OmniTrans™ Transport System is intended for use in the collection of clinical specimens (i.e., sputum, throat/ oropharyngeal swab, whole blood, urine, skin lesion material or exudate) potentially containing viruses, chlamydiae, mycoplasma, or ureaplasma and in their transport from the collection site to the testing laboratory. The system can be processed using standard clinical laboratory operating procedures for culture of clinical specimens.
Device Story
OmniTrans Transport System is a non-propagating transport device for clinical specimens. It consists of a plastic screw-cap tube containing transport medium (Hank’s Balanced Salt Solution, HEPES, BSA, gelatin, sucrose, amino acids, and antibiotics: amphotericin B, vancomycin, colistin) and optional flocking swabs. Healthcare professionals collect specimens from patients and place them into the medium. The system maintains specimen viability for up to 48 hours at 2–25°C. At the laboratory, the medium is processed using standard culture procedures. The device preserves the integrity of viruses, chlamydiae, mycoplasma, and ureaplasma for diagnostic identification. It benefits patients by ensuring reliable transport of samples to laboratories, facilitating accurate clinical diagnosis.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data. Bench testing only. Studies confirmed 18-month shelf-life stability via physical, physicochemical, and sterility assessments. Cytotoxicity testing (MRC-5 cell line) showed >70% viability. Microbial stasis testing confirmed antimicrobial effectiveness against S. aureus, E. coli, and C. albicans. Microbial recovery studies (fluorescent focus assays, roll-plate, and swab elution) demonstrated that 13 representative viruses and bacteria remained within 1 log10 (±90%) of time-zero counts after 48 hours of storage at 2–25°C.
Technological Characteristics
Transport medium in plastic screw-cap tubes; includes Hank’s Balanced Salt Solution, HEPES, BSA, gelatin, sucrose, L-glutamic acid, and antibiotics (amphotericin B, vancomycin, colistin). pH 7.3 ± 0.2. Includes flocking swabs. Storage 2–25°C. Shelf-life 18 months. Tubes sterilized via e-beam radiation. Non-sterile medium filled aseptically.
Indications for Use
Indicated for collection and transport of clinical specimens (sputum, throat/oropharyngeal swab, whole blood, urine, skin lesion material/exudate) potentially containing viruses, chlamydiae, mycoplasma, or ureaplasma. For use by healthcare professionals via prescription.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A transport culture medium is a device that consists of a semisolid, usually non-nutrient, medium that maintains the viability of suspected pathogens contained in patient specimens while in transit from the specimen collection area to the laboratory. The device aids in the diagnosis of disease caused by pathogenic microorganisms and also provides epidemiological information on these diseases.
Predicate Devices
Copan Universal Transport Medium (utm-rt) System (K042970)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
FDA
U.S. FOOD & DRUG
ADMINISTRATION
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY
ASSAY ONLY
## I Background Information:
A 510(k) Number
K240235
B Applicant
Shenzhen Dakewe Bio-engineering Co., Ltd.
C Proprietary and Established Names
OmniTrans Transport System
D Regulatory Information
| Product Code(s) | Classification | Regulation Section | Panel |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| JSM | Class I, reserved | 21 CFR 866.2390 – Transport Culture Medium | MI – Microbiology |
## II Submission/Device Overview:
A Purpose for Submission:
To obtain substantial equivalence determination for OmniTrans Transport System manufactured by Shenzhen Dakewe Bio-engineering Co., Ltd. for the collection and transport of viruses, chlamydiae, mycoplasma, and ureaplasma in clinical specimens for standard diagnostic or identification techniques.
B Measurand:
Not Applicable
C Type of Test:
Non-propagating transport device with culture medium.
## III Intended Use/Indications for Use:
A Intended Use(s):
See Indications for Use below
Food and Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
www.fda.gov
{1}
K240235 – Page 2 of 10
# B Indication(s) for Use:
OmniTrans Transport System is intended for use in the collection of clinical specimens (i.e., sputum, throat/oropharyngeal swab, whole blood, urine, skin lesion material or exudate) potentially containing viruses, chlamydiae, mycoplasma, or ureaplasma and in their transport from the collection site to the testing laboratory. The system can be processed using standard clinical laboratory operating procedures for culture of clinical specimens.
