The Warantec dental abutment is intended to be used with the root-form endosseous dental implant to aid in prosthetic rehabilitation.
Device Story
IU Implant System Abutment is a titanium alloy dental superstructure; used to support or maintain dental restorations following endosseous implant placement. Device is provided non-sterile; requires sterilization by clinician before use. Used in dental clinics by dentists/prosthodontists. Abutment connects to root-form implants to facilitate prosthetic rehabilitation; provides structural support for artificial teeth. Output is a physical interface for dental prosthetics; enables restoration of chewing function. Benefits include functional and aesthetic dental rehabilitation.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data. Bench testing included steam sterilization validation (ISO 17665-1/2), biocompatibility (referenced from K172345), fatigue testing (ISO 14801:2016), and MRI safety assessment via scientific rationale.
Technological Characteristics
Material: Ti 6Al 4V ELI (ASTM F136). Connection: Internal Hex. Angulation: 15°, 17°. Diameter: 4.0-5.0mm. Post height: 6, 8mm. Gingival height: 2-6mm. Sterilization: Steam (SAL 10^-6). Non-sterile delivery.
Indications for Use
Indicated for use with root-form endosseous dental implants to aid in prosthetic rehabilitation in patients requiring dental restoration.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An endosseous dental implant abutment is a premanufactured prosthetic component directly connected to the endosseous dental implant and is intended for use as an aid in prosthetic rehabilitation.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The guidance document entitled “Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Root-Form Endosseous Dental Implants and Endosseous Dental Implant Abutments” will serve as the special control. (See § 872.1(e) for the availability of this guidance document.)
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image contains the logos of the Department of Health and Human Services and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The Department of Health and Human Services logo is on the left, and the FDA logo is on the right. The FDA logo includes the letters "FDA" in a blue square, followed by the words "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue text.
Warantec Co., Ltd, Younggwang Choi RA Team Manager 411~412, 474, Dunchon-dearo, Jungwon-gu Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do 13229 REPUBLIC OF KOREA
Re: K221969
Trade/Device Name: IU Implant System Abutment Regulation Number: 21 CFR 872.3630 Regulation Name: Endosseous Dental Implant Abutment Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: NHA Dated: April 14, 2023 Received: April 14, 2023
Dear Younggwang Choi:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
{1}------------------------------------------------
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely.
Andrew I. Steen -S
Andrew I. Steen Assistant Director DHT1B: Division of Dental and ENT Devices OHT1: Office of Ophthalmic, Anesthesia, Respiratory, ENT and Dental Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
## Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K221969
Device Name IU Implant System Abutment
Indications for Use (Describe)
The Warantec dental abutment is intended to be used with the root-form endosseous dental implant to aid in prosthetic rehabilitation.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
X Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
| Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
#### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/3/Picture/0 description: The image shows the word "WARANTEC" in a sans-serif font. The color of the text is a light teal. The letters are all capitalized and evenly spaced. The overall impression is clean and modern.
## 510(k) Summary – K221969
May 10, 2023
#### 1. Submitter
| | Submitter |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Name | WARANTEC Co., Ltd. |
| Address | 411-412, 474, Dunchon-daero, Jungwon-gu, Seongnam-si,<br>Gyeonggi-do, 13229, Rep. of Korea |
| Phone/Fax | +82-2-3675-5851/+82-2-3675-5853 |
| Contact person | Younggwang Choi / RA<br>ygchoi@oneplant.co.kr |
| Summary Date | May 10, 2023 |
## 2. Device information
| a) | Trade Name : | IU Implant System Abutment |
|----|-----------------------|------------------------------------|
| b) | Common Name : | Endosseous Dental Implant Abutment |
| c) | Classification Name : | Endosseous Dental Implant Abutment |
| d) | Product Code : | NHA |
| e) | Regulation Number : | 872.3630 |
| f) | Class of device : | Class II |
| g) | Panel : | Dental |
#### 3. Predicate devices
- Primary Predicate Device: a)
IU Implant System / Warantec Co., Ltd. / K172345
#### Reference Device: b)
ONEPLANT Dental Implant System / Warantec Co., Ltd. / K081748 Implantium® / SuperLine® Prosthetics / Dentium Co., Ltd. / K160828
{4}------------------------------------------------
#### 4. Device description
The IU Implant System Abutment is a dental implant superstructure made of titanium alloy. It is an abutment used to support or maintain the restoration after the implantation of the fixture in the oral cavity.
The abutments are provided non-sterile and should be sterilized before use.
#### 5. Indication for use
The Warantec dental abutment is intended to be used with the root-form endosseous dental implant to aid in prosthetic rehabilitation.
