TRUENESS™ AIR Blood Glucose Monitoring System; TRUENESS™ Blood Glucose Monitoring System
K231476 · Sinocare, Inc. · NBW · Dec 1, 2023 · Clinical Chemistry
Device Facts
Record ID
K231476
Device Name
TRUENESS™ AIR Blood Glucose Monitoring System; TRUENESS™ Blood Glucose Monitoring System
Applicant
Sinocare, Inc.
Product Code
NBW · Clinical Chemistry
Decision Date
Dec 1, 2023
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 862.1345
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Pediatric
Indications for Use
The TRUENESS™ Blood Glucose Monitoring System is intended for use in the quantitative measurement of glucose in capillary whole blood from the finger. It is intended for use by people with diabetes mellitus at home as an aid in monitoring the effectiveness of their diabetes control program. The TRUENESS™ Blood Glucose Monitoring System is intended to be used by a single person and should not be shared. It is for in vitro diagnostic use only. The TRUENESS™ Blood Glucose Monitoring System is not intended for the diagnosis of, or screening for diabetes. It is not intended for use on neonates. The TRUENESS™ Blood Glucose Monitoring System is comprised of the TRUENESS™ blood glucose meter and the TRUENESS™ blood glucose test strip. The TRUENESS™AIR Blood Glucose Monitoring System is intended for use in the quantitative measurement of glucose in capillary whole blood from the finger. It is intended for use by people with diabetes mellitus at home as an aid in monitoring the effectiveness of their diabetes control program. The TRUENESS™AIR Blood Glucose Monitoring System is intended to be used by a single person and should not be shared. It is for in vitro diagnostic use only. The TRUENESS™AIR Blood Glucose Monitoring System is not intended for the diagnosis of, or screening for diabetes. It is not intended for use on neonates. The TRUENESS™ AIR Blood Glucose Monitoring System is comprised of the TRUENESS™ AIR blood glucose meter and the TRUENESS™ blood glucose test strip.
Device Story
System measures glucose in capillary whole blood via amperometric assay using GDH-FAD chemistry; blood drawn from fingertip via lancing device; sample applied to test strip via capillary action; glucose reaction generates current proportional to concentration; meter calculates and displays plasma-equivalent glucose result. Used at home by patients with diabetes; TRUENESS AIR model includes Bluetooth for data transmission. Output aids patients in monitoring diabetes control program effectiveness. Device is for single-patient use; requires no manual coding; includes error detection for insufficient sample volume (E-7).
Clinical Evidence
Lay-user study with 354 participants demonstrated 99.7% of results within ±20% of laboratory comparator (ABL90 Flex Plus) across 42-460 mg/dL range. Accuracy at extreme glucose levels (<80 mg/dL and >250 mg/dL) showed 100% within ±20%. Bench testing confirmed precision (CV 1.7-4.9%), linearity (R²=0.999), and performance across hematocrit (15-60%), altitude (10,000 ft), and environmental conditions.
Technological Characteristics
Electrochemical biosensor using FAD-glucose dehydrogenase. Measurement range 40-600 mg/dL. Sample size 1 µL. Test time 5 seconds. Power: 2 AAA alkaline batteries. Connectivity: BLE (TRUENESS AIR only). Operating range 50°F-104°F. Altitude up to 10,100 ft. Software validation: moderate level of concern.
Indications for Use
Indicated for quantitative measurement of glucose in capillary whole blood from the finger in people with diabetes mellitus at home to monitor diabetes control program effectiveness. Not for neonates, diagnosis, or screening. Single-patient use only.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A glucose test system is a device intended to measure glucose quantitatively in blood and other body fluids. Glucose measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of carbohydrate metabolism disorders including diabetes mellitus, neonatal hypoglycemia, and idiopathic hypoglycemia, and of pancreatic islet cell carcinoma.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The device, when it is solely intended for use as a drink to test glucose tolerance, is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 862.9.
Predicate Devices
Contour® next GEN Blood Glucose Monitoring System (K193407)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
FDA
U.S. FOOD & DRUG
ADMINISTRATION
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY
ASSAY AND INSTRUMENT
## I Background Information:
A 510(k) Number
K231476
B Applicant
Sinocare Inc.
