mGRIP Total Prosthesis (3.00 mm) (58689); mGRIP Total Prosthesis (3.25 mm) (58691); mGRIP Total Prosthesis (3.50 mm) (58693); mGRIP Total Prosthesis (3.75 mm) (58695); mGRIP Total Prosthesis (4.00 mm) (58697); mGRIP Total Prosthesis (4.25 mm) (58699); mGRIP Total Prosthesis (4.50 mm) (58701); mGRIP Total Prosthesis (4.75 mm) (58703); mGRIP Total Prosthesis (5.00 mm) (58705); mGRIP Total Prosthesis (5.50 mm) (58707); mGRIP Total Prosthesis (6.00 mm) (58709); mGRIP Total Prosthesis (6.50
Applicant
MED-EL Elektromedizinische Geräte GmbH
Product Code
ETA · Ear, Nose, Throat
Decision Date
Apr 3, 2026
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Special
Regulation
21 CFR 874.3495
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic, Pediatric
Indications for Use
The passive middle ear implant – tympanoplasty total prosthesis is intended to be used for replacement of components of the ossicular chain, if at least the stapes footplate is present and functional. The tympanoplasty total prosthesis is implanted in the middle ear to restore sound transmission from the tympanic membrane to the oval window by replacing the ossicles totally. The tympanoplasty prosthesis is a medical device for single use delivered in sterile condition.
Device Story
Passive middle ear implants (TORPs) designed to bridge gap between tympanic membrane and stapes footplate; restore sound transmission. mGRIP features headplate with integrated spikes for cartilage stabilization; mARC features round headplate with ball-joint connection for tilt/alignment. Both made of medical-grade titanium; available in multiple functional lengths (3.0-7.0 mm). Implanted by ENT surgeons during standard otological surgery. Output is mechanical sound conduction. Benefits include improved stability (mGRIP) and anatomical alignment (mARC).
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. No clinical data. Evidence includes usability testing (IEC 62366-1) and mechanical/functional bench testing (lateral stability, ball-joint integrity). Biocompatibility, MRI safety, shelf-life, and sterilization validation were leveraged from the predicate device.
Technological Characteristics
Materials: Medical grade titanium (ASTM F67). Design: Cannulated distal footing; mGRIP has spiked headplate; mARC has ball-joint tiltable headplate. Dimensions: 3.0-7.0 mm functional lengths. Connectivity: None. Sterilization: Sterile. Software: None.
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients of all ages with congenital or acquired ossicular chain defects (e.g., chronic otitis media, traumatic injury, malformation, cholesteatoma) or inadequate conductive hearing from previous middle ear surgery, provided the stapes footplate is present and functional.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A total ossicular replacement prosthesis is a device intended to be implanted for the total functional reconstruction of the ossicular chain and facilitates the conduction of sound waves from the tympanic membrance to the inner ear. The device is made of materials such as polytetrafluoroethylene, polytetrafluoroethylene with vitreous carbon fibers composite, porous polyethylene, or from a combination of these materials.
{0}
FDA U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION
April 3, 2026
MED-EL Elektromedizinische Geräte GmbH
Vladislav Morozov
Advanced Specialist, Regulatory Affairs
Fürstenweg 77a
Innsbruck, Tirol 6020
Austria
Re: K260719
Trade/Device Name: mGRIP Total Prosthesis and mARC Total Prosthesis
Regulation Number: 21 CFR 874.3495
Regulation Name: Total Ossicular Replacement Prosthesis
Regulatory Class: Class II
Product Code: ETA
Dated: March 5, 2026
Received: March 5, 2026
Dear Vladislav Morozov:
We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
{1}
K260719 - Vladislav Morozov
Page 2
Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).
Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR) (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, ISO 13485 clause 7.3 (Design controls), ISO 13484 clause 8.3 (Nonconforming product), and ISO 13485 clause 8.5 (Corrective and preventative action). Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review, the QMSR requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (ISO 13485 clause 7.3 and 21 CFR 820.70) and document changes and approvals in the device master record (21 CFR 820.181).