# C Special Conditions for Use Statement(s):
Rx – For Prescription Use Only
# D Special Instrument Requirements:
Not Applicable
# IV Device/System Characteristics:
# A Device Description:
The OmniTrans Transport System is available in the following formats:
(a) Transport medium only, with the medium contained in a labeled plastic screw-cap tube. This format may contain tubes pre-filled with 1 mL, 1.5 mL, 2 mL, or 3 mL of transport medium.
(b) A kit format with the transport medium tube (1 or 3 mL as above) along with one (1) or two (2) swab(s) pre-packaged individually in sterile peel pouch for sample collection. The swab component is available as either or both of two (2) possible swab options:
(i) Minitip flocking swab with 8 cm breaking point.
(ii) Regular flocking swab with 3 cm breaking point.
A specimen bag, with appropriate biosafety warning labels, is also provided with the device for safe transportation of clinical specimens in the transport medium.
The OmniTrans Transport System medium is composed of the following components:
| Ingredient | Function |
| --- | --- |
| Hank’s Balanced Salt Solution | Maintains pH |
| HEPES | Maintains pH |
| Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA) | Protein stabilizer |
| Gelatin | Protein stabilizer |
| Sucrose | Nutrient component |
| Amino acid (L-glutamic acid) | Nutrient component |
| Antibiotics | |
| Amphotericin B | Inhibits fungi |
| Vancomycin | Inhibits gram-positive bacteria |
| Colistin | Inhibits gram-negative bacteria |
| Phenol red | Indicates pH |
The disposable swabs contained in OmniTrans Transport System devices are the only components that may come in contact with patient tissue (e.g., upper respiratory mucosal membranes, i.e., nasopharyngeal, oropharyngeal) during use for typically less than 1 minute. These swabs, manufactured by Shenzhen Dakewe Bio-engineering Co., Ltd. (i.e., the sponsor), are legally marketed standalone devices.
{2}
B Principle of Operation:
The candidate device, “OmniTrans Transport System,” is intended for the collection and transport of clinical specimens containing viruses, chlamydiae, mycoplasma or ureaplasma from the collection site to the testing laboratory. The device contains the OmniTrans Transport Medium that is packaged alone or with swabs. Each of the swabs may be used for specimen collection from different anatomical locations. Use of the OmniTrans Transport System is by prescription only, and sample collection is intended to be performed by health care professionals only. Following collection, the specimen is placed into a Transport Medium tube. The candidate device is designed for storage of specimens in the cold (2–8°C) or at controlled room temperatures (20–25°C) for up to 48h. The medium is non-toxic to mammalian host cells or cell lines commonly used for culturing the virus and chlamydiae tested. The system carrying the specimen can be processed using standard clinical laboratory operating procedures for culture of clinical specimens.
V Substantial Equivalence Information:
A Predicate Device Name(s):
Copan Universal Transport Medium (utm-rt) System
B Predicate 510(k) Number(s):
K042970
C Comparison with Predicate(s):
| Device & Predicate Device(s): | Device: K240235 | Predicate: K042970 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Device Trade Name | OmniTrans Transport System | Copan Universal Transport Medium (UTM-RT) System |
| Intended Use/Indications For Use | OmniTrans Transport System is intended for use in the collection of clinical specimens (i.e., sputum, throat/oropharyngeal swab, whole blood, urine, skin lesion material or exudate) potentially containing viruses, chlamydiae, mycoplasma, or ureaplasma and in their transport from the collection site to the testing laboratory. The system can be processed using standard clinical laboratory operating procedures for culture of clinical specimens. | Copan Universal Transport Medium (UTM-RT) System is intended for the collection and transport of clinical specimens containing viruses, chlamydiae, mycoplasma or ureaplasma from the collection site to the testing laboratory. UTM-RT can be processed using standard clinical laboratory operating procedures for viral, chlamydial, mycoplasma and ureaplasma culture. |
| General Device Characteristic Similarities | | |
| Single Use Device | Yes | Same |
| Product Configurations | Medium tubes alone or medium tubes and swabs co-packaged | Same |
| pH | 7.3 ± 0.2 | Same |
| Product Storage temperature | 2–25°C | Same |