C Proprietary and Established Names
TRUENESS™ AIR Blood Glucose Monitoring System; TRUENESS™ Blood Glucose Monitoring System
D Regulatory Information
| Product Code(s) | Classification | Regulation Section | Panel |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| NBW | Class II | 21 CFR 862.1345 - Glucose Test System | CH - Clinical Chemistry |
## II Submission/Device Overview:
A Purpose for Submission:
New device
B Measurand:
Glucose in capillary whole blood drawn from the fingertip
C Type of Test:
Quantitative amperometric assay (glucose dehydrogenase-FAD)
Food and Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
www.fda.gov
{1}
K231476 - Page 2 of 13
## III Intended Use/Indications for Use:
### A Intended Use(s):
See Indications for Use below.
### B Indication(s) for Use:
The TRUENESS™ Blood Glucose Monitoring System is intended for use in the quantitative measurement of glucose in capillary whole blood from the finger. It is intended for use by people with diabetes mellitus at home as an aid in monitoring the effectiveness of their diabetes control program. The TRUENESS™ Blood Glucose Monitoring System is intended to be used by a single person and should not be shared. It is for in vitro diagnostic use only. The TRUENESS™ Blood Glucose Monitoring System is not intended for the diagnosis of, or screening for diabetes. It is not intended for use on neonates.
The TRUENESS™ Blood Glucose Monitoring System is comprised of the TRUENESS™ blood glucose meter and the TRUENESS™ blood glucose test strip.
The TRUENESS™ AIR Blood Glucose Monitoring System is intended for use in the quantitative measurement of glucose in capillary whole blood from the finger. It is intended for use by people with diabetes mellitus at home as an aid in monitoring the effectiveness of their diabetes control program. The TRUENESS™ AIR Blood Glucose Monitoring System is intended to be used by a single person and should not be shared. It is for in vitro diagnostic use only. The TRUENESS™ AIR Blood Glucose Monitoring System is not intended for the diagnosis of, or screening for diabetes. It is not intended for use on neonates.
The TRUENESS™ AIR Blood Glucose Monitoring System is comprised of the TRUENESS™ AIR blood glucose meter and the TRUENESS™ blood glucose test strip.
### C Special Conditions for Use Statement(s):
OTC - Over The Counter
- For in vitro diagnostic use only
- For self-testing
- Not for use on critically ill
- Not for neonatal use
- Not for screening or diagnosis of diabetes mellitus
- Not for alternative site testing (AST) use.
- Xylose: Do not perform test during or soon after xylose absorption testing. High xylose level in the blood will cause inaccurate results
- Severe dehydration and excessive water loss may cause false low results. If you believe you are suffering from severe dehydration, consult a healthcare professional immediately.
- Inaccurate results may occur in severely hypotensive individuals or patients in shock.
- Inaccurate results may also occur in individuals experiencing a hyperosmolar-hyperglycemic-state (HHS)
- For single patient use only and should not be shared
{2}
- NOT intended for use in healthcare or assisted-use settings such as hospitals, physician offices, or long-term care facilities, including for routine assisted testing or as part of glycemic control procedures
- The meter and lancing device are for single patient use! DO NOT share them with anyone including other family members! DO NOT use on multiple patients. Use of this device on multiple patients may lead to transmission of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), Hepatitis C Virus (HCV), Hepatitis B Virus (HBV), or other blood borne pathogens
## D Special Instrument Requirements:
Trueness Blood Glucose Meter
Trueness Air Blood Glucose Meter
## IV Device/System Characteristics:
### A Device Description:
The TRUENESS and TRUENESS AIR Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems consist of the TRUENESS or TRUENESS AIR Blood Glucose Meter and the TRUENESS Blood Glucose Test Strips. The TRUENESS Blood Glucose Control Solutions (level 1 and level 2), and the TRUEDraw Lancing Device with TRUEPLUS lancets are for use with the system and are sold separately.
