The Access Thyroglobulin Antibody II assay is a paramagnetic particle, chemiluminescent immunoassay for the quantitative determination of thyroglobulin antibody levels in human serum and plasma using the Access Immunoassay Systems. The measurement of thyroid autoantibodies may aid in the diagnosis of Hashimoto's disease, nontoxic goiter, and Graves' disease.
Device Story
The Access Thyroglobulin Antibody II assay is a paramagnetic particle, chemiluminescent immunoassay used for the quantitative measurement of thyroglobulin antibodies in human serum and plasma. The device is operated on Access Immunoassay Systems in a clinical laboratory setting. The assay utilizes a reagent pack containing Dynabeads paramagnetic particles coated with streptavidin and biotinylated human thyroglobulin, along with a human thyroglobulin-alkaline phosphatase conjugate. The system processes samples to detect antibody levels, providing quantitative results that assist clinicians in diagnosing thyroid-related conditions such as Hashimoto's disease, nontoxic goiter, and Graves' disease. The modified version includes specific blockers for biotin and alkaline phosphatase to mitigate analytical interference.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Performance evaluated via precision (within-lab and instrument-to-instrument), linearity, high-dose hook effect, analytical specificity (interference and cross-reactivity), and matrix comparison. Precision studies showed %CV < 15.1%. Linearity supported the 1.5–2500 IU/mL range. Interference testing confirmed no significant bias (≤ ±10%) with biotin up to 3510 ng/mL. Method comparison with the predicate (N=123) showed high correlation (R=0.99). Reference range verification used 30 healthy donor samples.
Technological Characteristics
Paramagnetic particle, chemiluminescent sandwich immunoassay. Reagents include streptavidin-coated Dynabeads, biotinylated human thyroglobulin, and human thyroglobulin-alkaline phosphatase conjugate. Buffer components include TRIS, protein (bovine), sodium azide, and ProClin 300. Automated operation on Access Immunoassay Systems. Measuring range: 1.5-2,500 IU/mL.
Indications for Use
Indicated for the quantitative determination of thyroglobulin antibody levels in human serum and plasma to aid in the diagnosis of Hashimoto's disease, nontoxic goiter, and Graves' disease.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A thyroid autoantibody immunological test system is a device that consists of the reagents used to measure by immunochemical techniques the thyroid autoantibodies (antibodies produced against the body's own tissues). Measurement of thyroid autoantibodies may aid in the diagnosis of certain thyroid disorders, such as Hashimoto's disease (chronic lymphocytic thyroiditis), nontoxic goiter (enlargement of thyroid gland), Grave's disease (enlargement of the thyroid gland with protrusion of the eyeballs), and cancer of the thyroid.
{0}
K213517 - Page 1 of 10
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY
ASSAY ONLY
## I Background Information:
A 510(k) Number
K213517
B Applicant
Beckman Coulter, Inc.
C Proprietary and Established Names
Access Thyroglobulin Antibody II
D Regulatory Information
| Product Code(s) | Classification | RegulationSection | Panel |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| JZO | Class II | 21 CFR 866.5870 - Thyroid Autoantibody Immunological Test System | IM - Immunology |
## II Submission/Device Overview:
A Purpose for Submission:
Modification of the previously cleared device to mitigate biotin interference
B Measurand:
Anti-Thyroglobulin autoantibody
C Type of Test:
Quantitative, Chemiluminescent Immunoassay
## III Intended Use/Indications for Use:
A Intended Use(s):
{1}
Same as Indication for Use below
## B Indication(s) for Use:
The Access Thyroglobulin Antibody II assay is a paramagnetic particle, chemiluminescent immunoassay for the quantitative determination of thyroglobulin antibody levels in human serum and plasma using the Access Immunoassay Systems. The measurement of thyroid autoantibodies may aid in the diagnosis of Hashimoto's disease, nontoxic goiter, and Graves' disease.
