K211004 · Medacta International S.A. · JWH · May 13, 2021 · Orthopedic
Device Facts
Record ID
K211004
Device Name
GMK Spherika Femurs and Fixed Tibial Trays Plus
Applicant
Medacta International S.A.
Product Code
JWH · Orthopedic
Decision Date
May 13, 2021
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 888.3560
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
The Evolis/GMK knee prosthesis is designed for cemented use in total knee arthroplasty, if there is evidence of sufficient sound bone to seat and support the components. This knee replacement system is indicated in the following cases: - Severely painful and/or disabled joint as a result of arthritis, traumatoid arthritis or polyarthritis. - Avascular necrosis of femoral condyle. - Post traumatic loss of joint configuration. - Primary implantation failure. Tibial wedges cemented are to be attached to the tibial baseplate with both the fixing cylinders and bone cement. The screwed tibial augments are for screwed fixation to the tibial baseplate. In case a semi-constrained liner is used, an extension stem must be implanted both on the femoral components. In case a GMK Revision tibial tray is used, an extension stem must be implanted. GMK Sphere/Spherika can be implanted using a kinematic alignment approach. When a kinematic alignment approach is utilized, this knee replacement system is indicated in the following cases: - Severely painful and/or disabled joint as a result of arthritis, traumatic arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis. - Collagen disorders, and/or avascular necrosis of the femoral condyle. - Moderate valgus, varus, or flexion deformities.
Device Story
GMK-SPHERE Spherika Femurs and Tibial Trays plus are sterile, implantable orthopedic components for total knee arthroplasty; used in cemented procedures to replace femoral articular surfaces. Subject devices include femoral components (standard and anatomical) and fixed tibial trays in various sizes. Designed for use by orthopedic surgeons in clinical settings. Implants manufactured from Co-Cr-Mo alloy (ISO 5832-4), with optional TiNbN coating. Compatible with kinematic alignment surgical technique. Output is a restored knee joint structure; clinical benefit is pain relief and improved joint function for patients with degenerative or traumatic knee conditions. No software or AI components involved.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical studies were conducted. Substantial equivalence is supported by non-clinical bench testing, including dynamic endurance testing of the posterior femoral condyle, range of motion analysis, and design validation reports. Mechanical resistance and wear characteristics were leveraged from previously cleared predicate submissions.
Technological Characteristics
Materials: Co-Cr-Mo alloy (ISO 5832-4:2014), optional TiNbN coating, and Type 1 UHMWPE (ISO 5834-2:2019) for tibial inserts. Design: Tricompartmental knee prosthesis components for cemented fixation. Connectivity: None (mechanical implant). Sterilization: Not specified (standard medical device practices).
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients with severely painful/disabled joints due to arthritis, traumatic arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, polyarthritis, avascular necrosis of the femoral condyle, post-traumatic joint configuration loss, primary implantation failure, collagen disorders, or moderate valgus, varus, or flexion deformities requiring total knee arthroplasty.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A knee joint patellofemorotibial polymer/metal/polymer semi-constrained cemented prosthesis is a device intended to be implanted to replace a knee joint. The device limits translation and rotation in one or more planes via the geometry of its articulating surfaces. It has no linkage across-the-joint. This generic type of device includes prostheses that have a femoral component made of alloys, such as cobalt-chromium-molybdenum, and a tibial component or components and a retropatellar resurfacing component made of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene. This generic type of device is limited to those prostheses intended for use with bone cement (§ 888.3027).
{0}------------------------------------------------
May 13, 2021
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image contains the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On the left is the Department of Health and Human Services logo. To the right of that is the FDA logo, which consists of the letters "FDA" in a blue square, followed by the words "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue text.
Medacta International SA % Chris Lussier Senior Director, Quality and Regulatory Medacta USA 3973 Delp Street Memphis, Tennessee 83118
Re: K211004
Trade/Device Name: GMK-SPHERE Spherika Femurs and Tibial Trays plus Regulation Number: 21 CFR 888.3560 Regulation Name: Knee joint patellofemorotibial polymer semi-constrained cemented prosthesis Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: JWH Dated: April 1, 2021 Received: April 2, 2021
Dear Chris Lussier:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal
{1}------------------------------------------------
statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
Ting Song, Ph.D., R.A.C. Assistant Director DHT6A: Division of Joint Arthroplasty Devices OHT6: Office of Orthopedic Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
## Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known)
## K211004
### Device Name
GMK-SPHERE Spherika Femurs and Tibial Trays plus
Indications for Use (Describe)
The Evolis/GMK knee prosthesis is designed for cemented use in total knee arthroplasty, if there is evidence of sufficient sound bone to seat and support the components.
