The Access Thyroglobulin Antibody II assay is a paramagnetic particle, chemiluminescent immunoassay for the quantitative determination of thyroglobulin antibody levels in human serum and plasma using the Access Immunoassay Systems. The measurement of thyroid autoantibodies may aid in the diagnosis of Hashimoto’s disease, nontoxic goiter, and Graves’ disease.
Device Story
Access Thyroglobulin Antibody II is a sequential two-step immunoenzymatic sandwich assay for human serum/plasma. Input: patient sample added to reaction vessel with thyroglobulin-coated paramagnetic particles. Process: TgAb binds to particles; unbound material washed away; thyroglobulin-alkaline phosphatase conjugate added; second incubation; unbound material washed away; chemiluminescent substrate added. Output: light production measured by luminometer, proportional to analyte concentration. Used in clinical laboratories on Dxl 9000 Access Immunoassay Analyzer. Analyte concentration determined automatically from stored calibration. Results assist clinicians in diagnosing thyroid-related autoimmune conditions.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Precision evaluated per CLSI EP05-A3 (N=80 per sample for within-lab; N=75 for instrument-to-instrument and lot-to-lot). Linearity assessed per CLSI EP06 (0.04–2,911.95 IU/mL). Detection capability (LoB 0.1 IU/mL, LoD 0.2 IU/mL, LoQ 1.5 IU/mL) determined per CLSI EP17-A2. Method comparison (N=114 patient samples) against predicate showed Passing-Bablok slope 0.97, intercept -0.37, R² 1.00.
Indicated for quantitative determination of thyroglobulin antibody levels in human serum and plasma to aid in the diagnosis of Hashimoto’s disease, nontoxic goiter, and Graves’ disease.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A thyroid autoantibody immunological test system is a device that consists of the reagents used to measure by immunochemical techniques the thyroid autoantibodies (antibodies produced against the body's own tissues). Measurement of thyroid autoantibodies may aid in the diagnosis of certain thyroid disorders, such as Hashimoto's disease (chronic lymphocytic thyroiditis), nontoxic goiter (enlargement of thyroid gland), Grave's disease (enlargement of the thyroid gland with protrusion of the eyeballs), and cancer of the thyroid.
{0}
FDA U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY
ASSAY ONLY
## I Background Information:
A 510(k) Number
K240996
B Applicant
Beckman Coulter, Inc.
C Proprietary and Established Names
Access Thyroglobulin Antibody II
D Regulatory Information
| Product Code(s) | Classification | Regulation Section | Panel |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| JNL | Class II | 21 CFR 866.5870 Thyroid Autoantibody Immunological System | IM - Immunology |
## II Submission/Device Overview:
A Purpose for Submission:
Modification of the previously cleared device – the change of substrate for the assay on the DxI 9000 Immunoassay Analyzer
B Measurand:
Anti-Thyroglobulin autoantibody
C Type of Test:
Quantitative, Chemiluminescent immunoassay
## III Intended Use/Indications for Use:
A Intended Use(s):
Food and Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
www.fda.gov
{1}
See Indications for Use below.
## B Indication(s) for Use:
The Access Thyroglobulin Antibody II assay is a paramagnetic particle, chemiluminescent immunoassay for the quantitative determination of thyroglobulin antibody levels in human serum and plasma using the Access Immunoassay Systems. The measurement of thyroid autoantibodies may aid in the diagnosis of Hashimoto’s disease, nontoxic goiter, and Graves’ disease.
## C Special Conditions for Use Statement(s):
Rx - For Prescription Use Only
For In Vitro Diagnostic Use
## D Special Instrument Requirements:
DxI 9000 Access Immunoassay Analyzer (K221225)
## IV Device/System Characteristics:
### A Device Description:
Each Access Thyroglobulin Antibody II (TgAb II) reagent kit contains two reagent packs (100 determinations, 50 tests/pack). Each pack contains the following:
- R1a (3.25 mL): Paramagnetic particles coated with streptavidin and coupled to biotinylated human thyroglobulin, suspended in a TRIS buffer with protein (bovine) and preservatives
- R1b (13.25 mL): Human thyroglobulin alkaline phosphatase (bovine) conjugate in a TRIS buffer with protein (bovine) and preservatives
- R1c (4.5 mL): TRIS buffer with bovine protein and preservatives
- R1d (3.1 mL): TRIS buffer with blocking polymer and preservatives
Materials needed but not supplied with reagent kit.
- Access Thyroglobulin Antibody II Calibrators: at 0, 50, 250, 500, 1000, and 2500 IU/mL
- Quality Control (QC) materials: commercial control material
- Substrate: Lumi-Phos PRO
- UniCel DxI Wash Buffer II
The modification of the Access Thyroglobulin Antibody II is to replace substrate (Lumi-Phos 530) with a new substrate, Lumi-Phos PRO, on the DxI 9000 Access Immunoassay Analyzer.
