NeuroQuant® is intended for automatic labeling, visualization and volumetric quantification of segmentable brain structures from a set of MR images. It is intended to automate the manual process of identifying, labeling and quantifying the volume of segmentable brain structures identified on MR images.
Device Story
NeuroQuant is an automated MR post-processing software; inputs 3D T1 MRI series and T2 FLAIR MR series. Internal pipeline performs artifact correction, atlas-based segmentation, volume calculation, and report generation. Outputs segmented images with color overlays and morphometric reports in DICOM format. Used in clinical research and routine care by radiologists, neurologists, and neuroradiologists; results displayed on third-party PACS/workstations. Software assists clinicians in assessing structural MRIs by providing quantitative volumetric data compared to reference percentiles; aids in identifying brain abnormalities/lesions. Benefits include standardized, reproducible morphometric measurements, reducing manual segmentation time.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Segmentation accuracy evaluated against expert manual segmentations using Dice's coefficient: 80-90% for subcortical structures, 75-85% for cortical regions, and >80% for lesions (using T1/T2 FLAIR). Reproducibility assessed via repeated scans: mean absolute volume difference 1-5% for subcortical structures; mean absolute lesion volume difference <0.25cc (<2.5% percentage difference).
Technological Characteristics
Software-based medical image processing; operates on off-the-shelf hardware (Linux, Mac OS X, Windows). Uses dynamic probabilistic neuroanatomical atlas for segmentation. Inputs: 3D T1 MRI and T2 FLAIR series (DICOM). Outputs: DICOM series with color overlays and morphometric reports. Automated quality control includes tissue contrast, atlas alignment, and scan protocol verification.
Indications for Use
Indicated for automatic labeling, visualization, and volumetric quantification of brain structures and lesions from MR images in patients requiring structural MRI assessment. Results are compared to age and gender-matched reference percentile data.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A medical image management and processing system is a device that provides one or more capabilities relating to the review and digital processing of medical images for the purposes of interpretation by a trained practitioner of disease detection, diagnosis, or patient management. The software components may provide advanced or complex image processing functions for image manipulation, enhancement, or quantification that are intended for use in the interpretation and analysis of medical images. Advanced image manipulation functions may include image segmentation, multimodality image registration, or 3D visualization. Complex quantitative functions may include semi-automated measurements or time-series measurements.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls; voluntary standards—Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) Std., Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG) Std., Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers (SMPTE) Test Pattern).
{0}------------------------------------------------
Public Health Service
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
September 7, 2017
CorTechs Labs, Inc Kora Marinkovic Director of Quality and Regulatory Affairs 4690 Executive Drive. Suite 250 San Diego, CA 92121
Re: K170981
Trade/Device Name: NeuroOuant Regulation Number: 21 CFR 892.2050 Regulation Name: Picture archiving and communications system Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: LLZ Dated: August 9, 2017 Received: August 11, 2017
Dear Kora Marinkovic:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device
{1}------------------------------------------------
related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely,
Michael D. O'Hara For
Robert A. Ochs, Ph.D Director Division of Radiological Health Office of In Vitro Diagnostics and Radiological Health Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration
#### Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known)
K170981
Device Name NeuroQuant
Indications for Use (Describe)
Meuro Quant is intended for automatic labeling, visualization and volumetric quantification of segmentable brain structures and lesions from a set of MR images. Volumetric measurements may be compared to reference percentile data.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
#### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW."
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to;
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
FORM FDA 3881 (8/14)
PSC Publishing Services (301) 443-6740 EF
Form Approved: OMB No. 0910-0120 Expiration Date: January 31, 2017 See PRA Statement below.
