K193407 · Ascensia Diabetes Care · NBW · Dec 23, 2021 · Clinical Chemistry
Device Facts
Record ID
K193407
Device Name
Contour® next GEN Blood Glucose Monitoring System
Applicant
Ascensia Diabetes Care
Product Code
NBW · Clinical Chemistry
Decision Date
Dec 23, 2021
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 862.1345
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
The Contour® next GEN Blood Glucose Monitoring System consists of the Contour® next GEN meter, Contour® NEXT test strips and the Contour® Diabetes app. The Contour® next GEN Blood Glucose Monitoring System is intended to be used for the quantitative measurement of glucose in fresh capillary whole blood drawn from the fingertips. The Contour® next GEN Blood Glucose Monitoring System is intended to be used by a single person and should not be shared. The Contour® next GEN Blood Glucose Monitoring System is intended for self-testing outside the body (in vitro diagnostic use) by people with diabetes at home as an aid in monitoring the effectiveness of a diabetes control program. The Contour® next GEN Blood Glucose Monitoring System should not be used for the diagnosis of or screening for diabetes or for neonatal use. The system is intended for in vitro diagnostic use only.
Device Story
System measures glucose in capillary whole blood via amperometric biosensor technology; utilizes FAD-GDH chemistry on Contour NEXT test strips. User applies blood to strip; meter converts electrical current to glucose concentration. System includes meter, test strips, lancing device, and Contour Diabetes App (Android/iOS). Used at home by patients for diabetes management; data transmitted via wireless connection to mobile app. Provides quantitative glucose results; aids in monitoring diabetes control programs. Features 60-second re-application capability for insufficient samples. Meter automatically codes test strips. Robustness validated for 5-year single-patient use life, including disinfection cycles. Benefits include accurate, convenient self-monitoring of blood glucose levels.
Clinical Evidence
Lay-user study (n=371) compared device results to YSI 2300 STAT PLUS analyzer. Combined results: 99.19% within ±20% of reference. Accuracy at extremes (n=248) showed 100% within ±20% for both low (<80 mg/dL) and high (>250 mg/dL) glucose ranges. Bench testing validated linearity (20-600 mg/dL), precision (CV <3.0%), interference, hematocrit (20-55%), and environmental robustness.
Technological Characteristics
Glucose test system; FAD-GDH chemistry; multi-pulse voltage pattern. Powered by two CR2032 coin cell batteries. Features Bluetooth Low Energy 4.2, micro-USB port, and illuminated strip port with color-coded target indicators. Form factor is oval. Software includes algorithm for glucose calculation and connectivity to mobile app.
Indications for Use
Indicated for quantitative measurement of glucose in fresh capillary whole blood from fingertips in people with diabetes for home self-testing as an aid in monitoring diabetes control programs. Not for diabetes diagnosis, screening, or neonatal use.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A glucose test system is a device intended to measure glucose quantitatively in blood and other body fluids. Glucose measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of carbohydrate metabolism disorders including diabetes mellitus, neonatal hypoglycemia, and idiopathic hypoglycemia, and of pancreatic islet cell carcinoma.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The device, when it is solely intended for use as a drink to test glucose tolerance, is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 862.9.
Predicate Devices
Contour® Next ONE Blood Glucose Monitoring System (K160682)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
FDA
U.S. FOOD & DRUG
ADMINISTRATION
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY
ASSAY AND INSTRUMENT
## I Background Information:
A 510(k) Number
K193407
B Applicant
Ascensia Diabetes Care
C Proprietary and Established Names
Contour® next GEN Blood Glucose Monitoring System
D Regulatory Information
| Product Code(s) | Classification | Regulation Section | Panel |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| NBW | Class II | 21 CFR 862.1345 - Glucose Test System | CH - Clinical Chemistry |
## II Submission/Device Overview:
A Purpose for Submission:
New device
B Measurand:
Glucose in fresh capillary whole blood drawn from the fingertips
C Type of Test:
Quantitative amperometric assay (glucose dehydrogenase-FAD)
## III Intended Use/Indications for Use:
Food and Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
www.fda.gov
{1}
K193407 - Page 2 of 13
A Intended Use(s):
See Indications for Use below.