The TRUENESS AIR Blood Glucose Meter and TRUENESS Blood Glucose Meter differ only in Bluetooth functionality which is present only in the TRUENESS AIR Blood Glucose Meter.
### B Principle of Operation:
The TRUENESS and TRUENESS AIR Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems measure the amount of glucose in whole blood quantitative using fresh capillary whole blood from the fingertip and reports the plasma equivalent glucose results. The glucose measurement is achieved by using an amperometric detection method that uses glucose dehydrogenase flavin-adenine dinucleotide (GDH-FAD) based chemistry. When a drop of blood is applied to the test strip it is pulled into the test strip through capillary action. Glucose in the sample reacts with test strip chemistry generating electrons and producing a current that is proportional to the glucose concentration in the sample. After the reaction time, the detected current is calculated by the meter and the resulting glucose concentration is displayed by the meter.
### C Instrument Description Information:
1. Instrument Name:
Trueness Blood Glucose Meter
Trueness Air Blood Glucose Meter
K231476 - Page 3 of 13
{3}
K231476 - Page 4 of 13
2. Specimen Identification:
There is no sample identification function with this device. Samples are applied directly to the test strip as they are collected.
3. Specimen Sampling and Handling:
The glucose system is intended to be used with capillary whole blood from the finger only. The whole blood sample is applied directly to the test strip by capillary action.
4. Calibration:
The meter does not require calibration or coding by the user. The meter is automatically coded.
5. Quality Control:
Two (2) levels of glucose control solutions are available with this system, but are sold separately. Recommendations on when to test the control materials are provided in the labeling. If control test results are out of range when comparing to the range printed on the test strip vial, the user is advised to repeat the test. If problems continue, the user is cautioned not to use the meter and to contact customer service. The control solutions are not included in the average of the patient results when the measurements are performed in control testing mode.
V Substantial Equivalence Information:
A Predicate Device Name(s):
Contour® next GEN Blood Glucose Monitoring System
B Predicate 510(k) Number(s):
K193407
C Comparison with Predicate(s):
| Device & Predicate Device(s): | K231476 | K193407 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Device Trade Name | TRUENESS and TRUENESS AIR Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems | Contour® next GEN Blood Glucose Monitoring System |
| General Device Characteristic Similarities | | |
| Intended Use/Indications For Use | Quantitatively measure glucose in fresh capillary whole blood | Same |
{4}
| Device & Predicate Device(s): | K231476 | K193407 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | drawn from the fingertips by people with diabetes at home as an aid in monitoring the effectiveness of a diabetes control program. | |
| Reagent Enzyme | FAD-Glucose Dehydrogenase | Same |
| Test Time | 5 seconds | Same |
| General Device Characteristic Differences | | |
| Measurement Range | 40 – 600 mg/dL | 20 – 600 mg/dL |
| Sample Size | 1 μL | 0.6 μL |
VI Standards/Guidance Documents Referenced:
FDA Guidance Document: Self-Monitoring Blood Glucose Test Systems for Over-the-Counter Use. Issued on September 29, 2020.
IEC 60601-1-2:2014 Medical Electrical Equipment Part 1-2: General Requirement for Basic Safety and Essential Performance - Collateral Standard: Electromagnetic Compatibility - Requirements and Tests.
VII Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
The TRUENESS AIR Blood Glucose Monitoring System was used as a representative model for the performance evaluations below to support both the TRUENESS and the TRUENESS AIR Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems because the only difference between the systems is the present of Bluetooth technology in the TRUENESS AIR Blood Glucose Meter.