## C Special Conditions for Use Statement(s):
Rx - For prescription use only
For In Vitro Diagnostic Use Only
## D Special Instrument Requirements:
Access 2 Immunoassay System (K121214)
UniCel DxI 600 Access Immunoassay System (K023764)
UniCel DxI 800 Access Immunoassay System (K121790)
## IV Device/System Characteristics:
### A Device Description:
**Materials included in the Access Thyroglobulin Antibody II:**
Access Thyroglobulin Antibody II Reagent Pack (2 packs, 50 tests/pack) contains:
- R1a (3.25 mL): Paramagnetic particles coated with streptavidin, coupled to biotinylated human thyroglobulin in TRIS buffer with bovine protein, preservative
- R1b (13.25 mL): Human thyroglobulin bovine alkaline phosphatase conjugate in TRIS buffer with bovine protein, preservative
- R1c (4.5 mL): TRIS buffer with bovine protein, free biotin, alkaline phosphatase blocking reagent, preservative
- R1d (3.1 mL): TRIS buffer with blocking polymer, preservative
**Materials needed but not supplied:**
- Access Thyroglobulin Antibody II Calibrators: at 0, 50, 250, 1,000, and 2,500 IU/mL
- Quality control materials: commercial control material
- Access Substrate
- Access Wash Buffer II
To mitigate the risk of biotin interference and non-TgAb specific binding of an interferent to alkaline phosphatase (ALP), the Access Thyroglobulin Antibody II reagent pack has been modified from the previously cleared assay by adding free biotin and alkaline phosphatase blocking reagent to existing Well 2 (R1c) of the reagent pack.
K213517 - Page 2 of 10
{2}
K213517 - Page 3 of 10
B Principle of Operation:
The Access Thyroglobulin Antibody II assay is a sequential two-step immunoenzymatic (“sandwich”) assay. A sample is added to a reaction vessel with paramagnetic particles coated with the thyroglobulin protein. The thyroglobulin autoantibodies (TgAb) in the sample bind to the thyroglobulin. After incubation in a reaction vessel, materials bound to the solid phase are held in a magnetic field while unbound materials are washed away. The thyroglobulin-alkaline phosphatase conjugate is added and binds to the TgAb. After the second incubation, materials bound to the solid phase are held in a magnetic field while unbound materials are washed away. Then, the chemiluminescent substrate is added to the vessel and light generated by the reaction is measured with a luminometer. The light production is directly proportional to the concentration of TgAb in the sample. The amount of TgAb in the sample is determined from a stored, multi-point calibration curve.
V Substantial Equivalence Information:
A Predicate Device Name(s):
Access Thyroglobulin Antibody II
B Predicate 510(k) Number(s):
K112933
C Comparison with Predicate(s):
| Device & Predicate Device(s): | K213517 (Candidate Device) | K112933 (Predicate) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Device Trade Name | Access Thyroglobulin Antibody II | Access Thyroglobulin Antibody II |
| General Device Characteristic Similarities | | |
| Intended Use/Indications for Use | The Access Thyroglobulin Antibody II assay is a paramagnetic particle, chemiluminescent immunoassay for the quantitative determination of thyroglobulin antibody levels in human serum and plasma using the Access Immunoassay Systems. The measurement of thyroid autoantibodies may aid in the diagnosis of Hashimoto's disease, nontoxic goiter, and Graves' disease. | Same |
| Analyte | Thyroglobulin antibody (TgAb) | Same |
| Methodology | Chemiluminescent immunoassay | Same |
{3}
| Sample types | Human serum and plasma (EDTA or lithium heparin) | Same |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Sample volume | 10 μL | Same |
| Calibrator scheme | 6-level multipoint calibration curve | Same |
| General Device Characteristic Differences | | |
| Analytical measuring interval | 1.5–2500 IU/mL | 0.9–2500 IU/mL |
| Detection Capability | LoB: 0.0 IU/mL
LoD: 0.4 IU/mL
LoQ: 1.5 IU/mL | LoB: 0.9 IU/mL
LoD: 0.9 IU/mL
LoQ: 0.9 IU/mL |
| Biotin interference | No interference up to 3510 ng/mL | No interference up to 100 ng/mL |
VI Standards/Guidance Documents Referenced:
The following Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines were used:
- CLSI EP05-A3, Evaluation of Precision of Quantitative Measurement Procedures; Approved Guideline – Third Edition
- CLSI EP06-Ed2, Evaluation of the Linearity of Quantitative Measurement Procedures – Second Edition
- CLSI EP07-A3, Interference Testing in Clinical Chemistry – Third Edition
- CLSI EP09c 3rd Edition, Measurement Procedure Comparison and Bias Estimation Using Patient Samples
- CLSI EP17-A2, Evaluation of Detection Capability for Clinical Laboratory Measurement Procedures; Approved Guideline – Second Edition
- CLSI EP25-A, Evaluation of Stability of In Vitro Diagnostic Reagents; Approved Guideline
- CLSI EP28-A3c, Defining Establishing and Verifying Reference Intervals in the Clinical Laboratory; Approved Guideline – Third Edition
- CLSI EP35, Assessment of Equivalence or Suitability of Specimen Types for Medical Laboratory Measurement Procedures – First Edition
- CLSI EP37, Supplemental Tables for Interference Testing in Clinical Chemistry – First Edition
VII Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
A Analytical Performance:
All results met the manufacturer’s pre-determined acceptance criteria.