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reporting-combination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR) (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.
All medical devices, including Class I and unclassified devices and combination product device constituent parts are required to be in compliance with the final Unique Device Identification System rule ("UDI Rule"). The UDI Rule requires, among other things, that a device bear a unique device identifier (UDI) on its label and package (21 CFR 801.20(a)) unless an exception or alternative applies (21 CFR 801.20(b)) and that the dates on the device label be formatted in accordance with 21 CFR 801.18. The UDI Rule (21 CFR 830.300(a) and 830.320(b)) also requires that certain information be submitted to the Global Unique Device Identification Database (GUDID) (21 CFR Part 830 Subpart E). For additional information on these requirements, please see the UDI System webpage at https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/unique-device-identification-system-udi-system.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reporting-mdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-
{2}
K260719 - Vladislav Morozov
Page 3
assistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
JOYCE C. LIN -S
for Shu-Chen Peng, Ph.D.
Assistant Director
DHT1B: Division of Dental and ENT Devices
OHT1: Office of Ophthalmic, Anesthesia, Respiratory, ENT, and Dental Devices
Office of Product Evaluation and Quality
Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{3}
FORM FDA 3881 (8/23)
Page 1 of 1
PSC Publishing Services (301) 443-6740
EF
| DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration Indications for Use | Form Approved: OMB No. 0910-0120 Expiration Date: 07/31/2026 See PRA Statement below. |
| --- | --- |
| 510(k) Number (if known) K260719 | |
| Device Name mGRIP Total Prosthesis and mARC Total Prosthesis | |
| Indications for Use (Describe) INTENDED USE: The passive middle ear implant – tympanoplasty total prosthesis is intended to be used for replacement of components of the ossicular chain, if at least the stapes footplate is present and functional. The tympanoplasty total prosthesis is implanted in the middle ear to restore sound transmission from the tympanic membrane to the oval window by replacing the ossicles totally. The tympanoplasty prosthesis is a medical device for single use delivered in sterile condition. | |
| INTENDED USER The tympanoplasty prosthesis is intended to be implanted by qualified ENT surgeons only, with adequate skills to perform otological surgeries. Replacement of the ossicular chain is a standard surgical procedure, no additional specific device training is mandatory or required for the safe and effective use. | |
| TARGET PATIENT POPULATION The target patient population for the passive middle ear implant are patients of all ages requiring reconstruction of the ossicular chain. | |
| INDICATIONS: The tympanoplasty prosthesis is indicated to treat patients with: - congenital or acquired ossicular chain defects (e.g., chronic otitis media, traumatic injury, malformation, cholesteatoma) - inadequate conductive hearing from previous middle ear surgery | |
| The total ossicular replacement prosthesis is indicated, if at least the stapes footplate is present and functional. | |
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) ☑ Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) ☐ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) | |
| CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED. | |
| This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. "DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW." | |
| The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to: Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov | |
| "An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number." | |
{4}
MED-EL
# 510(k) SUMMARY
# MED-EL Elektromedizinische Geräte GmbH
[As Required by 21 CFR 807.92(c)]
## 1.0 Submitter [807.92(a)(1)]
**Manufacturer:**
MED-EL Elektromedizinische Geräte GmbH (hereafter MED-EL)
Fürstenweg 77a, 6020 Innsbruck
Austria
**Contact Person:**
Vladislav Morozov
MED-EL Advanced Specialist, Regulatory Affairs
Phone: +43 577885067
**FDA Official Correspondent:**
Elizabeth Gfoeller
MED-EL Corporate Director, Regulatory Affairs
Phone: +43 577885614
Date the Summary was prepared: March 31, 2026.
