K253373 · Southern Medical (Pty) , Ltd. · JEY · Dec 19, 2025 · Dental
Device Facts
Record ID
K253373
Device Name
Southern Craniomaxillofacial (CMF) System
Applicant
Southern Medical (Pty) , Ltd.
Product Code
JEY · Dental
Decision Date
Dec 19, 2025
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 872.4760
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
The Southern MF System is a maxillofacial plate and screw system intended for osteotomy, reconstruction, and fracture fixation in midface, maxillofacial, and mandibular surgeries.
Device Story
The Southern MF System is a set of bone plates and screws used to stabilize and immobilize bone segments in the maxillofacial, midface, and mandibular regions to facilitate osseous fusion. The system comprises various plate shapes (e.g., straight, curved, L, T, Y, X, chin, LeFort, orbital floor, meshes) and bone screws in multiple lengths and diameters (self-drilling or self-tapping). The device is used by surgeons in clinical settings to fixate bone segments in a set orientation. The system provides mechanical stability to bone fractures or osteotomy sites, aiding in patient recovery and bone healing.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Mechanical performance evaluated via static and dynamic four-point bending (ASTM F382), screw axial pullout (ASTM F543), screw torsional breaking force (ASTM F543), and screw insertion torque (ASTM F543). Results demonstrate mechanical strength sufficient for intended use and equivalent to predicate devices.
Technological Characteristics
Plates: Grade 2 commercially pure titanium (ASTM F67). Screws: Ti-6Al-4V ELI titanium alloy (ASTM F136). Surface: Anodized. Form factor: Various plate geometries (0.2-1.5mm thickness) and screw diameters (1.5-2.3mm). Sterilization: Non-sterile. Mechanical testing per ASTM F382 and ASTM F543.
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients requiring osteotomy, reconstruction, or fracture fixation in midface, maxillofacial, and mandibular regions. Contraindicated for use in the orbital roof or where exposure of the intracranial compartment is presented.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A bone plate is a metal device intended to stabilize fractured bone structures in the oral cavity. The bone segments are attached to the plate with screws to prevent movement of the segments.
{0}
FDA U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION
December 19, 2025
Southern Medical (Pty) Ltd.
% Nathan Wright
Engineer & Regulatory Specialist
Applied Technical Services (Empirical Technologies)
4628 NorthPark Drive
Colorado Springs, Colorado 80918
Re: K253373
Trade/Device Name: Southern Maxillofacial (MF) System
Regulation Number: 21 CFR 872.4760
Regulation Name: Bone Plate
Regulatory Class: Class II
Product Code: JEY, DZL
Dated: September 29, 2025
Received: September 30, 2025
Dear Nathan Wright:
We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
{1}
K253373 - Nathan Wright
Page 2
Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).
Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality System (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, 21 CFR 820.30, Design controls; 21 CFR 820.90, Nonconforming product; and 21 CFR 820.100, Corrective and preventive action. Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review, the QS regulation requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (21 CFR 820.30 and 21 CFR 820.70) and document changes and approvals in the device master record (21 CFR 820.181).
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reporting-combination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.