1. Precision/Reproducibility:
Precision and reproducibility measurements were conducted in accordance with the CLSI guideline EP05-A3 as detailed below.
K213517 - Page 4 of 10
{4}
Within-Laboratory Precision
To evaluate within-laboratory precision, a panel of five samples was prepared by pooling individual native serum samples to cover the AMI of the modified Access Thyroglobulin Antibody II assay. Each sample was assayed in two replicates per run, two runs per day for 20 days, using one reagent pack lot on one Access 2 Immunoassay System to obtain a total of 80 replicates per sample. Three quality controls were run in duplicate on each day to qualify each test run. Mean, standard deviation (SD) and % coefficient of variation (%CV) were analyzed for each sample. The results are summarized in the table below:
| Sample | N | Mean (IU/mL) | Within-Run | | Between-Run | | Between-Day | | Within-Laboratory | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV |
| Sample 1 | 80 | 3.1 | 0.3 | 10.3 | 0.2 | 5.9 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 11.8 |
| Sample 2 | 80 | 5.3 | 0.4 | 7.5 | 0.2 | 4.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 8.6 |
| Sample 3 | 80 | 95 | 4.1 | 4.3 | 3.2 | 3.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 5.2 | 5.4 |
| Sample 4 | 80 | 506 | 19.0 | 3.8 | 18.6 | 3.7 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 26.6 | 5.3 |
| Sample 5 | 80 | 1485 | 77.7 | 5.2 | 75.4 | 5.1 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 108.3 | 7.3 |
Instrument-to-instrument precision
To evaluate between-instrument precision, a panel of five serum samples was prepared by pooling individual native serum samples to cover the AMI of the modified Access Thyroglobulin Antibody II assay. Each sample was assayed in five replicates per run, one run per day over five days, using one reagent pack lot on three Access 2 Immunoassay Systems to obtain a total of 75 replicates per sample. Three quality controls were run in duplicate on each day to qualify each test run. The results are summarized in the table below:
| Sample | N | Mean (IU/mL) | Within-Run | | Between-Day | | Between-Instrument | | Total | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV |
| Sample 1 | 75 | 3.4 | 0.3 | 8.1 | 0.1 | 2.4 | 0.2 | 6.2 | 0.4 | 10.4 |
| Sample 2 | 75 | 5.3 | 0.5 | 8.7 | 0.3 | 6.2 | 0.4 | 6.9 | 0.7 | 12.8 |
| Sample 3 | 75 | 94 | 5.2 | 5.5 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 1.8 | 2.0 | 5.9 | 6.2 |
| Sample 4 | 75 | 508 | 26.9 | 5.3 | 9.2 | 1.8 | 19.5 | 3.8 | 34.5 | 6.8 |
| Sample 5 | 75 | 1611 | 207.0 | 12.8 | 127.6 | 7.9 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 243.1 | 15.1 |
Lot-to-lot imprecision:
Lot-to-lot imprecision was evaluated by testing samples using three lots of the modified Access Thyroglobulin Antibody II assay. The $\% \mathrm{CV}$ for lot-to-lot imprecision is less than $10\%$ for all samples tested.