## 2.0 Device Names [807.92(a)(2)]
**Table 1 Device/Trade Names of MED-EL PMEI Tympanoplasty Total Prostheses**
| Device/Trade Name | Device Classification Name | Classification | Product code | Regulation (CFR) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| mGRIP Total Prosthesis | Total Ossicular replacement Prosthesis | Class II | ETA | 874.3495 |
| mARC Total Prosthesis | | | | |
## 3.0 Predicate Devices [807.92(a)(3)]
**Table 2 Predicate device and Reference device manufactured by MED-EL**
| Predicate device | | Reference device (relevant for mARC Total Prosthesis) | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| mXACT Total Prosthesis Offcenter | K241269 | mCLIP ARC Partial Prosthesis | K241261 |
Page 1 of 12
{5}
MEDIEL
# 4.0 Description of the Devices [807.92(a)(4)]

mGRIP Total Prosthesis


Figure 1. mGRIP Total Prosthesis total ossicular replacement prosthesis (TORP). A) 3D-view, B) Top-view, C) Schematic view: "L" functional length of the TORP prosthesis. "A" length of the headplate.

The mGRIP Total Prosthesis (Figure 1) is a total ossicular replacement prosthesis (TORP) which is used to bridge the gap between the tympanic membrane & the stapes footplate.
The mGRIP Total Prosthesis is made of medical grade titanium and consists of a cannulated distal footing ("stem") as coupling structure and a headplate with integrated "spikes". The headplate offers a bending option to allow coupling to the malleus handle. The spikes are delivered prebent $90^{\circ}$ towards the cartilage. The spikes stabilize the cartilage to the prosthesis which shall lower the risk of early postoperative prosthesis dislocation. The fenestrated headplate allows good intraoperative visibility to the surgical field.
The mGRIP Total Prosthesis has different fixed functional lengths (L: 3.00 to 7.00 mm) and the headplate length (A) corresponds to the oval headplate dimensions (3.6 × 2.6 mm).
The functional length describes the distance between tympanic membrane and the central point of the stapes footplate.
{6}
MEDIEL
mARC Total Prosthesis

Figure 2. mARC Total Prosthesis total ossicular replacement prosthesis (TORP). A) 3D-view, B) Schematic view: "L" functional length of the TORP prosthesis. "A" length of the headplate.


The mARC Total Prosthesis (Figure 2) is a total ossicular replacement prosthesis (TORP) which is used to bridge the gap between the tympanic membrane & the stapes footplate.
The mARC Total Prosthesis is made of medical grade titanium and consists of a cannulated distal footing ("stem") as coupling structure and a round headplate with a ball-joint connection. The ball-joint allows tilting of the headplate to support anatomical alignment and facilitate coupling to the tympanic membrane cartilage interface. The tiltable design can improve intraoperative handling and offer enhanced visibility due to the ability to adjust the headplate position during placement.
The mARC Total Prosthesis has different fixed functional lengths (L: 3.00 to 7.00) and the headplate length (A) corresponds to the diameter of the round headplate ( $\varnothing$ 2.6 mm).
The functional length describes the distance between tympanic membrane and the central point of the stapes footplate.
{7}
MEDIEL
5.0
Statement of the Intended use [807.92(a)(5)]
The intended use and indications of the mGRIP Total Prosthesis and mARC Total Prosthesis and the predicate device are identical.
PMEI Tympanoplasty Total Prostheses
**Intended Use**
The passive middle ear implant – tympanoplasty total prosthesis is intended to be used for replacement of components of the ossicular chain, if at least the stapes footplate is present and functional. The tympanoplasty total prosthesis is implanted in the middle ear to restore sound transmission from the tympanic membrane to the oval window by replacing the ossicles totally. The tympanoplasty prosthesis is a medical device for single use delivered in sterile condition.
**Intended User**
The tympanoplasty prosthesis is intended to be implanted by qualified ENT surgeons only, with adequate skills to perform otological surgeries. Replacement of the ossicular chain is a standard surgical procedure, no additional specific device training is mandatory or required for the safe and effective use.
**Target Patient Population**
The target patient population for the passive middle ear implant are patients of all ages requiring reconstruction of the ossicular chain.
