VivaChek Link Plus Blood Glucose Monitoring System
Applicant
Vivachek Biotech (Hangzhou) Co., Ltd.
Product Code
NBW · Clinical Chemistry
Decision Date
Dec 22, 2023
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 862.1345
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
VivaChek™ Link Plus Blood Glucose Monitoring System is comprised of VivaChek™ Link Plus Blood Glucose Meter and the VivaChek™ Ino Blood Glucose Test Strips. VivaChek™ Link Plus Blood Glucose Monitoring System is intended to quantitatively measure the glucose concentration in fresh capillary whole blood samples drawn from the fingertips. It is intended for use by persons with diabetes at home as an aid to monitor the effectiveness of diabetes control. It is not intended for neonatal use or for the diagnosis of or screening for diabetes. This system is intended for self-testing outside the body (in vitro diagnostic use), and should only be used by a single person and should not be shared.
Device Story
System uses electrochemical amperometric biosensor to measure glucose concentration in fresh capillary whole blood. Blood sample drawn into test strip via capillary action; glucose reacts with glucose oxidase and mediator to generate electrons; resulting current correlates to glucose concentration. Device includes 4G module for data transmission. Used by patients with diabetes at home for self-monitoring. Output displayed on meter screen; helps patients track glucose levels to manage diabetes. Device is handheld, battery-operated, and intended for single-patient use.
Clinical Evidence
Lay user study (n=352) demonstrated 100% of results within ±20% of comparator (YSI 2300) across 48.1–314.5 mg/dL range. Accuracy at extreme glucose concentrations (n=105) showed 100% within ±20% for both <80 mg/dL and >250 mg/dL ranges. Bench testing validated precision, linearity, interference, hematocrit (20-70%), altitude (up to 10,413 ft), and environmental operating conditions.
Technological Characteristics
Electrochemical amperometric biosensor; glucose oxidase chemistry. Rechargeable 3.7V lithium polymer battery. 4G wireless connectivity. Dimensions: 100.9mm x 61.6mm x 23.7mm. Weight: ~85g. Operating range: 20-600 mg/dL; 20-70% hematocrit; 41-113°F. Complies with FCC Part 15, 2, 24, 27, and 47 CFR § 2.1093.
Indications for Use
Indicated for persons with diabetes for quantitative measurement of glucose concentration in fresh capillary whole blood from fingertips to monitor diabetes control. Not for neonatal use, diagnosis, or screening. For single-patient, home-use, in vitro diagnostic self-testing.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A glucose test system is a device intended to measure glucose quantitatively in blood and other body fluids. Glucose measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of carbohydrate metabolism disorders including diabetes mellitus, neonatal hypoglycemia, and idiopathic hypoglycemia, and of pancreatic islet cell carcinoma.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The device, when it is solely intended for use as a drink to test glucose tolerance, is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 862.9.
Predicate Devices
VivaChek™ Ino Smart Blood Glucose Monitoring System (K173140)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
FDA
U.S. FOOD & DRUG
ADMINISTRATION
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY
ASSAY AND INSTRUMENT
## I Background Information:
A 510(k) Number
K233058
B Applicant
VivaChek Biotech (Hangzhou) Co., Ltd.
C Proprietary and Established Names
VivaChek™ Link Plus Blood Glucose Monitoring System
D Regulatory Information
| Product Code(s) | Classification | Regulation Section | Panel |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| NBW | Class II | 21 CFR 862.1345 - Glucose Test System | CH - Clinical Chemistry |
## II Submission/Device Overview:
A Purpose for Submission:
New device
B Measurand:
Glucose in capillary whole blood from the fingertip
C Type of Test:
Quantitative amperometry (glucose oxidase).
## III Intended Use/Indications for Use:
A Intended Use(s):
Food and Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
www.fda.gov
{1}
See Indications for Use below.
