K221799 · Silver Fox Corporation Limited · ITI · Sep 16, 2022 · Physical Medicine
Device Facts
Record ID
K221799
Device Name
Electric Wheelchair, Model: 9000N
Applicant
Silver Fox Corporation Limited
Product Code
ITI · Physical Medicine
Decision Date
Sep 16, 2022
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 890.3860
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
The Electrical Wheelchair (Model: 9000N) is a motor-driven, and indoor transportation vehicle with the intended use to provide mobility to the disabled, the elderly and the infirm for short-distance travel.
Device Story
Motor-driven indoor transportation vehicle; battery-powered DC motor; user-operated via joystick controller. Components: foldable aluminum alloy frame, seat cushion, two rear driving wheels with hub motor/electromagnetic brake assemblies, two pivoting casters, Lithium-ion battery, controller/master module. User controls speed and steering via joystick; releasing joystick triggers automatic deceleration and brake engagement. Used in indoor environments or flat surfaces near buildings; operated by patient. Provides mobility for disabled/elderly/infirm. Controller displays battery status and abnormal conditions. Foldable design facilitates storage and transport.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data or animal studies provided. Substantial equivalence demonstrated through extensive lab bench testing, including ISO 7176 series (stability, braking, energy consumption, dimensions, speed, fatigue, climatic, obstacle climbing, power/control systems, ignition resistance) and ISO 10993 biocompatibility testing.
Technological Characteristics
Frame: Aluminum alloy. Contact materials: Nitrile rubber (joystick handle), silica gel (buttons), ABS (joystick cover), PU (armrest), polyester (seat). Power: 24V 11AH Lithium-ion battery; DC 24V 180W motors. Control: Joystick-based electronic controller with electromagnetic brakes. Connectivity: None. Sterilization: N/A. Software: Moderate level of concern; rule-based control system.
Indications for Use
Indicated for disabled, elderly, and infirm individuals requiring mobility assistance for short-distance travel. Intended for indoor use or on flat roads near buildings. Not for cross-country use, grass, gravel, or slopes exceeding 12 degrees. Maximum user weight 100kg.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A powered wheelchair is a battery-operated device with wheels that is intended for medical purposes to provide mobility to persons restricted to a sitting position.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On the left is the Department of Health & Human Services logo. To the right of that is the FDA logo, which is a blue square with the letters "FDA" in white. To the right of the blue square is the text "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue.
September 16, 2022
Silver Fox Corporation Limited % Iris Fung Regulation Manager Guangdong Jianda Medical Technology Co., Ltd. 906 Room, Longxiang Garden, Tianhe District Guangzhou. 510000 China
Re: K221799
Trade/Device Name: Electric Wheelchair, Model: 9000N Regulation Number: 21 CFR 890.3860 Regulation Name: Powered Wheelchair Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: ITI Dated: June 13, 2022 Received: June 21, 2022
Dear Iris Fung:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal
{1}------------------------------------------------
statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
Tushar Bansal, Ph.D Acting Assistant Director, Acute Injury Devices Team DHT5B: Division of Neuromodulation and Physical Medicine Devices OHT5: Office of Neurological and Physical Medicine Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
{2}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K221799
Device Name Electrical Wheelchair, Model: 9000N
#### Indications for Use (Describe)
The Electrical Wheelchair (Model: 9000N) is a motor-driven, and indoor transportation vehicle with the intended use to provide mobility to the disabled, the elderly and the infirm for short-distance travel.
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) | |
|-------------------------------------------------|--|
| | |
Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
X Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
## 510(k) Summary
This summary of 510(k) safety and effectiveness information is being submitted in accordance with requirements of 21 CFR 807.92.
## 1. Submitter Information
Sponsor Company Name: Silver Fox Corporation Limited Address: No.18, 1st TongLe Road, TongLe Industrial Zone, TangXa Town, PengJiang District, JiangMen City, GuangDong Province, China. Phone: +86-13422526650 Contact Person (including title): CHEN YAN /QA manager E-mail: Yan.chen@silverfox.cn
Application Correspondent: Guangdong Jianda Medical Technology Co Ltd. Address: 906 Room, Longxiang Garden, Tianhe district, Guangzhou, China Contact Person:Ms. Iris Fung Tile: Regulation Manager Tel: +86- 13211147965 Email: mdc-fs@foxmail.com; jianda-lee@foxmail.com
## 2. Subject Device Information
Type of 510(k) submission: Traditional Common Name: Powered Wheelchair Trade Name: Electrical Wheelchair Classification Name: Powered Wheelchair Review Panel: Physical Medicine Product Code: ITI Regulation Number: 21 CFR 890.3860 Regulation Class: Class II
## 3. Predicate Device Information
Sponsor: JERRY MEDICAL INSTRUMENT (SHANGHAI) CO., LTD. Common Name: Powered Wheelchair Trade Name: Electric Wheelchair
{4}------------------------------------------------
510(k) number: K192739 Review Panel: Physical Medicine Product Code: ITI Regulation Number: 21 CFR 890.3860 Regulation Class: Class II
## 4. Device Description
The proposed device, Electrical wheelchair, mainly powered by battery, motivated by DC motor, driven by user controlling joystick and adjusting speed.
