K123646 · Syntermed, Inc. · KPS · Feb 22, 2013 · Radiology
Device Facts
Record ID
K123646
Device Name
EMORY CARDIAC TOOLBOX 4.0
Applicant
Syntermed, Inc.
Product Code
KPS · Radiology
Decision Date
Feb 22, 2013
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 892.1200
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Software as a Medical Device, Real-World Evidence
Real-World Evidence
Submission
Device
Sponsor
RWD Sources
RWE Use Summary
Key Tags
K123646 · Feb 22, 2013
EMORY CARDIAC TOOLBOX 4.0
Syntermed, Inc.
Retrospective clinical patient datasets; Clinical study cohorts
Retrospective patient data was used to validate the accuracy of myocardial perfusion, left-ventricular function parameters, normal limits for PET/SPECT protocols, and decision support algorithms.
Patients undergoing SPECT and PET studies; Sample Size: 301
Not applicable for this study
Accuracy in deriving perfusion, function and dyssynchrony variables
Indications for Use
The Emory Cardiac Toolbox™ 4.0 software program should be used for the quantification of myocardial perfusion for the display of wall motion and quantification of left-ventricular function parameters from SPECT & PET myocardial perfusion studies (EGS™), for the 3D alignment of coronary artery models from CT coronary angiography onto the left ventricular 3D epicardial surface, for the assessment of cardiac mechanical dyssynchrony using phase analysis, for generation of the short axis, vertical, and horizontal long axis tomograms from the SPECT raw data using either filtered backprojection (FBP) or iterative reconstruction (MLEM/OSEM), for the quantification of myocardial blood flow and coronary flow reserve, and for the decision support in interpretation (LVX) and automatic structured reporting of the study. The product is intended for use by trained nuclear technicians and nuclear medicine or nuclear cardiology physicians. The clinician remains ultimately responsible for the final interpretation and diagnosis based on standard practices and visual interpretation of all SPECT and PET data.
Device Story
Emory Cardiac Toolbox 4.0 is a software suite for processing and displaying gated SPECT and PET myocardial perfusion studies. It accepts raw SPECT data (FBP or MLEM/OSEM reconstruction) and CT coronary angiography models. The software performs automated quantification of perfusion, ejection fraction, volumes, myocardial mass, transient ischemic dilatation, coronary blood flow, coronary flow reserve, and mechanical dyssynchrony via phase analysis. It provides 3D alignment of coronary artery models onto the left ventricular epicardial surface and includes an expert system (LVX) for decision support and automated structured reporting. Used in clinical settings by nuclear technicians and physicians, the software automates data processing while requiring final physician verification. The output assists clinicians in interpreting nuclear cardiology images by integrating quantitative metrics with visual analysis, supporting diagnostic decision-making and potentially improving assessment accuracy for cardiac conditions.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing and clinical validation performed. IDL to .NET conversion accuracy >99% (n=301). Coronary blood flow validation (n=44). Decision support validation (n=126). Previous versions validated via phantom, animal, and patient studies (n=217 for LV function; n=80 for multicenter trial; n=176 for Rb-82; n=90 for PET perfusion; n=144 for N-13-ammonia; n=8 for CT alignment; n=10 for SPECT reconstruction; n=165 for phase analysis).
Technological Characteristics
Software-based processing for SPECT/PET imaging. Operates on .NET framework for PC, nuclear medicine systems, or web browsers. Supports FBP and iterative (MLEM/OSEM) reconstruction. Features include 3D alignment, phase analysis, and expert system decision support. No hardware components.
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients undergoing SPECT or PET myocardial perfusion studies requiring quantification of myocardial perfusion, left-ventricular function, coronary blood flow, coronary flow reserve, and cardiac mechanical dyssynchrony. Used by trained nuclear technicians and physicians for diagnostic support and structured reporting.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An emission computed tomography system is a device intended to detect the location and distribution of gamma ray- and positron-emitting radionuclides in the body and produce cross-sectional images through computer reconstruction of the data. This generic type of device may include signal analysis and display equipment, patient and equipment supports, radionuclide anatomical markers, component parts, and accessories.