## B Indication(s) for Use:
VivaChek™ Link Plus Blood Glucose Monitoring System is comprised of VivaChek™ Link Plus Blood Glucose Meter and the VivaChek™ Ino Blood Glucose Test Strips. VivaChek™ Link Plus Blood Glucose Monitoring System is intended to quantitatively measure the glucose concentration in fresh capillary whole blood samples drawn from the fingertips. It is intended for use by persons with diabetes at home as an aid to monitor the effectiveness of diabetes control. It is not intended for neonatal use or for the diagnosis of or screening for diabetes. This system is intended for self-testing outside the body (in vitro diagnostic use), and should only be used by a single person and should not be shared.
## C Special Conditions for Use Statement(s):
OTC - Over The Counter
- Not for use on critically ill patients, patients in shock or in a hyperglycemic-hyperosmolar state with or without ketosis.
- Not for neonatal use.
- Not for use on patient with severe dehydration.
- Not for use on patient that is severely hypotensive.
- Not for screening or diagnosis of diabetes mellitus.
- Not for Alternative Site Testing (AST).
- Do not use the system above 10413 ft (3174 meters) in altitude.
- This meter is not intended for use in healthcare or assisted-use settings such as hospitals, physician offices, or long-term care facilities because it has not been cleared by FDA for use in these settings, including for routine assisted testing or as part of glycemic control procedures. Use of this meter on multiple patients may lead to transmission of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), Hepatitis C Virus (HCV), Hepatitis B Virus (HBV), or other bloodborne pathogens.
## D Special Instrument Requirements:
VivaChek™ Link Plus Blood Glucose Meter
## IV Device/System Characteristics:
### A Device Description:
VivaChek™ Link Plus Blood Glucose Monitoring System, is designed to quantitatively measure the glucose concentration in fresh capillary whole blood from the fingertip. The system consists of: VivaChek™ Link Plus Blood Glucose Meter, VivaChek™ Ino Blood Glucose Test Strips, and the VivaChek™ Ino Control Solution with three levels (level 1, 2 and 3). The blood glucose meter contains a 3.7-volt lithium Ion Battery that can be charged using USB port, plastic housing and Buttons and a 4G module for data transmission. The materials needed but not provided include a single user lancing device (VivaChek lancing device) and sterile lancets (VivaChek lancets) both cleared under K220475, VivaChek™ Ino Control Solution and VivaChek™ Ino Blood Glucose Test Strips.
K233058 - Page 2 of 12
{2}
B Principle of Operation:
VivaChek™ Link Plus Blood Glucose Monitoring System is designed to quantitatively measure the glucose concentration in fresh capillary whole blood. The glucose measurement is achieved by using the amperometric detection method. The test is based on measurement of electrical current caused by the reaction of the glucose with the reagents on the electrode of the test strip. The blood sample is pulled into the tip of the test strip through capillary action. Glucose in the sample reacts with glucose oxidase and the mediator. Electrons are generated, producing a current that is proportional to the glucose concentration in the sample. After the reaction time, the glucose concentration in the sample is displayed.
C Instrument Description Information:
1. Instrument Name:
VivaChek™ Link Plus Blood Glucose Meter
2. Specimen Identification:
There is no sample identification function with this device. Samples are applied directly to the test strip as they are collected.
3. Specimen Sampling and Handling:
The glucose system is intended to be used with capillary whole blood from the finger only. The whole blood sample is applied directly to the test strip by capillary action.
4. Calibration:
The meter does not require calibration or coding by the user. The meter is automatically coded.
5. Quality Control:
Three levels of glucose control solutions are available for use with this system and can be purchased separately. Recommendations on when to test with control solutions are provided in the labeling. Acceptable ranges for each level of control solution are printed on the test strip vial label. The user is cautioned not to use the meter if the control result falls outside these ranges. The control solution readings are automatically marked by the meter as control results and are not included in the patient result averages.