| General Device Characteristic Differences | | |
K240235 – Page 3 of 10
{3}
| Device & Predicate Device(s): | Device: K240235 | Predicate: K042970 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Medium Volume | 1 mL; 1.5 mL; 2 mL or 3 mL | 1.5 mL; 3 mL; or 10 mL |
| Container | Tube; plastic; self-standing with a screw cap | Tube; plastic; self-standing with a screw cap; with three 3mm glass beads |
| Shelf-life | 18 months | 12 months |
| Supported strains | • Adenovirus
• Cytomegalovirus
• Echovirus Type 30
• Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1
• Herpes Simplex Virus Type 2
• Influenza A
• Parainfluenza virus type 3
• Respiratory Syncytial Virus
• Vaccinia virus
• Chlamydia pneumoniae
• Chlamydia trachomatis
• Mycoplasma pneumoniae
• Ureaplasma urealyticum | • Adenovirus
• Cytomegalovirus
• Echovirus Type 30
• Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1
• Herpes Simplex Virus Type 2
• Influenza A
• Parainfluenza virus type 3
• Respiratory Syncytial Virus
• Varicella Zoster virus
• Chlamydia pneumoniae
• Chlamydia trachomatis
• Mycoplasma pneumoniae
• Ureaplasma urealyticum
• Mycoplasma hominis |
| Medium Formulation | • Hank’s Balanced Salt Solution
• Bovine Serum Albumin
• Gelatin
• Sucrose
• L-glutamic acid
• HEPES buffer
• Vancomycin
• Amphotericin B
• Colistin
• Phenol red | • Hank’s Balanced Salt Solution
• Bovine Serum Albumin
• Gelatin
• Sucrose
• L-glutamic acid
• HEPES buffer
• Vancomycin
• Amphotericin B
• Colistin
• Phenol red
• L-cysteine |
VI Standards/Guidance Documents Referenced:
Not Applicable
VII Performance Characteristics:
A Analytical Performance:
1. Precision/Reproducibility
Not Applicable
2. Linearity
K240235 - Page 4 of 10
{4}
Not Applicable
3. Analytical Specificity/Interference
Not Applicable
4. Assay Reportable Range
Not Applicable
5. Traceability; Expected Values (Controls, Calibrators, or Methods); Assay Cut-Off
Not Applicable
6. Shelf-life Stability:
Stability studies were performed in real time with OmniTrans Transport Medium to determine if any quality changes of the transport media occur when stored for extended periods under specified storage conditions (i.e., 2–25°C). At both cold (2–8°C) and controlled room temperature (20–25°C), transport media stability was assessed with serial evaluation of physical, physicochemical, and microbiological characteristics (e.g., medium appearance, net volumetric content; pH; sterility of medium in tube) at media lot production (i.e., time 0) and then at 6, 12, 18 months, and beyond. Further, microbial stasis in medium was compared between a newly produced lot (age 2 months at test) and an older lot (age >18 months at test).
## A. Appearance, Net Volumetric Content, and pH:
Random tubes from three (3) medium lots were assessed qualitatively for appearance (color and clarity) and quantitatively through estimation of net volumetric content and pH measurement at time 0 (i.e., 0–2 days after production at ambient temperatures, 20–25°C) and then serially at 6, 12, 18, and >18 months following storage in the cold (2–8°C) or at controlled room temperatures (20–25°C). Additionally, the results from the oldest lots (>18 months of age at test) were compared with those of random tubes from a newly manufactured (day of production) lot. There was no appreciable change in appearance, net volumetric content, or pH of the media in tubes at either temperature range. Further, all pH measurements were within the predefined range (7.3 ± 0.2, i.e., pH 7.1–7.5). Therefore, the predefined acceptance criteria for these physical and physicochemical characteristics were met during storage of the OmniTrans Transport Media for up to 18 months under pre-set storage conditions.
## B. Sterility assessment:
The OmniTrans Transport System is not claimed to be sterile nor is it intended to be sterilized by the end user. To decrease the chances of contamination, the screw-capped tubes are separately sterilized with electron beam (e-beam) radiation prior to aseptic filling with transport media under controlled conditions. Using medium lots of serial post-production ages (0, 6, 12, 18, and >18 months), aseptic status of transport media in tubes from these lots was confirmed by observation of no microbial growth after 14 days of incubation of transport medium aliquots in fluid thioglycolate medium at 30–35°C and trypticase soy broth at 20–25°C. The swabs provided with the OmniTrans Transport System are individually packaged and are sold as sterile.