**Indications**
The tympanoplasty prosthesis is indicated to treat patients with:
- congenital or acquired ossicular chain defects (e.g., chronic otitis media, traumatic injury, malformation, cholesteatoma)
- inadequate conductive hearing from previous middle ear surgery
The total ossicular replacement prosthesis is indicated, if at least the stapes footplate is present and functional.
Page 4 of 12
{8}
MED
EL
6.0 Comparison of Technological Characteristics with predicate devices [807.92(a)(6)]
## 6.1 mGRIP Total Prosthesis
Table 3 mGRIP Total Prosthesis. Substantial Equivalence Comparative Table of technological parameters/features and characteristics. n/a not applicable.
| Parameters / Features / Characteristics | SUBJECT DEVICE
mGRIP Total Prosthesis
(K260719)
MED-EL Elektromedizinische
Geräte GmbH | PREDICATE DEVICE
mXACT Total Prosthesis
Offcenter (K241269)
MED-EL Elektromedizinische
Geräte GmbH |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Intended Use and Indications for Use | | |
| Intended Use | The passive middle ear implant – tympanoplasty total prosthesis is intended to be used for replacement of components of the ossicular chain, if at least the stapes footplate is present and functional. The tympanoplasty total prosthesis is implanted in the middle ear to restore sound transmission from the tympanic membrane to the oval window by replacing the ossicles totally. The tympanoplasty prosthesis is a medical device for single use delivered in sterile condition. | |
| Indications for Use | The tympanoplasty prosthesis is indicated to treat patients with:
- congenital or acquired ossicular chain defects (e.g., chronic otitis media, traumatic injury, malformation, cholesteatoma)
- inadequate conductive hearing from previous middle ear surgery
The total ossicular replacement prosthesis is indicated, if at least the stapes footplate is present and functional. | |
| Target population | Patients of all ages | |
| Technological characteristics | | |
| Design | | |
| Headplate | Oval (3.6 x 2.6 mm), bendable | Oval (3.6 x 2.6 mm), bendable |
| Shaft | Staged shaft (Ø 0.25 mm / 0.20 mm) | Staged shaft (Ø 0.25 mm / 0.20 mm) |
| Coupling Structure | Cannulated footing | Cannulated footing |
| Additional features | headplate with integrated spikes | n/a |
| Method of Attachment | cannulated distal footing; shall be placed on the stapes footplate | |
| Number of sizes (length variants) | 13 | |
Page 5 of 12
{9}
MEDCEL
| Dimensions (functional lengths) of the length variants [mm] | 3.0, 3.25, 3.5, 3.75, 4.0, 4.25, 4.5, 4.75, 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0 |
| --- | --- |
| Shaft Ø [mm] | Staged shaft (Ø 0.25 mm / 0.20 mm) |
| Headplate dimensions | Ø 2.60 x 3.60 mm (oval and off-centric) |
| Materials in body contact | Medical grade titanium ASTM F67 |
| Biocompatibility | Yes (EN ISO 10993) |
| Surgical Tools (mandatory) | n/a |
| Surgical Tools (optional) | Tympanoplasty Sizers for total prostheses (Class I). Material: polypropylene |
| Packaging configuration | One (1) prosthesis per package |
| Single Use | Yes |
| Sterile | Yes |
| MRI | MRI Conditional at 1.5, 3.0 and 7.0 T |
## 6.2 mARC Total Prosthesis
Table 4 mARC Total Prosthesis. Substantial Equivalence Comparative Table of technological parameters/features and characteristics. n/a not applicable.
