LINK Embrace Shoulder System- Anatomical Configuration
K210899 · Waldemar Link GmbH & Co. KG · KWT · Jun 21, 2021 · Orthopedic
Device Facts
Record ID
K210899
Device Name
LINK Embrace Shoulder System- Anatomical Configuration
Applicant
Waldemar Link GmbH & Co. KG
Product Code
KWT · Orthopedic
Decision Date
Jun 21, 2021
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 888.3650
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
The LINK Embrace Shoulder System - Anatomic Configuration is intended for anatomic total or hemi shoulder arthroplasty. Indications: • A severely painful and/or disabled shoulder joint resulting from osteoarthritis or theumatoid arthritis - · Avascular necrosis of the humeral head - · Deformity and/or limited motion · Fracture-dislocations of the proximal humerus where the articular surface is severely comminuted, separated from its blood supply or where the surgeon's experience indicates that alternative methods of treatment are unsatisfactory · Revision of a failed primary component - · Ununited humeral head fractures - · Cuff tear arthropathy (CTA Heads only) The All Poly Glenoid Components are intended for cemented use. The Humeral Stems Standard with CaP (HX) and Short with CaP (HX) are intended for cementless fixation. The Humeral Stems Standard without CaP (HX) and Short without CaP (HX) are intended for cementless fixation. The Humeral Fracture Stems are intended for cementless fixation.
Device Story
Anatomic total or hemi shoulder arthroplasty system; replaces damaged shoulder joint components. System comprises Ti6Al4V humeral stems (monoblock), CoCrMo humeral heads, and UHMWPE glenoid components. Stems feature proximal modular taper for head adapter assembly; some stems include Calcium Phosphate (CaP) coating for cementless fixation. Surgeon selects components based on patient anatomy; implants secured via cement or cementless fixation. Device restores joint function; reduces pain; improves range of motion. Used in clinical orthopedic settings by surgeons.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data. Substantial equivalence demonstrated through non-clinical bench testing, including range of motion analysis (ASTM F1378), glenoid loosening (ASTM F2028), fatigue testing with fretting/corrosion assessment, static/post-fatigue locking mechanism evaluation (ASTM F2009), UHMWPE wear characterization, and biocompatibility evaluation.
Technological Characteristics
Materials: Ti6Al4V alloy, CoCrMo alloy, UHMWPE (conventional and Vitamin E crosslinked). Fixation: Cemented or cementless (with/without CaP coating). Design: Modular humeral stems, head adapters, and glenoid components. Mechanical assembly via taper connections. Sterilization: EO. Standards: ASTM F1378, F2028, F2009.
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients with severely painful/disabled shoulder joints due to osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, traumatic arthritis, avascular necrosis, deformity, limited motion, proximal humerus fracture-dislocations, failed primary components, ununited humeral head fractures, or cuff tear arthropathy.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A shoulder joint metal/polymer non-constrained cemented prosthesis is a device intended to be implanted to replace a shoulder joint. The device limits minimally (less than normal anatomic constraints) translation in one or more planes. It has no linkage across-the-joint. This generic type of device includes prostheses that have a humeral component made of alloys, such as cobalt-chromium-molybdenum, and a glenoid resurfacing component made of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene, and is limited to those prostheses intended for use with bone cement (§ 888.3027).
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II. The special controls for this device are:(1) FDA's:
(i) “Use of International Standard ISO 10993 ‘Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices—Part I: Evaluation and Testing,’ ”
(ii) “510(k) Sterility Review Guidance of 2/12/90 (K90-1),”
(iii) “Guidance Document for Testing Orthopedic Implants with Modified Metallic Surfaces Apposing Bone or Bone Cement,”
(iv) “Guidance Document for the Preparation of Premarket Notification (510(k)) Application for Orthopedic Devices,” and
(v) “Guidance Document for Testing Non-articulating, ‘Mechanically Locked’ Modular Implant Components,”
(2) International Organization for Standardization's (ISO):
(i) ISO 5832-3:1996 “Implants for Surgery—Metallic Materials—Part 3: Wrought Titanium 6-Aluminum 4-Vandium Alloy,”
(ii) ISO 5832-4:1996 “Implants for Surgery—Metallic Materials—Part 4: Cobalt-Chromium-Molybdenum Casting Alloy,”
(iii) ISO 5832-12:1996 “Implants for Surgery—Metallic Materials—Part 12: Wrought Cobalt-Chromium-Molybdenum Alloy,”
(iv) ISO 5833:1992 “Implants for Surgery—Acrylic Resin Cements,”
(v) ISO 5834-2:1998 “Implants for Surgery—Ultra-high Molecular Weight Polyethylene—Part 2: Moulded Forms,”
(vi) ISO 6018:1987 “Orthopaedic Implants—General Requirements for Marking, Packaging, and Labeling,” and
(vii) ISO 9001:1994 “Quality Systems—Model for Quality Assurance in Design/Development, Production, Installation, and Servicing,” and
(3) American Society for Testing and Materials':
(i) F 75-92 “Specification for Cast Cobalt-28 Chromium-6 Molybdenum Alloy for Surgical Implant Material,”
(ii) F 648-98 “Specification for Ultra-High-Molecular-Weight Polyethylene Powder and Fabricated Form for Surgical Implants,”
(iii) F 799-96 “Specification for Cobalt-28 Chromium-6 Molybdenum Alloy Forgings for Surgical Implants,”
(iv) F 1044-95 “Test Method for Shear Testing of Porous Metal Coatings,”
(v) F 1108-97 “Titanium-6 Aluminum-4 Vanadium Alloy Castings for Surgical Implants,”
(vi) F 1147-95 “Test Method for Tension Testing of Porous Metal Coatings,”
(vii) F 1378-97 “Specification for Shoulder Prosthesis,” and
(viii) F 1537-94 “Specification for Wrought Cobalt-28 Chromium-6 Molybdenum Alloy for Surgical Implants.”