## C. Cytotoxicity assessment:
The OmniTrans Transport Medium does not come into contact with patient tissue. However, at the destination laboratory, the specimens transported in the medium may be placed in contact with
K240235 - Page 5 of 10
{5}
mammalian cell lines used for viral and chlamydial culture. Therefore, an in vitro cytotoxicity assay was conducted for the transport medium with MRC-5, a human fetal lung fibroblast cell-line. Cell viability under test conditions was >70% and the medium did not demonstrate appreciable cytopathic effects on the assayed cells. The assay results were comparable between the oldest (age >18 months) and a newly manufactured (1 month at test) medium lots.
## D. Microbial stasis assessment:
Microbial stasis studies were conducted to assess the effectiveness of the antimicrobial components of the OmniTrans Transport Medium. An old (>18 months at test) and a new (<3 months) lot of the medium were tested with one type-culture each of Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, and Candida albicans. Briefly, each microorganism strain was inoculated in the transport medium to a final concentration of 10⁵–10⁶ CFU/mL, incubated at 37°C for 0–48 hours, and plated for counting on trypticase soy agar (for bacteria) or Sabouraud’s dextrose agar (for Candida albicans). The OmniTrans Transport Medium had no increase in microbial counts under the test conditions at 48 hours, and both tested medium lots passed the criteria for microbial stasis.
**Conclusions:** The collective observations for medium characteristics (i.e., appearance, net volume, pH, sterility in tube, and microbial stasis) in timed studies with variously aged lots support the claim for 18 months of shelf-life stability for the transport medium when stored in the cold (2–8°C) and at controlled room temperatures (20–25°C). Therefore, the shelf life of the OmniTrans Transport System was determined to be 18 months from the date of manufacture when stored at temperatures 2–25°C.
## 7. Performance: Specimen Stability:
### Viral and Bacterial recovery studies
Microorganism recovery studies in appropriate negative clinical matrices were conducted with thirteen (13) different representative viruses and bacteria using the OmniTrans Transport Medium lots of various post-production ages, including:
- Old (16–18, or >18 months at the time of use in tests),
- Middle-aged (age 9–10 months at test), and
- New, including <1 week (i.e., newly produced lot) to <3 months of age at test.
Table 1 below summarizes the specimen stability study methodologies and acceptance criteria used for microbial recovery studies. Table 2 summarizes the negative clinical matrices used to demonstrate the specimen stability. The contrived samples using negative clinical matrix for virus or bacteria in OmniTrans Transport System were stored in the cold (2–8°C) or at room temperatures (20–25°C). Microbial recovery studies used media from variously aged lots spanning the claimed shelf life. The recovery study data are summarized in Tables 3–6 below.
Table 1. Methodology and Acceptance Criteria of Recovery Studies Conducted at cold (2–8°C) or controlled room (20–25°C) temperatures.
| Method | Acceptance Criteria |
| --- | --- |
| • Fluorescent Focus Assay (viruses and chlamydiae)
○ Neat stocks of organisms prepared in two (2) different dilutions in pooled Negative Clinical Matrix.
○ Swabs (in triplicate) inoculated with each dilution and incubated in | a. Negative Control (NC): normal cellular morphology observed; no fluorescent foci detected.
b. In Positive Control (PC): fluorescent foci detected. |
K240235 - Page 6 of 10
{6}
K240235 - Page 7 of 10
| Method | Acceptance Criteria |
| --- | --- |
| transport medium at 2–8°C and 20–25°C for the study duration.
○ Organism viability determined in organism-appropriate culture/growth media at key post-inoculation time points using a 96-well plate culture assay followed by immunostaining and enumeration of fluorescent foci. | c. Test result invalid when the criteria are not met in NC/PC groups; identical retests are required.
d. Tested organisms recovered at various time points after incubation; a minimum of 48h of testing was considered for recovery results.
e. Any change in recovery numbers within one log difference (±90%) was considered acceptable. |
| • Roll plate assays (qualitative for bacteria)
○ 10-fold dilution series of inoculum prepared in pooled negative clinical matrix.
