K192953 · Aptos, LLC · GAW · Aug 27, 2020 · General, Plastic Surgery
Device Facts
Record ID
K192953
Device Name
APTOS Threads – Polypropylene Surgical Sutures
Applicant
Aptos, LLC
Product Code
GAW · General, Plastic Surgery
Decision Date
Aug 27, 2020
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 878.5010
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
The APTOS Threads - Polypropylene Surgical Sutures are indicated for general soft tissue approximation, excluding closure of the epidermis, where use of a non-absorbable suture is appropriate.
Device Story
APTOS Threads are sterile, nonabsorbable, dyed polypropylene surgical sutures (USP size 2-0) featuring a bidirectional barbed design. The device includes needles attached to both ends; needles are constructed from 420B stainless steel. The suture incorporates upper and lower anchoring sections with barbs oriented in opposite directions, separated by a small unbarbed section, with additional smooth sections adjacent to the needle-thread interfaces. The device is intended for use by surgeons for general soft tissue approximation. It functions by anchoring tissue via the barbed design, eliminating the need for traditional knots. The device is supplied sterile via ethylene oxide sterilization for single use.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data. Substantial equivalence established through bench testing, including biocompatibility (ISO 10993 series), physical testing (USP <861>, <871>, <881>), ex-vivo tissue holding strength, sterility validation (ISO 11135), and shelf-life/package integrity testing.
Indicated for general soft tissue approximation, excluding epidermis closure, in patients requiring non-absorbable sutures.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
Nonabsorbable polypropylene surgical suture is a monofilament, nonabsorbable, sterile, flexible thread prepared from long-chain polyolefin polymer known as polypropylene and is indicated for use in soft tissue approximation. The polypropylene surgical suture meets United States Pharmacopeia (U.S.P.) requirements as described in the U.S.P. Monograph for Nonabsorbable Surgical Sutures; it may be undyed or dyed with an FDA approved color additive; and the suture may be provided with or without a standard needle attached.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The special control for this device is FDA's “Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Surgical Sutures; Guidance for Industry and FDA.” See § 878.1(e) for the availability of this guidance document.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On the left is the Department of Health & Human Services logo. To the right of that is the FDA logo in blue, with the words "U.S. FOOD & DRUG" stacked on top of the word "ADMINISTRATION".
August 27, 2020
Aptos, LLC. Nikolai Pirtskhalaichvili Vice President of Operations 20/4 V. Orbeliani Street Tbilisi, 0105 Ge
Re: K192953
Trade/Device Name: APTOS Threads - Polypropylene Surgical Sutures Regulation Number: 21 CFR 878.5010 Regulation Name: Nonabsorbable Polypropylene Surgical Suture Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: GAW Dated: October 18, 2019 Received: October 21, 2019
Dear Nikolai Pirtskhalaichvili:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for
{1}------------------------------------------------
devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely.
Cindy Chowdhury, Ph.D., M.B.A. Acting Assistant Director DHT4B: Division of Infection Control and Plastic Surgery Devices OHT4: Office of Surgical and Infection Control Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K192953
Device Name
APTOS Threads - Polypropylene Surgical Sutures
Indications for Use (Describe)
The APTOS Threads - Polypropylene Surgical Sutures are indicated for general soft tissue approximation, excluding closure of the epidermis, where use of a non-absorbable suture is appropriate.
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) | |
|-------------------------------------------------|--|
|-------------------------------------------------|--|
X Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
| Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
Submission Date: October 21, 2019
K192953
#### SUBMITTER 1.
APTOS, LLC. 20/4 V. Orbeliani Street T'bilisi Georgia, 0105
Contact Person: Tamara Beshidze Phone: +99532 2920371/Ext 533 Email: tamara.beshidze@aptos.ge
#### DEVICE 2.
Device Trade Name: APTOS Threads - Polypropylene Surgical Sutures Common Name: Nonabsorbable polypropylene surgical suture Classification Regulation: 21 CFR 878.5010 Regulatory Class: II Product Code: GAW Panel: General and Plastic Surgery
#### PREDICATE DEVICE 3.
Predicate Device: FilBloc Permanent Sutures (K171039)
#### DEVICE DESCRIPTION 4.
APTOS Threads - Polypropylene Surgical Sutures are a dyed, nonabsorbable, sterile surgical strand of polypropylene in USP size 2-0. The base product is an isotactic crystalline stereoisomer of polypropylene, a synthetic linear polyolefin.