This medical device product has functions subject to FDA premarket review as well as functions that are not subject to FDA premarket review. For this application, if the product has functions that are not subject to FDA premarket review, FDA assessed those functions only to the extent that they either could adversely impact the safety and effectiveness of the functions subject to FDA premarket review or they are included as a labeled positive impact that was considered in the assessment of the functions subject to FDA premarket review.
K233058 - Page 3 of 12
{3}
V Substantial Equivalence Information:
A Predicate Device Name(s):
VivaChek™ Ino Smart Blood Glucose Monitoring System
B Predicate 510(k) Number(s):
K173140
C Comparison with Predicate(s):
| Device & Predicate Device(s): | K233058 | K173140 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Device Trade Name | VivaChek™ Link Plus Blood Glucose Monitoring System | VivaChek Ino Smart Blood Glucose Monitoring System |
| General Device Characteristic Similarities | | |
| Intended Use/Indications For Use | For the quantitatively measure the glucose concentration in fresh capillary whole blood samples drawn from the fingertips. It is intended for use by persons with diabetes at home as an aid to monitor the effectiveness of diabetes control. | Same |
| Test Strip | VivaChek™ Ino Blood Glucose Test Strips | Same |
| Strip Chemical Composition | Glucose oxidase | Same |
| Sample Type | Fresh capillary whole blood | Same |
| Measurement Range | 20-600 mg/dL | Same |
| Sample Volume | 0.8 μL | Same |
| Test Time | 5 seconds | Same |
| General Device Characteristic Differences | | |
| Battery Type | Rechargeable, 800 mAh, 3.7 Volt DC, lithium polymer battery | Rechargeable, 250mAh, 3.7 Volt DC, lithium polymer battery |
| Data Transmission | 4G | Bluetooth |
K233058 - Page 4 of 12
{4}
VI Standards/Guidance Documents Referenced:
FDA Guidance Document: Self-Monitoring Blood Glucose Test Systems for Over-the-Counter Use. Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff. Issued on September 29, 2020.
VII Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
A Analytical Performance:
1. Precision/Reproducibility:
Within-Run Precision (Repeatability)
The sponsor performed a repeatability study using 3 lots of VivaChek™ Ino Blood Glucose Test Strips, 10 VivaChek™ Link Plus Blood Glucose Meters and venous whole blood adjusted to 5 glucose concentration levels (i.e., Level 1: 30 to 50 mg/dL, Level 2: 51 to 110 mg/dL, Level 3: 111 to 150 mg/dL, Level 4: 151 to 250 mg/dL, and Level 5: 251 to 400 mg/dL). Each sample was tested in replicates of 10 on each of 10 meters using 3 lots of test strips for a total of 300 tests per glucose concentration. Results are summarized below:
| Glucose Level (mg/dL) | Strip Lot | n | Mean (mg/dL) | SD (mg/dL) | %CV |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Level 1 (30 to 50) | 1 | 100 | 40.0 | 1.7 | 4.3% |
| | 2 | 100 | 40.2 | 1.8 | 4.4% |
| | 3 | 100 | 40.3 | 1.7 | 4.3% |
| | Combined | 300 | 40.2 | 1.7 | 4.3% |
| Level 2 (51 to 110) | 1 | 100 | 70.5 | 2.1 | 2.9% |
| | 2 | 100 | 70.4 | 2.2 | 3.1% |
| | 3 | 100 | 70.5 | 2.0 | 2.9% |
