K251401 · Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania · KPS · Nov 25, 2025 · Radiology
Device Facts
Record ID
K251401
Device Name
PennPET Explorer Positron Emission Tomograph
Applicant
Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania
Product Code
KPS · Radiology
Decision Date
Nov 25, 2025
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 892.1200
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
The PennPET Explorer PET system is a diagnostic imaging device that, together with the co-located IQon CT scanner, combines Positron Emission Tomography (PET) and X-ray Computed Tomography (CT) systems. The IQon CT system images anatomical cross-sections by computer reconstruction of X-ray transmission data. The PET system images the distribution of PET anatomy-specific radiopharmaceuticals in the patient. Together, these systems are used for the purposes of detecting, localizing, diagnosing, staging, re-staging, and follow-up for monitoring therapy response of various diseases in oncology, cardiology, and neurology. The system is intended to image the whole body, heart, brain, lung, gastrointestinal, bone, lymphatic, and other major organs for a wide range of patient types, sizes, and extent of diseases. The CT scanner can also be operated as fully functional, independent diagnostic tool, including for use in radiation therapy planning.
Device Story
PennPET Explorer is a PET/CT imaging system comprising a 142 cm axial field-of-view (AFOV) PET gantry co-located with a Philips IQon CT scanner. PET gantry consists of six stacked modular detector rings based on Philips Vereos technology. System inputs include X-ray transmission data (CT) and coincidence events from radiopharmaceutical distribution (PET). Data acquisition computers process signals from all six rings simultaneously. Output consists of reconstructed PET and CT images for clinical review by radiologists. Used in clinical settings for oncology, cardiology, and neurology. Extended AFOV allows whole-body imaging in a single frame without patient movement. Improved sensitivity and time-of-flight resolution benefit patients by enabling faster scans or lower radiopharmaceutical doses. Healthcare providers use output for disease staging, localization, and therapy response monitoring.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical study performed. Substantial equivalence supported by non-clinical bench testing, including NEMA NU 2-2018 performance measurements, electromagnetic compatibility (IEC 60601-1-2), and electrical safety (IEC 60601-1). Simulated use testing and review of sample clinical images by board-certified radiologists confirmed image quality is as good or better than the predicate device due to superior sensitivity.
Technological Characteristics
Modular PET gantry with six stacked detector rings (142 cm AFOV). Components derived from Philips Vereos PET. Energy source: ionizing radiation (PET radiopharmaceuticals and X-ray). Connectivity: networked for data processing. Software: modified firmware for multi-ring readout and data processing. Cooling system optimized for multi-ring operation. Standards: NEMA NU 2-2018, IEC 60601-1, IEC 60601-1-2, ANSI AAMI ES60601-1.
Indications for Use
Indicated for diagnostic imaging of whole body, heart, brain, lung, gastrointestinal, bone, lymphatic, and other major organs in patients of varying types and sizes for detection, localization, diagnosis, staging, re-staging, and therapy monitoring in oncology, cardiology, and neurology. CT component indicated for anatomical cross-sectional imaging and radiation therapy planning.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An emission computed tomography system is a device intended to detect the location and distribution of gamma ray- and positron-emitting radionuclides in the body and produce cross-sectional images through computer reconstruction of the data. This generic type of device may include signal analysis and display equipment, patient and equipment supports, radionuclide anatomical markers, component parts, and accessories.
Predicate Devices
Ingenuity TF Digital (Vereos) PET/CT System (K123599)
Ingenuity TF Big Bore (Gemini TF Big Bore) PET/CT System (K081135)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
FDA U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION
November 25, 2025
Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania
Joel Karp
Section Chief, Physics & Instrumentation Group
5th Floor, Franklin Building
3451 Walnut Street
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6205
Re: K251401
Trade/Device Name: PennPET Explorer Positron Emission Tomograph
Regulation Number: 21 CFR 892.1200
Regulation Name: Emission Computed Tomography System
Regulatory Class: Class II
Product Code: KPS, JAK
Dated: October 10, 2025
Received: October 10, 2025
Dear Joel Karp:
We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of
U.S. Food & Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993
www.fda.gov
{1}
K251401 - Joel Karp
Page 2
Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).
Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality System (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, 21 CFR 820.30, Design controls; 21 CFR 820.90, Nonconforming product; and 21 CFR 820.100, Corrective and preventive action. Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review, the QS regulation requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (21 CFR 820.30 and 21 CFR 820.70) and document changes and approvals in the device master record (21 CFR 820.181).
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reporting-combination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.