A Analytical Performance:
1. Precision/Reproducibility:
Within-Run Precision (Repeatability)
Within-run precision studies were performed using venous whole blood samples of 5 glucose levels (40-50, 51-110, 111-150, 151-250, 251-400 mg/dL). Each sample was tested in replicates of ten with three test strip lots and 10 meters for a total of 300 tests per glucose level. Results are summarized below:
K231476 - Page 5 of 13
{5}
K231476 - Page 6 of 13
| Venous Blood Glucose Level (mg/dL) | Lot | N | Mean (mg/dL) | SD (mg/dL) | CV |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 40-50 | Lot 1 | 100 | 43.5 | 1.6 | 3.7% |
| | Lot 2 | 100 | 43.5 | 1.6 | 3.8% |
| | Lot 3 | 100 | 44.9 | 2.1 | 4.6% |
| | Combined | 300 | 44.0 | 1.8 | 4.0% |
| 51-110 | Lot 1 | 100 | 101.2 | 3.2 | 3.1% |
| | Lot 2 | 100 | 103.0 | 3.6 | 3.5% |
| | Lot 3 | 100 | 99.9 | 4.0 | 4.0% |
| | Combined | 300 | 101.4 | 3.5 | 3.5% |
| 111-150 | Lot 1 | 100 | 128.4 | 4.1 | 3.2% |
| | Lot 2 | 100 | 128.1 | 4.2 | 3.3% |
| | Lot 3 | 100 | 132.1 | 4.5 | 3.4% |
| | Combined | 300 | 129.5 | 4.2 | 3.3% |
| 151-250 | Lot 1 | 100 | 211.1 | 7.1 | 3.4% |
| | Lot 2 | 100 | 205.7 | 4.9 | 2.4% |
| | Lot 3 | 100 | 208.8 | 6.5 | 3.1% |
| | Combined | 300 | 208.6 | 6.3 | 3.0% |
| 251-400 | Lot 1 | 100 | 334.2 | 9.0 | 2.7% |
| | Lot 2 | 100 | 337.0 | 12.1 | 3.6% |
| | Lot 3 | 100 | 347.1 | 8.1 | 2.3% |
| | Combined | 300 | 339.4 | 9.7 | 2.9% |
## Intermediate Precision (Between Run)
Intermediate (between run) precision was evaluated using five levels of glucose control solutions (40-50, 51-110, 111-150, 151-250, 251-400 mg/dL), 3 test strip lots, and 10 meters. Each control solution level was measured once a day for 10 days with each meter and test strip lot, for a total of 100 replicates per control solution level per test strip lot for a total of 300 replicates for each glucose control level. Results are summarized below:
| Control Levels (mg/dL) | Strip lot | N | Mean (mg/dL) | SD (mg/dL) | CV (%) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 40-50 | Lot 1 | 100 | 43.9 | 2.2 | 4.9% |
| | Lot 2 | 100 | 45.9 | 1.7 | 3.6% |
| | Lot 3 | 100 | 45.1 | 1.8 | 4.0% |
| | Combined | 300 | 45.0 | 1.9 | 4.3% |
| 51-110 | Lot 1 | 100 | 97.9 | 3.1 | 3.2% |
| | Lot 2 | 100 | 98.9 | 2.3 | 2.3% |
| | Lot 3 | 100 | 97.8 | 2.1 | 2.2% |
| | Combined | 300 | 98.2 | 2.5 | 2.6% |
{6}
| Control Levels (mg/dL) | Strip lot | N | Mean (mg/dL) | SD (mg/dL) | CV (%) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 111-150 | Lot 1 | 100 | 137.6 | 3.7 | 2.7% |
| | Lot 2 | 100 | 138.3 | 3.2 | 2.3% |
| | Lot 3 | 100 | 137.5 | 3.0 | 2.2% |
| | Combined | 300 | 137.8 | 3.3 | 2.4% |
| 151-250 | Lot 1 | 100 | 203.4 | 5.0 | 2.5% |
| | Lot 2 | 100 | 205.2 | 3.7 | 1.8% |
| | Lot 3 | 100 | 203.8 | 3.4 | 1.7% |
| | Combined | 300 | 204.1 | 4.2 | 2.1% |
| 251-400 | Lot 1 | 100 | 384.0 | 10.5 | 2.7% |
| | Lot 2 | 100 | 380.7 | 7.5 | 2.0% |
| | Lot 3 | 100 | 380.5 | 9.3 | 2.4% |
| | Combined | 300 | 381.7 | 9.2 | 2.4% |
2. Linearity:
The linearity of the glucose measurement was evaluated using venous whole blood spiked with glucose. Eleven whole blood samples were adjusted to the following glucose concentrations (as measured by the ABL90 FLEX analyzer as the comparator method): 31.1, 85.9, 149.5, 208.6, 261.9, 315.6, 377.9, 444.6, 502.4, 554.4, and 614.0 mg/dL. The summary of the linear regression analysis for each lot was as follows:
| Test Strip Lot # | Slope | y-intercept | R² value |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Lot 1 | 1.0003 | -3.2540 | 0.9994 |
| Lot 2 | 1.0026 | -3.1289 | 0.9987 |
| Lot 3 | 0.9970 | -3.7063 | 0.9991 |
| Combined | 0.9999 | -3.3630 | 0.9990 |
The results of the study support the sponsor's claimed glucose measuring range of 40-600 mg/dL. If a sample result is less than 40 mg/dL glucose, the result is flagged by the meter as "Lo". If a sample result exceeds 600 mg/dL glucose, the result is flagged by the meter as "Hi". The "Lo" and "Hi" functions were validated by the sponsor and were demonstrated to function as intended.