Biomet Corp. Comprehensive Shoulder System (K060692)
LINK Embrace Shoulder System - Reverse Configuration (K200368)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The logo consists of two parts: the Department of Health and Human Services seal on the left and the FDA acronym followed by the full name of the agency on the right. The FDA part of the logo is in blue, with the acronym in a square and the agency name in a sans-serif font.
Waldemar Link GmbH & Co. KG % Terry Powell Regulatory Affairs LinkBio Corp. 69 King Street Dover, New Jersey 07801
## Re: K210899
Trade/Device Name: LINK Embrace Shoulder System- Anatomical Configuration Regulation Number: 21 CFR 888.3650 Regulation Name: Shoulder joint metal/polymer non-constrained cemented prosthesis Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: KWT, KWS, PAO, HSD Dated: March 26, 2021 Received: March 29, 2021
Dear Terry Powell:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part
June 21, 2021
{1}------------------------------------------------
801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4. Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
For Michael Owens Assistant Director DHT6A: Division of Joint Arthroplasty Devices OHT6: Office of Orthopedic Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Ouality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
## Indications for Use
#### 510(k) Number (if known) K210899
Device Name
LINK Embrace Shoulder System - Anatomical Configuration
Indications for Use (Describe)
General indications:
The LINK Embrace Shoulder System - Anatomic Configuration is intended for anatomic total or hemi shoulder arthroplasty.
Indications:
• A severely painful and/or disabled shoulder joint resulting from osteoarthritis or theumatoid arthritis
- · Avascular necrosis of the humeral head
- · Deformity and/or limited motion
· Fracture-dislocations of the proximal humerus where the articular surface is severely comminuted, separated from its blood supply or where the surgeon's experience indicates that alternative methods of treatment are unsatisfactory
· Revision of a failed primary component
- · Ununited humeral head fractures
- · Cuff tear arthropathy (CTA Heads only)
The All Poly Glenoid Components are intended for cemented use.
The Humeral Stems Standard with CaP (HX) and Short with CaP (HX) are intended for cementless fixation.
The Humeral Stems Standard without CaP (HX) and Short without CaP (HX) are intended for cementless fixation.
The Humeral Fracture Stems are intended for cementless fixation.
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) | | |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| <table style="border:none"><tr><td><span style="display:inline-block; min-width:20px;">☑</span>Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) </td><td><span style="display:inline-block; min-width:20px;">☐</span>Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) </td></tr></table> | <span style="display:inline-block; min-width:20px;">☑</span> Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) | <span style="display:inline-block; min-width:20px;">☐</span> Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) |
| <span style="display:inline-block; min-width:20px;">☑</span> Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) | <span style="display:inline-block; min-width:20px;">☐</span> Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) | |
### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
# 510(k) Summary
| 510(k) Number: | K210899 |
|---------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 510(k) Submitter: | Waldemar Link GmbH & Co. KG<br>Barkhausenweg 10<br>22339 Hamburg, Germany<br>Phone: +49-40-539950<br>Facility Registration #:3003386935 |
| Contact Person: | Waldemar Link GmbH & Co. KG<br>Stefanie Fuchs (Regulatory Affairs)<br>Oststraße 4-10<br>Norderstedt, GERMANY 22844<br>Phone: +49-40 53995-530<br>Fax: +49-40 53995-174<br>E-Mail: st.fuchs@linkhh.de |
| Date Prepared: | May 26, 2021 |
| Trade Name: | LINK Embrace Shoulder System – Anatomical Configuration |
| Common Name: | Artificial Shoulder Joint Replacement |
| Classification Name: | Shoulder joint metal/polymer non-constrained cemented prosthesis; 21<br>CFR §888.3650, product code KWT |
| | Shoulder joint metal/polymer semi-constrained cemented<br>prosthesis; 21 CFR §888.3660, product code KWS, PAO |
| | Shoulder joint humeral (hemi-shoulder) metallic uncemented<br>prosthesis; 21 CFR §888.3690, product code HSD |
| Classification and Panel: | Class II, Orthopedic / 87 |
| Predicate Devices: | Lima Corp. SMR Shoulder System:: K161476 [Primary Predicate] |
| | Biomet Corp. Comprehensive Shoulder System:: K060692. |
| | LINK GmbH & Co KG: LINK Embrace Shoulder System - Reverse<br>Configuration: K200368 |
| Trade Name: | LINK Embrace Shoulder System – Anatomical Configuration |
| Device Description: | The LINK Embrace Shoulder System offers diverse fixation options<br>suitable for the majority of patient populations and indications. A wide<br>range of stems in different configurations allows for cemented and<br>cementless fixation. |