B Indication(s) for Use:
The Contour® next GEN Blood Glucose Monitoring System consists of the Contour® next GEN meter, Contour® NEXT test strips and the Contour® Diabetes app.
The Contour® next GEN Blood Glucose Monitoring System is intended to be used for the quantitative measurement of glucose in fresh capillary whole blood drawn from the fingertips.
The Contour® next GEN Blood Glucose Monitoring System is intended to be used by a single person and should not be shared. The Contour® next GEN Blood Glucose Monitoring System is intended for self-testing outside the body (in vitro diagnostic use) by people with diabetes at home as an aid in monitoring the effectiveness of a diabetes control program.
The Contour® next GEN Blood Glucose Monitoring System should not be used for the diagnosis of or screening for diabetes or for neonatal use.
The system is intended for in vitro diagnostic use only.
C Special Conditions for Use Statement(s):
- OTC - Over The Counter
- This device is not intended for use in healthcare or assisted-use settings such as hospitals, physician offices, or long-term care facilities because it has not been cleared by FDA for use in these settings, including for routine assisted testing or as part of glycemic control procedures. Use of this device on multiple patients may lead to transmission of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), Hepatitis C Virus (HCV), Hepatitis B Virus (HBV), or other bloodborne pathogens.
- Not to be used for the diagnosis of or screening for diabetes
- Not for Alternative Site Testing (AST)
- The system should not be used to test critically ill patients and should not be used by persons with reduced peripheral blood flow.
- Inaccurate results may occur in severely hypotensive individuals or patients in shock.
- Inaccurate low results may occur for individuals experiencing a hypoxia state, or a hyperglycemic-hyperosmolar state, with or without ketosis.
- Not indicated for neonatal use.
- This system has not been tested at altitudes higher than 20,674 feet (6,301 meters).
- Severe dehydration (excessive water loss) may cause inaccurate results.
- For single-patient use only.
D Special Instrument Requirements:
Contour® next GEN Blood Glucose Meter
{2}
K193407 - Page 3 of 13
# IV Device/System Characteristics:
# A Device Description:
The Contour® next GEN Blood Glucose Monitoring System has been developed for use with the currently marketed Contour® NEXT Test Strip. The new system utilizes amperometric biosensor technology to quantitatively measure the glucose concentration in whole blood in five seconds. This new Contour® next GEN blood glucose monitoring system includes the meter, test strips, the Contour® Diabetes App, a lancing device, lancets, User Guide, Quick Reference Guide, carrying case, registration/warranty card, and control solution. The Contour® Diabetes App is compatible with Android (operating systems 5.0, 6.0, 7.0, 8.0, 9.0, 10.0, and 11.0) and Apple devices (iOS 12.0, 13.0, and 14.0)
# B Principle of Operation:
The Contour® next GEN Blood Glucose Monitoring System measures the amount of glucose in whole blood quantitative using fresh capillary whole blood from the fingertip amperometrically. The reaction of glucose dehydrogenase and an electron mediator in the test strip with glucose in the sample produces an electrical current which is proportional to the amount of glucose in the sample. The meter measures the current and converts it to the corresponding glucose concentration, which is displayed by both the meter meter's display screen and the Contour® Diabetes app.
C Instrument Description Information:
| Modes of Operation | Yes | No |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Does the applicant's device contain the ability to transmit data to a computer, webserver, or mobile device? | ☑ | ☐ |
| Does the applicant's device transmit data to a computer, webserver, or mobile device using wireless transmission? | ☑ | ☐ |
| Software | | |
| FDA has reviewed applicant's Hazard Analysis and software development processes for this line of product types. | ☑ | ☐ |
1. Instrument Name:
Contour® next GEN Blood Glucose Monitoring System
2. Specimen Identification:
There is no sample identification function with this device. Samples are applied directly to the test strip as they are collected.
