The Emory Cardiac Toolbox™ 4.0 – 4.3 software program should be used for the quantification of myocardial perfusion for the display of wall motion and quantification of left-ventricular function parameters from SPECT & PET myocardial perfusion studies (EGS™) including to quantitatively evaluate the wall motion and wall thickening of the heart using longitudinal, radial, and circumferential strain measurements, for the 3D alignment of coronary artery models from CT coronary angiography onto the left ventricular 3D epicardial surface and analysis of the CT data to evaluate calcified plaques in the coronary arteries, for the assessment of cardiac mechanical dyssynchrony using phase analysis, for generation of the short axis, vertical, and horizontal long axis tomograms from the SPECT raw data using either filtered back projection (FBP) or iterative reconstruction (MLEM/OSEM), for the quantification of myocardial blood flow and coronary flow reserve, and for the decision support in interpretation (LVX) and automatic structured reporting of the study.
Device Story
Emory Cardiac Toolbox™ 4.3 is a software suite for processing and analyzing cardiac SPECT, PET, and CT coronary angiography data. It ingests medical imaging data to perform quantitative analysis of myocardial perfusion, left-ventricular function, wall motion, and wall thickening. Key features include 3D alignment of coronary artery models onto epicardial surfaces, calcium scoring (Agatston scores/plaque volumes), and strain analysis (longitudinal, radial, circumferential). The software generates tomograms, perfusion maps, and structured reports to assist clinicians in interpreting cardiac studies and assessing coronary artery disease. Used in clinical settings by physicians, the device provides automated measurements and decision support, aiding in the diagnosis and management of cardiac conditions. It leverages 3D segmentation algorithms for lesion evaluation and compares patient data against established normal limits to identify abnormalities in cardiac function and perfusion.
Clinical Evidence
Validation included clinical comparison studies. CACS module validated against Siemens SyngoVia™ (n=52 patients, 110 vessels); linear plaque volume regression r2=0.99, Agatston score r2>0.99. Strain analysis validated against TTE (n=80 high-risk CAD, n=22 low-risk); longitudinal strain correlated at stress (r=0.68, p<0.001) and rest (r=0.58, p<0.001). Radial and circumferential strain also showed high correlation with TTE (p<0.001). Results demonstrate high reproducibility and correlation with reference standards.
Technological Characteristics
Software-based cardiac image processing system. Features 3D segmentation algorithms for lesion evaluation, phase analysis for dyssynchrony, and strain analysis. Supports SPECT (FBP, MLEM/OSEM reconstruction) and PET data. Provides automated reorientation, quantification of myocardial blood flow, and coronary flow reserve. Integrates CT data for calcium scoring and coronary artery modeling. Standalone software application.
Indications for Use
Indicated for quantification of myocardial perfusion, wall motion, and left-ventricular function from SPECT/PET studies; evaluation of coronary artery calcified plaques via CT; assessment of cardiac mechanical dyssynchrony; and quantification of myocardial blood flow/coronary flow reserve in patients undergoing cardiac imaging.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An emission computed tomography system is a device intended to detect the location and distribution of gamma ray- and positron-emitting radionuclides in the body and produce cross-sectional images through computer reconstruction of the data. This generic type of device may include signal analysis and display equipment, patient and equipment supports, radionuclide anatomical markers, component parts, and accessories.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On the left is the Department of Health & Human Services logo. To the right of that is the FDA logo, which is a blue square with the letters "FDA" in white. To the right of the blue square is the text "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue.
March 30, 2023
Syntermed % Kenneth Van Train President 245 South Owens Drive ANAHEIM CA 92808
Re: K223422
Trade/Device Name: Emory Cardiac Toolbox™ 4.3 Regulation Number: 21 CFR 892.1200 Regulation Name: Emission computed tomography system Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: KPS, JAK, LLZ Dated: February 24, 2023 Received: March 1, 2023
Dear Kenneth Van Train:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's
{1}------------------------------------------------
requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (OS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
Dghk
Daniel M. Krainak, Ph.D. Assistant Director Magnetic Resonance and Nuclear Medicine Team DHT8C: Division of Radiological Imaging and Radiation Therapy Devices OHT8: Office of Radiological Health Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known)
## K223422
Device Name
Emory Cardiac Toolbox 4.3
Indications for Use (Describe)
The Emory Cardiac Toolbox™ 4.0 – 4.3 software program should be used for the quantification of myocardial perfusion for the display of wall motion and quantification of left-ventricular function parameters from SPECT & PET myocardial perfusion studies (EGS™) including to quantitatively evaluate the wall motion and wall thickening of the heart using longitudinal, radial, and circumferential strain measurements, for the 3D alignment of coronary artery models from CT coronary angiography onto the left ventricular 3D epicardial surface and analysis of the CT data to evaluate calcified plaques in the coronary arteries, for the assessment of cardiac mechanical dyssynchrony using phase analysis, for generation of the short axis, vertical, and horizontal long axis tomograms from the SPECT raw data using either filtered back projection (FBP) or iterative reconstruction (MLEM/OSEM), for the quantification of myocardial blood flow and coronary flow reserve, and for the decision support in interpretation (LVX) and automatic structured reporting of the study.