All medical devices, including Class I and unclassified devices and combination product device constituent parts are required to be in compliance with the final Unique Device Identification System rule ("UDI Rule"). The UDI Rule requires, among other things, that a device bear a unique device identifier (UDI) on its label and package (21 CFR 801.20(a)) unless an exception or alternative applies (21 CFR 801.20(b)) and that the dates on the device label be formatted in accordance with 21 CFR 801.18. The UDI Rule (21 CFR 830.300(a) and 830.320(b)) also requires that certain information be submitted to the Global Unique Device Identification Database (GUDID) (21 CFR Part 830 Subpart E). For additional information on these requirements, please see the UDI System webpage at https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/unique-device-identification-system-udi-system.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reporting-mdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
{2}
K253373 - Nathan Wright
Page 3
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
Sherrill Lathrop Blitzer
for Andrew Steen
Assistant Director
DHT1B: Division of Dental and ENT Devices
OHT1: Office of Ophthalmic, Anesthesia, Respiratory, ENT, and Dental Devices
Office of Product Evaluation and Quality
Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{3}
FORM FDA 3881 (8/23)
Page 1 of 1
PSC Publishing Services (301) 443-6740
EF
| DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration Indications for Use | Form Approved: OMB No. 0910-0120 Expiration Date: 07/31/2026 See PRA Statement below. |
| --- | --- |
| 510(k) Number (if known) K253373 | |
| Device Name Southern Maxillofacial (MF) System | |
| Indications for Use (Describe) The Southern MF System is a maxillofacial plate and screw system intended for osteotomy, reconstruction, and fracture fixation in midface, maxillofacial, and mandibular surgeries. | |
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) ☑ Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) ☐ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) | |
| CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED. | |
| This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.* | |
| The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to: Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov | |
| "An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number." | |
{4}
K253373 – 510(K) SUMMARY
SOUTHERN MEDICAL
EMPIRICAL TECHNOLOGIES
An RICH Company
| Submitter’s Name: | Southern Medical (Pty) Ltd |
| --- | --- |
| Submitter’s Address: | 55 Regency Drive
Route 21 Corporate Park
Irene, Centurion South Africa 0062 |
| Submitter’s Telephone: | 27-12-667-6243 |
| Contact Person: | Nathan Wright, MS, RAC
Applied Technical Services (Empirical Technologies)
1-719-351-0248
nawright@atslab.com |
| Date Summary was Prepared: | December 19, 2025 |
| Trade or Proprietary Name: | Southern Maxillofacial (MF) System |
| Device Classification Name: | Plate, Bone |
| Classification & Regulation #: | Class II per 21 CFR §872.4760 |
| Product Code: | JEY |
| Secondary Classification | Class II per 21 CFR §872.4880 |
| Secondary Product Code | DZL |
| Classification Panel: | Division of Dental and ENT Devices |
DESCRIPTION OF THE DEVICE SUBJECT TO PREMARKET NOTIFICATION:
The Southern MF System includes a series of plates, meshes, and screws intended to stabilize and immobilize bone segments in the maxillofacial, midface, and mandibular regions, thereby facilitating osseous fusion in a set orientation. The Southern MF System consists of bone plates made from Grade 2 commercially pure titanium (ASTM F67) in various shapes and sizes to accommodate various surgical requirements. It also includes bone screws made from Ti-6Al-4V ELI (ASTM F136) Titanium Alloy. The bone screws are made available in a variety of lengths and diameters, and in self-drilling and self-tapping variations. The Subject Device is not intended for use in the orbital roof and can only be used if no exposure of the intracranial compartment is presented.
INDICATIONS FOR USE
The Southern MF System is a maxillofacial plate and screw system intended for osteotomy, reconstruction, and fracture fixation in midface, maxillofacial, and mandibular surgeries.
TECHNOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS
Predicate Devices
| 510k Number | Trade or Proprietary or Model Name | Manufacturer | Product Code | Predicate Type |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| K140037 | Optimus CMF System | Osteonic Co., Ltd | JEY, DZL | Primary |
| K160363 | Optimus CMF System | Osteonic Co., Ltd. | JEY, DZL | Reference |
| K953385 | Lorenz 1.0mm, 1.5mm, and 2.0mm System | Walter Lorenz Surgical, Inc. | JEY | Reference |
The subject and predicate devices have the same technological characteristics and the minor differences do not raise any new issues to substantial equivalence. Below is the comparison of the subject device to predicates.