3. Analytical Specificity/Interference:
To assess potential interferences, the sponsor used venous whole blood samples adjusted to 3 glucose concentration ranges: 50-70, 110-130, and 225-270 mg/dL. Each of these samples was divided into a test pool and a control pool, with each of the potential endogenous and exogenous interfering substances added to the test pool. The % difference between the test sample and the control sample was calculated using mean of 10 replicates for each of the 3
K231476 - Page 7 of 13
{7}
strip lots tested. The highest concentrations tested at which no significant interference was observed (within ± 10% average bias between test and control samples) are presented in the following table:
| Potential Interferent | Maximum tested concentration with no significant interference (mg/dL) |
| --- | --- |
| Acetaminophen | 20 |
| Ascorbic acid | 6 |
| Conjugated Bilirubin | 37.5 |
| Unconjugated Bilirubin | 40 |
| Cholesterol | 500 |
| Creatinine | 15 |
| Dopamine | 0.09 |
| EDTA | 0.1 |
| Galactose | 60 |
| Gentisic acid | 1.8 |
| Reduced Glutathione | 4.6 |
| Hemoglobin | 1000 |
| Ibuprofen | 50 |
| L-Dopa | 0.75 |
| Maltose | 480 |
| Mannitol | 1800 |
| Methyldopa | 2 |
| Salicylic acid | 60 |
| Sodium | 180 mmol/L |
| Tolbutamide | 72 |
| Tolazamide | 9 |
| Triglycerides | 1500 |
| Uric acid | 23.5 |
| Xylose | 5 |
| Icodextrin | 1094.4 |
| Pralidoxime iodide | 5 |
| Sorbitol | 0.09 |
| Xylitol | 0.09 |
| Lactitol | 0.09 |
| Isomalt | 0.09 |
| Maltitol | 0.09 |
| Heparin Lithium | 300 IU/dL |
| Acetone | 70 |
| Caffeine | 6 |
| Ceftriaxone | 81 |
| Ethanol | 400 |
| Glipizide | 0.2 |
| Maltotetraose | 70 |
K231476 - Page 8 of 13
{8}
| Potential Interferent | Maximum tested concentration with no significant interference (mg/dL) |
| --- | --- |
| Maltotriose | 180 |
| Metformin | 4 |
| Naproxen Sodium | 55 |
| Tetracycline | 1.5 |
| Warfarin (Coumadin) | 1 |
The sponsor has included the following in the labeling:
- Xylose: Do not perform test during or soon after xylose absorption testing. High xylose level in the blood will cause inaccurate results.
4. Assay Reportable Range:
40 – 600 mg/dL
5. Traceability, Stability, Expected Values (Controls, Calibrators, or Methods):
The glucose measurement functionality of the TRUENESS Blood Glucose Monitoring System and TRUENESS AIR Blood Glucose Monitoring System are traceable to the NIST SRM 917c glucose reference material. The method comparison/lay-user study was performed using the ABL90 Flex Plus Analyzer as the comparator method (see section VII.C.3).
