Dynamic probabilistic neuroanatomical atlas based on MR image intensity
Dice coefficients > 85% for whole brain regions; 75%-85% for subcortical structures
Dice coefficients > 85% for whole brain regions; 75%-85% for subcortical structures
—
—
Accuracy evaluation comparing QyScore segmentations to expert manual segmentations
>1 (expert readers)
Brain lesion segmentation
Dynamic probabilistic neuroanatomical atlas based on MR image intensity
—
Mean absolute volume difference of 3.34mL
—
—
Accuracy evaluation on a validation population with lesion loads ranging from 0.09mL to 87.65mL
>1 (expert readers)
Indications for Use
QyScore is intended for automatic labeling, visualization and volumetric quantification of segmentable brain structures and lesions from a set of MR images. Volumetric data may be compared to reference percentile data. QyScore is not intended for use in clinical scenarios that require evaluation of the white matter hyperintensities.
Device Story
QyScore is medical image processing software for clinical use by physicians or neuroimaging-trained personnel. It retrieves 3DT1 and T2FLAIR DICOM MRI data from a server, processes it via an analysis server, and performs automatic segmentation of grey matter, white matter, hippocampus, amygdala, and white matter hyperintensities. The device uses a dynamic probabilistic neuroanatomical atlas based on MR image intensity to transform inputs into volumetric measurements. Outputs include an electronic PDF report and color overlays displayed on a graphical user interface. The software compares volumetric data to reference percentile data and prior scans. Results are reviewed by a trained physician to assist in clinical decision-making regarding brain structure and lesion assessment. The device integrates with RIS/PACS systems and operates on off-the-shelf hardware.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Accuracy evaluated by comparing QyScore segmentations to expert manual segmentations. Dice coefficients >85% for whole brain regions and 75-85% for subcortical structures. Lesion segmentation (3DT1+T2FLAIR) assessed on population with lesion loads 0.09mL to 87.65mL; mean absolute volume difference 3.34mL. Software verification, validation, and human factors testing performed.
Technological Characteristics
Software-only device operating on off-the-shelf hardware (Linux). Uses dynamic probabilistic neuroanatomical atlas for segmentation. DICOM-compatible; integrates with RIS/PACS. Complies with IEC 62304, ISO 14971:2012, and AAMI ANSI IEC 62366:2007.
Indications for Use
Indicated for automatic labeling, visualization, and volumetric quantification of brain structures and lesions from MR images in patients aged 20 to 90 years. Not for use in clinical scenarios requiring evaluation of white matter hyperintensities.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A medical image management and processing system is a device that provides one or more capabilities relating to the review and digital processing of medical images for the purposes of interpretation by a trained practitioner of disease detection, diagnosis, or patient management. The software components may provide advanced or complex image processing functions for image manipulation, enhancement, or quantification that are intended for use in the interpretation and analysis of medical images. Advanced image manipulation functions may include image segmentation, multimodality image registration, or 3D visualization. Complex quantitative functions may include semi-automated measurements or time-series measurements.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls; voluntary standards—Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) Std., Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG) Std., Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers (SMPTE) Test Pattern).
Predicate Devices
NeuroQuant Medical Image Processing Software (K170981)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image contains the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The logo consists of two parts: a symbol on the left and the agency's name on the right. The symbol on the left is a stylized depiction of a human figure, while the text on the right reads "FDA U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue letters. The words "FOOD & DRUG" are larger than the other words.
December 13, 2019
Qynapse % Mr. Michael Daniel President Daniel & Daniel Consulting, LLC 340 Jones Lane GARDNERVILLE NV 89460
Re: K192531
Trade/Device Name: OyScore Software Regulation Number: 21 CFR 892.2050 Regulation Name: Picture archiving and communications system Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: LLZ Dated: November 29, 2019 Received: December 2, 2019
Dear Mr. Daniel:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part
{1}------------------------------------------------
801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
Thalia T Mills, Ph.D. Director Division of Radiological Health OHT7: Office of In Vitro Diagnostics and Radiological Health Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K192531
Device Name Qyscore Software
#### Indications for Use (Describe)
QyScore is intended for automatic labeling, visualization and volumetric quantification of segmentable brain structures and lesions from a set of MR images. Volumetric data may be compared to reference percentile data. QyScore is not intended for use in clinical scenarios that require evaluation of the white matter hyperintensities.