1 | Page
{5}
Predicate Comparison
| | Southern Medical Pty, Ltd. Southern Maxillofacial (MF) System (Subject) | Osteonic Co., Ltd. Optimus CMF System | | Walter Lorenz Surgical (acquired by Biomet) LORENZ 1.0mm, 1.5mm, 2.0mm System (K953385) | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | (K140037) | (K160363) | | Comparison |
| Regulation | 872.4760, 872.4880 | 872.4760, 872.4880 | | 872.4760 | Same. |
| Product Code | JEY, DZL | JEY, DZL | | JEY | Same. |
| Indications for Use | The Southern MF System is a maxillofacial plate and screw system intended for osteotomy, reconstruction, and fracture fixation in midface, maxillofacial, and mandibular surgeries. | Optimus CMF System is implantable bone plates and bone screws for maxillofacial and mandible surgery procedures including: 1. Fractures 2. Osteotomies 3. Reconstructive procedures 4. Revision procedures where other treatments or devices have failed. | | The 1.5mm Lorenz System is indicated for trauma, neurosurgery, craniomaxillary reconstruction, and orthognathic procedures in midface. The 2.0mm Lorenz System is indicated for orthognathic surgery of the midface and mandible, oral and maxillofacial trauma, and reconstructive surgery. | Equivalent. The subject specifies the midface application which falls within the maxillofacial application of the predicate indications for use. |
| Material | Plates – Unalloyed Titanium (ASTM F67) Screws – Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium Alloy (ASTM F136) | Plates – Unalloyed Titanium (ASTM F67) Screws – Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium Alloy (ASTM F136) | | Titanium | Same. |
| Surface | Anodized (Plates and Screws) | Anodized (Plates only) | | Unknown | Equivalent. Anodization of subject screws raises no questions for substantial equivalence. |
| Sterility | Non-sterile | Non-sterile | | Unknown | Same. |
| Plate Styles and Sizes | Styles: Straight Plates/Dog Bone Plates, Curved Plates, L-Plates, Square & Matrix Plates, X-Plates, T-Plates/Y-Plates, Z-Plates, Chin Plates, LeFort Plates, Angled Plates, H-Plates, Orbital Floor Plates, Meshes, Burr-Hole Plates
Thickness (mm): 0.2, 0.3, 0.6, 0.8, 1, 1.5 | Styles: Straight Plates/Dog Bone Plates, Curved Plates, L-Plates, Square & Matrix Plates, X-Plates, T-Plates/Y-Plates, Z-Plates, Chin Plates, LeFort Plates, Angled Plates, H-Plates, Orbital Floor Plates, Additional Plate Options
Thickness (mm): 0.6, 0.8, 1., 1.5, 0.4, 0.5, 0.7, 0.8, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.6 | | Styles: Straight Plates/Dog Bone Plates, Curved Plates, L-Plates, Square & Matrix Plates, X-Plates, T-Plates/Y-Plates, Z-Plates, Chin Plates, LeFort Plates, Angled Plates, H-Plates, Orbital Floor Plates, Meshes, Burr-Hole Plates, Additional Plate Options
Thickness (mm): 0.2, 0.3, 0.5, 0.6, 1 | Equivalent. Subject styles and sizes are the same or very similar to those of the predicate. Any minor differences do not impact device performance as compared to the predicate devices; performance testing demonstrates that the Southern CMF System is substantially equivalent to the predicate devices.
The predicates includes plate styles not offered in the subject system which are not relevant to the comparison for substantial equivalence. |
| Bone Screws | Diameter (mm): Ø1.5, Ø1.8, Ø2.0, Ø2.3
Length (mm): 4 to 16
Style: Self-Tapping or Self-Drilling | Diameter (mm): Ø1.3, Ø1.5, Ø1.8, Ø1.95, Ø2.0, Ø2.3, Ø2.4, Ø2.7
Length (mm): 3 to 20
Style: Self-Tapping, Self-Drilling, Emergency, or IMF | | Diameter (mm): Ø1.5, Ø1.8, Ø2.0, Ø2.3
Length (mm): 2.5 to 19
Style: Self-Drilling, Emergency | Equivalent. Subject screw styles are the same as the predicate, and the subject sizes fall within the envelope of predicate screw sizes. The predicates include screw styles not offered in the subject system which are not relevant to the comparison for substantial equivalence. |
Page
{6}
3 | Page
# PERFORMANCE DATA
The Southern Maxillofacial (MF) System has been tested in the following test modes:
- Bone Plate Static and Dynamic Four-Point Bending per ASTM F382
- Screw Axial Pullout per ASTM F543
- Screw Torsional Breaking Force per ASTM F543
- Screw Insertion Torque per ASTM F543
The results of these non-clinical tests show that the strength of the Southern Maxillofacial (MF) System is sufficient for its intended use and the mechanical performance is substantially equivalent to legally marketed predicate devices.
# CONCLUSION
The overall technology characteristics and mechanical performance data lead to the conclusion that the Southern Maxillofacial (MF) System is substantially equivalent to the predicate device.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.