3. Specimen Sampling and Handling:
The system is intended to be used with capillary whole blood from the fingertip. The whole blood sample is applied directly to the test strip by capillary action. Samples are to be tested immediately upon collection.
{3}
K193407 - Page 4 of 13
4. Calibration:
The meter does not require calibration or coding by the user. The meter is automatically coded.
5. Quality Control:
Contour® Next Control Solution are aqueous solutions that can be purchased separately. Recommendations on when to perform a control solution testing are provided in the labeling. The acceptable range for each control level is printed on the test strip bottle or on the bottom of the test strip box. The user is cautioned not to use the meter if the control result falls outside these ranges and to contact Customer Service. The control solution readings are not included in the average of the patient results when the measurements are performed in the "QC" measurement mode. When in QC measurement mode the meter will automatically mark the result as a control solution test.
V Substantial Equivalence Information:
A Predicate Device Name(s):
CONTOUR® NEXT ONE Blood Glucose Monitoring System
B Predicate 510(k) Number(s):
K160682
C Comparison with Predicate(s):
D
| Device & Predicate Device(s): | K193407 | K160682 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Device Trade Name | Contour® next GEN Blood Glucose Monitoring System | Contour® Next One Blood Glucose Monitoring System |
| General Device Characteristic Similarities | | |
| Intended Use/Indications For Use | Quantitatively measure glucose in fresh capillary whole blood drawn from the fingertips by people with diabetes at home as an aid in monitoring the effectiveness of a diabetes control program. | Same |
| Test Strip | Contour® Next | Same |
| Test strip chemistry | FAD-GDH | Same |
{4}
| Device & Predicate Device(s): | K193407 | K160682 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Sample re-application capability | 60-second re-application time | Same |
| General Device Characteristic Differences | | |
| Alternative Site Testing | No | Yes (palm) |
| Test Result Trends (Averages) | Yes | No |
| Test Reminders | Yes | No |
VI Standards/Guidance Documents Referenced:
- IEC 60601-1-2:2014, Medical electrical equipment -- Part 1-2: General requirements for basic safety and essential performance -- Collateral Standard: Electromagnetic disturbances -- Requirements and tests
VII Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
A Analytical Performance:
1. Precision/Reproducibility:
Repeatability:
A repeatability study was conducted with the Contour® next GEN blood glucose monitoring system using five venous whole blood specimens with glucose target levels of 40, 75, 130, 200, and 336 mg/dL. Each level was tested with three lots of test strips in replicates of 10 on each of 10 meters for a total of 300 results per glucose concentration and 1500 results total. Results are summarized below:
| Lot | Reference Glucose, mg/dL | Mean (mg/dL) | SD (mg/dL) | CV % |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | 41.5 | 42.0 | 1.0 | 2.5 |
| | 79.6 | 81.1 | 1.3 | 1.6 |
| | 134.5 | 135.2 | 1.9 | 1.4 |
| | 218.1 | 216.5 | 3.2 | 1.5 |
| | 350.1 | 343.6 | 4.3 | 1.2 |
| 2 | 39.0 | 40.1 | 1.2 | 3.0 |
| | 77.6 | 78.3 | 1.4 | 1.8 |
K193407 - Page 5 of 13
{5}
K193407 - Page 6 of 13
Intermediate precision:
Intermediate measurement precision was evaluated using 5 control solutions at glucose levels within the ranges of 30-50, 51-100, 111-150, 151-250, and 251-400 mg/dL. For each level, three lots of test strips were tested in replicates on each of ten meters on ten separate days for a total of 300 results per glucose level. Results are summarized below:
| Lot | Control level | Mean (mg/dL) | SD (mg/dL) | CV % |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | 1 | 43.8 | 0.7 | 1.5 |
| | 2 | 84.7 | 1.1 | 1.3 |
| | 3 | 127.3 | 1.5 | 1.2 |
| | 4 | 220.3 | 3.1 | 1.4 |
| 2 | 1 | 42.9 | 0.5 | 1.2 |
| | 2 | 83.6 | 0.9 | 1.1 |
| | 3 | 125.8 | 1.4 | 1.1 |
| | 4 | 219.2 | 2.4 | 1.1 |
| 3 | 1 | 42.5 | 0.6 | 1.4 |
| | 2 | 83.4 | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| Lot | Reference Glucose, mg/dL | Mean (mg/dL) | SD (mg/dL) | CV % |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 3 | 141.7 | 139.6 | 2.1 | 1.5 |
| | 214.1 | 211.7 | 2.5 | 1.2 |
| | 347.2 | 340.9 | 4.2 | 1.2 |
| | 37.0 | 38.3 | 1.1 | 2.9 |
| 3 | 75.5 | 76.5 | 1.3 | 1.7 |
| | 139.2 | 137.6 | 2.0 | 1.4 |
| | 214.1 | 209.6 | 4.0 | 1.9 |
| | 345.2 | 339.0 | 4.6 | 1.3 |
| Pooled | 39.2 | 40.1 | 1.1 | 2.8 |
| | 77.6 | 78.6 | 1.3 | 1.7 |
| | 138.5 | 137.5 | 2.0 | 1.5 |
| | 215.4 | 212.6 | 3.3 | 1.6 |
{6}
| Lot | Control level | Mean (mg/dL) | SD (mg/dL) | CV % |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | 3 | 125.7 | 1.7 | 1.4 |
| | 4 | 220.1 | 3.1 | 1.4 |
| | 5 | 370.6 | 6.1 | 1.6 |
| Pooled | 1 | 43.1 | 0.6 | 1.4 |
| | 2 | 83.9 | 1.1 | 1.3 |
| | 3 | 126.3 | 1.5 | 1.2 |
| | 4 | 219.9 | 2.9 | 1.3 |
| | 5 | 370.6 | 6.5 | 1.8 |
# 2. Linearity:
To evaluate linearity, a study was conducted using twelve blood samples adjusted to glucose concentrations covering the reportable range of 20 to $600\mathrm{mg / dL}$ . The specific glucose values by the YSI analyzer were 22.5, 39.5, 78.9, 139.3, 199.5, 262.5, 314.3, 380.3, 433.3, 498.5, 556.5, and $592.0\mathrm{mg / dL}$ . Results on the candidate device were compared to YSI 2300 Stat Plus Glucose Analyzer. Each glucose level was tested in replicates of 24 using three test strip lots. Plasma glucose concentrations were measured on the YSI 2300 analyzer before and after each blood specimen was tested on meters, and the average of results was used as the comparison value. Proportionally weighted least squares regression produced the following:
| Lot | Slope | y-intercept | r2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | 0.975 | 1.91 | 0.9980 |
| 2 | 0.996 | 0.72 | 0.9980 |
| 3 | 0.989 | 1.45 | 0.9984 |
The results of the study support the sponsor's claimed glucose measuring range of 20 - 600 mg/dL. If the concentration of a sample is less than $20\mathrm{mg / dL}$ , the result is flagged by the meter as LO. If the concentration of a sample is greater than $600\mathrm{mg / dL}$ , the result is flagged by the meter as HI. The low and high functions were validated and were demonstrated to function as intended.
# 3. Analytical Specificity/Interference:
The sponsor performed a study to evaluate the effect of common exogenous and endogenous compounds with the potential to interfere with the glucose measurements.
Venous blood samples were prepared at glucose concentrations of approximately $60\mathrm{mg / dL}$ (3.3 mmol/L), $120\mathrm{mg / dL}$ (6.7 mmol/L) and $260\mathrm{mg / dL}$ (14.4 mmol/L) and were divided into a test pool with the potential interferent added and a control sample with no added interferent.
K193407 - Page 7 of 13
{7}
One measurement was made with a test strip from each of three lots on each of the 10 meters using each of the three glucose levels. This produces 10 measurements per meter per lot for each glucose concentration, resulting in a total of 90 measurements for each interferent.
