K234131 · Hemostasis, LLC · QAU · Jul 26, 2024 · General, Plastic Surgery
Device Facts
Record ID
K234131
Device Name
Resolv Endoscopic Hemostat System
Applicant
Hemostasis, LLC
Product Code
QAU · General, Plastic Surgery
Decision Date
Jul 26, 2024
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 878.4456
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic, Real-World Evidence
Real-World Evidence
Submission
Device
Sponsor
RWD Sources
RWE Use Summary
Key Tags
K234131 · Jul 26, 2024
Resolv Endoscopic Hemostat System
Hemostasis, LLC
Clinical evaluation of human subjects
The clinical evaluation of 59 subjects was used to demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of the Resolv Endoscopic Hemostat System, reporting 100% hemostasis and specific rebleed rates.
Endoscopic hemostasis; Nonvariceal GI bleeding; Clinical evaluation
Clinical Evidence
Study Design
Population
Comparator
Key Endpoints
Human clinical evaluation; Clinical evaluation
Subjects undergoing endoscopic upper GI procedures; Sample Size: 59
The Hemostasis Resolv Endoscopic Hemostat System is intended for use under the care of a health care professional for hemostasis of upper nonvariceal gastrointestinal bleeding, excluding Forrest Ia classification of bleeding.
Device Story
Sterile, single-use endoscopic system delivering plant-based polysaccharide hemostat powder to GI bleeding sites. System includes powder cartridge, flow dispenser, catheter tubing, and gas source tubing. Connects to external medical CO2 source (0.6–1.0 slpm flow). Operated by physician via endoscope distal controls to aim powder flow; trigger stops flow. Used in clinical settings for non-variceal upper GI bleeds. Powder absorbs moisture to form a mechanical barrier, promoting hemostasis. Maximum 16.7g powder per device; limit 33.4g per patient. Provides immediate bleeding control; reduces rebleeding risk.
Clinical Evidence
Clinical evaluation conducted in India with 59 subjects undergoing endoscopic upper GI procedures. Primary endpoint: hemostasis achievement. Results: 100% hemostasis success rate, 3.4% endoscopically confirmed re-bleed rate, and 5.1% all-cause rebleed rate. Supported by porcine animal model study validating safety and performance requirements per 21 CFR 878.4456.
Technological Characteristics
Plant-based polysaccharide hemostat powder; identical to NexStat Plus. Delivery via catheter/dispenser system using external medical CO2. Flow rate 0.6–1.0 slpm. Sterile (gamma radiation, SAL 10⁻⁶). Biocompatible per ISO 10993-1. Single-use. No software/electronics.
Indications for Use
Indicated for hemostasis of non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding in patients, excluding Forrest Ia classification. Intended for use by healthcare professionals.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A hemostatic device for intraluminal gastrointestinal use is a prescription device that is endoscopically applied to the upper and/or lower gastrointestinal tract and is intended to produce hemostasis via absorption of fluid or by other physical means.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The special controls for this device are:(1) The device must be demonstrated to be biocompatible.
(2) Performance data must support the sterility and pyrogenicity of the device.
(3) Performance data must support the shelf life of the device by demonstrating continued sterility, package integrity, and device functionality over the identified shelf life.
(4) In vivo performance testing must demonstrate that the device performs as intended under anticipated conditions of use. The testing must evaluate the following:
(i) The ability to deliver the hemostatic material to the bleeding site;
(ii) The ability to achieve hemostasis in a clinically relevant model of gastrointestinal bleeding; and
(iii) Safety endpoints, including thromboembolic events, local and systemic toxicity, tissue trauma, gastrointestinal tract obstruction, and bowel distension and perforation.
(5) Non-clinical performance testing must demonstrate that the device performs as intended under anticipated conditions of use. The following performance characteristics must be evaluated:
(i) Materials characterization of all components must demonstrate the device meets established specifications, which must include compositional identity and purity, characterization of impurities, physical characteristics, and reactivity with fluids.
(ii) Performance testing must demonstrate the mechanical integrity and functionality of the system used to deliver the device and demonstrate the device meets established specifications, including output pressure for propellant-based systems.
(6) Labeling must include:
(i) Information identifying and explaining how to use the device and its components; and
(ii) A shelf life.
