K252574 · Erchonia Corporation · OLI · Dec 15, 2025 · General, Plastic Surgery
Device Facts
Record ID
K252574
Device Name
Erchonia CLX (Model # CFL)
Applicant
Erchonia Corporation
Product Code
OLI · General, Plastic Surgery
Decision Date
Dec 15, 2025
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 878.5400
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
Low level laser system for aesthetic use
Device Story
Handheld, non-invasive, non-thermal low-level laser device for submental fat reduction. Emits green (520 nm) and violet (405 nm) light via two semiconductor diodes; light is shaped into a uniform line beam by internal optics. Operated by clinician in a clinic setting. Device induces temporary pores in adipocytes, releasing lipids into interstitial space for natural detoxification. Powered by rechargeable battery with inductive charging base. User controls device via touchscreen GUI. Output provides aesthetic improvement of submental fat without surgery, pain, or downtime. Benefits include non-invasive fat reduction and avoidance of surgical risks.
Clinical Evidence
Prospective, open-label, dual-center study (n=30 healthy females, age 18-65, BMI 32.73 kg/m2). Subjects received 8 treatments over 4 weeks. Primary endpoint: blinded evaluation of pre- and post-treatment photographs. 86.67% responder rate (26/30 subjects) achieved, defined as at least 2 of 3 blinded evaluators correctly identifying photo order. No device-related adverse events reported.
Technological Characteristics
Handheld electro-mechanical device; two semiconductor laser diodes (green 520nm, violet 405nm); 7.5mW output per diode; Class 2 laser (IEC 60825-1). Line-generating optics. Rechargeable battery with inductive charging. Touchscreen GUI. Complies with IEC 60601-1, IEC 60601-1-2, IEC 60601-1-11, and 21 CFR 1040.10/11.
Indications for Use
Indicated for use as a non-invasive dermatological aesthetic treatment for improving the appearance of submental fat in adult patients.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A Low Level Laser System for Aesthetic Use is a device using low level laser energy for the disruption of adipocyte cells within the fat layer for the release of fat and lipids from these cells for noninvasive aesthetic use.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The special control for this device is the FDA guidance document entitled “Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff; Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Low Level Laser System for Aesthetic Use.” See § 878.1(e) for the availability of this guidance document.
{0}
FDA U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION
December 15, 2025
Erchonia Corporation
Travis Sammons
Clinical Affairs Manager
112 Southchase Blvd.
Fountain Inn, South Carolina 29644
Re: K252574
Trade/Device Name: Erchonia CLX (Model # CFL)
Regulation Number: 21 CFR 878.5400
Regulation Name: Low Level Laser System For Aesthetic Use
Regulatory Class: Class II
Product Code: OLI
Dated: August 8, 2025
Received: August 14, 2025
Dear Travis Sammons:
We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device"
U.S. Food & Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993
www.fda.gov
{1}
K252574 - Travis Sammons
Page 2
(https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).
Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality System (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, 21 CFR 820.30, Design controls; 21 CFR 820.90, Nonconforming product; and 21 CFR 820.100, Corrective and preventive action. Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review, the QS regulation requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (21 CFR 820.30 and 21 CFR 820.70) and document changes and approvals in the device master record (21 CFR 820.181).
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reporting-combination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.
All medical devices, including Class I and unclassified devices and combination product device constituent parts are required to be in compliance with the final Unique Device Identification System rule ("UDI Rule"). The UDI Rule requires, among other things, that a device bear a unique device identifier (UDI) on its label and package (21 CFR 801.20(a)) unless an exception or alternative applies (21 CFR 801.20(b)) and that the dates on the device label be formatted in accordance with 21 CFR 801.18. The UDI Rule (21 CFR 830.300(a) and 830.320(b)) also requires that certain information be submitted to the Global Unique Device Identification Database (GUDID) (21 CFR Part 830 Subpart E). For additional information on these requirements, please see the UDI System webpage at https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/unique-device-identification-system-udi-system.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reporting-mdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn).