Results on the candidate meter from the test samples were compared to results obtained on the candidate meter from the control sample. The highest tested concentrations at which no significant interference was observed are presented in the following table:
| Potential Interferent | Highest concentration tested with no significant interference (mg/dL) |
| --- | --- |
| Acetaminophen (Paracetamol) | 20 |
| Ascorbic acid | 6 |
| Conjugated Bilirubin | 50 |
| Unconjugated Bilirubin | 40 |
| Cholesterol | 500 |
| Creatinine | 15 |
| Dopamine | 0.09 |
| Galactose | 60 |
| Gentisic acid | 1.8 |
| Reduced Glutathione | 5 |
| Hemoglobin | 1000 |
| Ibuprofen | 50 |
| L-Dopa (Levodopa) | 0.75 |
| Maltose | 480 |
| Mannitol | 1800 |
| Methyl-Dopa | 2 |
| Pralidoxime Iodide (PAM) | 8.1 |
| Salicylic acid | 60 |
| Sodium | 396 |
| Tolbutamide | 100 |
| Tolazamide | 40 |
| Triglyceride | 1500 |
| Uric acid | 24 |
| Sorbitol | 1.1 |
| Xylitol | 1.1 |
| Lactitol | 1.1 |
| Maltitol | 1.1 |
| Isomalt | 1.1 |
All concentrations of xylose tested demonstrated significant interference with the device system; therefore, the sponsor includes the following in their labeling: Xylose: Do not use during or soon after xylose absorption therapy as this could cause an erroneous result with your meter.
K193407 - Page 8 of 13
{8}
4. Assay Reportable Range:
The assay reportable range is 20-600 mg/dL.
5. Traceability, Stability, Expected Values (Controls, Calibrators, or Methods):
The system is traceable to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) SRM 917 glucose reference material.
Test Strip Stability:
The Contour® Next Test Strip stability protocols and acceptance criteria were reviewed and found to be acceptable in k111268 for the strips packaged in vials and in k191286 for the individually foil wrapped test strips.
The manufacture claims shelf life and opened-vial stability of 24 months when stored at temperatures between 41°F–86°F and 10%–80% Relative Humidity (RH).
For individually foil wrapped test strips, the shelf life is also 24 months when stored at temperatures between 41°F–86°F and 10%–80% Relative Humidity (RH).
6. Detection Limit:
The claimed reportable range for this assay is 20-600 mg/dL and is supported by the linearity study above (section VII.A.2).
7. Assay Cut-Off:
Not applicable.
8. Accuracy (Instrument):
Not applicable.
9. Carry-Over:
Not applicable. The device uses single-use test strips.
B Comparison Studies:
1. Method Comparison with Predicate Device:
See the lay user study below, section VII.C3, for system accuracy in the hands of the intended user.
2. Matrix Comparison:
Not applicable. The device is only intended for use with fresh capillary whole blood from a fingerstick.
K193407 - Page 9 of 13
{9}
C Clinical Studies:
1. Clinical Sensitivity:
Not applicable.
2. Clinical Specificity:
Not applicable.
3. Other Clinical Supportive Data (When 1. and 2. Are Not Applicable):
Lay-user Performance study:
To assess the performance of the Contour® next GEN Blood Glucose Monitoring System in the hands of the intended users, the sponsor performed a lay user study with 371 English speaking participants who were untrained (including naïve users and people with diabetes). The data was collected using three test strip lots at two clinical trial sites. The participants were responsible for obtaining their own fingertip capillary sample and performing a blood glucose test using only the instructions from the product labeling written in English.