This knee replacement system is indicated in the following cases:
- · Severely painful and/or disabled joint as a result of arthritis, traumatoid arthritis or polyarthritis.
- Avascular necrosis of femoral condyle.
- · Post traumatic loss of joint configuration.
- · Primary implantation failure.
Tibial wedges cemented are to be attached to the tibial baseplate with both the fixing cylinders and bone cement. The screwed tibial augments are for screwed fixation to the tibial baseplate.
In case a semi-constrained liner is used, an extension stem must be implanted both on the femoral components. In case a GMK Revision tibial tray is used, an extension stem must be implanted.
GMK Sphere/Spherika can be implanted using a kinematic alignment approach. When a kinematic alignment approach is utilized, this knee replacement system is indicated in the following cases:
· Severely painful and/or disabled joint as a result of arthritis, traumatoid arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis.
- · Collagen disorders, and/or avascular necrosis of the femoral condyle.
- · Moderate valgus, varus, or flexion deformities.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
| <input checked="" type="checkbox"/> Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) | <input type="checkbox"/> Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------|
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------|
## CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
## *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
# 3.0 510(k) Summary
#### I. Submitter
Medacta International SA Strada Regina 6874 Castel San Pietro (CH) Switzerland Phone (+41) 91 696 60 60 Fax (+41) 91 696 60 66
Contact Person: Stefano Baj, Regulatory and Compliance Director, Medacta International SA Applicant Correspondent: Chris Lussier, Senior Director of Quality and Regulatory, Medacta USA Date Prepared: April 1, 2021
#### II. Device
| Device Proprietary Name: | GMK-SPHERE Spherika Femurs and Tibial Trays plus |
|--------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Common or Usual Name: | Total Knee Prosthesis |
| Classification Name: | Knee joint patellofemorotibial polymer/metal/polymer semi-constrained cemented prosthesis |
| Primary Product Code: | JWH |
| Regulation Number: | 21 CFR 888.3560 |
| Device Classification | II |
#### III. Predicate Device
Substantial equivalence is claimed to the following device:
- Medacta International SA, GMK Sphere K121416
Reference predicates:
- Medacta International SA, GMK Sphere Extension, K140826
- Medacta International SA, GMK Sphere Extension, K162035
- Medacta International SA, GMK Sphere - Kinematic Alignment, K173890
- Medacta International SA, GMK Sphere E-Cross K202022 ●
- Medacta International SA, GMK Total Knee System - TiNbN Coating, K202684
- Medacta International SA, GMK Total Knee System, K090988
- Medacta International SA, GMK Line Extension K120790
- Medacta International SA, GMK Narrow K122232
- Medacta International SA, GMK Extension K142069 ●
{4}------------------------------------------------
#### IV. Device Description
The purpose of this submission is to notify the FDA of the GMK SPHERE range Extension, that includes GMK Spherika Femurs and GMK Fixed Tibial Trays Plus.
Subject devices are sterile implantable devices designed for tricompartment of the natural knee joint.
The subject devices are marketed as individually packaged femoral and tibial components, designed for cemented use in total knee arthroplasty procedures.
GMK Spherika femoral component is an implantable device intended to be used in case of total knee arthroplasty to replace the femoral articular surfaces of the knee joint. GMK Spherika femoral component can be used in Kinematic Alignment surgical technique. The Kinematic Alignment surgical technique was already cleared in K173890.
GMK Tibial Trays Plus are a range extension of the GMK Tibial trays already cleared, in details they are fixed intermediate sizes of the tibia trays.
The subject devices are a line extension to Medacta previously cleared implants: GMK Sphere (K121416), GMK Sphere Extension (K140826), GMK Knee Prosthesis- GMK Sphere Tibial Insert Flex (K162035), GMK Sphere - Kinematic Alignment ( K173890), GMK Sphere CR Tibial Inserts (K181635), GMK Sphere E-Cross (K202022), GMK Total Knee System-TiNbN Coating (K202684), Medacta International SA, GMK Total Knee System (K090988), GMK Line Extension (K120790), GMK Narrow K122232, MK Extension (K142069) and
The subject devices are manufactured with the same materials of the previous cleared femurs and tibial trays.