| | Humeral Stems (Ti6Al4V) are available in monoblock designs, and feature a proximal modular taper connection for assembly to head adapters. The monoblock Humeral Stems are available in Standard Stems and Short Stems with a broad size spectrum, and in non-coated and Calcium Phosphate coated versions. Humeral Fracture Stems are also available. The Humeral Stems have been previously cleared for use with the LINK Embrace Shoulder System – Reverse [K200368]. |
| | Humeral Heads (CoCrMo) are available in several sizes with a female taper for connection to the Head Adapters. |
| | CTA Heads (CoCrMo) are available in neutral and different offset versions and feature a male taper for connection to Humeral Stems. |
| | The Cemented All Poly Glenoids are available in conventional polyethylene and in highly crosslinked polyethylene with Vitamin E (E-Dur). |
| | The LINK Embrace Shoulder System is supported by a streamlined, lightweight and ergonomic instrument set. |
| Indications for Use: | General indications: The LINK Embrace Shoulder System - Anatomic Configuration is intended for anatomic total or hemi shoulder arthroplasty. |
| | Indications:<br>- A severely painful and/or disabled shoulder joint resulting from osteoarthritis, traumatic arthritis or rheumatoid arthritis<br>- Avascular necrosis of the humeral head<br>- Deformity and/or limited motion<br>- Fracture-dislocations of the proximal humerus where the articular surface is severely comminuted, separated from its blood supply or where the surgeon's experience indicates that alternative methods of treatment are unsatisfactory<br>- Revision of a failed primary component<br>- Ununited humeral head fractures<br>- Cuff tear arthropathy (CTA Heads only)<br>The All Poly Glenoid Components are intended for cemented use.<br>The Humeral Stems, Standard with CaP (HX) and Short with CaP (HX), are intended for cementless fixation. |
| | The Humeral Stems, Standard without CaP (HX) and Short without CaP (HX), are intended for cemented or cementless fixation.<br>The Humeral Fracture Stems are intended for cemented or cementless fixation. |
| | Comparison to the predicate: The subject system is substantially equivalent to the predicates in that all are hemi or total shoulder systems intended for an anatomic configuration, all describe use for primary, revision (i.e., previously |
{4}------------------------------------------------
{5}------------------------------------------------
failed joint replacement), or fracture indications, and all describe use for cuff tear arthroplasty.
The subject system is manufactured from Ti6Al4V alloy with some components also having a CaP coating, CoCrMo alloy, and UHMWPE, like the predicates.
The subject and predicate systems include a range of humeral stems for cemented or cementless fixation within the humerus, which are assembled to Humeral Heads (with corresponding Head Adapters) that articulate with Cemented All Poly Glenoids.
There are also minor differences between the subject and predicate systems. The subject and predicate Biomet systems include monolithic stems that mate with head adaptors and heads, while the predicate SMR system has modular stems that mate with humeral bodies, head adaptors and humeral heads. The subject CTA heads mate directly with the humeral stems, where the predicate LIMA CTA heads are used with an adapter. The subject All Poly Glenoids have 4 pegs and are available in conventional polyethylene and in highly crosslinked polyethylene with Vitamin E (E-Dur), whereas the predicate LIMA All Poly Glenoids have 3 pegs (or a single peg design) and are available in conventional polyethylene. The subject system offers head adaptors in several offsets and a neutral version with or without suture holes. The head adaptors are assembled to the humeral stems with a taper connection and assembly screw. The use of a supplemental assembly screw and the option for suture holes differs from the adapters of the predicate systems. All systems offer various component sizes to accommodate differences in patient anatomies, although the specific dimensions of each system's components are unique. All systems feature mechanical taper connections for assembly of the humeral constructs, although the specific dimensions of each system's tapers differ. Engineering analyses and mechanical tests were conducted to demonstrate equivalent performance despite minor design differences.
Performance Testing: Non-clinical performance testing and analysis were provided, including:
- Range of Motion analysis (ASTM F1378) -
- -Glenoid loosening (ASTM F2028)
- -Fatigue testing with Fretting/Corrosion assessment
- Static and post-fatigue evaluation of component Locking -Mechanisms (ASTM F2009)
- Wear Rationale -
- Characterization of UHMWPE sterilized EO (reference -K200368)
- Biocompatibility evaluation -
{6}------------------------------------------------
| | The results of non-clinical performance testing demonstrate that the<br>device is suitable for its intended purpose and Substantially Equivalent<br>to the predicates. |
|-------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Clinical Testing: | Clinical performance Testing was not required to demonstrate the<br>substantial equivalence of this device. |
| Conclusion: | The subject LINK Embrace Shoulder System - Anatomical<br>Configuration is substantially equivalent to the predicate devices<br>identified in this premarket notification. |
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.