Results were analyzed by comparing the blood glucose results obtained by the lay users with the Contour® next GEN Next Gen Blood Glucose Monitoring System against results obtained with a laboratory-based comparator method (YSI Model 2300 STAT PLUS glucose analyzer). The glucose concentrations in the samples ranged from 55 to 467 mg/dL, as measured by the YSI Model 2300 STAT PLUS glucose analyzer. Results are summarized in the tables below:
| Glucose Concentrations < 75mg/dL | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Within ±5mg/dL | Within ±10mg/dL | Within ±15mg/dL | Within ±20mg/dL |
| 8/9 (88.89%) | 9/9 (100%) | 9/9 (100%) | 9/9 (100%) |
| | | | |
| Glucose Concentrations ≥ 75mg/dL | | | |
| Within ±5% | Within ±10% | Within ±15% | Within ±20% |
| 236/362 (65.19%) | 339/362 (93.65%) | 357/362 (98.62%) | 359/362 (99.17%) |
| | | | |
| Results from all glucose concentrations combined | | | |
| Within ±5% | Within ±10% | Within ±15% | Within ±20% |
| 241/371 (64.96%) | 347/371 (93.53%) | 366/371 (98.65%) | 368/371 (99.19%) |
Linear regression of the data produced a slope of 1.030, an intercept of 0.071, and an r value of 0.9811.
At the end of the lay-user study, each participant was asked to complete a usability questionnaire regarding ease of understanding of information in the user manual and the ease of use when performing a blood glucose test. From the sponsor's analysis of the questionnaire responses, the participants overall were satisfied with the ease of operation by
K193407 - Page 10 of 13
{10}
following the instructions for use in the User's Manual and the overall performance of the Contour® next GEN Blood Glucose Monitoring System.
Readability: A Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level assessment was conducted on the Contour® next GEN User Guide, Contour® next Test Strips and Contour® next Quick Start Guide and the results demonstrated that the labeling was written at lower than 8th grade level.
Accuracy at Extreme Glucose Study:
An additional study was conducted to assess the accuracy of the Contour® next GEN system at the extreme low and high ends of the claimed measurement range using 120 capillary whole blood samples with glucose concentrations below 80 mg/dL, and 128 samples greater than 250 mg/dL. Samples were altered by spiking or glycolysis in order to obtain the appropriate glucose concentrations. Samples were tested with the Contour® next GEN system with test strips from 3 lots and compared to the results obtained on YSI 2300 analyzer. The glucose concentrations in the samples ranged from 23 - 77 mg/dL on the lower end and 255 - 592 mg/dL on the higher end, as measured by the YSI 2300. Results from one representative lot are summarized below:
| Contour next GEN system accuracy results for glucose <80 mg/dL | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Within ±5% | Within ±10% | Within ±15% | Within ±20% |
| 87/120 (72.5%) | 114/120 (95.0%) | 120/120 (100.0%) | 120/120 (100.0%) |
| Contour next GEN system accuracy results for glucose >250 mg/dL | | | |
| Within ±5% | Within ±10% | Within ±15% | Within ±20% |
| 111/128 (86.7%) | 127/128 (99.2%) | 128/128 (100.0%) | 128/128 (100.0%) |
D Clinical Cut-Off:
Not applicable.
E Expected Values/Reference Range:
The sponsor states the following in the labeling:
Nondiabetic plasma glucose concentrations should be less than 100 mg/dL in the fasting state and less than 140 mg/dL in the post-prandial state (after a meal). You should consult with your health care professional for glucose values specific to your needs.
American Diabetes Association. 2. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes: Standards of medical care in diabetes—2020. Diabetes Care. 2020;43(supplement 1):S14-S31.
K193407 - Page 11 of 13
{11}
F Other Supportive Instrument Performance Characteristics Data:
1. Hematocrit study: To evaluate the effect of hematocrit on the Contour® next GEN Blood Glucose Monitoring System, the sponsor analyzed venous whole blood samples at hematocrit levels of 20, 25, 30, 35, 42, 45, 50, 55, and 60% ± 2%. Each hematocrit level was adjusted to achieve five glucose levels of approximately 40, 70, 130, 200, and 350 mg/dL. Three strip lots and 24 meters were used to collect data for each hematocrit level and glucose level (n=24 per lot per hematocrit per glucose level). The percent biases relative to the comparator method demonstrated were acceptable to support the claimed hematocrit range of 20 to 55%.