| Parameters / Features / Characteristics | SUBJECT DEVICE
mARC Total Prosthesis (K260719)
MED-EL Elektromedizinische Geräte GmbH | PREDICATE DEVICE
mXACT Total Prosthesis
Offcenter (K241269)
MED-EL Elektromedizinische Geräte GmbH |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Intended Use and Indications for Use | | |
| Intended Use | The passive middle ear implant – tympanoplasty total prosthesis is intended to be used for replacement of components of the ossicular chain, if at least the stapes footplate is present and functional. The tympanoplasty total prosthesis is implanted in the middle ear to restore sound transmission from the tympanic membrane to the oval window by replacing the ossicles totally. The tympanoplasty prosthesis is a medical device for single use delivered in sterile condition. | |
| Indications for Use | The tympanoplasty prosthesis is indicated to treat patients with:
- congenital or acquired ossicular chain defects (e.g., chronic otitis media, traumatic injury, malformation, cholesteatoma)
- inadequate conductive hearing from previous middle ear surgery
The total ossicular replacement prosthesis is indicated, if at least the stapes footplate is present and functional. | |
| Target population | Patients of all ages | |
| Technological characteristics | | |
Page 6 of 12
{10}
MEDIEL
| Design | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Headplate | Round (Ø 2.6 mm), tiltable | Oval (3.6 x 2.6 mm) |
| Shaft | Continuous shaft (Ø 0.20 mm) | Staged shaft (Ø 0.25 mm / 0.20 mm) |
| Coupling Structure | Cannulated footing | Cannulated footing |
| Additional features | ball joint (shaft/headplate) | n/a |
| Method of Attachment | cannulated distal footing; shall be placed on the stapes footplate | |
| Number of sizes (length variants) | 13 | |
| Dimensions (functional lengths) of the length variants [mm] | 3.0, 3.25, 3.5, 3.75, 4.0, 4.25, 4.5, 4.75, 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0 | |
| Shaft Ø [mm] | Shaft Ø 0.20 mm | Staged shaft (Ø 0.25 mm / 0.20 mm) |
| Headplate dimensions | Ø 2.6 mm (round and centric) | Ø 2.60 x 3.60 mm (oval and off-centric) |
| Materials in body contact | Medical grade titanium ASTM F67 | |
| Biocompatibility | Yes (EN ISO 10993) | |
| Surgical Tools (mandatory) | n/a | |
| Surgical Tools (optional) | Tympanoplasty Sizers for total prostheses (Class I). Material: polypropylene | |
| Packaging configuration | One (1) prosthesis per package | |
| Single Use | Yes | |
| Sterile | Yes | |
| MRI | MRI Conditional at 1.5, 3.0 and 7.0 T | |
Page 7 of 12
{11}
MED
Table 5 mARC Total Prosthesis. Reference device comparison of technological parameters/features and characteristics. n/a not applicable.
| Parameters / Features / Characteristics | SUBJECT DEVICE mARC Total Prosthesis (K260719) MED-EL Elektromedizinische Geräte GmbH | REFERENCE DEVICE mCLIP ARC Partial Prosthesis (K241261) MED-EL Elektromedizinische Geräte GmbH |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Intended Use and Indications for Use | | |
| Intended Use | The passive middle ear implant – tympanoplasty total prosthesis is intended to be used for replacement of components of the ossicular chain, if at least the stapes footplate is present and functional. The tympanoplasty total prosthesis is implanted in the middle ear to restore sound transmission from the tympanic membrane to the oval window by replacing the ossicles totally. The tympanoplasty prosthesis is a medical device for single use delivered in sterile condition. | The passive middle ear implant – tympanoplasty partial prosthesis is intended to be used for replacement of components of the ossicular chain, if at least the stapes footplate is present and functional. The tympanoplasty prosthesis is implanted in the middle ear to restore sound transmission from the tympanic membrane to the oval window by replacing the ossicles partially. The tympanoplasty prosthesis is a medical device for single use delivered in sterile condition. |