The pigmented suture is dyed blue (with [Phthalocyaninato(2-)] copper, Color Index Number 74160) to enhance visibility; the colorant meets all requirements of US 21CFR, Parts 70-82. There is no coating or any other additives.
The threads incorporate a bidirectional barbed design. The threads are supplied with needles attached to both ends. The thread's upper and lower anchoring sections are barbed in opposite direction with a small unbarbed section between them and two smooth unbarbed sections, each immediately adjacent to needle-thread attachment interfaces. The needles are constructed from 420B stainless steel. The needles are provided sterile via Ethylene Oxide sterilization.
{4}------------------------------------------------
#### INDICATIONS FOR USE ട്.
The APTOS Threads – Polypropylene Surgical Sutures are indicated for general soft tissue approximation, excluding closure of the epidermis, where use of a non-absorbable suture is appropriate.
#### COMPARISON OF TECHNOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS 6.
The proposed device is a barbed suture device with very similar physical characteristics to the predicate. Both devices are constructed from polypropylene and possess barbs to achieve the intended use of approximation of tissue.
The FilBloc Permanent Suture device does have some differences, as it has a wider variety of designs and options, such as unidirectional barbs, non-barbed sutures. The proposed device configuration is the same design as one of the predicate configuration, i.e. size 2-0 sutures with bidirectional barbs.
The similarities and differences in technological characteristics between the subject APTOS Threads - Polypropylene Surgical Sutures and the predicate sutures are summarized below.
| | Proposed New Device | Predicate Device |
|-----------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 510(k) Number | K192953 | K171039 |
| Applicant | AMAP International, Inc. | Assut Europe, Italy |
| Device Name | APTOS Threads – Polypropylene<br>Surgical Sutures | FilBloc Permanent Sutures |
| Classification<br>Regulation | 21 CFR 878.5010 | 21 CFR 878.5010 |
| Product Code | GAW | GAW |
| Indication | Aptos Threads – Polypropylene<br>Surgical Sutures are indicated for<br>general soft tissue approximation,<br>excluding closure of the epidermis,<br>where use of a non-absorbable suture<br>is appropriate. | FilBloc Permanent sutures are intended<br>for general soft tissue approximation,<br>excluding closure of the epidermis,<br>where use of a non-absorbable suture<br>is appropriate. |
| | Proposed New Device | Predicate Device |
| Design | APTOS Threads – Polypropylene<br>Surgical Sutures incorporate a<br>bidirectional barbed design. The<br>threads are supplied with needles<br>attached to both ends. The thread's<br>upper and lower anchoring sections<br>are barbed in opposite direction with<br>a small unbarbed section between<br>them and two smooth unbarbed<br>sections, each immediately adjacent<br>to needle-thread attachment<br>interfaces. The needles are<br>constructed from 420B stainless steel.<br>Standard needle attachment. | Device Description:<br>The Assut FilBloc Permanent Suture range<br>of devices comprises a variety of gauge<br>sizes and lengths,<br>supplied with or without stainless steel<br>needles, which are also available in a<br>variety of different sizes and shapes.<br>The sutures may have a 'block' at one end,<br>which allows surgeons to close wounds<br>quickly and securely without tying knots<br>or changing suturing techniques. The block<br>is made from the same material as the<br>suture, and is used to anchor the suture.<br>The suture thread can be smooth or can<br>have unidirectional or bidirectional barbs<br>along the axis of the monofilament surface,<br>either convergent or divergent. |
| Rx Only? | Yes | Yes |
| Suture Barbs | Bi-Directional | None<br>Bidirectional<br>Unidirectional |
| Materials | Polypropylene Monofilament | Polypropylene Monofilament |