Predicate Devices
EndoClot Polysaccharide Hemostatic System (K190677)
{0}
FDA U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION
July 26, 2024
Hemostasis LLC
Lakshmi Ganesh Bollina
Regulatory Affairs Specialist
5000 Township Parkway
St. Paul, Minnesota 55110
Re: K234131
Trade/Device Name: Resolv Endoscopic Hemostat System
Regulation Number: 21 CFR 878.4456
Regulation Name: Hemostatic Device For Intraluminal Gastrointestinal Use
Regulatory Class: Class II
Product Code: QAU
Dated: June 25, 2024
Received: June 26, 2024
Dear Lakshmi Ganesh Bollina:
We have reviewed your section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Additional information about changes that may require a new premarket notification are provided in the FDA guidance documents entitled "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99812/download) and "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Software Change to an Existing Device" (https://www.fda.gov/media/99785/download).
U.S. Food & Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993
www.fda.gov
{1}
K234131 - Lakshmi Ganesh Bollina
Page 2
Your device is also subject to, among other requirements, the Quality System (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820), which includes, but is not limited to, 21 CFR 820.30, Design controls; 21 CFR 820.90, Nonconforming product; and 21 CFR 820.100, Corrective and preventive action. Please note that regardless of whether a change requires premarket review, the QS regulation requires device manufacturers to review and approve changes to device design and production (21 CFR 820.30 and 21 CFR 820.70) and document changes and approvals in the device master record (21 CFR 820.181).
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR Part 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reporting-combination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR Part 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR Parts 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reporting-mdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
Tek N. Lamichhane - S
Digitally signed by Tek N. Lamichhane
Date: 2024.07.26 14:56:04
-04'00"
Tek N. Lamichhane, Ph.D.
Assistant Director
DHT4B: Division of Infection Control and Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Devices
OHT4: Office of Surgical and Infection Control Devices
Office of Product Evaluation and Quality
Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}
FORM FDA 3881 (6/20)
Page 1 of 1
PSC Publishing Services (301) 443-6740
EF
| DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration Indications for Use | Form Approved: OMB No. 0910-0120 Expiration Date: 06/30/2023 See PRA Statement below. |
| --- | --- |
| 510(k) Number (if known) K234131 | |
| Device Name Resolv Endoscopic Hemostat System | |
| Indications for Use (Describe) The Hemostasis Resolv Endoscopic Hemostat System is intended for use under the care of a health care professional for hemostasis of upper nonvariceal gastrointestinal bleeding, excluding Forrest Ia classification of bleeding. | |
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) ☑ Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) ☐ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) | |
| CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED. | |
| This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.* | |
| The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to: Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov | |
| "An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number." | |
{3}
510(k) Summary
K234131
Resolv™ Endoscopic Hemostat System
Date Prepared: 25 July 2024
Submitter: Hemostasis, LLC
5000 Township Parkway
St. Paul, MN 55110
Telephone: 651-855-1466
Fax: 651-855-1465
Contact: Mr. Lakshmi Ganesh Bollina
Regulatory Affairs Specialist
5000 Township Parkway
St. Paul, MN 55110
Telephone: 651-855-1466
Proprietary Name: Resolv™ Endoscopic Hemostat System
Common/Usual Name: Endoscopic Hemostat
Classification: Hemostatic device for intraluminal gastrointestinal use, Product Code QAU, Class II, 21 CFR 878.4456
Predicate Device: EndoClot Polysaccharide Hemostatic System K190677
Reference Device: NexStat® Plus Topical Hemostat K122886
Establishment Registration Number: 3007225047
Description:
The Resolv™ Endoscopic Hemostat System is a sterile prescription device intended for use under the care of a health care professional for hemostasis of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding, excluding Forrest Ia classification of bleeding. The device consists of a hemostat powder and dispenser components provided in a tray with a Tyvek lid acting as the sterile barrier. The hemostat powder is further contained within in a capped cartridge and packaged in a foil pouch. The dispenser components include a flow dispenser, two catheter tubing sets and a gas source tubing set. The gas source tubing set is connected to a medical CO₂ gas source that is flow and pressure controlled. The endoscope distal end controls are used to aim the flow and placement of the hemostat powder. The trigger is released to stop the flow of powder. The device contains a maximum of 16.7 grams of hemostat powder and no more than 2 devices (33.4 grams) may be used on a patient either in a single procedure or in conjunction with rebleeding up to 10 days after the initial procedure. If 2 devices (33.4 grams) have been used in the initial procedure an alternate modality must be used should rebleeding occur.
The hemostat powder is identical to the commercially available topical hemostat, NexStat® Plus which received 510(k) clearance with K122886 as a topical wound dressing, comprised of plant-based polysaccharides.