All medical devices, including Class I and unclassified devices and combination product device constituent parts are required to be in compliance with the final Unique Device Identification System rule ("UDI Rule"). The UDI Rule requires, among other things, that a device bear a unique device identifier (UDI) on its label and package (21 CFR 801.20(a)) unless an exception or alternative applies (21 CFR 801.20(b)) and that the dates on the device label be formatted in accordance with 21 CFR 801.18. The UDI Rule (21 CFR 830.300(a) and 830.320(b)) also requires that certain information be submitted to the Global Unique Device Identification Database (GUDID) (21 CFR Part 830 Subpart E). For additional information on these requirements, please see the UDI System webpage at https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/unique-device-identification-system-udi-system.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reporting-mdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the
{2}
K251401 - Joel Karp
Page 3
Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,

Daniel M. Krainak, Ph.D.
Assistant Director
DHT8C: Division of Radiological
Imaging and Radiation Therapy Devices
OHT8: Office of Radiological Health
Office of Product Evaluation and Quality
Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{3}
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
Indications for Use
Form Approved: OMB No. 0910-0120
Expiration Date: 07/31/2026
See PRA Statement below.
510(k) Number (if known)
K251401
Device Name
PennPET Explorer Positron Emission Tomograph
Indications for Use (Describe)
The PennPET Explorer PET system is a diagnostic imaging device that, together with the co-located IQon CT scanner, combines Positron Emission Tomography (PET) and X-ray Computed Tomography (CT) systems. The IQon CT system images anatomical cross-sections by computer reconstruction of X-ray transmission data. The PET system images the distribution of PET anatomy-specific radiopharmaceuticals in the patient. Together, these systems are used for the purposes of detecting, localizing, diagnosing, staging, re-staging, and follow-up for monitoring therapy response of various diseases in oncology, cardiology, and neurology.
The system is intended to image the whole body, heart, brain, lung, gastrointestinal, bone, lymphatic, and other major organs for a wide range of patient types, sizes, and extent of diseases. The CT scanner can also be operated as fully functional, independent diagnostic tool, including for use in radiation therapy planning.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
☑ Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
☐ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
*DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services
Food and Drug Administration
Office of Chief Information Officer
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff
PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
FORM FDA 3881 (8/23)
Page 1 of 1
PSC Publishing Services (301) 443-6740
{4}
510(k) Summary
# 1. 510(k) Summary in accordance with 21 CFR 807.92
K251401
| Date: | 2025-10-24 |
| --- | --- |
| Submitter: | Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania
5th Floor, Franklin Building
3451 Walnut Street
Philadelphia, PA 19104-6205 |
| Primary Contact Person: | Joel S. Karp, PhD
Section Chief, Physics & Instrumentation Group
Department of Radiology
University of Pennsylvania
Tel: +1 215-573-4998
E-mail: joelkarp@pennmedicine.upenn.edu |
| Device Trade Name: | PennPET Explorer Positron Emission Tomograph |
| Common Name: | Positron Emission Tomography (PET) System
Computed Tomography (CT) System |
| Classification Panel: | Radiology |
| Classification Names: | Emission Computed Tomography System, 21 CFR 892.1200
X-ray Computed Tomography, 21 CFR 892.1750 |
| Primary Product Code: | KPS |
| Secondary Product Code: | JAK |
| Device Class: | Class II |
| Predicate Device: | K123599, Ingenuity TF Digital (Vereos) PET/CT System |
| Reference Devices: | K172406, Ingenuity TF PET/CT System
K081135, Ingenuity TF Big Bore (Gemini TF Big Bore) PET/CT System |
| Device Description: | The PennPET Explorer is based on the PET technology of its predicate device, the Philips Vereos PET/CT scanner, but follows the model of its reference device, the previous Philips Gemini TF PET/CT by having co-located—yet separated—PET and CT scanners served by a common patient table. The PennPET Explorer uses a newly designed 142 cm axial field-of-view (AFOV) PET gantry and is intended to be used with a co-located Philips IQon multi-energy CT and patient table.
The PennPET Explorer PET gantry is a modular system comprising six PET detector rings stacked axially, yielding a 142 cm axial FOV. This allows imaging of the human head, torso, and upper legs in a single frame without moving the patient. The entire imaging chain of components from the detectors to the data acquisition computers is supplied by Philips and consists of components that are used in the |
510(k) Summary 2025-10-24.docx
Revised: 10/24/25 11:43 AM
{5}
510(k) Summary
| | Vereos PET scanner. The mechanical structure and data processing software have been modified and developed to handle the additional data from all six PET rings simultaneously.