| | Combined | 300 | 70.4 | 2.1 | 3.0% |
| Level 3 (111 to 150) | 1 | 100 | 129.4 | 4.0 | 3.1% |
| | 2 | 100 | 129.2 | 3.6 | 2.8% |
| | 3 | 100 | 129.7 | 3.4 | 2.6% |
| | Combined | 300 | 129.4 | 3.6 | 2.8% |
| Level 4 (151 to 250) | 1 | 100 | 200.2 | 4.9 | 2.4% |
| | 2 | 100 | 200.3 | 5.1 | 2.5% |
| | 3 | 100 | 198.4 | 5.8 | 2.9% |
| | Combined | 300 | 199.6 | 5.3 | 2.7% |
| Level 5 (251 to 400) | 1 | 100 | 349.3 | 8.7 | 2.5% |
| | 2 | 100 | 351.7 | 9.1 | 2.6% |
| | 3 | 100 | 349.8 | 7.8 | 2.2% |
| | Combined | 300 | 350.3 | 8.6 | 2.5% |
K233058 - Page 5 of 12
{5}
Intermediate Precision (Between Run)
Intermediate precision study was performed using 3 lots of VivaChek™ Ino Blood Glucose Test Strips, 10 VivaChek™ Link Plus Blood Glucose Meters, and 5 levels of glucose control solutions (i.e., Level 1: 30 to 50 mg/dL, Level 2: 51 to 110 mg/dL, Level 3: 111 to 150 mg/dL, Level 4: 151 to 250 mg/dL, and Level 5: 251 to 400 mg/dL). Each sample level was measured once a day with each meter and each test strip lot for 10 days, for a total of 300 replicates per level. Results are summarized below:
| Glucose Level (mg/dL) | Strip Lot | n | Mean (mg/dL) | SD (mg/dL) | %CV |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Level 1 (30 to 50) | 1 | 100 | 40.0 | 1.5 | 3.7% |
| | 2 | 100 | 39.9 | 1.4 | 3.6% |
| | 3 | 100 | 40.3 | 1.4 | 3.6% |
| | Combined | 300 | 40.0 | 1.5 | 3.7% |
| Level 2 (51 to 110) | 1 | 100 | 69.8 | 1.8 | 2.6% |
| | 2 | 100 | 70.4 | 1.7 | 2.4% |
| | 3 | 100 | 69.8 | 1.8 | 2.6% |
| | Combined | 300 | 70.1 | 1.8 | 2.6% |
| Level 3 (111 to 150) | 1 | 100 | 130.1 | 3.2 | 2.5% |
| | 2 | 100 | 129.7 | 3.3 | 2.6% |
| | 3 | 100 | 130.4 | 3.1 | 2.4% |
| | Combined | 300 | 130.1 | 3.2 | 2.5% |
| Level 4 (151 to 250) | 1 | 100 | 199.1 | 5.1 | 2.5% |
| | 2 | 100 | 200.1 | 4.8 | 2.4% |
| | 3 | 100 | 198.9 | 4.9 | 2.4% |
| | Combined | 300 | 199.5 | 4.9 | 2.5% |
| Level 5 (251 to 400) | 1 | 100 | 349.3 | 8.5 | 2.4% |
| | 2 | 100 | 350.2 | 8.7 | 2.5% |
| | 3 | 100 | 349.6 | 6.6 | 2.4% |
| | Combined | 300 | 349.9 | 8.6 | 2.4% |
2. Linearity:
A linearity study was conducted with 2 VivaChek™ Link Plus Blood Glucose Meters, 3 lots of VivaChek™ Ino Blood Glucose Test Strips, and 11 blood glucose concentration levels (19, 76, 135, 195, 250, 310, 365, 428, 482, 540, and 600 mg/dL) as determined by the comparative method (YSI 2300 STAT PLUS Glucose and L-Lactate Analyzer). VivaChek™ Link Plus Blood Glucose Monitoring System results were compared with the values obtained from the comparative method. The results from the linear regression analysis are summarized below:
| Test Strip Lot# | Slope | y-intercept | R²-value |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Lot 1 | 0.9968 | 0.9922 | 0.9981 |
| Lot 2 | 1.0006 | 1.5950 | 0.9980 |
| Lot 3 | 0.9908 | 2.3351 | 0.9977 |
K233058 - Page 6 of 12
{6}
The results of the study support the sponsor’s claimed glucose measurement range of 20 to 600 mg/dL. If a sample is less than 20 mg/dL, the result is flagged by the meter as “LO”. If a sample result is more than 600 mg/dL, the result is flagged by the meter as “HI”. The low and high functions were validated and demonstrated to function as intended.