2. The sponsor performed a study to evaluate the claimed minimum sample volume of 0.6 μL. Venous whole blood samples were adjusted to approximately 55, 110, 220, and 525 mg/dL. Each sample was analyzed with a sample size of 0.45, 0.50, 0.55, 0.60, and 0.70 μL using three strip lots and 10 Contour® Next meters. Results support the sponsor's minimum claimed sample volume of 0.6 μL.
3. Operating Conditions Study: The effect of operating temperatures and relative humidity on the performance of the Contour® next GEN Blood Glucose Monitoring System was evaluated using venous whole blood samples adjusted to approximately 40, 120, 350, and 525 mg/dL. Testing was conducted under the following temperature and relative humidity (RH) combinations: 5°C / 10% RH low temperature, low humidity); 5°C / 93% RH (low temperature, high humidity); 45°C / 10% RH (high temperature, low humidity); 45°C / 93% RH (high temperature, high humidity). Glucose results obtained under these conditions was collected using 15 Contour® Next meters and three lots of test strips and results were compared to the nominal condition (25°C / 50% RH). The study results support the claimed operating conditions of 5° to 45°C (41°F to 113°F) with relative humidity of 10% to 93%.
4. Altitude Study: To evaluate the effect of altitude, a study was conducted using venous whole blood samples adjusted to four concentration levels of glucose ranging from 47-408 mg/dL. Samples were placed under conditions to simulate altitude condition from 443 feet (sea level) to 20,674 feet. Each blood sample was tested using six meters with two lots of test strips. The values obtained at simulated altitudes were compared with the values obtained at the nominal condition. The results demonstrated acceptable bias to the nominal condition to support the claim in the labeling that glucose measurement performance is maintained at altitudes up to 20,674 feet.
5. Flex Studies: Sample perturbation, testing with used test strips, drop, vibration and shipping testing was completed. The testing performed demonstrated that the device is robust to intermittent sampling, sample perturbation, drop/shock, and vibration, and that an error message is returned to the user if a used test strip is inserted into the meter.
6. The sponsor provided documentation certifying that electrostatic discharge, electromagnetic interference, electrical safety, and electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) testing had been performed and the system was found to be compliant.
7. Intermittent Sampling (2nd chance testing): The Contour® next GEN Blood Glucose Monitoring System allows the user to reapply the blood sample within 60 seconds if the initial sample is insufficient to fill the test chamber. To evaluate this, the sponsor performed a study using blood samples adjusted to glucose concentrations of 60, 110, and 220 mg/dL.
K193407 - Page 12 of 13
{12}
Each of the three levels was tested at a hematocrit of 20, 42, and 55 for a total of nine distinct glucose/hematocrit combinations using 10 meters. The study evaluated meter performance with different initial volumes and different delay times before additional blood was added. The results were compared to the nominal condition of 0.6 μL of blood applied and the results support that accurate results are obtained with intermittent sampling.
8. Infection Control Studies: The Contour® next GEN Blood Glucose Monitoring System is intended for single patient use only. Disinfection efficacy studies were performed on the meter materials by an outside commercial laboratory, demonstrating complete inactivation of hepatitis B virus (HBV) with the chosen disinfectant Clorox Healthcare® Bleach Germicidal Wipes (EPA Registration Number 67619-12). Robustness studies were also performed by the sponsor using the Contour® Next Blood Glucose Monitoring System demonstrating that there was no change in the performance of the system or in the external materials of the meter after 260 cycles of cleaning and disinfection using the chosen disinfectant. The robustness studies were designed to simulate cleaning and disinfecting over the 5-year single-patient use life of the meter. Labeling was reviewed for adequate instructions for the validated cleaning and disinfection procedures.
9. Test Strip Lot Release Protocol: Glucose test strip lot release protocols and criteria were reviewed and found to be acceptable.
VIII Proposed Labeling:
The labeling supports the finding of substantial equivalence for this device.
IX Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
K193407 - Page 13 of 13
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.