## Open and Closed Vial Stability
Test strip stability was assessed using accelerated and real-time stability studies. Testing protocols and acceptance criteria were reviewed and found to be acceptable. The labeling includes claims that the TRUENESS Blood Glucose Test Strips are stable for 6 months after opening and 24 months unopened when stored between 41-86°F (5°C – 30°C) and 10% - 85% relative humidity.
6. Detection Limit:
Please see linearity section.
7. Assay Cut-Off:
Not applicable.
K231476 - Page 9 of 13
{9}
8. Accuracy (Instrument):
Not applicable.
9. Carry-Over:
Not applicable.
## B Comparison Studies:
1. Method Comparison with Predicate Device:
Please refer to lay user study below.
2. Matrix Comparison:
Not applicable. The device is only intended for use with fresh capillary whole blood.
## C Clinical Studies:
1. Clinical Sensitivity:
Not applicable.
2. Clinical Specificity:
Not applicable.
3. Other Clinical Supportive Data (When 1. and 2. Are Not applicable):
### Method Comparison/Lay User Performance Study
To assess the performance of the TRUENESS AIR Blood Glucose Monitoring System in the hands of lay users, the sponsor performed a study with 354 lay user participants who collected and tested their own fingertip capillary blood samples. The glucose concentrations in the samples ranged from 42-460 mg/dL including 11 native samples < 80 mg/dL and 33 native samples > 250 mg/dL as measured by the laboratory comparator method, the ABL90 Flex Plus (k160153). Results were analyzed by comparing blood glucose results obtained from the TRUENESS Blood Glucose meter by the lay user against the laboratory comparator value obtained by healthcare professionals. Results are summarized in the tables below:
| System Accuracy Results for Entire Glucose range | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Sample Site | Within ± 5% | Within ± 10% | Within ± 15% | Within ± 20% |
| Fingertip | 185 / 354
(52.3%) | 291 / 354
(82.2%) | 345 / 354
(97.5%) | 353 / 354
(99.7%) |
Regression analysis: $y = 0.987x - 1.508R^2 = 0.981$
K231476 - Page 10 of 13
{10}
# Usability:
At the end of the study, each participant was asked to complete a usability questionnaire regarding ease of understanding of information in the user manual and the ease of use when performing a blood glucose test. From the sponsor's analysis of the questionnaire responses, the participants overall were satisfied with the ease of operation by following the instructions for use in the User's Manual and the overall performance of the subject blood glucose monitoring system.
# Labeling Readability
The readability of the over-the counter, home use labeling was evaluated using a Flesch-Kincaid analysis and demonstrated that the readability grade level scores were less than an 8th grade level.
# Extreme Glucose Study
System accuracy at extreme glucose levels was evaluated by measuring 51 samples with glucose concentrations below $80\mathrm{mg / dL}$ and 50 samples with glucose concentrations greater than $250\mathrm{mg / dL}$ on the TRUENESS AIR Blood Glucose Monitoring System using 3 lots of test strips. Results on the candidate device were compared to the results obtained using the comparator method (ABL90 FLEX Plus Analyzer). Results are summarized below:
| System accuracy results for extreme low (<80mg/dL) glucose readings | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Within ± 5 % | Within ± 10 % | Within ± 15 % | Within ± 20 % |
| 28 / 51 (54.9%) | 44 / 51 (86.3%) | 50 / 51 (98%) | 51 / 51 (100%)) |
| System Accuracy results for extreme high (>250mg/dL) glucose readings | | | |
| Within ± 5 % | Within ± 10 % | Within ± 15 % | Within ± 20 % |
| 28 / 50 (56%) | 47 / 50 (94%) | 49 / 50 (98%) | 50 / 50 (100%) |
# D Clinical Cut-Off:
Not applicable.
# E Expected Values/Reference Range:
The sponsor included the following expected glucose values in their labeling:
| Time | Blood glucose result for people without diabetes |
| --- | --- |
| Before eating | < 100 mg/dL |
| 2 hours after a meal | < 140 mg/dL |
K231476 - Page 11 of 13
{11}
Source: American Diabetes Association Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes, January 2023 Volume 46, Supplement 1: S25.