{3}------------------------------------------------
# 510(k) Summary: NeuroQuant®
# 1. Submitter
| Name: | CorTechs Labs, Inc | |
|-------------------|--------------------------------------------------------|--|
| Address: | 4690 Executive Drive, Suite 250<br>San Diego, CA 92121 | |
| Contact Person: | Kora Marinkovic | |
| Telephone Number: | (858) 459-9703 | |
| Fax Number: | (858) 459-9705 | |
| E-mail: | koram@cortechslabs.com | |
| Date Prepared: | 8/4/2017 | |
#### 2. Device
| Device Trade Name: | NeuroQuant® |
|-------------------------|---------------------------------------------|
| Common Name: | Medical Image Processing Software |
| Classification Name: | System, Image Processing, Radiological |
| Regulation Number: | 21 CFR 892.2050 |
| Regulation Description: | Picture archiving and communications system |
| Product Code: | LLZ |
| Classification Panel: | Radiology |
# 3. Predicate Device
| Device: | NeuroQuant™ |
|---------------|--------------------|
| 510(k) Number | K061855 |
| Manufacturer | CorTechs Labs, Inc |
| Product Code: | LLZ |
{4}------------------------------------------------
| Image: CORTECHS Labs Logo | <b>510(k) Section Number: 5</b> | <b>Document No: 007</b> |
|---------------------------|---------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------|
| | <b>Title</b> | NeuroQuant 510(k) Premarket Submission: 510(k) Summary |
| | <b>Revision: 01</b> | Pages 2 of 4 Date: 8/4/2017 |
# 4. Device Description
NeuroQuant is a fully automated MR imaging post-processing medical device software that provides automatic labeling, visualization and volumetric quantification of brain structures and lesions from a set of MR images and returns segmented images and morphometric reports. The resulting output is provided in a standard DICOM format as additional MR series with segmented color overlays and morphometric reports that can be displayed on third-party DICOM workstations and Picture Archive and Communications Systems (PACS). The high throughput capability makes the software suitable for use in both clinical trial research and routine patient care as a support tool for clinicians in assessment of structural MRIs.
NeuroQuant provides morphometric measurements based on 3D T1 MRI series. The output of the software includes volumes that have been annotated with color overlays, with each color representing a particular segmented region, and morphometric reports that provide comparison of measured volumes to age and gender-matched reference percentile data. In addition, the adjunctive use of the T2 FLAIR MR series allows for improved identification of some brain abnormalities such as lesions, which are often associated with T2 FLAIR hyperintensities.
The NeuroQuant processing architecture includes a proprietary automated internal pipeline that performs artifact correction, atlas-based segmentation, volume calculation and report generation.
Additionally, automated safety measures include automated quality control functions, such as tissue contrast check, atlas alignment check and scan protocol verification, which validate that the imaging protocols adhere to system requirements.
From a workflow perspective, NeuroQuant is packaged as a computing appliance that is capable of supporting DICOM file transfer for input and output of results.
### 5. Intended Use
NeuroQuant® is intended for automatic labeling, visualization and volumetric quantification of segmentable brain structures from a set of MR images. It is intended to automate the manual process of identifying, labeling and quantifying the volume of segmentable brain structures identified on MR images.