### B Principle of Operation:
The Access Thyroglobulin Antibody II assay is a sequential two-step immunoenzymatic (“sandwich”) assay. A sample is added to a reaction vessel with paramagnetic particles coated with the thyroglobulin protein. The TgAb in the sample binds to the thyroglobulin coated on the
K240996 - Page 2 of 8
{2}
particles. After incubation, materials bound to the solid phase are held in a magnetic field while unbound materials are washed away. The thyroglobulin-alkaline phosphatase conjugate is added and binds to the TgAb. After a second incubation, materials bound to the solid phase are held in a magnetic field while unbound materials are washed away. Then the chemiluminescent substrate is added to the vessel and light generated by the reaction is measured with a luminometer. The light production is directly proportional to the concentration of analyte in the sample. Analyte concentration is automatically determined from a stored calibration.
# V Substantial Equivalence Information:
# A Predicate Device Name(s):
Access Thyroglobulin Antibody II
# B Predicate 510(k) Number(s):
K213517
# C Comparison with Predicate:
| Device & Predicate Device(s): | K240996 (Candidate) | K213517 (Predicate) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Device Trade Name | Access Thyroglobulin Antibody II | Access Thyroglobulin Antibody II |
| General Device Characteristic Similarities | | |
| Intended Use/Indications For Use | The Access Thyroglobulin Antibody II assay is a paramagnetic particle, chemiluminescent immunoassay for the quantitative determination of thyroglobulin antibody levels in human serum and plasma using the Access Immunoassay Systems. The measurement of thyroid autoantibodies may aid in the diagnosis of Hashimoto's disease, nontoxic goiter, and Graves' disease. | Same |
| Analyte | Thyroglobulin antibody (TgAb) | Same |
| Methodology | Chemiluminescent immunoassay | Same |
| Sample Type | Human serum and plasma (EDTA or lithium heparin) | Same |
| Sample Volume | 10 μL | Same |
| Calibration | 6-level multipoint calibration curve | Same |
| Measuring Interval | 1.5–2500 IU/mL | Same |
K240996 - Page 3 of 8
{3}
K240996 - Page 4 of 8
| General Device Characteristic Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Instrument | DxI 9000 Access Immunoassay Analyzer | Access 2 Immunoassay System; UniCel DxI 800 Immunoassay System; UniCel DxI 600 Immunoassay System |
| Substrate | Lumi-Phos PRO substrate | Access Substrate |
## VI Standards/Guidance Documents Referenced:
The following Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines were used:
- CLSI EP05-A3, Evaluation of Precision of Quantitative Measurement Procedures; Approved Guideline—Third Edition
- CLSI EP06, 2nd Edition, Evaluation of Linearity of Quantitative, Measurement Procedures
- CLSI EP09c, 3rd Edition, Measurement Procedure Comparison and Bias Estimation Using Patient Samples
- CLSI EP17-A2, Evaluation of Detection Capability for Clinical Laboratory Measurement Procedures; Approved Guideline– Second Edition
## VII Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
### A Analytical Performance:
All results presented below met the manufacturer’s pre-determined acceptance criteria.
1. Precision/Reproducibility:
Precision testing was performed in accordance with CLSI Guideline EP05-A3.