K213517 - Page 5 of 10
{5}
K213517 - Page 6 of 10
# 2. Linearity:
The linearity of the modified Access Thyroglobulin Antibody II assay was assessed in accordance with the CLSI guideline EP06-Ed2. Low and high pooled native samples were used to prepare six overlapping linearity series for the AMI. For each series, the lowest sample was tested in replicates of eight, while all other samples were tested in replicates of four on one Access 2 Immunoassay System using one reagent lot. The data were analyzed for weighted linear regression by comparing observed results to expected concentrations for each sample level. Deviation from linearity was calculated by determining the difference between observed and linear fit values. The results are summarized in the table below:
| Dilution Range (ng/mL) | Slope | Intercept | R2 | % Deviation from Linearity |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 0.39 – 20.38 | 0.93 | 0.009 | 0.99 | < 15 IU/mL: -0.5 to 0.2 IU/mL ≥ 15 IU/mL: 1.8% to 7.0% |
| 0.85 – 69.40 | 1.08 | -0.05 | 0.98 | < 15 IU/mL: -0.02 to 0.69 IU/mL ≥ 15 IU/mL: -7.7% to 6.5% |
| 50.70 – 302.02 | 0.91 | -0.92 | 0.97 | -8.7% to 11.5% |
| 211.24 – 850.53 | 1.26 | -47.18 | 0.90 | -16.8% to 17.4%* |
| 459.43 – 1418.88 | 1.10 | -24.97 | 0.96 | -7.7% to 11.0% |
| 961.35 – 2774.13 | 1.01 | -43.97 | 0.93 | -13.0% to 16.1%^ |
* one sample with concentration of 607.1 IU/mL showed 16.8% of deviation from the linearity, and one sample with concentration of 728.2 IU/mL showed 17.4% of deviation from the linearity. The rest of the samples had % deviation from the linearity within ±10%.
^ one sample with concentration of 1807.8 IU/mL showed -13.0% of deviation from the linearity, and one sample with concentration of 2943.1 IU/mL showed 16.1% of deviation from the linearity. The rest of the samples had % deviation from the linearity within ±10%.
The data support the linearity of the claimed analytical measuring interval (AMI) of 1.5 IU/mL to 2,500 IU/mL for the modified Access Thyroglobulin Antibody II assay.
## High Dose Hook Effect:
High dose hook effect of the modified Access Thyroglobulin Antibody II assay was evaluated by testing five serum samples with analyte concentration above the analytical measuring interval: 3,000, 15,000, 27,000, 39,000 and 51,000 IU/mL. Each sample was tested in replicates of five using three lots of reagents on one Access 2 Immunoassay System. The results showed no high dose hook effect up to an analyte concentration of 50,000 IU/mL.
# 3. Analytical Specificity/Interference:
## Interference
Interference studies were performed in accordance with the CLSI guidelines EP07 3rd Ed and EP37.
Patient sera representing two clinically relevant concentrations (4 IU/mL and 100 IU/mL) of TgAb were spiked with endogenous and exogenous interfering substances including biotin. Paired spiked and unspiked (control) samples were assayed in six replicates with three
{6}
reagent pack lots of the modified Access Thyroglobulin Antibody II on one Access 2 Immunoassay System, and the mean values were used to evaluate the observed bias by comparing measurements of the spiked and control samples. No significant interference ( $\leq$ $\pm 10\%$ of difference) was demonstrated at the final test concentrations listed in the table below.
| Interfering Substance | Test concentration |
| --- | --- |
| Acetaminophen | 20 mg/dL |
| Acetylsalicylic Acid | 65 mg/dL |
| Bilirubin | 40 mg/dL |
| Biotin | 3510 ng/mL |
| Hemoglobin | 500 mg/dL |
| Heparin (Sodium) | 8000 U/dL |
| Total protein (human serum albumin) | 6 g/dL |
| Ibuprofen | 50 mg/dL |
| Multi-vitamin* | 1:20 |
| Triglycerides (intralipid) | 500 mg/dL |
* Includes Vitamin C, 60 mg; Vitamin D3, 10 mcg (400 IU); Vitamin E, 13.5 mg; Thiamin, 1.1 mg, Riboflavin, 1.7 mg; Niacin, 20 mg; Vitamin B6, 2 mg; Vitamin B12, 6 mcg; Biotin, 300 mcg; Pantothenic Acid, 10 mg; Iron, 9 mg; Iodine, 150 mcg; Zinc, 3 mg; Manganese, 2 mg; Chromium, 25 mcg; Molybdenum 25 mcg.