{2}
K252574 - Travis Sammons
Page 3
Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
TANISHA
L. HITHE
Digitally signed by
TANISHA L. HITHE -S
Date: 2025.12.15
15:45:45 -05'00'
Tanisha Hithe
Assistant Director
DHT4A: Division of General Surgery Devices
OHT4: Office of Surgical and
Infection Control Devices
Office of Product Evaluation and Quality
Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{3}
FORM FDA 3881 (6/20)
Page 1 of 1
PSC Publishing Services (301) 443-6740
EF
| DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration Indications for Use | Form Approved: OMB No. 0910-0120 Expiration Date: 06/30/2023 See PRA Statement below. |
| --- | --- |
| 510(k) Number (if known) K252574 | |
| Device Name Erchonia CLX (Model # CFL) | |
| Indications for Use (Describe) The Erchonia CLX is indicated for use as a non-invasive dermatological aesthetic treatment for improving the appearance of submental fat. | |
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) ☑ Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) ☐ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) | |
| CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED. | |
| This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.* | |
| The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to: Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov | |
| "An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number." | |
{4}
510(k) Summary K252574
This summary of 510(k) safety and effectiveness information is being submitted in accordance with the requirements of 21 CFR 807.92.
Owner Information
Name and Address of Sponsor / Manufacturer
Erchonia Corporation
112 Southchase Blvd.
Fountain Inn, SC 29644
Telephone: 321-473-1251
Fax: 321-473-1608
Establishment Registration Number
2032513
Name and Address of Official Correspondent
Erchonia Corporation
112 Southchase Blvd.
Fountain Inn, SC 29644
Contact: Travis Sammons
Telephone: 888-242-0571
Fax: 321-473-1608
Email: tsammons@erchonia.com
Date Prepared
12/14/2025
Device Information
Trade Name: Erchonia CLX (Model # CFL)
Common Name: Fat Reducing Low Level Laser
Classification Name: Low level laser system for aesthetic use. (21 CFR 878.5400)
Classification: Class II
Panel: General & Plastic Surgery
Product Code: OLI
Predicate Devices
Erchonia Emerald cleared under K192544
Erchonia Violet ZERONA® Z8 cleared under K243811
Device Description
The Erchonia® CLX Laser is intended for patients seeking a noninvasive, non-thermal alternative for fat reduction in the submental (chin) area, allowing them to resume daily activities without the downtime associated with surgery, pain, wounds, or compression garments. The CLX Laser delivers non-thermal, low-level laser energy that induces temporary pore in adipocytes, allowing fat and lipids to be released into the interstitial space, where they are naturally processed by the body’s detoxification pathways. The CLX is built on the proven clinical foundation of previous Erchonia low-level laser devices, including the Violet ZERONA® Z8, ZERONA®, ZERONA®-AD, ZERONA® Z6 OTC, Verju, and Emerald.
The CLX Laser is a handheld device that incorporates two semiconductor diodes emitting green (520 nm ±10 nm) and violet (405 nm ±10 nm) light. Both diodes emit non-thermal light at 7.5 mW (±0.50 mW)
{5}
output, classified as Class 2 laser sources under IEC. The non-thermal light output from each diode is collected and directed through a proprietary, patented lens and then shaped into a uniform line beam by an internal refractor. The device is powered by a rechargeable internal battery and supplied with an inductive charging base driven by an external Class II medical-grade power supply. The device’s control software, embedded in a RAM chip on the printed circuit board, manages all user interface operations. The graphical user interface (GUI) and touch-screen prompts allow for intuitive device control. The software has been developed and validated in accordance with the applicable FDA and ISO requirements for software design and validation.
## Intended Use
Low level laser system for aesthetic use
## Indications for Use
The Erchonia CLX is indicated for use as a non-invasive dermatological aesthetic treatment for improving the appearance of submental fat.