{0}------------------------------------------------
K123646
FEB 2 2 2013
# 510(k) SUMMARY
## Safety and Effectiveness
1. Medical Device Establishment:
Syntermed, Inc. Registration No. 1066019 Owner Operator I.D. 9041128 Device Requlation Number: 892.1200 Product Code: KPS Classification Panel: Radiology Voice: (888) 263-4446 ext 102, FAX: (714) 281-1290 Contact person: Kenneth F. Van Train Address: Syntermed, Inc. 130 Wieuca Road Suite 108 Atlanta, GA 30342 Date Summary Prepared: November 15, 2012
2. Medical Device:
Emory Cardiac Toolbox™ 4.0 - Display and Processing program for gated SPECT & PET myocardial perfusion studies executing on nuclear medicine computer systems and Windows PC's.
Classification Name - System, Tomography, Computed, Emission
3. Medical Device Equivalence:
vww.syntermed.com · Office: 888.263.4446 · Fax: 888.216.7511
Emory Cardiac Toolbox v3.1 K071503, Emory Cardiac Toolbox v2.0 K992450 (PERFEX), COR Analyzer developed by Rcadia K110071, CORRIDOR 4DM V2010 developed by INVIA K101279, and Coronary Flow Reserve (CFR) Quantification (cfrQuant) developed by University of Texas Medical School at Houston K113754.
4. Device Description:
Nuclear is evolving. We're evolving with you.
· 130 West Wieuca Road · Suite 108
{1}------------------------------------------------
The Emory Cardiac Toolbox™ 4.0 is used to display gated wall motion and for quantifying parameters of left-ventricular perfusion and function from gated SPECT & PET myocardial perfusion studies and for the evaluation of dynamic PET studies. These parameters are: perfusion, ejection fraction, end-diastolic volume, end-systolic volume, myocardial mass, transient ischemic dilatation (TID), analysis of coronary blood flow and coronary flow reserve, and assessment of cardiac mechanic dyssynchrony. In addition, the program offers the capability of providing the following diagnostic information: computer assisted visual scoring, prognostic information, and expert system image interpretation. The program can also be used for the 3D alignment of coronary artery models from CT coronary angiography onto the left ventricular 3D epicardial surface and for generation of the short axis, vertical, and horizontal long axis tomograms from the SPECT raw data either filtered backprojection (FBP) or iterative reconstruction using (MLEM/OSEM). The Emory Cardiac Toolbox can be used with any of the following Myocardial SPECT Protocols: Same Day and Two Day Sestamibi, Dual-Isotope (Tc-99m/Tl-201), Tetrofosmin, and Thallium, Rubidium-82, Rubidium-82 with CTbased attenuation correction, N-13-ammonia, FDG protocols, and user defined normal databases. This program was developed to run in the .NET operating system environment which can be executed on any PC, any nuclear medicine computer system, or through a web browser. In addition, the program can be used for the decision support in interpretation and automatic structured reporting of the study. The program processes the studies automatically, however, user verification of output is required and manual processing capability is provided.
#### 5. Intended Use and Potential Adverse Effect on Health:
The Emory Cardiac Toolbox™ 4.0 software program should be used for the quantification of myocardial perfusion for the display of wall motion and quantification of left-ventricular function parameters from SPECT & PET myocardial perfusion studies (EGS™), for the 3D alignment of coronary artery models from CT coronary angiography onto the left ventricular 3D epicardial surface, for the assessment of cardiac mechanical dyssynchrony using phase analysis, for generation of the short axis, vertical, and horizontal long axis tomograms from the SPECT raw data using either filtered backproiection (FBP) or iterative reconstruction (MLEM/OSEM), for the quantification of myocardial blood flow and coronary flow reserve, and for the decision support in interpretation (LVX) and automatic structured reporting of the study.