| Indications for Use | The tympanoplasty prosthesis is indicated to treat patients with: - congenital or acquired ossicular chain defects (e.g., chronic otitis media, traumatic injury, malformation, cholesteatoma) - inadequate conductive hearing from previous middle ear surgery The total ossicular replacement prosthesis is indicated, if at least the stapes footplate is present and functional. | The tympanoplasty prosthesis is indicated to treat patients with: - congenital or acquired ossicular chain defects (e.g., chronic otitis media, traumatic injury, malformation, cholesteatoma) - inadequate conductive hearing from previous middle ear surgery The partial ossicular replacement prosthesis is indicated, if at least the stapes head and its stapes footplate are present and functional. |
| Target population | Patients of all ages | |
| Technological characteristics | | |
| Design | | |
| Headplate | Round (Ø 2.6 mm), tiltable | Round (Ø 2.6 mm), tiltable |
| Shaft | Continuous shaft (Ø 0.20 mm) | Continuous shaft (Ø 0.20 mm) |
| Coupling Structure | Cannulated footing | Clip |
| Additional features | ball joint (shaft/headplate) | ball joint (shaft/headplate) |
{12}
MEDEL
| Method of Attachment | cannulated distal footing; shall be placed on the stapes footplate | clip coupling; shall be placed on the stapes head |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Number of sizes (length variants) | 13 | 10 |
| Dimensions (functional lengths) of the length variants [mm] | 3.0, 3.25, 3.5, 3.75, 4.0, 4.25, 4.5, 4.75, 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0 | 0.75, 1.0, 1.25, 1.5, 1.75, 2.0, 2.25, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5 |
| Shaft Ø [mm] | Shaft Ø 0.20 mm | |
| Headplate dimensions | Ø 2.6 mm (round and centric) | |
| Materials in body contact | Medical grade titanium ASTM F67 | |
| Biocompatibility | Yes (EN ISO 10993) | |
| Surgical Tools (mandatory) | n/a | |
| Surgical Tools (optional) | Tympanoplasty Sizers for total prostheses (Class I). Material: polypropylene. | Tympanoplasty Sizers for partial prostheses (Class I). Material: polypropylene. |
| Packaging configuration | One (1) prosthesis per package | |
| Single Use | Yes | |
| Sterile | Yes | |
| MRI | MRI Conditional at 1.5, 3.0 and 7.0 T | |
Page 9 of 12
{13}
MEDCEL
# 6.3 Summary of technological differences
The mCLIP ARC Partial Prosthesis was considered as a reference device for the subject device mARC Total Prosthesis, because they use the identical tiltable headplate (ball joint connection to the shaft) and have the same shaft diameter; due to the different Intended Use and Indications for Use it cannot be considered as predicate device.
Comparing the technological differences, the following parameters, features and characteristics were considered IDENTICAL, EQUIVALENT, or DIFFERENT comparing the subject device mGRIP Total Prosthesis to the predicate device (1), and the subject device mARC Total Prosthesis to the predicate device (2) and the reference device (3).
| Parameters, features, characteristics | (1) mGRIP Total Prosthesis as compared to its predicate device (mXACT Total Prosthesis Offcenter) | (2) mARC Total Prosthesis as compared to its predicate device (mXACT Total Prosthesis Offcenter) | (3) mARC Total Prosthesis as compared to its reference device (mCLIP ARC Partial Prosthesis) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Headplate Design | EQUIVALENT | EQUIVALENT | IDENTICAL |
| Shaft Design | IDENTICAL | EQUIVALENT | IDENTICAL |
| Coupling Structure | IDENTICAL | IDENTICAL | DIFFERENT |
| Additional features | EQUIVALENT | EQUIVALENT | IDENTICAL |
| Method of Attachment | IDENTICAL | IDENTICAL | DIFFERENT |
| Number of sizes (length variants) | IDENTICAL | IDENTICAL | DIFFERENT |
| Shaft diameter | IDENTICAL | EQUIVALENT | IDENTICAL |
| Headplate dimensions | IDENTICAL | EQUIVALENT | IDENTICAL |
| Materials in body contact | IDENTICAL | IDENTICAL | IDENTICAL |
| Biocompatibility | IDENTICAL | IDENTICAL | IDENTICAL |
| Surgical Tools | IDENTICAL | IDENTICAL | EQUIVALENT |
| Packaging configuration | IDENTICAL | IDENTICAL | IDENTICAL |
| Single Use | IDENTICAL | IDENTICAL | IDENTICAL |
| Sterile | IDENTICAL | IDENTICAL | IDENTICAL |
| MRI | IDENTICAL | IDENTICAL | IDENTICAL |
A risk-based assessment was conducted to assess whether the differences of the subject devices mGRIP Total Prosthesis and mARC Total Prosthesis as compared to the predicate device mXACT Total Prosthesis Offcenter could significantly affect safety or effectiveness.