# Cross-reactivity
The cross-reactivity of the modified Access Thyroglobulin Antibody II assay was evaluated with 10 serum samples from patients with rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus and 20 serum samples tested positive for autoantibodies to cyclic citrullinated peptide, nuclear antigen, double stranded DNA, and rheumatoid factor. Each sample was tested in six replicates using three reagent pack lots on one Access 2 Immunoassay System. The results are summarized in the following table:
| | N | N of Positive |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Autoimmune diseases and conditions | | |
| Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) | 5 | 0 |
| Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) | 5 | 1* |
| Autoantibodies | | |
| Anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP) | 5 | 1^ |
| Anti-nuclear antigen (anti-ANA) | 5 | 0 |
| Anti-double stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA) | 5 | 0 |
| Rheumatoid factor (RF) | 5 | 0 |
* SLE sample with TgAb concentration of 906 IU/mL
^ one positive for anti-CCP with TgAb concentration of 6.23 IU/mL
# 4. Assay Reportable Range:
The assay reportable range is $1.5 - 2500\mathrm{IU / mL}$
K213517 - Page 7 of 10
{7}
K213517 - Page 8 of 10
5. Traceability, Stability, Expected Values (Controls, Calibrators, or Methods):
i) Traceability:
Refer to K112933. No change to the traceability of the modified Access Thyroglobulin Antibody II assay.
ii) Kit stability:
Shelf-life stability – A real-time stability study was performed in accordance with the CLSI guideline EP25 Ed2 to determine the shelf-life of the modified Access Thyroglobulin Antibody II kit stored at 2–10°C. One of the reagent pack lots was pre-stressed to environmental test conditions that simulated potential winter and summer transport. Five serum samples with TgAb concentrations spanning the AMI in five replicates was tested using three reagent pack lots on five Access 2 Immunoassay Systems at multiple time points throughout the claimed stability period and at least one month past the expiration date. Three quality controls were run in duplicate on each day to qualify each test run. Results support the 12-month shelf-life stability at 2–10°C for the modified Access Thyroglobulin Antibody II assay.
In-use reagent stability – In-use stability of the modified Access Thyroglobulin Antibody II assay was evaluated by testing samples using three lots of reagent packs which were opened and stored at 2–10°C. The commercial control samples and patient samples, representing low, medium, and high TgAb concentrations, were tested in duplicate at 10 time points over 58 days. The data supports the open vial stability of the modified Access Thyroglobulin Antibody II up to 56 days stored at 2–10°C after initial use.
6. Detection Limit:
The Limit of Blank (LoB), Limit of Detection (LoD), and Limit of Quantitation (LoQ) studies were conducted in accordance with the CLSI guideline EP17-A2. The studies evaluated two reagent pack lots of the modified Access Thyroglobulin Antibody II assay on two Access 2 Immunoassay Systems.
The LoB was determined with analyte-free samples including four serum, four lithium heparin (LiHep) plasma and four EDTA samples. Each blank sample was tested over three days with one run per day and five replicates per run to obtain a total of 60 replicates per sample type per reagent lot. The LoB was estimated as the 95th percentile of the measurements and determined to be 0 IU/mL for all sample types across two lots of reagent pack. The claimed LoB is 0 IU/mL.
The LoD were determined using 11 serum or LiHep plasma samples with low TgAb levels. Each sample was tested over five days with one run per day and nine replicates per run to obtain a total of 45 replicates per sample type per lot. The LoD was calculated as the LoB + 1.645 x SD of the replicates for the low-level samples and determined as 0.4 IU/mL for both serum and LiHep plasma. The claimed LoD is 0.4 IU/mL.