Each of the six detector rings is substantially equivalent to a Philips Vereos PET scanner. |
| --- | --- |
| Indications for Use / Intended Use: | The PennPET Explorer PET system is a diagnostic imaging device that, together with the co-located IQon CT scanner, combines Positron Emission Tomography (PET) and X-ray Computed Tomography (CT) systems. The IQon CT system images anatomical cross-sections by computer reconstruction of X-ray transmission data. The PET system images the distribution of PET anatomy-specific radiopharmaceuticals in the patient. Together, these systems are used for the purposes of detecting, localizing, diagnosing, staging, re-staging, and follow-up for monitoring therapy response of various diseases in oncology, cardiology, and neurology.
The system is intended to image the whole body, heart, brain, lung, gastrointestinal, bone, lymphatic, and other major organs for a wide range of patient types, sizes, and extent of diseases. The CT scanner can also be operated as fully functional, independent diagnostic tool, including for use in radiation therapy planning. |
| Comparison of Indications for Use: | There are two differences between the indications for use for the Philips Vereos (predicate device) and the PennPET Explorer:
1. The Philips Vereos combines the PET and CT into a single unit, while the PennPET Explorer is a standalone PET Imaging system that uses CT data and patient positioning provided by a collocated but electrically and mechanically independent Philips IQon CT scanner. This two-unit configuration is functionally equivalent to the single-unit Vereos.
2. The Philips Vereos’ Indications for Use states that “Both subsystems can also be operated as fully functional independent diagnostic tools.” Currently accepted clinical practice requires CT-based measured attenuation correction for any PET scan, so the PennPET Explorer Indications for Use do not include PET-only operation. |
| Technology: | The PennPET Explorer employs the same fundamental technology as the currently marketed and predicate device, Ingenuity TF Digital (Vereos) PET/CT (K123599).
The PennPET Explorer modifies the currently marketed and predicate device, Ingenuity TF Digital (Vereos) PET/CT (K123599) by extending the axial field-of-view (AFOV) from 16.4 cm to 142 cm. This is accomplished by combining six Vereos detector rings stacked axially into a single gantry. Other changes to support the multi-ring configuration include i) modified sensor board firmware to allow |
510(k) Summary 2025-10-24.docx
Revised: 10/24/25 11:43 AM
{6}
510(k) Summary
| | readout of all detector elements and data collection over the full 142-cm axial range, ii) modified cooling to enable a multi-ring configuration with minimal gaps between rings and to allow for operation at a lower temperature, leading to improved time-of-flight resolution, iii) modified couch to enable the full travel for PET/CT imaging, iv) modified software to support data processing of the larger, multi-ring data sets. All system components are identical to the marketed predicate device, Ingenuity TF Digital (Vereos) PET/CT (K123599) and have the same functionality as the currently marketed and predicate device (K123599). The extension of the AFOV by combining six Vereos rings leads to a sensitivity gain for measuring coincidence events, but otherwise performs in a substantially equivalent manner as the single-ring Vereos. The extension of the AFOV in the PennPET Explorer and related modifications do not impact safety and effectiveness of the PET/CT system. |
| --- | --- |
| Summary of Non-Clinical Performance Data: | Non-clinical performance testing has been performed on the PennPET Explorer and demonstrates compliance with the following International and FDA recognized consensus standards and FDA guidance document(s). Design Verification activities demonstrate that the PennPET Explorer meets the established design input requirements. Design Verification also included image quality verification and risk analysis risk mitigation testing. The following tests were performed on the PennPET Explorer according to the following international standards and FDA recognized consensus standards and FDA guidance documents:
- NEMA NU 2-2018, 12-326, Performance Measurements of Positron Emission Tomographs
- IEC 60601-1-2 Edition 4.1 2020-09 CONSOLIDATED VERSION 19-36 Medical electrical equipment - Part 1-2: General requirements for basic safety and essential performance - Collateral Standard: Electromagnetic disturbances - Requirements and tests
- AIM Standard 7321731 Rev. 3.00 2021-06-04 19-45 Medical Electrical Equipment and System Electromagnetic Immunity Test for Exposure to Radio Frequency Identification Readers - An AIM Standard
- IEC TR 60601-4-2 Edition 1.0 2016-05 19-19 Medical electrical equipment - Part 4-2: Guidance and interpretation - Electromagnetic immunity: performance of medical electrical equipment and medical electrical systems |
510(k) Summary 2025-10-24.docx
Revised: 10/24/25 11:43 AM
{7}
510(k) Summary
- IEC 60601-1 Edition 3.2 2020-08 CONSOLIDATED VERSION 19-49 Medical electrical equipment - Part 1: General requirements for basic safety and essential performance
- ANSI AAMI ES60601-1:2005/(R)2012 & A1:2012, C1:2009/(R)2012 & A2:2010/(R)2012 (Cons.Text) [Incl. AMD2:2021]
The following tests were performed on the marketed predicate device, Ingenuity TF Digital (Vereos) PET/CT (K123599) according to the following international standards and FDA recognized consensus standards and FDA guidance documents:
- IEC 60601-1:1988/A1:1991/A2:1995, Medical electrical equipment -- Part 1: General requirements for safety. Including applicable US and international deviations.