The interpretation provided by LVX is intended to assist a trained physician to analyze nuclear cardiology images. It was not meant to replace or eliminate the standard visual analysis of the gated SPECT & PET study. The physician should integrate all of the patients' clinical and diagnostic information, i.e. patients' history, stress and/or rest EKG, quality control images, visual interpretation of the gated tomographic images, and quantitative and decision support interpretative results, prior to making his final interpretation. This comprehensive processing technique (as with all diagnostic imaging) is not perfect, and will be associated with some false positive and false negative results. The expected accuracy of the initial program can be found in the multicenter trial results listed in the article by Vansant
{2}------------------------------------------------
et al Emory Cardiac Toolbox™ (CEquar®, EGS™) Version 2.0, Ref. 510(k) #: K992450 and Version 2.1, Ref. 510(k) #: K014033). The accuracy for modifications in version 4.0 for analysis of coronary blood flow, coronary flow reserve and for evaluation of the decision support system (LVX) in comparison to PERFEX results can be found in Item H (Testing & Validation) of this 510(k) submission. The physician should be aware of the accuracy when integrating the quantitative results for his final interpretation. Therefore, this program has no direct adverse effect on health since the results represent only a part of the information which the physician will utilize for his final interpretation. The final responsibility for interpretation of the study lies with the physician.
#### 6. Marketing History:
There have been several medical device gated SPECT programs marketed in the past which perform similar functions to those performed by the Emory Cardiac Tool Box™ 2.0, 2.1, 2.6 and 3.1. These programs are all used for the purpose of displaying wall motion and deriving functional parameters for the diagnostic interpretation by a physician. The Emory Cardiac Tool Box™ 4.0 provides additional features for the analysis of coronary blood flow, and for the decision support in interpretation (LVX) and automatic structured reporting of the SPECT and PET study and we believe is substantially equivalent to Emory Cardiac Toolbox v3.1 K071503 for conversion from IDL to NET; Emory Cardiac Toolbox v2.0 K992450 and COR Analyzer developed by Rcadia K110071 for decision support; and CORRIDOR 4DM V2010 developed by INVIA K101279 and Coronary Flow Reserve (CFR) Quantification (cfrQuant) developed by University of Texas Medical School at Houston K113754 for mvocardial blood flow and coronary flow reserve. To our knowledge there have been no safety problems with the COR Analyzer decision support system which has been in the marketplace since January 31, 2011 and with CORRIDOR which has been marketed since August 4, 2010 or Coronary Flow Reserve (CFR) Quantification (cfrQuant) marketed since July 19, 2012.
### 7. Conclusions:
The safety of this program has been determined through the various stages of software development which included the initial design, coding, debugging, testing, and validation. The effectiveness of the initial program, Emory Cardiac Toolbox™ 2.0. has been established in phantom and computer simulations studies, in-house trial validations which included an evaluation of left ventricular functional parameter calculations in 217 patients, and in a multicenter trial validation consisting of 80 patients. In addition, the computer assisted visual scoring, prognosis, expert system, and coronary fusion algorithms were successfully evaluated in 20, 504, 461, and 9 patients respectively. Additional validation of the Emory Cardiac Toolbox™ 2.1 program for development and validation of Rb-82 normal limits (n=176) and validation of PET tools for assessment of perfusion - metabolism match-mismatch (n=90) were successfully completed. Validation for the Emory Cardiac Toolbox™ 2.6 program included development and validation of N-13ammonia normal limits (n= 144) and validation of the alignment method for 3D CT coronary artery onto the left ventricular 3D epicardial surface using phantom and
{3}------------------------------------------------