LoQ used the same samples and testing protocol as described for LoD study. The LoQ, defined as the mean TgAb value of the sample which fulfills the specification of ≤ 1.5 IU/mL
{8}
that corresponds to the TgAb concentration that can be quantitatively determined with $\leq 20\%$ CV, was estimated as $1.5~\mathrm{IU / mL}$ for serum, and $0.9~\mathrm{IU / mL}$ for LiHep plasma. The claimed LoQ is $1.5~\mathrm{IU / mL}$ which is the lower limit of the AMI for the modified Access Thyroglobulin Antibody II.
# 7. Assay Cut-Off:
Refer to K112933
# B Comparison Studies:
# 1. Method Comparison with Predicate Device:
A method comparison study was performed in accordance with the CLSI guideline EP09c. The study evaluated a total of 123 native serum samples and native sample pools spanning the AMI of the modified Access Thyroglobulin Antibody II assay. Each sample was assayed in one replicate on a single Access 2 Immunoassay System using three lots of the candidate device and one lot of the predicate. Three commercial quality controls were run in duplicate on each day to qualify each test run. Results based on Passing-Bablok regression analysis are summarized in table below:
| Lot | N | Concentration Range (IU/mL) | Slope (95% CI) | Y-Intercept (95% CI) | R |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | 120 | 1.79 – 2216.25 | 0.99 (0.98 – 1.02) | -0.24 (-0.68 – 0.22) | 0.99 |
| 2 | 123 | 1.79 – 2216.25 | 1.03 (1.00 – 1.06) | -0.13 (-0.68 – 0.30) | 0.99 |
| 3 | 84 | 1.79 – 2216.25 | 1.01 (0.97 – 1.05) | -0.16 (-1.77 – 0.37) | 0.99 |
# 2. Matrix Comparison:
To demonstrate that lithium (Li)-Heparin and EDTA plasma samples yield results comparable with serum samples tested by the modified Access Thyroglobulin Antibody II assay, 38 matched samples with TgAb concentration across the claimed AMI of the assay were tested in singlicate with one reagent lot on one Access 2 Immunoassay System. Passing-Bablok regression analysis was performed, and the results are summarized in the following table:
| | N | Range (IU/mL) | Slope (95% CI) | Intercept (95% CI) | R |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Li-Heparin Plasma vs Serum | 38 | 1.5 – 2284.6 | 1.00 (0.99 – 1.06) | 0.27 (-0.18 – 0.98) | 0.99 |
| EDTA Plasma vs Serum | 38 | 1.6 – 2181.9 | 0.95 (0.91 – 0.99) | 0.54 (-0.06 – 1.41) | 0.99 |
# C Clinical Studies:
# 1. Clinical Sensitivity:
Please refer to K112933
K213517 - Page 9 of 10
{9}
2. Clinical Specificity:
Please refer to K112933
3. Other Clinical Supportive Data (When 1. and 2. Are Not Applicable):
Not applicable
D. Clinical Cut-Off:
Please refer to K112933
E. Expected Values/Reference Range:
The reference range for unmodified Access Thyroglobulin Antibody assay (predicate) was previously established based on a study in which 137 samples from males < 30 years of age were screened for their serum TSH, and absence of personal or family history of thyroid disease and non-thyroid autoimmune disease. The 95% non-parametric upper reference limit was determined to be < 4 IU/mL. Additionally, 519 normal samples collected in the U.S. from both males and females ranging in age from 18–74 years old were tested. The results indicated that 96% of these samples < 4 IU/mL.
To verify this reference range, a total of 30 serum samples collected from apparently healthy donors were tested with modified Access Thyroglobulin Antibody on Access 2 Immunoassay System. The results showed that 28 of 30 (93.3%) have value < 4 IU/mL with the established 95% non-parametric upper reference limit was < 4 IU/mL. Similar results were also observed for the predicate using this sample cohort.
VIII. Proposed Labeling:
The labeling supports the finding of substantial equivalence for this device.
IX. Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
K213517 - Page 10 of 10
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.