K190677 · Endoclot Plus Co., Ltd. · QAU · Jan 29, 2021 · General, Plastic Surgery
Device Facts
Record ID
K190677
Device Name
EndoClot
Applicant
Endoclot Plus Co., Ltd.
Product Code
QAU · General, Plastic Surgery
Decision Date
Jan 29, 2021
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 878.4456
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
EndoClot® PHS is used for hemostasis of nonvariceal gastrointestinal bleeding, excluding Forrest la classification of bleeding.
Device Story
EndoClot PHS is a sterile, single-use hemostatic system consisting of Absorbable Modified Polymer (AMP) particles in a PE bellow and an endoscopic applicator. Used by physicians during endoscopic procedures to treat nonvariceal gastrointestinal bleeding. The device is inserted through the working channel of an endoscope to the bleeding site. AMP particles are delivered via a gas source to the site, where they absorb water and form a mechanical barrier to achieve hemostasis. The system provides a physical method for bleeding control, aiding in clinical management of GI hemorrhage.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing and in vivo animal studies were conducted. Performance measures (gas pressure, spray pattern, powder feeding rate, water absorbency, pH) were similar or superior to the predicate. Biocompatibility (ISO 10993 series, ASTM F756-17), chemical characterization, and sterility (ISO 11737-2) testing confirmed safety. In vivo swine model studies validated efficacy and safety for GI bleeding control compared to the predicate.
Technological Characteristics
System comprises plant-derived Absorbable Modified Polymer (AMP) particles and a PE bellow applicator. Delivery via gas source through endoscopic working channel. Biocompatible, non-pyrogenic, sterile. Standards: ISO 10993-5, -10, -11, -18; OECD 471, 473, 474; ASTM F756-17; USP <85>; ISO 11737-2.
Indications for Use
Indicated for hemostasis of nonvariceal gastrointestinal bleeding in patients, excluding Forrest Ia classification bleeding.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A hemostatic device for intraluminal gastrointestinal use is a prescription device that is endoscopically applied to the upper and/or lower gastrointestinal tract and is intended to produce hemostasis via absorption of fluid or by other physical means.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The special controls for this device are:(1) The device must be demonstrated to be biocompatible.
(2) Performance data must support the sterility and pyrogenicity of the device.
(3) Performance data must support the shelf life of the device by demonstrating continued sterility, package integrity, and device functionality over the identified shelf life.
(4) In vivo performance testing must demonstrate that the device performs as intended under anticipated conditions of use. The testing must evaluate the following:
(i) The ability to deliver the hemostatic material to the bleeding site;
(ii) The ability to achieve hemostasis in a clinically relevant model of gastrointestinal bleeding; and
(iii) Safety endpoints, including thromboembolic events, local and systemic toxicity, tissue trauma, gastrointestinal tract obstruction, and bowel distension and perforation.
(5) Non-clinical performance testing must demonstrate that the device performs as intended under anticipated conditions of use. The following performance characteristics must be evaluated:
(i) Materials characterization of all components must demonstrate the device meets established specifications, which must include compositional identity and purity, characterization of impurities, physical characteristics, and reactivity with fluids.
(ii) Performance testing must demonstrate the mechanical integrity and functionality of the system used to deliver the device and demonstrate the device meets established specifications, including output pressure for propellant-based systems.
(6) Labeling must include:
(i) Information identifying and explaining how to use the device and its components; and
(ii) A shelf life.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image contains the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On the left, there is a symbol representing the Department of Health & Human Services - USA. To the right of this symbol, there is a blue square with the letters "FDA" in white. Next to the blue square, the words "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" are written in blue.
January 29, 2021
EndoClot Plus Co., Ltd. % Jonathan Hu Technical Manager Medwheat (Shanghai) Medical Technology Co., Ltd. Yangpu District Liaoyuan East Road Shuangyang First Suite No. 33 Room 303 Shanghai, 200093 Cn
Re: K190677
Trade/Device Name: EndoClot Regulation Number: 21 CFR 878.4456 Regulation Name: Hemostatic Device For Intraluminal Gastrointestinal Use Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: QAU Dated: January 29, 2019 Received: March 15, 2019
Dear Mr. Hu:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's
{1}------------------------------------------------
requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (OS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
Cindy Chowdhury, Ph.D., M.B.A. Assistant Director DHT4B: Division of Infection Control and Plastic Surgery Devices OHT4: Office of Surgical and Infection Control Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
### Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K190677
Device Name
EndoClot® Polysaccharide Hemostatic System
Indications for Use (Describe)
EndoClot® PHS is used for hemostasis of nonvariceal gastrointestinal bleeding, excluding Forrest Ia classification of bleeding.
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) | |
|-------------------------------------------------|--|
|-------------------------------------------------|--|
X Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
| Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/3/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for EndoClot, with a red plus sign to the right of the word "Clot". Above the logo is the text "K190677 Page 1 of 3". The logo is in blue and black.