The submission includes the following implants:
- . GMK Spherika Femoral Component Cemented, Left and Right, Sizes from 1 to 7 and from 1+ to 6+ made in Co-Cr-Mo (ISO 5832-4)
- . GMK Spherika Femoral Component Cemented, Left and Right, Sizes from 1 to 7 and from 1+ to 6+ made in Co-Cr-Mo (ISO 5832-4) and TiNbN Coated
- . GMK Spherika Femoral Component Anatomical, Cemented, Left and Right, Sizes from 1 to 7 and from 1+ to 6+ made in Co-Cr-Mo (ISO 5832-4)
- GMK Spherika Femoral Component Anatomical, Left and Right, Sizes from 1 to 7 and . from 1+ to 6+ made in Co-Cr-Mo (ISO 5832-4) and TiNbN Coated
- Tibial tray fixed cemented, Left and Right, Sizes from 1+ to 5+ plus 4 intermediate sizes ● made in Co-Cr-Mo (ISO 5832-4)
- Tibial tray fixed cemented, Left and Right, Sizes from 1+ to 5+ plus 4 intermediate sizes made in Co-Cr-Mo (ISO 5832-4) and TiNbN Coated
{5}------------------------------------------------
The subject devices, both Femoral Components and Tibial Trays, are manufactured from cobaltchromium-molybdenum alloy (Co-Cr-Mo) according to ISO 5832-4:2014 Implants for Surgery -Metallic Materials-Part 4: Cobalt-Chromium-Molybdenum Casting Allov.
In regards to the Femurs and Tibial Trays TiNbN Coating, they are manufactured from cobaltchromium-molybdenum alloy (Co-Cr-Mo) according to ISO 5832-4:2014 Implants for Surgery -Metallic Materials-Part 4: Cobalt-Chromium-Molybdenum Casting Alloy with Titanium Niobium Nitride (TiNbN) coating.
Like the predicate tibial trays devices, the tibial trays plus subject of this submission have a Fixed Tibial Tray Plug that is manufactured from Type 1 Ultra High Molecular Weight Polyethylene (UHMWPE) per ISO 5834-2: 2019 Implants for Surgery - Ultra-High-Molecular-Weight Polyethylene -Part 2: Moulded Forms.
The subject device also includes the utilization of the GMK Sphere E-cross tibial insert FLEX, already cleared (K202022) in case of retention of an efficient posterior cruciate ligament in the Kinematic Alignment configuration.
The Kinematic Alignment surgical technique was already cleared in K173890.
In this case there are no new implants or instruments, GMK Sphere E-cross tibial insert FLEX, already cleared (K202022).
#### V. Indications for Use
The Evolis/GMK knee prosthesis is designed for cemented use in total knee arthroplasty, if there is evidence of sufficient sound bone to seat and support the components. This knee replacement system is indicated in the following cases:
- . Severely painful and/or disabled joint as a result of arthritis, traumatic arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis or polyarthritis.
- Avascular necrosis of femoral condyle. •
- Post traumatic loss of joint configuration. .
- . Primary implantation failure.
Tibial wedges cemented are to be attached to the tibial baseplate with both the fixing cylinders and bone cement.
The screwed tibial augments are for screwed fixation to the tibial baseplate.
In case a semi-constrained liner is used, an extension stem must be implanted both on the tibial and on the femoral components. In case a GMK Revision tibial tray is used, an extension stem must be implanted.
GMK Sphere/Spherika can be implanted using a kinematic alignment approach. When a kinematic alignment approach is utilized, this knee replacement system is indicated in the following cases:
{6}------------------------------------------------
- Severely painful and/or disabled joint as a result of arthritis, traumatic arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis or polyarthritis.
- . Collagen disorders, and/or avascular necrosis of the femoral condyle.