3. Analytical Specificity/Interference:
Interference studies were performed with 10 VivaChek™ Link Plus Blood Glucose Meters and 3 lots of VivaChek™ Ino Blood Glucose Test Strips. The study was conducted using venous whole blood samples adjusted to 3 glucose levels (50-70, 110-130, and 225-270 mg/dL) as measured by the comparative method (YSI 2300 STAT PLUS Glucose and L-Lactate Analyzer). The adjusted blood glucose concentrations were separated into a control sample with no interferent added and a test sample containing one of 32 potentially interfering substances. No significant interference between the test and the control samples was defined by the sponsor as within ± 4.8 mg/dL at < 75 mg/dL glucose and within ± 8% at > 75 mg/dL glucose. The highest concentrations at which no significant interference t was observed are presented in the table below:
| Test Substance | Maximum tested concentration with no significant interference |
| --- | --- |
| Acetaminophen | 20 mg/dL |
| Ascorbic acid | 6 mg/dL |
| Conjugated Bilirubin | 50 mg/dL |
| Unconjugated Bilirubin | 40 mg/dL |
| Cholesterol | 500 mg/dL |
| Creatinine | 15 mg/dL |
| Dopamine | 20 mg/dL |
| EDTA | 200 mg/dL |
| Galactose | 60 mg/dL |
| Gentisic acid | 27.8 mg/dL |
| Reduced Glutathione | 92.9 mg/dL |
| Hemoglobin | 20000 mg/dL |
| Heparin | 800 IU/dL |
| Ibuprofen | 50 mg/dL |
| L-Dopa | 3 mg/dL |
| Maltose | 480 mg/dL |
| Mannitol | 1800 mg/dL |
| Methyldopa | 10.5 mg/dL |
| Salicylic acid | 60 mg/dL |
| Sodium | 180 mmol/L |
| Tolbutamide | 100 mg/dL |
| Tolazamide | 40 mg/dL |
| Triglycerides | 3000 mg/dL |
| Uric acid | 24 mg/dL |
K233058 - Page 7 of 12
{7}
| Test Substance | Maximum tested concentration with no significant interference |
| --- | --- |
| Xylose | 200 mg/dL |
| Sorbitol | 0.09 mg/dL |
| Lactose | 25 mg/dL |
| Tetracycline | 1.5 mg/dL |
| Xylitol | 0.09 mg/dL |
| Lactitol | 0.09 mg/dL |
| Isomalt | 0.09 mg/dL |
| Maltitol | 0.09 mg/dL |
The sponsor included the following statement in the labeling:
- Do not test your blood during or soon after a xylose absorption test. Xylose in the blood can give inaccurate results with this meter.
4. Assay Reportable Range:
20 to 600 mg/dL glucose
5. Traceability, Stability, Expected Values (Controls, Calibrators, or Methods):
The system is traceable to NIST SRM 917c glucose reference material. A method comparison study was performed using the candidate devices and YSI 2300 STAT PLUS Glucose and L-Lactate Analyzer as the comparative method (see section VII.C.3).
Open-vial and closed-vial Stability:
Test strip stability was assessed with accelerated studies and real-time stability studies. Protocols and acceptance criteria were reviewed and found acceptable. The labeling includes claims that the test strips are stable for 6 months after opening and 24 months unopened when stored between of 36 to 86°F (2 to 30°C) and 10 to 90% relative humidity.
6. Detection Limit:
Please see linearity in Section VII.A.2
7. Assay Cut-Off:
Not applicable.
8. Accuracy (Instrument):
Not applicable.
9. Carry-Over:
Not applicable.