The electrical wheelchair consists of two foldable armrests, a seat cushion, a foldable frame, two rear driving wheels with hub motor/electromagnetic brake assemblies, two pivoting casters, a Lithiumion battery, a battery charger, a controller and master module. .
Wheelchair frame: Foldable for easy storage and transportation.
Controller and Master module: control the forward, steering and speed adjustment of the electric wheelchair.
Battery: It was installed at the bottom of the wheelchair.
Rear wheel (Driving Wheel): equipped with motor and electric brake device.
Front wheel: Provide support to keep the wheelchair stable.
The battery of electrical wheelchair is Lithium-ion 24V, 11AH, and the charger is Input: 100-240VAC,50-
60Hz, 1.2-0.5A, Output:DC24V,3A
The maximum weight limitation of the user is 100kg.
This product can be quickly folded, disassembled, and is easy to place in the trunk of a car or lift upstairs.
The wheelchair is made of high-quality aluminum alloy. The weight without battery is 23kg.
This product is an indoor wheelchair that can be driven indoors or on flat roads near buildings. In principle, it cannot be cross-country. It is not recommended to drive on grass, gravel roads, slopes greater than 12°, and motor vehicle lanes.
# 5. Intended Use
The Electrical Wheelchair (Model: 9000N) is a motor-driven, and indoor transportation vehicle with the intended use to provide mobility to the disabled, the elderly and the infirm for short-distance travel.
# 6. Test Summary of Non-clinical Testing
# The Electrical Wheelchair has been evaluated the safety and performance by lab bench testing according to the following standards:
- . ISO 7176-1: 2014 Wheelchairs - Part 1: Determination of static stability
{5}------------------------------------------------
- . ISO 7176-2: 2017 Wheelchairs - Part 2:Determination of dynamic stability of electrically powered wheelchairs
- . ISO 7176-3: 2012 Wheelchairs - Part 3: Determination of effectiveness of brakes
- . ISO 7176-4: 2008 Wheelchairs - Part 4: Energy consumption of electric wheelchairs and scooters for determination of theoretical distance range
- . ISO 7176-5: 2008 Wheelchairs - Part 5: Determination of overall dimensions, mass and manoeuving space
- . ISO 7176-6: 2018 Wheelchairs - Part 6: Determination of maximum speed. acceleration and deceleration of electric wheelchairs
- . ISO 7176-7: 1998 Wheelchairs - Part 7: Measurement of seating and wheel dimensions
- ISO 7176-8: 2014 Wheelchairs Part 8: Requirements and test methods for static, impact and fatigue . strengths
- . ISO 7176-9: 2009 Wheelchairs - Part 9: Climatic tests for electric wheelchairs
- . ISO 7176-10: 2008 Wheelchairs - Part 10: Determination of obstacle-climbing ability of electrically powered wheelchairs
- . ISO 7176-11 : 2012 Wheelchairs - Part 11: Test dummies
- . ISO 7176-13 : 1989 Wheelchairs - Part 13: Determination of coefficient of friction of test surfaces
- . ISO 7176-14: 2008 Wheelchairs - Part 14: Power and control systems for electrically powered wheelchairs and scooters - Requirements and test methods
- ISO 7176-15: 1996 Wheelchairs - Part 15: Requirements for information disclosure,documentation and labeling
- . ISO 7176-16: 2012 Wheelchairs - Part 16: Resistance to ignition of postural support devices
- . ISO 7176-19:2008 Wheelchairs - Part 19: Wheeled mobility devices for use as seats in motor vehicles
#### EMC
- . ISO 7176-21: 2009 Wheelchairs - Part 21: Requirements and test methods for electromagnetic compatibility of electrically powered wheelchairs and scooters, and battery chargers
- . IEC 60601-1-2:2014 Medical electrical equipment - Part 1-2: General requirements for safety - Collateral standard: Electromagnetic compatibility - Requirements and tests
### Biocompatibility
The parts in contact with the user include: Joystick handle , is made of 100% Nitrile rubber; Joystick buttons are made of 100% silica gel; Upper/lower cover of Joystick are made of 100% ABS; Armrest are
{6}------------------------------------------------
made of 100% polyurethane (PU); Seat cushion, is made of 100% Ployester. All contact materials have passed biological tests and are harmless to humans.