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) | |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| <div> <span style="font-size: 10pt;">☑ Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)</span> </div> | <div> <span style="font-size: 10pt;">☐ Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)</span> </div> |
#### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/3/Picture/0 description: The image shows the word "Qynapse" in a blue sans-serif font. The word is written in all lowercase letters except for the first letter, which is capitalized. There is a registered trademark symbol to the right of the word. The word is centered and takes up most of the image.
# Premarket Notification 510(k) Summary
This summary of 510(k) safety and effectiveness information is submitted in accordance with the requirements of SMDA 1990 and 21 CFR 807.92.
## 510(k) Number: K192531
## Applicant Information:
| Date Prepared: | December 4, 2019 |
|----------------|-------------------------------|
| Name: | Qynapse |
| | Address: 67 rue Saint Jacques |
| | 75005 Paris, France |
| Contact Person: | Michael A Daniel, Consultant<br>madaniel@clinregconsult.com |
|-------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------|
| Mobile Number: | (415) 407-0223 |
| Office Number: | (775) 392-2970 |
| Facsimile Number: | (610) 545-0799 |
## Device Information:
| Trade Name: | QyScore Software |
|---------------------------|---------------------------------------------|
| Common Names: | Medical Image Processing Software |
| Classification Name(s): | Picture archiving and communications system |
| Product Code/ Regulation: | LLZ/21 CFR 892.2050 |
| Classification: | Class II |
### Predicate Device:
- NeuroQuant Medical Image Processing Software K170981 ●
### Device Description:
QyScore automatically provides segmentations and measures of brain structures and lesions from a set of MR images for patients between the ages of 20 and 90.
The software retrieves DICOM MRI data (3DT1 and T2FLAIR series) from a DICOM server and sends it to an analysis server for automatic segmentation of grey matter, white matter, hippocampus, amygdala and white matter hyperintensities. The outputs of the software include an electronic report and color overlays of the segmentation on the input images.
The results are displayed in a dedicated graphical user interface, allowing the user to:
- . Browse the segmentations and the measures,
- Compare the results of segmented brain structures to a reference healthy population, ●
- Read and edit a PDF report.
{4}------------------------------------------------
QyScore integrates with leading RIS/PACS systems and can be operated with any MRI scan from 1.5T and 3T scanners for T1 MRI processing, and 3T scanners for T2FLAIR MRI processing.
## Indications for Use:
QyScore is intended for automatic labeling, visualization and volumetric quantification of segmentable brain structures and lesions from a set of MR images. Volumetric data may be compared to reference percentile data. QyScore is not intended for use in clinical scenarios that require evaluation of the number of the white matter hyperintensities.
| | Subject device | Predicate device |
|------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| | QyScore v1.7.0 | NeuroQuant v2.2 |
| 510(k) number | N/A | K170981 |
| Regulation<br>number | 21 CFR 892.2050 | 21 CFR 892.2050 |
| Regulation<br>description | Picture archiving and<br>communications system | Picture archiving and<br>communications system |
| Classification<br>name | System, Image Processing,<br>Radiological | System, Image Processing,<br>Radiological |
| Classification | Class II | Class II |
| Product Code | LLZ | LLZ |
| Indications for<br>use | QyScore is intended for automatic<br>labeling, visualization and<br>volumetric quantification of<br>segmentable brain structures and<br>lesions from a set of MR images.<br>Volumetric data may be compared to<br>reference percentile data. QyScore is<br>not intended for use in clinical<br>scenarios that require evaluation of<br>the number of the white matter<br>hyperintensities. | NeuroQuant is intended for<br>automatic labeling, visualization and<br>volumetric quantification of<br>segmentable brain structures and<br>lesions from a set of MR images.<br>Volumetric measurements may be<br>compared to reference percentile<br>data. |
| Design and<br>incorporated<br>technology | - Automated measurement of brain<br>tissue volumes and structures and<br>lesions<br>- Automatic segmentation and<br>quantification of brain structures<br>using a dynamic probabilistic<br>neuroanatomical atlas based on the<br>MR image intensity | - Automated measurement of brain<br>tissue volumes and structures and<br>lesions<br>- Automatic segmentation and<br>quantification of brain structures<br>using a dynamic probabilistic<br>neuroanatomical atlas, with age and<br>gender specificity, based on the MR<br>image intensity |
| | - Results displayed through graphical user interface | |
| Physical<br>characteristics | - Software package<br>- Operates on off-the-shelf hardware (multiple vendors) | - Software package<br>- Operates on off-the-shelf hardware (multiple vendors) |
| Operating<br>system | Supports Linux | Supports Linux, Mac OS X and Windows |