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) | <span> <span style="padding-right:5px;">X</span>Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) </span> <span> <span style="padding-left:5px;"></span>Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) </span> |
|-------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|-------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
***DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.***
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services
Food and Drug Administration
Office of Chief Information Officer
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff
PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
*"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."*
{3}------------------------------------------------
# 510(k) SUMMARY K223422
## 1. Identification of the Submitter:
Kenneth Van Train President Syntermed. Inc. 333 Sandy Springs Circle Suite 107 Atlanta, GA 30328 Voice: (888) 263-4446 ext. 102, FAX: (714) 281-1290 Date of submission: January 3, 2022
## 2. Identification of the Product:
Device Proprietary Name: Emory Cardiac Toolbox™ 4.3 Common Name: Cardiac image processing software for SPECT and PET Classification Name: Emission Computed Tomography System Regulation Number: KPS: 21 CFR 892.1200, JAK: 21 CFR 892.1750, and LLZ: 21 CFR 892.2050 Product Code: KPS, JAK, and LLZ Classification Panel: Radiology Device Class: Class II
## 3. Medical Device Equivalence:
- Emory Cardiac Toolbox™ 4.0 K123646
- Syngo.CT Ca Scoring developed by Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc. ● K201034
- TOMTEC-Arena (AutoStrain Suite) developed by TOMTEC Imaging Systems ● GmbH K201632.
## 4. Device Description:
The Emory Cardiac Toolbox™ 4.3 is used to display gated wall motion and for quantifying parameters of left-ventricular perfusion and function from gated SPECT & PET myocardial perfusion studies and for the evaluation of dynamic PET studies.
## 5. New features in the current device
The new features added to the Emory Cardiac Toolbox™ are the analysis of the CT data to evaluate calcified plaques in the coronary arteries and analysis of wall motion and wall thickening of the heart using longitudinal, radial, and circumferential strain measurements.
## 6. Indication for Use
{4}------------------------------------------------
The Emory Cardiac Toolbox™ 4.0 – 4.3 software program should be used for the quantification of myocardial perfusion for the display of wall motion and quantification of left-ventricular function parameters from SPECT & PET myocardial perfusion studies (EGS™) including to quantitatively evaluate the wall motion and wall thickening of the heart using longitudinal, radial, and circumferential strain measurements, for the 3D alignment of coronary artery models from CT coronary angiography onto the left ventricular 3D epicardial surface and analysis of the CT data to evaluate calcified plaques in the coronary arteries, for the assessment of cardiac mechanical dyssynchrony using phase analysis, for generation of the short axis, vertical, and horizontal long axis tomograms from the SPECT raw data using either filtered backprojection (FBP) or iterative reconstruction (MLEM/OSEM), for the quantification of myocardial blood flow and coronary flow reserve, and for the decision support in interpretation (LVX) and automatic structured reporting of the study.