- . ISO 10993-1:2018 Biological evaluation of medical devices — Part 1: Evaluation and testing within a risk management process
- . ISO 10993-5:2009 Biological evaluation of medical devices — Part 5: Tests for in vitro cytotoxicity
- . ISO 10993-10:2010 Biological evaluation of medical devices — Part 10: Tests for irritation and skin sensitization
## 7. Comparison to Predicate Device
Compare with predicate device, the subject device is very similar in design principle, intended use,
functions, material and the applicable standards. The differences between subject device and predicate device do not raise and new questions of safety or effectiveness.
| Elements of<br>Comparison | Subject Device | Predicate Device | Verdict |
|---------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------|
| Product Code | ITI | ITI | Same |
| Regulation No. | 21 CFR 890.3860 | 21 CFR 890.3860 | Same |
| Class | II | II | Same |
| Product name | Electrical Wheelchair | Electric Wheelchair | Same |
| 510 (k)<br>Number | K221799 | K192739 | -- |
| Models | 9000N | JRWD6010, JRWD6012 | -- |
| Intended Use | The Electrical Wheelchair (Model: 9000N) is a motor-driven, and indoor<br>transportation vehicle with the intended<br>use to provide mobility to the disabled,<br>the elderly and the infirm for short-<br>distance travel. | The device is a motor-driven, and<br>indoor transportation vehicle with the<br>intended use to provide mobility to a<br>disabled or an elderly person limited to<br>a seated position. | Same |
| Use<br>environment | Indoor use | Indoor use | Same |
| Patient<br>Population | This electrical wheelchair is suitable<br>for short-distance travel for the<br>disabled and the elderly person. | The electric wheelchair is intended to<br>provide mobility to a person with a<br>disability or an older adult limited to a<br>sitting position | Same |
| Product<br>structure | Consists of two foldable armrests, a<br>backrest, a seat cushion, a foldable<br>frame, two rear driving wheels with | Consists of two foldable armrests, a<br>backrest, a seat cushion, a foldable<br>frame, two rear driving wheels with hub | Same |
### Table1 General Comparison
{7}------------------------------------------------
| Elements of<br>Comparison | Subject Device | Predicate Device | Verdict |
|---------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| | hub<br>motor/electromagnetic brake<br>assemblies, two pivoting casters, a<br>Lithium-ion battery, a battery charger,<br>a controller and master module. | motor/electromagnetic brake<br>assemblies, two pivoting casters, a Li-<br>ion batteries, an off-board battery<br>charger, a control panel, and an electric<br>motor controller. | |
| Driving system | Direct drive on the rear wheels | Direct drive on the rear wheels | Same |
| Number of<br>wheels | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Main frame<br>material | Aluminium alloy | Aluminium alloy | Same |
| Motor | DC 24V* 180W * 2pcs | DC24V* 180W*2pcs | Same |
| Battery | Lithium-ion 24V, 11AH,1pcs | DC 24V 20Ah Lithium-ion, 1 pcs | Subject Device<br>has a lower output<br>current, but this<br>will not affect the<br>use of the product<br>function and<br>safety. |
| Battery charger | Input:AC 100-240V, 50/60Hz<br>Output:DC24V, 3A max | High Power Technology Inc.<br>HP0180WL2<br>Input: 100-240 VAC<br>Output: DC 24V, 6 Amp | Subject Device<br>has a lower output<br>current, but this<br>will not affect the<br>use of the product<br>function and<br>safety. |
# Table2 Performance Comparison
| Elements of | Subject Device | Predicate Device | | Verdict |
|-------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Comparison | | JRWD6010 | JRWD6012 | |
| Dimensions | 39.0"x24.0"x38.0" | 38.1"x24.0"x37.0" | 39.3"x23.6"x37.0" | Similar |
| Folded<br>Dimensions | 26.0"x24.0"x16.0" | Not publicly available | | -- |
| Seat Cushion<br>size | 18.0"x18.0"x3.0" | Not publicly available | | -- |
| Weight,w/<br>Battery | 50lbs./23kg | 58.4 lbs. /26.5kg | 58.2 lbs./26.4kg | Subject Device has a<br>lighter weight, but this<br>will not affect the use of<br>the product function and<br>safety. |