2
{6}
Device Comparison Table
| Device | Erchonia CLX (Model # CFL) | Erchonia Emerald | Erchonia Violet ZERONA® Z8 | Differences |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 510(k) # | K252574 | K192544 | K243811 | |
| | Subject Device | Primary Predicate Device | Secondary Predicate Device | |
| Manufacturer | Erchonia Corp | Erchonia Corp | Erchonia Corp | None |
| Laser Power Output | Green: 7.5mW ± .50mW Violet: 7.5mW ± .50mW | 16mW ± 1.25mW | 23mW ± 2mW | Difference supported by clinical performance testing. See Performance Testing – Clinical. |
| Wavelength | Green: 520nm ± 10 nm Violet: 405nm ± 10 nm | Green: 532nm ± 10 nm | Violet: 405nm ± 10 nm | The subject device utilizes similar green and violet wavelengths as the predicate devices. Clinical study completed to support the combination of wavelengths in the subject device. See Performance Testing – Clinical |
| Total Treatment Time Applied per Area | 15 minutes | 0-30 minutes | 20 minutes | Same as the primary predicate |
| Treatment Frequency | 2 x week, 4 weeks | 3 x week, 4 weeks | 3 x week, 2 weeks | Similar to predicate devices |
| Number of Laser Diodes | 2 | 10 | 8 | The Erchonia Emerald and Erchonia Violet ZERONA® Z8 are intended for treatment of larger anatomical regions (waist, hips, and thighs). In contrast, the Erchonia CLX is specifically designed for targeted application to the smaller submental area and, as a result, requires fewer laser diodes to deliver treatment effectively. |
| Total Joules per Treated Region | 13.5 Joules | 14.4 Joules | 13.8 Joules | Similar to predicate devices. Calculated from power and treatment time. |
| Energy Source | Diode laser energy collected then dispersed via line generating optics | Diode laser energy collected then dispersed via line generating optics | Diode laser energy collected then dispersed via line generating optics | None |
| User Interface | Touchscreen | Touchscreen | Touchscreen | None |
| Intended Use | Low level laser system for aesthetic use | Low level laser system for aesthetic use | Low level laser system for aesthetic use | None |
| Indication for Use | The Erchonia CLX is indicated for use as a non-invasive dermatological aesthetic treatment for improving the appearance of submental fat. | Erchonia® Emerald (Model# SHL) Laser is indicated for use as a non-invasive dermatological aesthetic treatment for the reduction of body circumference in individuals with a Body Mass Index (BMI) up to 40 kg/m2 | The Zerona® VZ8 is indicated for use as a non-invasive dermatological aesthetic treatment for the reduction of body circumference. | Difference supported by clinical performance testing. See Performance Testing – Clinical. |
| Product Code | OLI | OLI | OLI | None |
{7}
4
# Comparison of Technological Characteristics with the Predicate Devices
The Erchonia CLX and the predicate devices (Erchonia Emerald, K192544 and Erchonia Violet ZERONA® Z8, K243811) share the same intended use, core Erchonia low-level laser technology, mechanism of action, and energy source. Specifically, all devices utilize diode laser energy collected then dispersed via line-generating optics to disrupt adipocytes and promote the release of fat without damaging surrounding tissues.
The CLX device emits green and violet wavelengths, identical to those of the predicate devices, ensuring equivalent photochemical interactions with adipocytes. The CLX contains fewer diodes due to its focused indication for the submental area, as compared to the predicate devices which target larger anatomical regions. New clinical data demonstrate the CLX is safe and effective for this more targeted application. Importantly, the subject device and the predicate devices share similar Total Treatment Time Applied per Area, Treatment Frequency, and Total Joules per Treated Region, further supporting substantial equivalence.
# Performance Standards
The Erchonia® CLX (Model # CFL) complies with FDA’s performance standards for light-emitting products (21CFR 1040.10 and 21 CFR 1040.11 by Laser Notice #50).
# Sterilization and Shelf-Life
The device is not provided sterile.
The device is not affected by shelf-life because it is an electro-mechanical device that is not sterile and whose components will not degrade over time while simply sitting in storage prior to initial use.
# Performance Testing-Animal
No animal testing conducted
# Performance Testing-Clinical
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this clinical study was to evaluate the efficacy of the Erchonia® CLX Laser in providing noninvasive fat reduction in the submental area.
STUDY DESIGN: The study was a prospective open-label dual-center design with post-study independent blinded primary outcome analysis.