○ Swabs (in triplicate) transferred 100 μL of each dilution into transport medium tubes, which were incubated at 2–8°C or 20–25°C for the study duration.
○ Swabs removed and rolled directly onto agar plates at key time points after incubation.
○ Plates incubated 37°C and 5% CO_{2} for 6 days for CFU enumeration. | a. In Negative Control (NC): no CFU detected.
b. In Positive Control (PC): CFU detected.
c. Test result invalid when the criteria are not met in NC/PC groups; identical retests are required.
d. Tested organisms recovered at various time points after incubation; a minimum of 48h of testing was considered for recovery results.
e. There shall be ≥5 CFU following the specified maintenance time from the specific dilution that yielded time-zero plate counts closest to 250 CFU.
f. Any change in recovery numbers within one log difference (±90%) was considered acceptable. |
| • Swab Elution method (quantitative for bacteria)
○ Inoculum prepared in pooled negative clinical matrix to 1.5 × 10^{7} CFU/mL.
○ Swabs (in triplicate) spiked with inoculum and incubated in transport medium at 2–8°C and 20–25°C for the study duration.
○ Swabs removed at key time points after incubation and 10-fold serial dilutions were prepared from each bacterium.
• Each dilution (100 μL/dilution) was added onto the agar plate in duplicate and incubated at 37°C and 5% CO_{2} for 6 days for CFU enumeration. | a. In Negative Control (NC): no CFU detected.
b. In Positive Control (PC): CFU detected.
c. Test result invalid when the criteria are not met in NC/PC groups; identical retests are required.
d. Tested organisms recovered at various time points after incubation; a minimum of 48h of testing was considered for recovery results.
e. Any change in recovery numbers within one log difference (±90%) was considered acceptable.
f. There shall be no more than a 3 log_{10} (1 × 10^{3} ± 10%) decline in CFU between the time-zero CFU count and the CFU count of the specified maintenance time.
g. For specimens maintained at cold temperature, there should be no more than a one-log increase in CFU and no more than a 3 log_{10} (1 × 10^{3}± 10%) decline in CFU between the time-zero CFU and the CFU after the specified holding period. |
{7}
Table 2: Summary of all recovery studies performed for various target analytes in appropriate negative clinical matrix (NCM).
| Group | Analyte (strain) | NCM used | Recovery Study Data Table # |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Virus | Adenovirus (ATCC VR-1) | Sputum | 3, 4 |
| | Cytomegalovirus (ATCC VR-977) | Whole blood | 3, 4 |
| | Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 (ATCC VR-260) | Skin lesion exudate | 3, 4 |
| | Herpes Simplex Virus Type 2 (ATCC VR-1779) | Skin lesion exudate | 3, 4 |
| | Echovirus 30 (ATCC VR-1660) | Throat swab | 3, 4 |
| | Vaccinia virus (ATCC VR-1354) | Skin lesion exudate | 3, 4 |
| | Influenza A (ATCC VR-1736) | Sputum | 3, 4 |
| | Parainfluenza virus type 3 (ATCC VR-1782) | Sputum | 3, 4 |
| | Respiratory syncytial virus (ATCC VR-1400) | Sputum | 3, 4 |
| Bacteria | Chlamydia pneumoniae (ATCC VR-1360) | Sputum | 3, 4 |
| | Chlamydia trachomatis (ATCC VR-880) | Sputum | 3, 4 |
| | Mycoplasma pneumoniae (ATCC 15531) | Sputum | 5, 6 |
| | Ureaplasma urealyticum (ATCC 27816) | Urine | 5, 6 |
Table 3: Recovery of viruses and chlamydiae at 2–8°C storage.
| Test Organism | Average Recovery in Foci Counts/mL (×10⁴ Foci Counts/mL) | | % Change in 0–48h (negative value indicates reduction) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | 0h | 48h | |
| Adenovirus | 2.50 | 2.48 | -1% |
| Cytomegalovirus | 0.95 | 0.76 | -20% |
| Echovirus 30 | 1.77 | 1.04 | -41% |
| Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 | 1.02 | 0.89 | -13% |
| Herpes Simplex Virus Type 2 | 11.04 | 6.42 | -42% |
| Vaccinia Virus | 11.55 | 8.30 | -28% |
| Influenza A | 13.89 | 12.21 | -12% |
| Parainfluenza virus type 3 | 28.84 | 23.47 | -19% |
| Respiratory Syncytial Virus | 5.39 | 4.76 | -12% |
| Chlamydia pneumoniae | 1.33 | 1.49 | 12% |
| Chlamydia trachomatis | 1.17 | 0.56 | -52% |
Table 4: Recovery of viruses and chlamydiae at 20–25°C storage.