| Frame design | Foldable/<br>The device consists of a foldable<br>and non-rigid type of power<br>wheelchair base with rear drive<br>and 2 casters in the front and 2<br>anti-tippers in the rear. | Foldable /<br>The device consists of a foldable and<br>non-rigid type of power wheelchair base<br>with rear drive and 2 casters in the front<br>and two anti-tippers in the rear. | | Same |
| Folding<br>mechanism | A foldable seat frames<br>(The backrest could be folded to | A foldable seat frames<br>(The backrest could be folded to seat) | | Same |
| Elements of | | Predicate Device | | |
| Comparison | Subject Device | JRWD6010 | JRWD6012 | Verdict |
| | seat) | | | |
| Front wheel<br>(inch ) | 8 | 8<br>(PU solid tire) | | |
| Rear tire<br>(inch) | 8<br>(PU solid tire) | 10<br>(PU solid tire) | 12<br>(Pneumatic tire) | Smaller sizes of rear<br>wheels, The difference<br>will not raise any new<br>safety and effectiveness<br>concerns. |
| Cruising<br>Range(km) | 15.5 | 20 | | Subject Device has a<br>shorter cruising range,<br>but this will not affect<br>the use of the product<br>function and safety. |
| Obstacle<br>climbing(mm) | 25 | 50 | | Subject Device has<br>a<br>lower obstacle climbing,<br>but this will not affect<br>the use of the product<br>function and safety. |
| Max. Speed<br>(km/h) | 4.5 | 6 | | Subject Device has a<br>smaller Max. speed, but<br>this will not affect the<br>of the product<br>use<br>function and safety. |
| Static stability<br>forward | 18.2° | 21.8° | | Both of the devices are<br>evaluated according to |
| Static stability<br>rearward | 18.0° | 19° | | standard<br>ISO 7176-<br>1:2014, so the different |
| Static stability<br>sideways | Left: 17.6°<br>Right: 16.6° | 19.2° | | static stability will not<br>impact the safety and<br>effectiveness. |
| Max. loading<br>(kg) | 220lbs(100kg) | 220lbs (100kg) | | Same |
| Maximum<br>safe<br>operational<br>incline | 10° | 10 degrees | | Same |
| Min. Turning<br>radium | 950mm | 1820mm | | The difference in the<br>tuming radius will bring<br>more convenience when<br>it turns.The difference<br>will not raise any new<br>safety and effectiveness<br>concerns. |
| Minimum<br>braking<br>distance | ≤1meter (39<br>inches )<br>flat,<br>≤1.6meter (63 inches) at 3°slope | 1m | | Similar |
| Max Speed<br>Forwards | 2.46mph(3.96km/h) | 3.75 mph (6 km/h) | | Both of the devices are<br>evaluated according to |
| Max. Speed<br>Backward | 1.57mph(2.52km/h) | 2.80 mph (4.5 km/h) | | standard<br>ISO 7176-<br>6:2018, so the different |
| Elements of<br>Comparison | Subject Device | Predicate Device | | Verdict |
| | | JRWD6010 | JRWD6012 | |
| | | | | will not impact the<br>safety and effectiveness |
| Controller | Silver Fox Corporation Limited | PG Drives Technology Ltd., new VSI | | Different Although<br>different controller is<br>used, both the control<br>system, including the<br>joystick controller, the<br>electromagnetic brakes<br>are similar. The joystick<br>controls the directions<br>and speed of movement,<br>and when the joystick is<br>released, the powered<br>wheelchair will slow<br>down to stop and the<br>brakes will<br>automatically re-engage.<br>The controller also<br>provides the battery<br>status displaying and<br>abnormal condition<br>displaying. Both of the<br>control systems are<br>evaluated according to<br>standard ISO 7176-<br>14:2008 and software<br>validation requirement<br>and there are no new<br>safety and effectiveness<br>concerns due to the<br>difference. |
| Speed control<br>method | Joystick control method | | Joystick control method | Same |
{8}------------------------------------------------
{9}------------------------------------------------
# Table3 Safety Comparison
| Elements of<br>Comparison | Subject Device | Predicate Device | Verdict |
|------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Main materials | Frame: Aluminiumalloy;<br>Wheel, Armrest: PU;<br>Backrest:polyeter | Frame: Aluminiumalloy;<br>Wheel, Armrest: PU;<br>Backrest: oxford cloth | The material for the<br>main frame is the same.<br>Biocompatibility<br>evaluation has been<br>carried out per ISO<br>10993-1. |