| Processing<br>architecture | Automated internal pipeline that performs:<br>- bias correction<br>- segmentation<br>- lesions quantification<br>- volume calculation<br>- report generation | Automated internal pipeline that performs:<br>- bias correction<br>- segmentation<br>- lesions quantification<br>- volume calculation<br>- report generation |
| Data Source | MRI scanner: 3DT1 and FLAIR MRI scans acquired with specified protocols.<br>Supports DICOM format as input. | MRI scanner: 3DT1 and FLAIR MRI scans acquired with specified protocols.<br>Supports DICOM format as input. |
| Output | - Provides volumetric measurements of brain structures and lesions<br>- Includes segmented color overlays and morphometric reports<br>- Automatically compares results to reference percentile data and to prior scans when available<br>- Supports DICOM format as output of results that can be displayed on DICOM workstations and Picture Archive and Communications Systems | - Provides volumetric measurements of brain structures and lesions<br>- Includes segmented color overlays and morphometric reports<br>- Automatically compares results to reference percentile data and to prior scans when available<br>- Supports DICOM format as output of results that can be displayed on DICOM workstations and Picture Archive and Communications Systems |
| Safety | Automated quality control function:<br>scan protocol verification<br>Results must be reviewed by a trained physician | Automated quality control functions:<br>- Tissue contrast check<br>- Scan protocol verification<br>- Atlas alignment check<br>Results must be reviewed by a trained physician |
## Summary Comparison to Predicate:
{5}------------------------------------------------
QyScore and the predicate device are software for automatically identifying and quantifying the volumes of brain structures, automatic labeling and visualization. The devices have the
{6}------------------------------------------------
same intended use and operating principle. They take MR brain images as input and generate an electronic report with similar quantitative information. For both devices, output volumes are compared to a normative dataset of control subjects computed based on MRI data from normal control subjects.
QyScore and NeuroQuant achieve their intended use based on a similar principle, since the quantification system relies on skull stripping (brain extraction), a brain segmentation based on a probabilistic atlas and image intensity information, and volume calculations of the segmented brain structures. Both devices normalize the volumes with the intracranial volume to allow for the statistical comparison with a normative dataset.
Both devices are DICOM compatible and operate on off-the-shelf hardware. OyScore is used by medical personnel or neuroimaging trained personnel. NeuroQuant is used by physicians skilled in brain MR imaging.
## Summary of Performance Testing
Testing performed on the OyScore software included:
- Software verification testing .
- Software validation testing
- Human factors testing
- Validation studies based on scientific literature
- Evaluation of segmentation accuracy ●
For the accuracy evaluation, QyScore segmentations were compared to expert manual segmentations for each segmented structure. Several acceptance criteria have been set in agreement with the literature, on both overlap metrics and volume difference metrics.
The Dice coefficients exceed 85% on whole brain regions and are in the range of 75%-85% for subcortical brain structures segmented from 3DT1 MRI scans. The lesions segmentation, performed on (3DT1+T2FLAIR) paired sequences, was assessed on a broad validation population, with lesion loads ranging from 0.09mL to 87.65mL. The resulting mean absolute volume difference is 3.34mL.
The performance testing demonstrated that the software meets its intended use, product specifications and user needs.
## Software
Qynapse followed IEC 62304 and the FDA Guidance Document, "General Principles of Software Validation; Final Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff" (January, 2002) with respect to software development and validation. The QyScore software is classified as a "moderate level of concern" per the FDA guidance document.
# Verification and validation testing was completed in compliance with the following standards and guidance documents:
- · ISO 14971:2012. Medical devices application of risk management to medical devices
- AAMI ANSI IEC 62304:2006, Medical device software Software life cycle processes ●
{7}------------------------------------------------
- . General Principles of Software Validation; Final Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff" (January, 2002)
- AAMI ANSI IEC 62366:2007, Medical devices Application of usability engineering . to medical devices
Testing described in this 510(k) consists of verification of all design input requirements and product specifications. All clinical input requirements were validated.
## Conclusion
Based upon the intended use, product technical information, performance evaluation, and standards compliance provided in this premarket notification, the QyScore software has been shown to be substantially equivalent to the legally marketed predicate device. The technological differences do not raise any new questions of safety and effectiveness.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.