## F Other Supportive Instrument Performance Characteristics Data:
### 1. Hematocrit study
The effect of different hematocrit levels was evaluated using venous whole blood samples with hematocrit levels of 15-60% (15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 42, 50, 55 and 60%) at five levels of glucose (40-50, 51-110, 111-50, 151-250, and 251-400 mg/dL). Each sample was tested in replicates of 10 using 10 meters and three test strip lots. Results from the candidate system were compared to results obtained using the comparator method (ABL90 FLEX analyzer) a laboratory-based comparator measurement and to the candidate system results of samples with normal hematocrit (~42%). The results demonstrated acceptable performance across the claimed hematocrit range of 15-60%.
### 2. Altitude Effects
To evaluate the effects of altitude on the TRUENESS AIR Blood Glucose Monitoring System results, contrived venous whole blood samples were altered to 6 glucose concentrations (45-55, 76-84, 124-136, 190-210, 338-362, and 507-548 mg/dL) and tested at 10,000 ft feet above sea level. The meter results were compared to those obtained with the comparator method (ABL90 FLEX analyzer). The results support the labeling claim that the system functions as intended at altitudes up to an altitude of 10,000 feet.
### 3. Sample Volume
The sponsor performed a study to support the claimed minimum sample volume of 1.0 μL for the TRUENESS and TRUENESS AIR Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems. Venous whole blood samples with three levels of glucose concentrations (approximately 55, 110, 215 mg/dL) were tested at five sample volumes (0.8, 0.9, 1.0, 1.1 and 1.2 μL) using 3 lots of the test strips and 10 meters. Values obtained with the candidate system were compared to those obtained using the comparator ABL90 FLEX method. The meter has an error message displayed, E-7, if enough blood is not added to the test strip. The results of the study support the claimed sample volume of 1.0 μL and that the insufficient sample volume error message functions as intended.
### 4. System Operating Conditions Testing
The sponsor performed operating condition studies using venous whole blood samples with 5 glucose levels (40-50, 51-110, 111-114, 151-250, and 280-400 mg/dL) to evaluate temperatures ranging from 50-104°F (10-40°C) and relative humidity from 10% to 90%. Candidate system results obtained at the following temperature and humidity combinations were compared to candidate system results obtained at ambient conditions (23°C/50%RH): low temperature/low humidity, low temperature/high humidity, high temperature/low humidity and high temperature/high humidity. The results support the claims in the labeling that the system can be used in conditions of 50-104°F (10-40°C) with relative humidity of 10 to 90%.
K231476 - Page 12 of 13
{12}
K231476 - Page 13 of 13
## 5. Flex studies
The following additional flex studies were performed with the TRUENESS AIR Blood Glucose Monitoring System: sample perturbation, intermittent sampling, used test strips, drop, and shipping testing. The testing performed demonstrated that the device is robust under these conditions.
## 6. Electrical Safety and EMC Testing
The sponsor provided documentation certifying that acceptable electrical safety and electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) testing had been performed, and the system was found to be compliant.
## 7. Infection Control Testing
The device system is intended for single-patient use only. Disinfection efficacy studies were performed on the external materials comprising the meter by an outside commercial testing laboratory demonstrating complete inactivation of hepatitis B virus (HBV) with the chosen disinfectant, SUPER SANI-CLOTH ® Germicidal Disposable Wipes (EPA Registration #9480-4). A robustness study was also conducted by the sponsor demonstrating that there was no change in performance or in the external materials of the meter after 520 cleaning and disinfection cycles using the SUPER SANI-CLOTH ® Germicidal Disposable Wipes. The robustness studies were designed to simulate 5 years of single-patient device use. Labeling was reviewed for adequate instructions for the validated cleaning and disinfection procedures.
## 8. Glucose test strip lot release
Glucose test strip lot release protocols and criteria were reviewed and found to be acceptable.
## VIII Proposed Labeling:
The labeling supports the finding of substantial equivalence for this device.
## IX Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.