| Dyed | phthalocyanine copper - C.I. 74160;<br>21 CFR§ 74.3045 | phthalocyanine copper - C.I. 74160; 21<br>CFR§ 74.3045 |
| USP Sizes | USP 2-0 | 4/0 to 1 |
| Needle Shape | Straight | 1/2 circle, 3/8 circle, 5/8 circle, "ski"<br>needle, Straight |
| Needle Cross<br>Section | Cylindrical | Cylindrical, Triangular, Trapezoidal |
| Needle Material | 420B stainless steel | Surgical stainless steel: AISI 470, AISI<br>455, AISI 301, AISI 302, AISI 304, AISI<br>304L, AISI 31,6 AISI 320, AISI 321,<br>Cobalt chromium |
| Single Use | Yes | Yes |
| Sterile | Yes, EO Sterilization, SAL 10-6 | Yes, EO Sterilization, SAL 10-6 |
| Complies with<br>USP<861>,<br>USP<871>,<br>USP<881> | Yes | Yes |
| Biocompatible | Biocompatible in accordance with<br>ISO 10993-1 and FDA Guidance | Biocompatible in accordance with ISO<br>10993-1 and FDA Guidance |
### Device Comparison Table:
{5}------------------------------------------------
{6}------------------------------------------------
#### 7. PERFORMANCE DATA
# Biocompatibility
Biocompatibility testing was performed in accordance with ANSVAAMI/ISO 10993-1:2009/(R)2013, Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices - Part 1: Evaluation and Testing Within A Risk Management Process, as well as FDA's 2016 guidance document "Use of International Standard ISO 10993-1. Biological evaluation of medical devices - Part 1: Evaluation and testing within a risk management process." Specific testing included the following:
- . Cytotoxicity, ISO 10993-5
- Sensitization, ISO 10993-10
- Irritation, ISO 10993-10
- . Acute systemic Toxicity, ISO 10993-11
- Materials Mediated Pyrogenicity, ISO 10993-11
- Implantation, ISO 10993-6
- Hemocompatibility, ISO 10993-4, ASTM F756-17 ●
- Subchronic Toxicity, 90-day Subchronic Intramuscular Implantation, ISO 10993-11
- Genotoxicity, Ames Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay, OECD 471
- Genotoxicity: In Vivo Mouse Micronucleus Mutagenicity Assay, OECD 487
- Genotoxicity: Mouse Lymphoma Assay, OECD 476
- Bacterial Endotoxin Test, USP<161>
# Bench Testing
Physical testing was performed to establish compliance with:
- . USP<861> suture diameter
- USP<871> suture attachment
- USP<881> tensile strength
Ex-vivo tissue holding strength testing was conducted compared to the predicate to demonstrate substantially equivalent tissue holding strength.
Ethylene Oxide sterility validation testing was conducted in accordance with overkill half-cycle methods per ISO 11135:2014 to demonstrate SAL 10°. Residuals were evaluated in accordance with ANSI/AAMI/ISO 10993-7:2008/(R) 2012.
Shelf life testing involved package integrity and seal strength testing subsequent to environmental preconditioning and distribution simulation, in accordance with AAMI/ISO 11607-1: 2006 (R) 2010, ASTM D4169-16, ASTMF88/F88M-15, and ASTM F2096-11.
{7}------------------------------------------------
## Animal Study
Not applicable. Animal studies are not necessary to establish the substantial equivalence of this device.
## Clinical Study
Not applicable. Clinical studies are not necessary to establish the substantial equivalence of this device.
#### CONCLUSIONS 8.
The technological features of the APTOS Threads – Polypropylene Surgical Sutures are very similar to the predicate device, as both devices are constructed of dyed polypropylene, and may have divergent bi-directional barbs, with smooth sections in the middle and next to the introductory needles. Testing was conducted to demonstrate that the APTOS Threads -Polypropylene Surgical Sutures are substantially equivalent to the predicates. This included testing to demonstrate that, like the predicates, the APTOS Threads are biocompatible, sterile, have adequate shelf life, meet USP physical testing requirements for sutures, and possess tissue holding strength adequate to approximate tissue. The results of this testing demonstrate that the APTOS Threads - Polypropylene Surgical Sutures are substantially equivalent to the predicate devices.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.