7. Comparison Table with predicate device(s)
Submitted Device: Emory Cardiac Toolbox™ 4.3 (K223422) Predicate Devices:
- Emory Cardiac Toolbox™ 4.0 (K123646) ●
- Calcium Scoring: Syngo.CT Ca Scoring developed by Siemens Medical Solutions . USA, Inc. (K201034)
- Strain Analysis: TOMTEC-Arena (AutoStrain Suite) developed by TOMTEC Imaging ● Systems GmbH (K201632)
| Function or Parameter | ECTb™ 4.0 | ECTb™ 4.3 | Syngo.CT | TOMTEC-<br>Arena |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|-----------|----------|------------------|
| 2D and 3D Display of<br>perfusion and left-ventricular<br>function from gated SPECT &<br>PET myocardial perfusion<br>studies | Yes | Yes | NA | NA |
| Quantitative analysis of<br>perfusion for extent, severity,<br>reversibility, mass, and<br>viability | Yes | Yes | NA | NA |
| Quantitative analysis of<br>function for ejection fraction,<br>end-diastolic volume, end-<br>systolic volume, myocardial<br>mass volumes, wall<br>thickening, and transient<br>ischemic dilation (TID) | Yes | Yes | NA | NA |
| Provides computer assisted<br>visual scoring and prognostic<br>information | Yes | Yes | NA | NA |
| Decision support for image<br>interpretation | Yes | Yes | NA | NA |
| 3D alignment of coronary | Yes | Yes | NA | NA |
| artery models from CT<br>coronary angiography onto left<br>ventricular 3D epicardial<br>surface | | | | |
| Can be used with the following<br>myocardial protocols: Same<br>Day and two Day Sestamibi,<br>Dual-Isotope (Tc-99m/TI-201),<br>Tetrofosmin, Thallium,<br>Rubidium-82, N-13 Ammonia,<br>and FDG | Yes | Yes | NA | NA |
| Provides automatic and<br>manual reorientation of<br>SPECT gated and non-gated<br>data sets. | Yes | Yes | NA | NA |
| Measurement of Left<br>ventricular dyssyncrony | Yes | Yes | NA | NA |
| Provides a method for<br>analyzing Myocardial Blood<br>Flow and Coronary Flow<br>Reserve | Yes | Yes | NA | NA |
| Automatic highlighting of<br>coronary calcifications. The<br>calcified plaques are<br>assigned manually to their<br>respective coronary artery by<br>mouse click. | NA | Yes | Yes | NA |
| Automatic highlighting of meta<br>using a default threshold of<br>1000 HU. | NA | Yes | Yes | NA |
| Ability to calculate Agatston<br>scores and plaque volumes | NA | Yes | Yes | NA |
| Automatic evaluation of<br>lesions by a 3D segmentation<br>algorithm | NA | Yes | Yes | NA |
| Ability to split a lesion into 2<br>territories. | NA | Yes | Yes | NA |
| Ability to window the Calcium<br>Scoring CT | NA | Yes | Yes | NA |
| Ability to generate a report<br>related to the calcium<br>scoring data. | NA | No | Yes | NA |
| Quantitatively evaluate the<br>wall motion and wall<br>thickening of the heart using<br>longitudinal, radial, and<br>circumferential strain<br>measurements. | NA | Yes | NA | Yes |
| Quantitative strain analysis | NA | No | NA | Yes |
| Regional strain (by wall and<br>by 17-segment polar maps) | NA | Yes | NA | Yes |
| Comparison to a normal limit<br>(with color-coding) for global<br>and 17-segment regional<br>analysis | NA | Yes | NA | No |
{5}------------------------------------------------
{6}------------------------------------------------
# 8. Performance Validation
Emory-CACS: The CACS module was validated against the FDA approved Siemens SynqoVia™ toolbox (K201034). A clinical comparison test was the method used for validation. The test data was comprised a group of 52 patients using 110 vessels with calcified plaques that had been previously scored by Emory radiologists; the same lesions selected by the radiologist were analyzed by the Emory-CACS and SYngo.CT CaScoring modules. Regression analysis was performed between the SyngoVia™ and the Emory-CACS module. On a per patient basis, linear plaque volume regression (m = 1.10; b = 0.46) produced an r2 = 0.99 and Agatston score regression (m = 1.01; b = 1.06) produced an r2 > 0.99. The values obtained by the Emory-CACS module demonstrated excellent correlations with the Syngo.CT CaScoring developed by Siemens Medical Solutions.
ECTb™ Strain: MPI measurements were validated for resting global longitudinal strain vs. an accepted reference standard, TTE echo A clinical comparison test was the method used for validation. Longitudinal, radial, and circumferential strains from a low-risk cohort (n=22) were used to establish normal limits to evaluate against the results of a high-risk cohort (n=80). Positive strain, lower limits of normal were determined as the mean radial strain minus 2-standard deviations (SD). For circumferential and longitudinal strains, both negative in sign, lower limits of normal were determined as the mean strain plus 2-SDs. Validation of strain analysis for ECTb™ 4.3 was performed in 80 patients with variable coronary artery disease (CAD) and 22 patients with low-risk of CAD. In the CAD cohort, longitudinal strain assessed with PET MPI and TTE were strongly correlated at stress (r= 0.68, p <.001) and rest (r= 0.58, p<.001). PET MPI radial strain was also highly correlated with TTE at stress (r=-0.70, p<.001) and at rest (r=-0.59, p<.001). Similarly, PET MPI circumferential strain was highly correlated with TTE at stress (r=0.67, p<.001) and at rest (r=0.69.p<.001). The results de monstrate that all values between ECTb™ Strain and TTE correlated strongly and were found to be highly reproducible.
## 9: Conclusion
The current device has the same indication for use and has the same technological characteristics as the predicate device(s). The performance of the additional new features have been tested and the results have met the predefined acceptance criteria, and it has been determined to be substantially equivalent to predicate device(s).
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.