- IEC 60601-1-1:2000, Medical electrical equipment -- Part 1-1: General requirements for safety – Collateral standard: Safety requirements for medical electrical systems
- IEC 60601-1-2:2001/A1:2004, Medical electrical equipment -- Part 1-2: General requirements for safety - Collateral standard: Electromagnetic compatibility - Requirements and tests
- IEC 60601-1-3:1994, Medical electrical equipment -- Part 1: General requirements for safety -- 3. Collateral standard: General requirements for radiation protection in diagnostic X-ray equipment
- IEC 60601-1-4:1996/A1:1999, Medical electrical equipment -- Part 1-4: General requirements for safety - Collateral standard: Programmable electrical medical systems
- IEC 60601-2-32:1994, Medical electrical equipment -- Part 2: Particular requirements for the safety of associated equipment of X-ray equipment
- IEC 60601-2-44:2001/A1:2002, Medical electrical equipment -- Part 2-44: Particular requirements for the safety of X-ray equipment for computed tomography
- NEMA NU2-2007, Measurements of Positron Emission Tomographs
Device-Specific Guidance Documents:
- Guidance for the Submission of Premarket Notifications for Emission Computed Tomography Devices and Accessories (SPECT and PET) and Nuclear Tomography Systems, December 3, 1998
- Guidance for Industry and FDA Administration Staff - Content of Premarket Submissions for Device Software Functions, June 14, 2023
510(k) Summary 2025-10-24.docx
Revised: 10/24/25 11:43 AM
{8}
510(k) Summary
| | • Guidance for Industry and FDA Administration Staff - Cybersecurity in Medical Devices: Quality System Considerations and Content of Premarket Submissions, June 27, 2025
• Guidance for Industry and FDA Administration Staff - Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC) of Medical Devices, June 6, 2022
Non-clinical design validation testing demonstrates that the PennPET Explorer can be used as defined in its clinical workflow and intended use. This testing includes internal PET AR image evaluation as well as External clinical images reviewed by certified board radiologists.
All the testing described above were used to support the substantial equivalence of the PennPET Explorer with extended AFOV and revised software and demonstrate that the PennPET Explorer with extended AFOV and revised software application:
• Complies with the aforementioned international and FDA-recognized consensus standards and/or FDA device specific guidance document, and;
• Meets the acceptance criteria and is adequate for its intended use.
Therefore, the PennPET Explorer is substantially equivalent to the currently marketed and predicate device, Ingenuity TF Digital (Vereos) PET/CT (K123599) in terms of safety and effectiveness. |
| --- | --- |
| Summary of Clinical Performance Data: | The PennPET Explorer did not require any clinical study. The clinical evaluation was conducted via simulated use testing and is accounted in the summary of “Non-Clinical Testing” section of the summary. The substantial equivalence to the currently marketed and predicate device, Ingenuity TF Digital (Vereos) PET/CT (K123599) was demonstrated with the following attributes:
• Design Features
• Indication for use
• Technological characteristics
• Safety and effectiveness
Sample clinical images were reviewed and evaluated by certified radiologists. All images were evaluated to be as good or better than the predicate device due to its superior sensitivity. |
| Substantial Equivalence Conclusion: | The PennPET Explorer is substantially equivalent to the currently marketed and predicate device, Ingenuity TF Digital (Vereos) PET/CT (K123599), in terms of design features, indications for use, fundamental scientific technology and safety and effectiveness, with the advantages of improved time-of-flight resolution and improved sensitivity for detecting coincidence events due to the longer AFOV. |
510(k) Summary 2025-10-24.docx
Revised: 10/24/25 11:43 AM
{9}
510(k) Summary
| | The extension of the AFOV for the PennPET Explorer does not introduce any new risks nor impact the safety and effectiveness of the PennPET Explorer.
Additionally, substantial equivalence was demonstrated by non-clinical (verification and validation) performance tests provided in this 510(k) premarket notification. These tests demonstrate that the PennPET Explorer complies with the design input requirements and the international and FDA-recognized consensus standards and that it is as safe and effective as the currently marketed and predicate device, Ingenuity TF Digital (Vereos) PET/CT (K123599) without raising any new safety and/or effectiveness concerns. |
| --- | --- |
510(k) Summary 2025-10-24.docx
Revised: 10/24/25 11:43 AM
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.