| Test Organism | Average Recovery in Foci Counts/mL (×10⁴ Foci Counts/mL) | | % Change in 0–48h (negative value indicates reduction) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | 0h | 48h | |
| Adenovirus | 2.50 | 2.64 | 6% |
| Cytomegalovirus | 0.95 | 0.51 | -46% |
| Echovirus 30 | 1.77 | 0.97 | -45% |
| Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 | 1.02 | 1.09 | 7% |
K240235 – Page 8 of 10
{8}
| Test Organism | Average Recovery in Foci Counts/mL (×10⁴ Foci Counts/mL) | | % Change in 0–48h (negative value indicates reduction) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | 0h | 48h | |
| Herpes Simplex Virus Type 2 | 11.04 | 6.52 | -41% |
| Vaccinia Virus | 11.55 | 8.91 | -23% |
| Influenza A | 13.89 | 10.68 | -23% |
| Parainfluenza virus type 3 | 28.84 | 8.39 | -71% |
| Respiratory Syncytial Virus | 5.39 | 3.17 | -41% |
| Chlamydia pneumoniae | 1.33 | 1.03 | -23% |
| Chlamydia trachomatis | 1.17 | 0.41 | -65% |
Table 5: Mycoplasma pneumoniae and Ureaplasma urealyticum recovery by Roll-plate and Swab elution method at 2–8°C storage.
| Test Organism | Average Recovery in CFU counts using Roll Plate Method | | | Average Recovery using Swab Elution Method (×10⁴ CFU/mL) | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | 0h | 48h | % Change in 0–48h (negative value indicates reduction) | 0h | 48h | Log₁₀ Changes in 0–48 hrs. (positive indicates reduction) |
| Mycoplasma pneumoniae | 243 | 227 | -7% | 5.96 | 5.47 | 0.04 |
| Ureaplasma urealyticum | 264 | 189 | -28% | 5.10 | 3.81 | 0.13 |
Table 6: Mycoplasma pneumoniae and Ureaplasma urealyticum recovery by Roll-plate and Swab elution method at 20–25°C storage.
| Test Organism | Average Recovery in CFU counts using Roll Plate Method | | | Average Recovery using Swab Elution Method (×10⁴ CFU/mL) | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | 0h | 48h | % Change in 0–48h (negative value indicates reduction) | 0h | 48h | Log₁₀ Changes in 0–48 hrs. (positive indicates reduction) |
| Mycoplasma pneumoniae | 243 | 187 | -23% | 5.96 | 4.14 | 0.16 |
| Ureaplasma urealyticum | 264 | 139 | -47% | 5.10 | 2.68 | 0.28 |
Conclusions: The primary criterion for acceptance of recovery studies (as indicated in Table 1) was pre-set at recovered numbers (Fluorescent Foci counts or CFUs, as applicable) being within 1 Log₁₀ (i.e., ±90%) of the enumeration at time 0. As observed in the recovery studies using OmniTrans Transport Medium lots of post-production age up to 18 months, all the viral and bacterial recovery counts at 48 hours satisfied this criterion. Therefore, during transport in the OmniTrans Transport System when stored at 2–25°C, the specimen stability claim of microbial recovery for up to 48 hours is acceptable.
K240235 – Page 9 of 10
{9}
B Comparison Studies:
Method Comparison with Predicate Device; Matrix Comparison:
Not Applicable
C Clinical Studies:
Clinical Sensitivity; Clinical Specificity; Other Clinical Supportive Data:
Not Applicable
D Clinical Cut-Off:
Not Applicable
E Expected Values/Reference Range:
Not Applicable
VIII Proposed Labeling:
The labeling supports the finding of substantial equivalence for this device.
IX Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
K240235 – Page 10 of 10
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.