K221124 · Boston Scientific Corporation · PKL · Aug 4, 2022 · Gastroenterology, Urology
Device Facts
Record ID
K221124
Device Name
MANTIS Clip
Applicant
Boston Scientific Corporation
Product Code
PKL · Gastroenterology, Urology
Decision Date
Aug 4, 2022
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 876.4400
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
The MANTIS Clip is indicated for clip placement within the gastrointestinal (GI) tract for the purpose of: 1. Endoscopic marking 2. Hemostasis for: Mucosal/sub-mucosal defects < 3 cm; Bleeding ulcers; Arteries < 2 mm; Polyps < 1.5 cm in diameter; Diverticula in the colon; Prophylactic clipping to reduce the risk of delayed bleeding post lesion resection 3. Anchoring to affix jejunal feeding tubes to the wall of the small bowel; and Anchoring to affix fully covered esophageal self-expanding metal stents to the wall of the esophagus 4. As a supplemental closure method of luminal perforations < 20 mm that can be treated conservatively
Device Story
Sterile, single-use, radiopaque endoscopic clipping device; consists of handle assembly, delivery catheter, and clip. Used by physicians in clinical settings via forward-viewing endoscope (working channel ≥2.8 mm). Clip features stainless steel capsule/arms, cobalt chrome yoke, styrene tension breaker. Jaws allow up to five open/close cycles for repositioning before final deployment. Device provides mechanical tissue approximation for hemostasis, marking, or anchoring. Output is physical closure/fixation of tissue or devices. Benefits include reduced bleeding risk, secure stent/tube placement, and perforation management. MR Conditional.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Evaluated clip assembly function, opening gap, retention force, cantilever force, torque, opening/closing force, jaw deflection, grasping capability, scope compatibility, and endoscope passability. MR conditionality supported by testing and scientific rationale per FDA guidance. No clinical data provided.
Technological Characteristics
Materials: stainless steel, polyester, cobalt chrome, styrene. Dimensions: 235 cm working length. Sensing/Actuation: mechanical cable-driven jaw actuation. Connectivity: none. Sterilization: Ethylene Oxide (ISO 11135-1). MR Conditional. No software/algorithm.
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients requiring endoscopic marking, hemostasis of GI defects (mucosal/sub-mucosal <3cm, bleeding ulcers, arteries <2mm, polyps <1.5cm, colonic diverticula), prophylactic clipping post-resection, anchoring of jejunal feeding tubes or esophageal stents, and closure of luminal perforations <20mm.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A hemorrhoidal ligator is a device used to cut off the blood flow to hemorrhoidal tissue by means of a ligature or band placed around the hemorrhoid.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). Except for a hemostatic metal clip intended for use in the gastrointestinal tract, the device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 876.9.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On the left is the Department of Health & Human Services logo. To the right of that is the FDA logo, with the letters "FDA" in a blue square. Next to that is the text "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue.
August 4, 2022
Boston Scientific Corporation Jia Huang Principal Regulatory Affairs Specialist 100 Boston Scientific Way Marlborough, MA 01752
Re: K221124 Trade/Device Name: MANTIS Clip Regulation Number: 21 CFR 876.4400 Regulation Name: Hemorrhoidal ligator Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: PKL Dated: July 1, 2022 Received: July 5, 2022
Dear Jia Huang:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21
{1}------------------------------------------------
CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safetyreporting-combination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (OS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act): 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/medical-device-safety/medicaldevice-reporting-mdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advicecomprehensive-regulatory-assistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@tda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
for
Shanil P. Haugen, Ph.D. Assistant Director DHT3A: Division of Renal, Gastrointestinal, Obesity and Transplant Devices OHT3: Office of GastroRenal, ObGyn, General Hospital and Urology Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K221124
Device Name MANTISTM Clip
#### Indications for Use (Describe)
The MANTIS Clip is indicated for clip placement within the gastrointestinal (GI) tract for the purpose of.
