IEC 60601-1, IEC 60601-1-2. | Identical compliance with external standards. |
| ISO Standards met | Company complies with ISO 13485:2016. ISO14971 | Company complies with ISO 13485:2016. ISO14971 | |
**Table 12-2. Side-by-Side Comparison of the Subject and Secondary Predicate Device (for comparison of neuronavigation-related features and performance)**
Brain Ultimate, Inc., Traditional 510 (k)
QuickVision Ultimate rTMS
Page 9 of 14
{13}
| Criteria | (Subject Device) QuickVision Ultimate rTMS | (Secondary Predicate) Visor2 (K210109) | Equivalence Comments |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Product Classification | SGE / 21 CFR 882.4560 Class II device | HAW / 21 CFR 882.4560 Class II device | Equivalent (Neuronavigation for TMS has been cleared under both SGE and HAW) |
| TMS Coil Position Principle | Based on anatomy (MRI picture) and indirect targeting of treatment target through measured distance and direction using optical stereotactic navigation. | Based on anatomy (MRI picture) and indirect targeting of treatment target through measured distance and direction using optical stereotactic navigation. | Identical |
| Fundamental technology for locating TMS coil location with regard to prior acquired MRI images | Infrared locators and 3D tracking infrared camera technology for land-marking to facial and skull features using tracking tools. | Infrared locators and 3D tracking infrared camera technology for land-marking to facial and skull features using tracking tools. | Identical |
| Compatible TMS Coils | Commercially available Brain Ultimate coils cleared for TMS use: BY90A BY90B BF90A | Commercially available TMS coils from several manufacturers. | Equivalent |
| Neuronavigation Components | 3D Tracking System Patient Marker Coil Marker Pointer Tool Computer Software | 3D Tracking subsystem (Stereotactic camera positioning system), Calibration board, Reference tracking tool, Pointer tool, Coil tracker, Computer, Software, Cart | Equivalent |
Brain Ultimate, Inc., Traditional 510 (k)
QuickVision Ultimate rTMS
Page 10 of 14
{14}
| Criteria | (Subject Device) QuickVision Ultimate rTMS | (Secondary Predicate) Visor2 (K210109) | Equivalence Comments |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | Cart | | |
| 3D Tracking System | Commercially available optical stereotactic Polaris tracking system from Northern Digital Inc. | Commercially available optical stereotactic Polaris tracking system from Northern Digital Inc. | Identical |
| Tracking System Accuracy | 0.25 mm RMS | 0.25 mm RMS | Identical |
| System Accuracy | 4 mm | 4 mm | Identical |
| Scanner Interface | Import of MRI images in DICOM format. Import of fMRI/PET images. Mapping results exported as CSV text file and DICOM images with voxel coloring according to motor response amplitudes and language mapping classifications. | Import of MRI images in DICOM format. Import of fMRI/PET images. Mapping results exported as CSV text file and DICOM images with voxel coloring according to motor response amplitudes and language mapping classifications. | Equivalent |
| MRI Features | • tMRI/MRI import • MRI based head modeling • efield visualization | • tMRI/MRI import • MRI based head modeling • efield visualization | Equivalent |
| DICOM conformance | Yes | Yes | Equivalent |
| Brain Segmentation | Semi-automated image segmentation of skin and brain from patient MRI. | Semi-automated image segmentation of skin and brain from patient MRI. | Equivalent |
Brain Ultimate, Inc., Traditional 510 (k)
QuickVision Ultimate rTMS
Page 11 of 14
{15}
| Criteria | (Subject Device) QuickVision Ultimate rTMS | (Secondary Predicate) Visor2 (K210109) | Equivalence Comments |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Head Model | Generation of accurate 3-D model of the patient's head. | Generation of accurate 3-D model of the patient's head. | Equivalent |
| Planning Features | Coil targets to deliver TMS to specific area; includes visibility, location and description. | Coil targets to deliver TMS to specific area; includes visibility, location and description. | Equivalent |
| 2D and 3D Viewing | Axial, coronal, sagittal slices through configurable cut planes in 3D scene. | Axial, coronal, sagittal slices through configurable cut planes in 3D scene. | Equivalent |
| Registration Feature | Crosshairs to register specific MRI landmarks, pointer tool and head tracker; validation tests to determine inaccuracies. | Crosshairs to register specific MRI landmarks, pointer tool and head tracker; validation tests to determine inaccuracies. | Equivalent |
| Electrical Safety | Complies with IEC 60601-1 | Complies with IEC 60601-1 | Equivalent |
| EMC | Complies with IEC 60601-1-2 | Complies with IEC 60601-1-2 | Equivalent |
Brain Ultimate, Inc., Traditional 510 (k)
QuickVision Ultimate rTMS
Page 12 of 14
{16}
# NON-CLINICAL AND/OR CLINICAL TESTS SUMMARY
The following special control is applicable to the subject device (Product Code: OBP) of this 510(k) submission:
"Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff: Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) Systems."
The following performance tests specified in this guidance document were performed and their results for the subject device are identical to the primary predicate device of our own (K243460), as there is no difference between them in their TMS features and design, including the coils used:
# Electric Field:
- a) SMT Comparison
- b) Electrical Field Strength Decay over z-axis distance from coil center (in the direction of head center)
# Magnetic Field:
- a) Output Waveform for pulse width and amplitude
- b) Magnetic Field Strength Linearity as a function of machine intensity setting
- c) Magnetic Field Spatial Distribution
- d) Magnetic Field Gradient (dB/dt)
Also, the "Intensity Variation of Pulses within a Burst" not specified in the guidance document but essential for iTBS protocol was performed. The results for the subject device are identical to the primary predicate device of our own (K243460), as there is no difference between them in their TMS features and design.
An additional test related to the neuronavigation feature, linear and angular accuracy of tracking, was performed and its report is attached in this 510(k).
# CONCLUSION STATEMENT
The subject device and the predicate devices have identical intended use/indication for use, target population, treatment procedure, treatment position and all recommended standard treatment protocol parameters.
The subject device is the exact same as the primary predicate device with the neuronavigation feature added to it. The added neuronavigation feature is similar to the one provided by the secondary predicate device.
Bench-top testing results for the subject device for its TMS functionalities are identical to those for the primary predicate device, as there are no differences between their features and design, including the TMS coils used. The tracking accuracy test results for the subject device are very similar to those for the secondary predicate device as they both use the exact same third party commercially available optical tracking system (Polaris).
The subject device does not introduce any new safety considerations in comparison to the primary or secondary predicate devices.
Brain Ultimate, Inc., Traditional 510 (k)
QuickVision Ultimate rTMS
Page 13 of 14
{17}
Based on the information and supporting documentation provided in the premarket notification, the QuickVision Ultimate rTMS is substantially equivalent to the cited primary and secondary predicate devices. Testing demonstrates that the QuickVision Ultimate rTMS fulfills prospectively defined design and performance specifications.
Brain Ultimate, Inc., Traditional 510 (k)
QuickVision Ultimate rTMS
Page 14 of 14
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.