{4}
# Indications for Use:
The Hemostasis Resolv™ Endoscopic Hemostat System is intended for use under the care of a health care professional for hemostasis of non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding, excluding Forrest Ia classification of bleeding.
# Substantial Equivalence:
The Resolv™ Endoscopic Hemostat System is substantially equivalent to the primary predicate EndoClot® Polysaccharide Hemostatic System, 510(k) Number K190677 (QAU), clearance date 01/29/2021, for the following reasons:
- Both have the same FDA Classification, Intended use and target population.
- Both are sterile, single use devices that deliver a plant-based polysaccharide powder to the GI bleeding site.
- Both contain materials proven biocompatible for their intended use in accordance with ISO 10993-1.
The primary differences appear to be the gas source, flow rate and digestibility in the GI Tract.
- Gas Source: Resolv™ utilizes the hospital supply CO₂, while the EndoClot® PHS utilizes air drawn from OR and filtered.
- Gas Flowrate: The flow is set within the range of 0.6 to 1.0 slpm for Resolv™, while for Endoclot the flow is based on gas pressure defined in Endoclot IFU.
- Digestibility in the GI Tract leading to release of sugar molecules: The Resolv hemostat powder is 13% digestible where Endoclot PHS powder is fully digested.
In addition, the powder hemostat used in the Resolv™ is identical to the Class II topical hemostat, NexStat® Plus, in terms of material composition, mechanism of action, manufacturing and sterilization. Due to the differences in Intended Use and delivery system, Resolv™ Endoscopic Hemostat System has undergone additional biocompatibility testing, sterilization validation, packaging testing and in vivo and non-clinical performance testing in accordance with its intended use special controls specified in 21 CFR 878.4456 for a Hemostatic device for intraluminal gastrointestinal use.
# Summary of Non-Clinical Performance Data
## Biocompatibility:
Biocompatibility testing was performed using ISO 10993 – Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices and FDA guidance document Use of International Standard ISO 10993-1, “Biological evaluation of medical devices – Part 1: Evaluation and testing within a risk management process” dated Sept.8, 2023. The Hemostasis Resolv™ Endoscopic Hemostat System complies with the biocompatibility requirements for its intended use.
## Sterilization, Packaging, Shelf Life:
The Hemostasis Resolv™ Endoscopic Hemostat System is sterilized using a validated gamma radiation method to assure a sterility assurance level (SAL) of 10⁻⁶. The packaged device has been successfully tested for package integrity and device functionality over the labeled shelf life of 24 months.
## Performance Bench Testing:
Design verification testing was performed for the Resolv™ Endoscopic Hemostat System to demonstrate physical and functional requirements were met.
{5}
# Animal Performance Testing:
In vivo animal studies have been conducted to support the substantial equivalence claims of Resolv™ Endoscopic Hemostat system as compared to the predicate device Endoclot®. The objective of the study was to validate the efficacy and safety of Resolv™ Endoscopic Hemostat system in a porcine animal model for bleeding control in the upper GI tract. The results of the animal study demonstrated that the Resolv™ did meet the in vivo safety and performance requirements of the special controls in 21 CFR 878.4456 by effectively delivering the hemostat to the bleeding site and achieving hemostasis and meeting all the safety endpoints and is substantially equivalent to the predicate.
# Clinical Performance Testing:
A human clinical evaluation was conducted in India to support the safety and effectiveness of the use of Resolv™ Endoscopic Hemostat System. Resolv™ was studied in 59 subjects undergoing endoscopic upper GI procedures. Hemostasis was achieved in 100% of patients with an endoscopically confirmed re-bleed rate of 3.4% and an all-cause rebleed rate of 5.1%.
| Hemostat System | Forrest Bleeding Classification | Number of Subjects | Hemostasis % | Rebleed Rate % | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | | Endoscopically Confirmed | All Cause |
| Resolv | Ib | 59 | 100% | 3.4% | 5.1% |
Real world evidence provided for the Resolv Endoscopic Hemostat System support that the Resolv is substantially equivalent to the predicate in all aspects of safety and efficacy.
# Conclusion:
Utilizing FDA's Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff "Format for Traditional and Abbreviated 510(k)s" issued on September 13, 2019, a comparison of key characteristics demonstrates that the proposed device Resolv™ Endoscopic Hemostat System is substantially equivalent to the predicate device in terms of intended use and performance characteristics. The Resolv™ Endoscopic Hemostat System is as safe, as effective, and performs as well as the predicate device.
The substantial equivalence analysis supports that the Resolv™ Endoscopic Hemostat System presents no new concerns about safety and effectiveness and is suitable for its intended use.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.