- 1. Endoscopic marking
- 2. Hemostasis for:
- Mucosal/sub-mucosal defects < 3 cm
- · Bleeding ulcers
- Arteries < 2 mm
- Polyps < 1.5 cm in diameter
- · Diverticula in the colon
- · Prophylactic clipping to reduce the risk of delayed bleeding post lesion resection
- 3. Anchoring to affix jejunal feeding tubes to the wall of the small bowel; and
- Anchoring to affix fully covered esophageal self-expanding metal stents to the wall of the esophagus
- 4. As a supplemental closure method of luminal perforations < 20 mm that can be treated conservatively
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| <span style="font-size:12px;">☑</span> Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) |
| <span style="font-size:12px;">☐</span> Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) |
### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW *
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
K221124 Page 1 of 5
#### SECTION 5: 510(K) SUMMARY
#### 1. Submitter
Boston Scientific Corporation 100 Boston Scientific Way Marlborough, MA 01752
Contact: Jia Huang Principal Regulatory Affairs Specialist Tel: 617-912-0826 Date Prepared: April 15, 2022
#### 2. Proposed Device
Trade Name: MANTIS™ Clip Classification Name: Hemostatic Metal Clip for the GI Tract Regulation Number: 876.4400 Product Code: PKL Classification: Class II
### 3. Predicate Device
#### Primary Predicate Device:
Trade Name: Resolution 360™ Clip Classification Name: Hemostatic Metal Clip for the GI Tract Regulation Number: 876.4400 Product Code: PKL Classification: Class II 510(k) Clearance Number: K151802
### Secondary Predicate Device:
Trade Name: Resolution 360™ ULTRA Clip Classification Name: Hemostatic Metal Clip for the GI Tract Regulation Number: 876.4400 Product Code: PKL Classification: Class II 510(k) Clearance Number: K193424
### Reference Device:
Trade Name: OTSC (Over-the scope-clip) System Set Classification Name: Hemostatic Metal Clip for the GI Tract Regulation Number: 876.4400 Product Code: PKL Classification: Class II 510(k) Clearance Number: K101428
#### Reference Device:
Trade Name: Resolution™ Clip Classification Name: Hemostatic Metal Clip for the GI Tract
{4}------------------------------------------------
Regulation Number: 876.4400 Product Code: PKL Classification: Class II 510(k) Clearance Number: K142987
# 4. Device Description
The MANTIS Clip is a sterile device consisting of a pre-loaded, radiopaque, singleuse, endoscopic clipping device consisting of two main components: the delivery system and the clip.
The delivery system consists of a handle assembly and delivery catheter. The deliverv system is constructed using stainless steel, and polyester materials. The delivery system will allow for the device to rotate at the distal end. The MANTIS Clip delivery system is offered in a 235cm working length. The clip consists of a stainlesssteel capsule and clip arms, a cobalt chrome yoke, and a styrene tension breaker. The clip is deployed from the delivery system during use. The MANTIS Clip jaws are engineered such that they can be opened and closed up to five times prior to deployment, aiding in repositioning of the clip at the lesion site. Re-opening, closing, and rotation capability may be limited by clinical circumstances and patient anatomy. There are no associated accessories included with this device. The clip jaw teeth are designed with smaller angle between the teeth and the clip arm body.
## 5. Indications for Use
The MANTIS Clip is indicated for clip placement within the gastrointestinal (GI) tract for the purpose of:
- 1. Endoscopic marking
- 2. Hemostasis for:
- Mucosal/sub-mucosal defects < 3 cm
- Bleeding ulcers
- · Arteries < 2 mm
- Polyps < 1.5 cm in diameter
- Diverticula in the colon
- Prophylactic clipping to reduce the risk of delayed bleeding post lesion resection
- 3. Anchoring to affix jejunal feeding tubes to the wall of the small bowel; and Anchoring to affix fully covered esophageal self-expanding metal stents to the wall of the esophagus
- 4. As a supplemental closure method of luminal perforations < 20 mm that can be treated conservatively
## 6. Technological Characteristics
{5}------------------------------------------------
The proposed MANTIS Clip has different technological characteristics compared to the primary predicate Resolution 360 Clip (K151802) and the secondary predicate Resolution 360 ULTRA Clip (K193424). However, both the proposed and the primary predicate devices (K151802, K193524) can pass through forward viewing endoscope with a working channel equal to or greater than 2.8 mm to the target position. In addition, both the proposed and the primary predicate devices (K151802, K193524) have the same design to allow rotation of the clips. The materials of the components used to manufacture the deployed clip and the delivery catheter of the proposed and the primary and secondary predicate devices (K151802, K193424) are identical. The materials of the components used to manufacture the handle assembly of the proposed and the primary and secondary predicate devices (K151802, K193424) are identical except for the colorant of the handle with thumb ring which is non-patient contacting.