a) Within-Laboratory Precision:
The studies were performed at a single site using one lot of the modified Access Thyroglobulin Antibody II (TgAb II) reagent on one DxI 9000 Access Immunoassay Analyzer. Five samples (four native serum sample pools and one contrived serum sample) were run in duplicate per run, two runs daily over 20 days, resulting in 80 datapoints for each sample. The data were analyzed by ANOVA methods for within-run (repeatability), between-run, between-day, and within-laboratory precision. The mean (IU/mL), standard deviation (SD, IU/mL), and percent coefficient of variation (%CV) for each sample are summarized in table below:
{4}
| Sample | Mean (IU/mL) | N | Within-Run | | Between-Run | | Between-Day | | Within-Laboratory | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV |
| 1 | 2.4 | 80 | 0.1 | 4.2 | 0.1 | 2.5 | 0.1 | 2.0 | 0.1 | 5.2 |
| 2 | 188 | 80 | 6.6 | 3.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 3.9 | 2.1 | 7.6 | 4.1 |
| 3 | 727 | 80 | 22.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 21.3 | 2.9 | 30.6 | 4.2 |
| 4 | 1493 | 80 | 35.5 | 2.4 | 39.9 | 2.7 | 51.2 | 3.4 | 74.0 | 5.0 |
| 5 | 1925 | 80 | 53.5 | 2.8 | 56.9 | 3.0 | 80.9 | 4.2 | 112.5 | 5.8 |
# b) Instrument-to-Instrument Precision:
The study was performed using three individual DxI 9000 Access Immunoassay Analyzers with a single lot of the modified Access TgAb II reagent. Five samples (four native serum sample pools and one native serum supplemented with TgAb for high analytical measuring interval (AMI) values) were tested in replicates of five per run, one run per day, over five days, resulting in 75 datapoints for each sample. The results are summarized in table below:
| Sample | Mean (IU/mL) | N | Within-Run (Repeatability) | | Between-Day | | Between-Instrument | | Reproducibility | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV |
| 1 | 2.6 | 75 | 0.1 | 4.7 | 0.1 | 1.9 | 0.1 | 2.8 | 0.2 | 5.8 |
| 2 | 184 | 75 | 4.1 | 2.2 | 2.9 | 1.6 | 4.8 | 2.6 | 6.9 | 3.8 |
| 3 | 744 | 75 | 19.2 | 2.6 | 12.1 | 1.6 | 2.5 | 0.3 | 22.8 | 3.1 |
| 4 | 1503 | 75 | 43.9 | 2.9 | 15.2 | 1.0 | 26.3 | 1.8 | 53.4 | 3.6 |
| 5 | 1966 | 75 | 68.2 | 3.5 | 102.2 | 5.2 | 23.9 | 1.2 | 125.1 | 6.4 |
# c) Lot-to-Lot Precision
The lot-to-lot precision of Lumi-Phos PRO Substrate was assessed in K223921.
The reagent lot-to-lot precision was evaluated using three lots of the modified Access Thyroglobulin Antibody II (TgAb II) reagent and one calibrator lot on each of three DxI 9000 Access Immunoassay Analyzers. For each instrument, four native serum samples were run in five replicates per run, one run per day over 5 days, resulting in 75 datapoints per sample. Representative results from one instrument are summarized in table below:
| Sample | Mean (IU/mL) | N | Within-Run (Repeatability) | | Between-Day | | Between-Reagent Lot | | Total | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV |
| 1 | 3.8 | 75 | 0.16 | 4.1 | 0.13 | 3.5 | 0.00 | 0.0 | 0.20 | 5.3 |
| 2 | 179 | 75 | 4.67 | 2.6 | 2.48 | 1.4 | 3.78 | 2.1 | 6.50 | 3.6 |
| 3 | 468 | 75 | 16.36 | 3.5 | 12.62 | 2.7 | 19.42 | 4.2 | 28.35 | 6.1 |
| 4 | 1590 | 75 | 71.92 | 4.5 | 56.66 | 3.6 | 107.35 | 6.8 | 141.09 | 8.9 |
K240996 - Page 5 of 8
{5}
2. Linearity:
The linearity of the modified Access Thyroglobulin Antibody II assay was assessed in accordance with the CLSI Guideline EP06, 2nd Ed. One individual native low sample, four low native pooled samples, and five high pooled native samples were used to prepare five overlapping dilution series, tiled across the AMI. For each series, the lowest sample was tested in replicates of eight, while all other samples were tested in replicates of four on one DxI 9000 Access Immunoassay Analyzer using one reagent lot and one calibrator lot. The data were analyzed by weighted least squares (WLS) regression by comparing observed results to expected concentrations for each linearity panel. Deviation from linearity predicted from WLS regression was calculated by determining the difference between observed and linear fit values for each dilution series, as well as a composite regress across all dilution series. The results are summarized in the table below:
| Dilution Series | | Slope (95% CI) | Intercept (95% CI) | R² | %Deviation* (Deviation**) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | 0.04–29.60 | 0.954 (0.937–0.971) | -0.002 (-0.024–0.021) | 0.996 | -1% to 5% (-0.2 to 0.1 IU/mL) |
| 2 | 11.83–264.77 | 1.017 (1.003–1.031) | -0.052 (-0.513–0.410) | 0.998 | -2% to 4% (-0.1 IU/mL) |
| 3 | 258.80–608.34 | 1.050 (1.015–1.084) | -7.988 (-20.475–4.499) | 0.992 | -4% to 3% |
| 4 | 607.89–1170.02 | 1.088 (1.029–1.148) | -35.279 (-82.419–11.861) | 0.978 | -5% to 3% |
| 5 | 1095.44–2911.95 | 0.967 (0.917–1.017) | 36.141 (-34.444–106.727) | 0.987 | -3% to 2% |
| All | 0.04–2911.95 | 1.008 (1.001–1.015) | -0.020 (-0.047–0.007) | 0.997 | -6% to 7% (-0.7 to 0.02 IU/mL) |
* % Deviation from Linearity for concentrations > 15 IU/mL
** Deviation (ng/mL) from Linearity for concentrations ≤ 15 IU/mL
The data support a linear interval from 0.04 to 2,911.95 IU/mL with the deviations from linearity within ± 10% for analyte concentration ≥15 IU/mL and ± 0.7 IU/mL for analyte concentration <15 IU/mL. The study results support the linearity of the claimed AMI: 1.5 – 2500 IU/mL.