#### 6. Substantial equivalence comparison
The IU Implant System is similar designs and dimensions, and has the same material, intended use, surface treatment and technological characteristics as the identified primary predicate device (K172345) and reference devices (K081748 / K160828). When compared with predicate device, no new questions of substantial equivalence have been raised for the IU Implant System Abutment.
| Device Name | Indication for use |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| IU Implant System<br>Abutment<br>(Subject device) | The Warantec dental abutment is intended to be used with the root-form<br>endosseous dental implant to aid in prosthetic rehabilitation. |
| IU Implant System<br>(Primary Predicate<br>Device: K172345) | The IU Implant System is intended to be surgically placed in the bone of the<br>upper or lower jaw arches to provide support for prosthetic devices, such as<br>artificial teeth, and to restore the patient's chewing function. |
| ONEPLANT Dental<br>Implant System<br>(References Predicate<br>Device: K081748) | ONEPLANT is designed for use in dental implant Surgery. These are intended<br>for use in partially or fully edentulous mandibles and maxillae to support for<br>single or multiple-unit restorations such as cemented retained, screw retained, or<br>over denture restorations and terminal or intermediate abutment support for fixed<br>bridework. |
| Implantium® /<br>SuperLine®<br>Prosthetics<br>(References Predicate<br>Device: K160828) | Implantium® SuperLine® Prosthetics is intended for use as an aid in prosthetic<br>rehabilitation |
{5}------------------------------------------------
The subject device (IU system abutment) has substantially the equivalent in indications and design principles as the predicate and reference devices listed above.
All are intended for use with endosseous dental implants in the maxilla and mandible to provide functional and prosthetic rehabilitation of the edentulous maxilla and mandible.
The differences between the target device IFUS(Indications for Use Statements) and the predicate and reference device are related to the specific device names, design feature, compatible implant lines.
None of these differences impact substantial equivalence. because all IFUS express equivalent intended use to facilitate dental prosthetic restorations, and the indications are expressed equivalently using different specific wording.
{6}------------------------------------------------
# WaRantec
## Device comparison
#### - Angled Abutment
| - Angled Abutment | | | |
|------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| | IU Implant System Abutment<br>(Subject Device) | ONEPLANT Dental Implant System<br>(References Predicate) | Dentium Implantium® &<br>SuperLine® Prosthetics<br>(References Predicate) |
| Company Name | Warantec Co., Ltd. | Warantec Co., Ltd. | DENTIUM Co., Ltd. |
| 510(k) Number | New Device | K081748 | K160828 |
| Classification and<br>Product Code | Class II; 872.3630; NHA | | |
| Design | Image: Abutment 1 | Image: Abutment 2 | Image: Abutment 3 |
| Material | Ti 6Al 4V ELI<br>(ASTM F136) | Ti 6Al 4V ELI<br>(ASTM F136) | Pure Titanium Grade4<br>(ASTM F67) |
| Surface Treatment | None | None | None |
| Connection | Internal Hex Connection | Internal Hex Connection | Internal Hex Connection |
| Angulation | 15°, 17° | 20° | 15°, 25° |
| Diameter | 4.0~5.0mm | 5.0mm | 4.5~5.5mm |
| Post height | 6, 8mm | 6, 8mm | 7mm |
| Gingival Height | 2~6mm | 2~5mm | 1.5mm, 2.5mm, 3.5mm |
| Restoration type | Single & Multi | Single & Multi | Single & Multi |
| Similarities | The subject and reference devices have same intended use, functions, materials and<br>general shape (design). | | |
| Differences | The differences between the subject device and the reference predicate device are the surface<br>treatment, angulation, and dimensional range.<br>These minor differences don't affect product's fundamental function.<br>K160828 was selected as the reference device to support the difference in dimensions such as<br>diameter and length and the angle difference of the abutment, including the dimensions and<br>angle range of the subject device.<br>Therefore, the subject device and the reference devices are substantially equivalent. | | |
{7}------------------------------------------------
#### 7. Non-clinical testing data
Non-clinical testing data submitted, referenced, or relied upon to demonstrate substantial equivalence included:
• Steam sterilization validation according to ISO 17665-1 and ISO 17665-2, demonstrating a sterility assurance level (SAL) of 10-6.
• Biocompatibility of Ti-6A1-4V ELI (ASTM F136) demonstrated by the referenced Warantec submission. K172345, using the same materials and manufacturing processes as the subject device.
• Fatigue testing was conducted on the worst case according to ISO 14801:2016 and the FDA Special Controls Guidance Document for Root-form Endosseous Dental Implants and Endosseous Dental Abutment.
· Non-clinical worst-case MRI review was performed to evaluate the metallic IU System Abutment devices in the MRI environment using scientific rationale and published literature (e.g., Woods, Terry O., Jana G. Delfino, and Sunder Rajan. "Assessment of Magnetically Induced Displacement Force and Torque on Metal Alloys Used in Medical Devices." Journal of Testing and Evaluation 49.2 (2019): 783-795), based on the entire system including all variations (all compatible implant bodies, dental abutments, and fixation screws) and material compositions. The rationale addressed parameters per the FDA guidance "Testing and Labeling Medical Devices for Safety in the Magnetic Resonance (MR) Environment', including magnetically induced displacement force and torque.
No clinical data were included in this submission.
#### 8. Conclusion
The subject device has the similar technological characteristics to the predicate device, main material, indication for use and design.
Based on the information provided for this premarket notification of Warantec Co., Ltd. conclude that IU System Abutment are substantially equivalent to predicate devices.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.