| Materials<br>contacting user | Armrest: PU;<br>Backrest, Seat cushion: polyeter<br>Joystick handle : Nitrile rubber;<br>Joystick buttons: silica gel;<br>Upper/lower cover of Joystick:<br>ABS | Armrest: PU:<br>Backrest: oxford cloth<br>Seat: oxford cloth<br>newVSi electric wheelchair<br>controller:<br>Joystick knob: Santoprene 101-80;<br>Joystick Gaiter: Silicone 3032<br>(50%) & 5031 (50%)<br>Enclosure Moulding(s): ABS/PC<br>Wonderloy PC-540<br>Keypad: Silicone keypad coatings | There are no new safety<br>and effectiveness<br>concerns due to the<br>difference. |
{10}------------------------------------------------
| Elements of<br>Comparison | Subject Device | Predicate Device | Verdict |
|-----------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------|
| | | TC-2407 & CH-6330 | |
| Biocompatibility<br>of materials<br>contacting user | Comply with ISO 10993-1, FDA<br>Cytotoxicity (ISO 10993-5:2009),<br>Sensitization and Intracutaneous<br>Reactivity (ISO 10993-10:2010) | Comply with ISO 10993-1, FDA<br>Cytotoxicity (ISO 10993-5:2009),<br>Sensitization and Intracutaneous<br>Reactivity (ISO 10993-10:2010) | Same |
| Label and<br>Labeling | Conforms to FDA Regulatory<br>Requirements | Conforms to FDA Regulatory<br>Requirements | Same |
| Level of<br>Concern of the<br>Software | Moderate | Moderate | Same |
## 8. Summary of substantial equivalence discussion
The 9000N electrical wheelchair complied with the requirements of ISO 7176-2:2017, ISO 7176-3:2012, ISO 7176-4:2008, ISO 7176-5:2008, ISO 7176-6:2018, ISO 7176-7:1998, ISO 7176-8:2014. ISO 7176-9:2009. ISO 7176-10:2008. ISO 7176-11:2012. ISO 7176-13:1989. ISO 7176-14:2008. ISO 7176-15:1996, ISO 7176-16:2012, ISO 7176-19:2008, ISO 7176-21:2009, IEC 60601-1-2:2014, ISO 10993-1:2018, ISO10993-5:2009, ISO 10993-10:2010..
The intended uses for both devices are the same. Mainframes of two devices are folded by way of front and rear close, and frame materials all meet the Tensile Strength, Yield Load, and Elongation tests. The design principles of the controller and Driving system are the same, and both meet the requirements of the ISO 7176-14:2008. Software validation is carried out on both control systems. Brake system and speed control are designed in the same way as well, and both meet the requirements of the ISO 7176-3:2012. Maximum obstacle climbing, Max Speed and Static stability different while such differences will not impact the safety and effectiveness of the subject device or raise new safety and effectiveness concerns as well as both meet the requirements of the ISO 7176-2:2001,ISO 7176-6: 2018, ISO 7176-10:2008. The biocompatibility of the Predicate device and Subject device meet the requirements of the ISO 10993-5:2009 & ISO 10993-10:2010.
The flame retardant test of the seat cushion and armrest of subject device is carried out according to the ISO 7176-16 test. Therefore, the subject device meets the flame retardancy of FDA requirements.
In conclusion, the technological characteristics, features, specifications, materials, mode of operation, and intended use of the device substantially equivalent to the predicate quoted above. The differences between the subject device and predicate devices do not raise new issues of safety or effectiveness. The differences between the subject device and predicate devices do not raise new issues of safety or effectiveness.
## 9. Summary of Clinical Test
{11}------------------------------------------------
No animal study and clinical studies are available for our device. Clinical testing was not required to demonstrate the substantial equivalence of the electrical wheelchair to its predicate device.
## 10. Conclusion
The differences between 9000N electrical wheelchair and its predicate devices do not introduce a new intended use and do not raise new issues of safety and effectiveness. Verification and Validation testing demonstrated that no adverse effects have been introduced by these differences and that the device performs as intended. From the results of nonclinical testing described, it can be concluded that 9000N electrical wheelchair is substantially equivalent to the legally marketed predicate device.
## 11. Summary Prepared Date
13 June 2022
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.