K233058 - Page 8 of 12
{8}
K233058 - Page 9 of 12
# B Comparison Studies:
1. Method Comparison with Predicate Device:
Please refer to lay user study below in section VII.C3.
2. Matrix Comparison:
Not applicable.
# C Clinical Studies:
1. Clinical Sensitivity:
Not applicable.
2. Clinical Specificity:
Not applicable.
3. Other Clinical Supportive Data (When 1. and 2. Are Not Applicable):
Method Comparison/Lay User Performance Study:
To assess the performance of the VivaChek™ Link Plus blood glucose monitoring system in the hands of lay users, the sponsor performed a study with 352 lay user participants who collected and tested their own fingertip capillary blood samples using only the instructions from the product labeling in English. The glucose concentrations in the samples ranged from 48.1 to 314.5 mg/dL, including 54 samples with glucose levels <80 mg/dL and 66 samples with glucose level >250 mg/dL, as measured by the comparator method (YSI 2300 analyzer). Results were analyzed by comparing blood glucose results obtained from the VivaChek™ Link Plus blood glucose meter by the lay user against the laboratory comparator value obtained by healthcare professionals. Results are summarized in the tables below:
| VivaChek™ Link Plus Blood Glucose Monitoring System are summarized below: Accuracy Across the Entire Glucose Range: | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Within ± 5% | Within ± 10% | Within ± 15% | Within ± 20% |
| 243/352 (69.0 %) | 339/352 (96.3 %) | 352/352 (100 %) | 352/352 (100 %) |
| Regression Analysis: |
| --- |
| y = 0.9965x + 0.3553; R² = 0.9942 |
# Usability:
At the end of the lay-user study, each participant was asked to complete a usability questionnaire regarding ease of understanding of information in the user manual and the ease
{9}
of use when performing a blood glucose test. The sponsor's analysis of the questionnaire responses demonstrated that the participants were satisfied with the ease of operation by following the instructions for use in the User's Manual and with the overall performance of the VivaChek™ Link Plus blood glucose monitoring system.
## Labeling Readability:
The readability of the user manual and test strip package insert, were evaluated using a Flesch-Kincaid analysis and demonstrated that the readability was less than an 8th grade level.
## Accuracy at Extreme Glucose Study:
An accuracy study was performed to evaluate the performance of VivaChek™ Link Plus Blood Glucose Monitoring System was evaluated with the 105 fingertip blood samples containing extreme glucose concentrations at the extreme lower and upper ends of the claimed glucose measuring range. Of the 105 blood samples, 53 samples were less than or equal to 80 mg/dL and 52 samples were greater than or equal to 250 mg/dL. Results on the candidate devices using 3 test strip lots were compared to the results obtained using the comparative method (YSI 2300 STAT PLUS Glucose and L-Lactate Analyzer) and are summarized below:
| For glucose concentrations < 80 mg/dL: | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Within ± 5% | Within ± 10% | Within ± 15% | Within ± 20% |
| 29/53 (54.7 %) | 49/53 (92.5%) | 53/53 (100 %) | 53/53 (100 %) |
| For glucose concentrations > 250 mg/dL: | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Within ± 5% | Within ± 10% | Within ± 15% | Within ± 20% |
| 33/52 (63.5 %) | 48/52 (92.3 %) | 52/52 (100 %) | 52/52 (100 %) |
## D Clinical Cut-Off:
Not applicable.
## E Expected Values/Reference Range:
The sponsor includes the following expected blood glucose values for people without diabetes in the labeling:
| Time | Normal plasma glucose range for adults without diabetes, mg/dL |
| --- | --- |
| Before breakfast (fasting) | < 100 |
| 2 hours after a meal | <140 |
K233058 - Page 10 of 12
{10}
Reference: American Diabetes Association; Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2023 Abridged for Primary Care Providers. Clin Diabetes 2 January 2023; 41 (1): 4–31.