patient studies (n = 8). Validation for the Emory Cardiac Toolbox™ 3.1 program included development (phantom, animal, and patients n=4) and prospective validation of SPECT reconstruction in 10 patients and for phase analysis which included development in 90 normal patients and prospective validation in 75 additional patients. Validation for the Emory Cardiac Toolbox™ 4.0 program included 301 patients used to validate the accuracy in deriving similar values for 14 perfusion, function and dyssynchrony variables from IDL to .NET conversion which demonstrated an accuracy greater than 99%, the coronary blood flow validation was conducted in 44 patient studies, and the decision support validation was conducted in 126 studies and these results are listed in Item H, Testing & Validation. We contend that the method employed for the development and validation for the conversion from IDL to .NET operating system, the analysis of coronary blood flow and coronary flow reserve, and the decision support for interpretation of SPECT and PET data have proven its safety and effectiveness. In our opinion the additional features in Emory Cardiac Toolbox™ 4.0 for decision support for interpretation and coronary blood flow analysis are substantially equivalent to Emory Cardiac Toolbox v2.0 K992450 (PERFEX) and Rcadia's COR Analyzer K110071 for decision support (LVX) and INVIA's CORRIDOR 4DM V2010 K101279 and Coronary Flow Reserve (CFR) Quantification (cfrQuant) developed by University of Texas Medical School at Houston K113754 for coronary blood flow analysis which have all been cleared for marketing. The Emory Cardiac Toolbox™ 4.0 is intended for the same purpose as Emory Cardiac Toolbox™ 3.1 along with the additional purpose of decision support for interpretation, coronary blood flow, and coronary flow reserve analysis and raises no new issues of safety or effectiveness.
14
{4}------------------------------------------------
#### DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
Image /page/4/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The logo consists of a circular seal with the words "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES • USA" arranged around the perimeter. Inside the circle is a stylized image of an eagle with its wings spread.
#### Public Health Service
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-002
February 22, 2013
Syntermed, Inc. Kenneth F. Van Train, Ph.D. President, 130 Wieuca Road Suite 108 Atlanta, GA 30342
Re: k123646
Emory Cardiac Toolbox 4.0 Regulation Number: 21 CFR 892.1200 Regulation Name: Emission Computerized Tomography Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: KPS Dated: November 16, 2012 Received: November 27, 2012
Dear Dr. Van Train:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21
{5}------------------------------------------------
Page 2 - [Contact Person's Name]
CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Parts 801 and 809), please contact the Office of In Vitro Diagnostics and Radiological Health at (301) 796-5450. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/industry/support/index.html.
Sincerely yours,
Michael Hara
Janine M. Morris Director Division Radiological Health Office of In Vitro Diagnostics and Radiological Health Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{6}------------------------------------------------
### Indications for Use
510(k) Number: K123646
Device Name:_Emory Cardiac Toolbox™ 4.0
Indications For Use:
The Emory Cardiac Toolbox™ 4.0 software program should be used for the quantification of myocardial perfusion for the display of wall motion and quantification of left-ventricular function parameters from SPECT & PET myocardial perfusion studies (EGS™), for the 3D alignment of coronary artery models from CT coronary angiography onto the left ventricular 3D epicardial surface, for the assessment of cardiac mechanical dyssynchrony using phase analysis, for generation of the short axis, vertical, and horizontal long axis tomograms from the SPECT raw data using either filtered backprojection (FBP) or iterative reconstruction (MLEM/OSEM), for the quantification of myocardial blood flow and coronary flow reserve, and for the decision support in interpretation (LVX) and automatic structured reporting of the study.
The product is intended for use by trained nuclear technicians and nuclear medicine or nuclear cardiology physicians. The clinician remains ultimately responsible for the final interpretation and diagnosis based on standard practices and visual interpretation of all SPECT and PET data.
Prescription Use X (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) AND/OR
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 807 Subpart C)
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of In Vitro Diagnostics and Radiological Health (OIR)
Michi FDA'Hara
(Division Sign C
Page 1 of
Division of Radiotogical Hea
Office of In Vitro Diagnostics and Radiological He
510(k) L.123646
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.