SUBJECTS: The primary intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis population comprised thirty (30) subjects. Subjects were healthy females aged 18 to 65 years who presented with visible fat bulges in the submental area and who subsequently satisfied all qualification criteria including agreeing to maintain body weight within $\pm 5\%$ and to refrain from partaking in any other treatment to promote body contouring and/or weight loss during study participation. Subjects in the study ITT population were Caucasian (100%) females (100%) with an average age of 45.55 years and average BMI of $32.73~\mathrm{kg/m^2}$.
STUDY TREATMENT: Subjects received eight (8) 15-minute treatments with the Erchonia® CLX to the submental region over four (4) consecutive weeks; two (2) procedures per week; each at least two days apart and performed at the test site. All subjects received active study treatment.
STUDY RESULTS: Primary efficacy outcome assessment involved blinded, de-coded and randomized post-study evaluation of before (Pre-Treatment) and after (Week 16 12-Weeks Post-Treatment Endpoint) subject digital photographs by three (3) Independent Blinded Evaluators. Attainment of primary efficacy outcome success was pre-established as the
{8}
proportion of accurately identified subject pre- and post-treatment photographs by at least two of the three (2 of 3) Independent Blinded Evaluators, with a clinically important outcome predefined as at least 2 of the 3 Blinded Independent Evaluators correctly identifying the order of a subject’s Pre-Treatment and Week 16 12-WeeksPost-Treatment photographs for 80% or more of subjects (Responder Rate of ≥ 80%). Responder Rate for the primary ITT subject population was 86.67% (26 of 30 subjects).
ADVERSE EVENTS: There were no study device- or treatment-related adverse events or other safety-related events reported or recorded throughout the course of this clinical study. Therefore, the application of the Erchonia® CLX for the intended indication and patient population did not raise any safety concerns.
CONCLUSION: These study results support the claim of the Erchonia® CLX as an effective non-invasive treatment to affect the appearance of fat in the submental area.
## Biocompatibility
Not applicable. The device does not come in contact with the skin or any other bodily tissue.
## Risk Assessment
The Erchonia® CLX Laser is acceptable in accordance with IEC 60601 and IEC 60825, by virtue of Engineering and third-party verification. All identified risks have been mitigated to ensure the lowest acceptable risk possible using the ISO 14971 standard framework.
## Performance Data
Safety and electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) testing was conducted on the Erchonia EVRL Laser, which shares the same platform as the Erchonia CLX. The Erchonia CLX and Erchonia EVRL devices share identical components, with the sole difference being the wavelength of emitted light. The CLX emits green and violet wavelengths, whereas the EVRL emits red and violet wavelengths. This variation in emission wavelength does not impact the safety or EMC characteristics of the device. Accordingly, the testing conducted under the following standards is directly applicable to the CLX:
- IEC 60601-1 (General Requirements for Basic Safety and Essential Performance)
- IEC 60601-1-6 (Usability)
- IEC 60601-1-11 (Home Use)
- IEC 60601-1-2 (EMC Requirements)
- IEC 60825-1 (Laser Safety)
## Compliance with Voluntary Standards
The Erchonia® CLX Laser complies with the following voluntary standards:
IEC 60601-1-2:2014+AMD1:2020 Edition 4.1
IEC 60601-1:2005+AMD1:2012+AMD2:2020 Edition 3.2
IEC 60601-1-11:2015+AMD1:2020 Edition 2.1
IEC 60825-1:2014 Edition 3.0
## Conclusion
In conclusion, the Erchonia CLX Laser shares the same or similar technological characteristics with the predicate devices Erchonia Emerald (K192544) and Erchonia Violet ZERONA Z8 (K243811), including wavelength, treatment frequency, total joules per treated region, energy source, and mechanism of action. Clinical data provided in this submission confirm that minor technological differences do not raise new concerns regarding safety or effectiveness and sufficiently support the intended use. Additionally, extensive research on Erchonia's green and violet wavelengths—analogous to those used by the subject
5
{9}
device—has demonstrated their safety and effectiveness for non-invasive fat reduction under the OLI product code. Therefore, the Erchonia CLX Laser is substantially equivalent to the predicate devices and is safe and effective for its intended indication for use as a non-invasive dermatological aesthetic treatment for improving the appearance of submental fat.
6
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.