3. Analytical Specificity/Interference and Cross-reactivity:
Refer to K213517.
4. Assay Reportable Range:
The reportable range is the same as the claimed analytical measuring interval: 1.5 IU/mL to 2500 IU/mL.
5. Traceability, Stability, Expected Values (Controls, Calibrators, or Methods):
a) Traceability:
K240996 - Page 6 of 8
{6}
Traceability was established in K112933. The traceability of these modifications to the Access Thyroglobulin Antibody II assay is unchanged.
b) Stability:
The Access TgAb II Reagent kit and the Lumi-Phos PRO substrate are packaged separately. Access TgAb II Reagent kit stability was established in K213517. The proposed change introduces a new substrate (Lumi-Phos PRO). The shelf-life claims and on-board stability claims for Lumi-Phos PRO substrate were established in K221225.
6. Detection Capability:
CLSI guideline EP17-A2 was followed to determine the Limit of Blank (LoB), Limit of Detection (LoD) and Limit of Quantitation (LoQ) for the modified Access TgAb II on DxI 9000 Access Immunoassay Analyzer.
a) LoB:
Five blank individual native serum samples were tested in five replicates per run, one run per day over three days using two modified Access TgAb II reagent lots (N=75 datapoints for each lot) on two DxI 9000 Access Immunoassay Analyzers. The LoB for each reagent lot was calculated using the 95% percentile of all datapoints for each of the two reagents. The claimed non-parametric LoB for the modified Access TgAb II on DxI 9000 Access Immunoassay Analyzer is 0.1 IU/mL.
b) LoD:
Eleven native serum samples containing low levels of TgAb II analyte were tested over five days, one run per day, and a minimum of eight replicates per run for each of two Access TgAb II reagent lots. Two DxI 9000 Access Immunoassay Analyzers were used for a minimum of N=492 datapoints for each reagent lot. The non-parametric method of LoD per CLSI EP17-A2 was used to determine the maximum observed LoD between the two lots. The claimed LoD for the modified Access TgAb II on the DxI 9000 Access Immunoassay Analyzer is 0.2 IU/mL.
c) LoQ:
Thirteen native serum samples or pools containing low levels of TgAb II analyte were tested in nine replicates per run, one run per day, for five days on each of two Access TgAb II reagent lots, on two DxI 9000 Access Immunoassay Analyzers. This resulted in a minimum of N=540 datapoints for each sample for each reagent lot. For LoQ determination, a precision model was used to estimate the within-laboratory %CV for each sample for each instrument and reagent lot combination. The precision profile was used to calculate an LoQ based on a 20% CV threshold. The claimed LoQ for the modified Access TgAb II on DxI 9000 Access Immunoassay Analyzer is 1.5 IU/mL.
7. Assay Cut-Off:
Not applicable
K240996 - Page 7 of 8
{7}
K240996 - Page 8 of 8
# B Comparison Studies:
1. Method Comparison with Predicate Device:
CLSI guideline EP09c, 3rd Edition was followed to compare the Access TgAb II assay on the DxI 9000 Access Immunoassay Analyzer to the predicate device, the Access TgAb II on the Access 2 Immunoassay System. A total of 114 de-identified patient serum samples within the AMI of the Access TgAb II assay were tested in singlicate with three Access TgAb II reagent lots and three calibrator lots, on three DxI 9000 Access Immunoassay Analyzers (candidate) as well as three Access 2 instruments (predicate). The comparison between measurement methods was analyzed using the Passing-Bablok regression method. Regression results are summarized in the following table:
| N | Interval (IU/mL) | Slope (95% CI) | Intercept (95% CI) | R² |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 114 | 2.3 – 2463 | 0.97 (0.95 – 0.99) | -0.37 (-0.99 – 0.047) | 1.00 |
2. Matrix Comparison:
The comparability of claimed matrices were previously reviewed in K213517.
C Clinical Studies:
Refer to K112933
D Clinical Cut-Off:
Refer to K112933
E Expected Values/Reference Range:
Refer to K213517
VIII Proposed Labeling:
The labeling supports the finding of substantial equivalence for this device.
IX Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.