Page 10 of 12
{14}
MEDCEL
7.0 Non-clinical Testing [807.92(b)(1)]
Non-clinical testing was performed to support the substantial equivalence of the mGRIP Total Prosthesis and mARC Total Prosthesis to the predicate device. Because the subject devices and the predicate device share identical materials, manufacturing processes, sterilization method, and packaging, several data sets from the predicate device were leveraged. Only testing related to the design modifications required new evaluations.
**Testing leveraged from the predicate device:**
These evaluations were not repeated, because the subject devices do not introduce new worst-case conditions and fall fully within the previously validated configurations:
- MRI Safety (ASTM F2119, F2052, F2182)
- Biocompatibility (EN ISO 10993, FDA guidance FDA-2013-D-0350)
- Shelf-Life and Packaging (EN ISO 11607)
- Sterilisation Validation (EN ISO 11137-1, EN ISO 11137-2)
**New testing performed for the subject devices:**
**mGRIP Total Prosthesis**
Because the only modification is the integration of spikes in the headplate, specific testing was conducted to evaluate the impact of this design change:
- Usability Testing (IEC 62366-1) to confirm that ENT surgeons can safely manipulate the mGRIP Total Prosthesis and place it in the foreseen middle ear structure. Usability testing confirmed the usefulness of the headplate spikes.
- Mechanical and Functional Bench Testing to verify handling characteristics and device integrity (increased lateral stability of a spike-headplate prosthesis as compared to a non-spike-headplate prosthesis was confirmed).
**mARC Total Prosthesis**
The tiltable headplate is identical to the reference device mCLIP ARC Partial Prosthesis, which is a partial ossicular replacement prosthesis. Specific testing was conducted to evaluate the impact of this design change for a total prosthesis: ball joint connection between headplate and shaft, continuous vs. staged shaft diameter, round vs. oval headplate:
- Usability Testing (IEC 62366-1) to confirm that ENT surgeons can safely manipulate the mARC Total Prosthesis and place it in the foreseen middle ear structure. Usability testing confirmed the usefulness of the new design (especially the tiltable headplate).
- Mechanical Verification Testing to confirm that the ball-joint connection and continuous shaft design meet functional requirements (e.g., tilt range, handling performance).
This non-clinical testing demonstrated that the design modifications for the GRIP Total Prosthesis and mARC Total Prosthesis are substantially equivalent to the predicate device, the mXACT Total Prosthesis.
Page 11 of 12
{15}
MEDIEL
## 8.0 Substantial Equivalence Discussion
The subject devices and the identified predicate device are largely identical (see Table 3 and Table 4). Thus, bench tests for MRI, biocompatibility, shelf-life, sterilization and packaging were leveraged from testing performed on the predicate device. The tiltable headplate design (mARC Total Prosthesis) is new for a total prosthesis, but the identical headplate is used in the reference device mCLIP ARC Partial Prosthesis (see Table 5). The design changes of adding spikes to the headplate for mGRIP Total Prosthesis, or to have a ball joint connection between headplate and shaft with a round headplate for mARC Total Prosthesis, required usability testing with the subject devices. The performed usability testing according to IEC 62366-1:2015 confirmed that the modified design can be safely and effectively handled by its intended users. Additionally, bench testing confirmed the increased lateral stability of a spike-headplate prosthesis as compared to a non-spike-headplate prosthesis.
## 9.0 Conclusion [807.92(b)(3)]
The non-clinical testing demonstrates that the subject devices, the mGRIP Total Prosthesis and mARC Total Prosthesis are substantially equivalent to the predicate device, mXACT Total Prosthesis to perform its intended use safely and effectively.
Page 12 of 12
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.