- Moderate valgus, varus, or flexion deformities. ●
#### VI. Comparison of Technological Characteristics
- GMK Spherika Standard femoral component ●
GMK Spherika Standard Femoral Components and the Medacta predicate devices GMK SPHERE (K121416, K140826, K173890, K202684, K090988, K120790 and K142069) share the following characteristics:
- Sizes:
- Indication for use; ●
- Material;
- Packaging, ●
- Device Usage: ●
- Biocompatibility
- Shelf Life; and ●
- Sterilization Method. ●
GMK Spherika Standard Femoral Components and the Medacta predicate devices are technologically different from the predicate device as follows:
- anterior trochlea orientation ●
- GMK Fixed Tibial Trays Plus ●
Fixed Tibial Trays Plus implants and the predicate devices (K121416, K140826, K173890, K202684, K090988, K120790 and K142069) share the following characteristics:
- Shape; ●
- Instruction for use;
- Packaging ●
- Device Usage:
- Biocompatibility;
- Shelf Life; and
- Sterilization Method. ●
{7}------------------------------------------------
Fixed Tibial Trays Plus implants are technologically different from the predicate device as follows:
- Sizes (adding intermediate sizes) ●
Regarding the utilization of the GMK Sphere E-Cross tibial insert FLEX, already cleared (K202022) in case of retention of an efficient posterior cruciate ligament in Kinematic Alignment configuration there are no differences in the fundamental scientific technology. This is an additional surgical technique for use with the GMK Sphere E-cross tibial insert FLEX.
#### VII. Performance Data
A review of the mechanical data on the subject and predicate devices indicates that the subject devices are substantially equivalent to devices currently cleared for use and does not alter the intended surgical outcomes. The purpose of this submission is to introduce a line extension of the already cleared GMK-SPHERE system already cleared. The new devices design introduction was evaluated by risk analysis to identify any new risks associated. Based on the risk analysis, additional tests have been performed in order to demonstrate that the subject devices are substantially equivalent to the identified predicate devices.
Testing was conducted according to written protocols with acceptance criteria that were based on standards. The following mechanical studies were performed in support of a substantial equivalence determination:
## Non-Clinical Studies:
- PERFORMANCE TESTING
- GMK Spherika Dynamic Endurance test of the Posterior Femoral Condyle, Test Report O
- Rationale of equivalence with predicate devices constraints of GMK Spherika Femoral O Component in combination with GMK Sphere Tibial Insert, Test Report A.2
- Rationale of equivalence with predicate device contact areas and pressures of GMK O Spherika femoral component in combination with GMK Sphere Tibial Insert, Test Report A.3
- GMK Spherika Femoral Component in combination with GMK Sphere tibial insert O range of motion of the articulating Surfaces, Test Report A.4
- Rationale of equivalence with predicated device constraints of GMK Resurfacing and O Moto Patella Articulating with GMK Spherika Femoral component and GMK Spherika anatomical femoral component, Test Report A.5
- Rationale of Equivalence with predicate device GMK Resurfacing and Moto patella O Articulating on GMK Spherika Femoral Component and GMK-Spherika Anatomical Femoral Component, Test Report A.6
{8}------------------------------------------------
- GMK Spherika Femoral Component, Design Validation Report Nr.1 o
- GMK Spherika Optimization of Bone Coverage of the GMK Sphere Femoral O Component Kinematically Aligned, Test Report A8
- Validation test for GMK Sphere E-Cross tibial insert FLEX indication as CR option O
The following performance tests were previously conducted on the predicate devices and reviewed as part of the GMK Total Knee System submissions K090988, K120790, K121416, K122232, K140826, K142069, K173890, K202684 :
- mechanical resistance of the femoral component under physiological static and dynamic O loads:
- mechanical resistance of the tibial tray under physiological static and dynamic loads; O
- connection of the tibial tray with the tibial insert. O
- Evaluation of modular tapered connection O
- Wear test O
- Coating characterization according to ISO 11885 о
- PYROGENICITY ●
- Bacterial Endotoxin Test (LAL test) was conducted according to European O Pharmacopoeia §2.6.14 (which is equivalent to USP chapter <85>)
- O Pyrogen test according to USP chapter <151> for pyrogenicity determination
- the subject devices are not labeled as non-pyrogenic or pyrogen free O
## Clinical Studies
- No clinical studies were conducted ●
## VIII. Conclusion
Based on the above information, the subject devices are substantially equivalent to the identified predicate devices.
Substantial equivalence has been demonstrated through a comparison of intended use, design, and technological characteristics, as well as performance evaluations.
The subject implants are substantially equivalent to the predicate devices.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.