The proposed MANTIS Clip has identical indications for use as the primary predicate Resolution 360 Clip (K151802) and secondary predicate Resolution 360 ULTRA Clip (K193424). The proposed MANTIS Clip has identical intended use as the primary predicate Resolution 360 Clip (K151802) and secondary predicate Resolution 360 ULTRA Clip (K193424) and is placed using the identical methodology. The proposed MANTIS Clip has a jaw opening width between the primary predicate device (K151802) and the secondary predicate Resolution 360 ULTRA Clip (K193424). The proposed MANTIS Clip teeth length is longer than that of the primary and secondary predicate devices (K151802, 193424) but is shorter than the reference device OTSC System Set.
## 7. Substantial Equivalence
The proposed MANTIS Clip has identical design on the delivery system to primary predicate Resolution 360 Clip (K151802) and secondary predicate Resolution 360 ULTRA Clip (K193424).
The proposed MANTIS Clip has nearly identical design on the clip to its primary predicate Resolution 360 Clip (K151802) and secondary predicate Resolution 360 ULTRA Clip (K193424). The main difference between the proposed and predicate devices is the jaw teeth geometry. The proposed MANTIS Clip has longer and more curved jaw teeth design to allow capability to hold onto tissue after the clip is opened after being closed. All the materials for the clip's components are identical for the proposed MANTIS Clip and the primary predicate Resolution 360 Clip (K151802) and secondary predicate Resolution 360 ULTRA Clip (K193424).
{6}------------------------------------------------
Overall, the design requirements are not impacted by these minor design difference, the proposed device is deemed substantially equivalent to the predicate devices and continues to meet the pre-defined device specification.
# 8. Performance Data
The proposed MANTIS Clip meets the requirements of ISO 10993-1 Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices – Part 1: Evaluation and Testing, ISO 11135-1 Sterilization of Health Care products – Ethylene Oxide – Part 1: Requirements for Development, Validation, and Routing Control of Sterilization Process for Medical Devices, and ISO 10993-7 Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices - Part 7: Ethylene Oxide Sterilization Residuals.
The product specifications of the proposed MANTIS Clip are nearly identical to its predicate, the primary predicate device (K151802) and the secondary predicate Resolution 360 ULTRA Clip (K193424). The following bench testing was conducted to evaluate the changes on the proposed device. All Performance testing (bench) was successfully completed.
| Component | Product Specification | Result (Pass/Fail) |
|------------------------|----------------------------------------------------|--------------------|
| Clip | 4.1 Clip Assembly Repeated Open/ Close<br>Function | PASS |
| Clip | 4.2 Clip Opening Gap | PASS |
| Clip | 4.4 Deployed Clip: Retention Force | PASS |
| Clip | 4.5 Clip Approach: Cantilever Force | PASS |
| Clip | 4.6 Clip Approach: Vertical Oblique | PASS |
| Clip + Delivery System | 4.7 Torque – Full Device | PASS |
| Clip | 4.9.1 Clip Opening Force | PASS |
| Clip | 4.9.2 Clip Close Force | PASS |
| Clip | 4.14 Jaw Deflection | PASS |
| Clip | 4.15 Grasping Capability | PASS |
| Clip + Delivery System | 7.1 Scope Compatibility / Usability | PASS |
| Clip + Delivery System | 7.3 Endoscope Damage – Clip Passability | PASS |
| Clip + Delivery System | 7.6 Biopsy Valve Compatibility | PASS |
In addition, the proposed MANTIS Clip was evaluated for Magnetic Resonance (MR) to support MR Conditionality. MR testing along with scientifically based rationale for clinically relevant acceptance criteria consistent with the recommendations contained in the FDA Guidance Testing and Labeling Medical Devices for Safety in the Magnetic Resonance (MR) Environment were completed. The results from the test data and scientific rationale have determined that the proposed MANTIS Clip to be an MR Conditional device.
{7}------------------------------------------------
The results of above performance (bench) testing demonstrate that the proposed MANTIS Clip is considered substantially equivalent to the predicate devices.
# 9. Conclusion
Boston Scientific Corporation has demonstrated that the proposed MANTIS Clip is substantially equivalent to the currently cleared primary predicate Resolution 360 Clip (K151802) and secondary predicate device Resolution 360 ULTRA Clip (K193424) as the performance of the proposed MANTIS Clip meets the requirement of the per-defined acceptance criteria and intended use.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.