F Other Supportive Instrument Performance Characteristics Data:
1. Hematocrit Study
The effect of hematocrit on the VivaChek™ Link Plus Blood Glucose Monitoring System was evaluated with venous blood samples adjusted to hematocrit levels of 20%, 25%, 30%, 35%, 42%, 50%, 55%, 60%, 65%, and 70%. Each hematocrit level was adjusted to achieve five concentrations of glucose (30 to 50, 51 to 110, 111 to 150, 151 to 250, and 251 to 400 mg/dL). Each blood sample was tested using 10 VivaChek™ Link Plus Blood Glucose Meters with 3 lots of VivaChek™ Ino Blood Glucose Test Strips and tested on the YSI 2300 comparator method. The glucose values were compared to results obtained on the YSI 2300 comparator method, and to the normal hematocrit sample. The results support the claimed hematocrit range of 20% to 70% for the VivaChek™ Link Plus Blood Glucose Monitoring System.
2. System Operating Conditions Study
The sponsor performed an operating condition study using venous whole blood samples adjusted to 3 glucose levels (60 to 70, 100 to 120, and 300 to 400 mg/dL). Testing was conducted under the following five temperature and relative humidity (RH) combinations: 113°F (45°C) and 41°F (5°C), at 10% and 90% RH each and at 73°F (23°C) at 40% RH. The candidate system results were compared to results from the YSI 2300 comparator method. The results support the claims in the labeling that the system can be used in conditions of 41–113°F (5-45°C) with relative humidity of 10 to 90%.
3. Altitude Effects
The effect of altitude on the VivaChek™ Link Plus Blood Glucose Monitoring System was evaluated by testing whole blood samples at sea level (130 ft) and at 10,413 ft above sea level. The candidate system results were compared to those obtained with the comparator method (YSI 2300 analyzer). The results support the claims that the system functions as intended at altitudes up to the claimed altitude of 10,413 feet.
4. Sample Volume Study
The sponsor conducted a sample volume study using venous blood samples prepared at three glucose range intervals at thee glucose levels (50-65, 110-120, and 200-250 mg/dL) that were tested at different sample volumes (0.6, 0.7, and 0.8 μL). The candidate system results were compared against the YSI 2300 comparator method measurements. Results support the claimed minimum sample volume of 0.8 μL. The sponsor also provided validation studies demonstrating that with blood volumes below 0.8 μL, the insufficient sample volume error message functioned as intended.
5. Flex Studies
Intermittent sampling, sample perturbation, testing with used test strips, test strip early removal, drop/shock testing, and vibration testing was completed. The testing performed demonstrated that VivaChek™ Link Plus Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems are robust to intermittent sampling, sample perturbation, drop/shock, and vibration, and that an error message is returned to the user if a used test strip is inserted into the meter or test strip removal happens early.
K233058 - Page 11 of 12
{11}
K233058 - Page 12 of 12
6. Infection Control Studies
The VivaChek™ Link Plus Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems is intended for single-patient use only. Disinfection efficacy studies were performed on the materials comprising the meters by an outside commercial testing laboratory demonstrating complete inactivation of hepatitis B virus (HBV) with the chosen disinfectant, Clorox Germicidal Wipes, 0.55% sodium hypochlorite (EPA Registration # 67619-12). Robustness studies were also performed by the sponsor demonstrating that there was no change in performance or external materials of the meter after 608 cleaning and disinfection cycles with the Clorox Germicidal Wipes. The robustness studies were designed to simulate 5 years of single-patient use. Labeling was reviewed for adequate instructions for the validated cleaning and disinfection procedures.
7. Electrical Safety and EMC Studies
The sponsor provided documentation certifying that acceptable electrical safety and electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) testing had been performed and the system was found to be compliant.
8. Test Strip Lot Release Protocol
The test strip lot release protocol and acceptance criteria were reviewed and found to be acceptable.
VIII Proposed Labeling:
The labeling supports the finding of substantial equivalence for this device.
IX Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.