Date Prepared: Jan 28th, 2021
# 510(k) Summary
[As required by 21 CFR 807.92]
### 1. Submitter's Information
| Name of Sponsor: | EndoClot Plus Co., Ltd. |
|------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Address: | 101 Room, B8 Building, 218 Xinghu Street, Suzhou Industrial Park |
| Contact Name: | Huihui Xie |
| Telephone No.: | 086-512-62605550 |
| Fax No.: | 086-512-62605551 |
| Email Address: | <a href="mailto:Hui@endoclot.com">Hui@endoclot.com</a> |
**2. Correspondent's Information**
| Company Name: | Med-wheat Shanghai |
|---------------|--------------------|
|---------------|--------------------|
| Company Name: | Med-wheat Shanghai |
|---------------------|--------------------------|
| Correspondent Name: | Jonathan Hu |
| Telephone No.: | 86-021-65181421 |
| Email Address: | Jonathan.hu@medwheat.com |
### 3. Trade Name, Common Name, Classification
| Trade Name: | EndoClot® |
|---------------------------|----------------------------------|
| Common/Device Name: | Polysaccharide Hemostatic System |
| Mode Name: | EPK2302, EPK2303, EPK2305 |
| Regulation Classification | 878.4456 |
| Product Code: | QAU |
| Classification Panel: | General & Plastic Surgery |
| Device Class: | II |
### 4. Identification of Predicate Device(s)
The identified predicates within this submission are as follows:
The Hemospray® Endoscopic Hemospray®) has been cleared by FDA through De Novo No. DEN170015 (Date: May 7, 2018).
The EndoClot® Applicator has been cleared by FDA through 510(k) No. K162197 (Date: January 18, 2017).
{4}------------------------------------------------
# K190677 Page 2 of 3
### 5. Description of the Device
EndoClot® Polysaccharide Hemostatic System (EndoClot® PHS) is a sterilized single use medical device that is composed of Absorbable Modified Polymer (AMP®) particles in a PE bellow and an EndoClot® Applicator (K162197). The device contains no human or animal components. AMP® particles are biocompatible, non-pyrogenic and derived from plant starch.
### 6. Intended Use/Indication for Use
EndoClot® PHS is used for hemostasis of nonvariceal gastrointestinal bleeding, excluding Forrest la classification of bleeding.
### 7. Technological Characteristics
EndoClot® PHS is composed of Absorbable Modified Polymer (AMP®) particles in a PE bellow and an EndoClot® Applicator (K162197). AMP® particles are delivered through a catheter inserted through the working channel of an endoscope which provides access to the bleeding site.
When compared with Hemospray® (DEN170015), EndoClot® PHS has the same intended use but with reduced indications for use. They are with the same classification and same application technique that the particles are delivered by gas source and through a catheter inserted through the working channel of an endoscope which provides access to the bleeding site. Yet, there are also multiple dimensions are different, which are hemostatic particles and packaging. However, these different parts have been verified to be substantial equivalent.
When compared with EndoClot® Applicator (K162197), the applicator of EndoClot® PHS is identical with EndoClot® Applicator (K162197).
### 8. Performance Data
Performance tests, biocompatibility tests, chemical characterization, sterility test and in vivo animal studies were conducted to demonstrate that Endoclot® PHS and the predicate devices are substantially equivalent.
According to the performance tests, the properties (Pressure of Gas Source, Spray Pattern, Delay Time and Powder Feeding Rate, Water Absorbency and pH) of EndoClot® PHS are similar to or better than the predicate device Hemospray®. The results demonstrated that the proposed device is substantially equivalent to the predicate device for these performance measures.
The biocompatibility tests (Cytotoxicity, Sensitization, Intracutaneous Reactivity, Acute Systemic Toxicity, Pyrogen, Systemic Toxicity, Genotoxicity, Hemocompatibility and Endotoxins), chemical characterization and sterility test in accordance to Food and Drug Administration related guidance and recognized international standards (ISO10993-5:2009, ISO10993-10:2010, ISO10993-11:2017, ISO10993-18:2020, OECD 471:1997, OECD 473:2016,
{5}------------------------------------------------
OECD 474:2016, ASTM F756-17, USP42_NF37<85> and ISO11737-2:2009/(R)2014), indicated that Endoclot® PHS is substantially equivalent to the predicate.
In vivo animal studies have also been conducted to support the substantial equivalence claims of our product as compared to the predicate device Hemospray®. The objective of the study was to validate the efficacy and safety of EndoClot® PHS (compared to the predicate device) in a swine model for gastrointestinal bleeding control. The results demonstrated that the proposed device is substantially equivalent to the predicate.
## 9. Conclusion [21 CFR 807.92(b) (3)]
EndoClot® PHS has a reduced scope of intended use, with the same classification and application technique compared with Hemospray® (DEN170015). The applicator of EndoClot® PHS is identical with EndoClot® Applicator (K162197).
A series of tests were conducted to verify the safety and efficacy of Endoclot® PHS:
1) The performance tests demonstrated that the proposed device meets the design specifications and is suitable for the intended use.
2) The biocompatibility tests, chemical characterization and sterility test indicated that the proposed device is substantially equivalent to the predicate.
3) The in vivo animal studies demonstrated that the proposed device is substantially equivalent to the predicate.
In accordance with the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, 21 CFR Part 807 and based on the information provided in this premarket notification, EndoClot Plus Co., Ltd. concludes that EndoClot® PHS is substantially equivalent to predicate devices.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.