# 6. Comparison to Predicate Device
| | CorTechs Labs, Inc | CorTechs Labs, Inc |
|------------------------|-----------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------|
| Device Name | NeuroQuantTM V1.0 | NeuroQuant® V2.2 |
| 510(k) No | K061855 | N/A |
| Regulation No | 21 CFR 892.2050 | 21 CFR 892.2050 |
| Regulation Description | "Picture archiving and communications system" | "Picture archiving and communications system" |
Summary Comparison Table for the device and predicate device (K061855):
{5}------------------------------------------------
| Image: CORTECHS Labs logo | 510(k) Section Number: 5 | Document No: 007 | |
|---------------------------|--------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------|----------------|
| | Title | NeuroQuant 510(k) Premarket Submission: 510(k) Summary | |
| | Revision: 01 | Pages 3 of 4 | Date: 8/4/2017 |
| Classification Name | System, Image Processing, Radiological | System, Image Processing, Radiological |
|------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Classification | Class II | Class II |
| Product Code | LLZ | LLZ |
| Indications for Use | Automatic labeling, visualization and volumetric<br>quantification of segmentable brain structures<br>from a set of MR images, intended to automate<br>the current manual process of identifying,<br>labeling and quantifying the volume of<br>segmentable brain structures identified on MR<br>images | Automatic labeling, visualization and volumetric<br>quantification of segmentable brain structures<br>and lesions from a set of MR images. Volumetric<br>data may be compared to reference percentile<br>data |
| Design and<br>Incorporated<br>Technology | • Automated measurement of brain tissue<br>volumes and structures<br>• Automatic segmentation and quantification of<br>brain structures using a probabilistic<br>neuroanatomical atlas based on the MR image<br>intensity | • Automated measurement of brain tissue<br>volumes and structures and lesions<br>• Automatic segmentation and quantification of<br>brain structures using a dynamic probabilistic<br>neuroanatomical atlas, with age and gender<br>specificity, based on the MR image intensity |
| Physical<br>characteristics | • Software package<br>• Operates on off-the-shelf hardware (multiple<br>vendors) | • Software package<br>• Operates on off-the-shelf hardware (multiple<br>vendors) |
| Operating System | Supports Linux and Mac OS X | Supports Linux, Mac OS X and Windows. |
| Processing<br>Architecture | Automated internal pipeline that performs:<br>- artifact correction<br>- segmentation<br>- volume calculation<br>- report generation | Automated internal pipeline that performs:<br>- artifact correction<br>- segmentation<br>- lesion quantification<br>- volume calculation<br>- report generation |
| Data Source | • MRI scanner: 3D T1 MRI scans acquired with<br>specified protocols<br>• NeuroQuant Supports DICOM format as input | • MRI scanner: 3D T1 MRI scans acquired with<br>specified protocols<br>• NeuroQuant Supports DICOM format as input |
| Output | • Provides volumetric measurements of brain<br>structures<br>• Includes segmented color overlays and<br>morphometric reports<br>• Automatically compares results to reference<br>percentile data and to prior scans when available<br>• Supports DICOM format as output of results that<br>can be displayed on DICOM workstations and<br>Picture Archive and Communications Systems | • Provides volumetric measurements of brain<br>structures and lesions<br>• Includes segmented color overlays and<br>morphometric reports<br>• Automatically compares results to reference<br>percentile data and to prior scans when<br>available<br>• Supports DICOM format as output of results that<br>can be displayed on DICOM workstations and<br>Picture Archive and Communications Systems |
| Safety | • Automated quality control functions<br>- Tissue contrast check<br>- Scan protocol verification<br>- Atlas alignment check<br>• Results must be reviewed by a trained physician | • Automated quality control functions<br>- Tissue contrast check<br>- Scan protocol verification<br>- Atlas alignment check<br>• Results must be reviewed by a trained physician |
{6}------------------------------------------------
| CORTECHS Labs | | 510(k) Section Number: 5 | | Document No: 007 |
|---------------|--------------|--------------------------------------------------------|--------------|------------------|
| | Title | NeuroQuant 510(k) Premarket Submission: 510(k) Summary | | |
| | Revision: 01 | | Pages 4 of 4 | Date: 8/4/2017 |
NeuroQuant is functionally similar and improved from a previous 510(k) market-cleared CorTechs Labs NeuroQuant software device (NeuroQuant K061855).
Both devices have same intended use and basic design and similar operating principle.
Both systems use clinical MR brain scans as input and automatically identify and measure volumes of brain structures. Both systems provide morphometric measurements based on 3D T1 MRI series. The resulting output is provided in a standard DICOM format as additional MR series that can be displayed on third-party DICOM workstations and PACS.
Both systems produce similar reports. The output includes volumes that have been annotated with color overlays, with each color representing a particular segmented reqion, and morphometric reports that provide comparison of measured volumes to reference percentile data.
They utilize the same automated safety measures and have similar processing architecture.
Both devices are DICOM compatible and operate on off-the-shelf hardware.
Both systems are used by medical professionals, such as radiologists, neurologists and neuroradiologists, as well as by clinical researchers, as a support tool in assessment of structural MRIs.
# 7. Performance Testing
NeuroQuant performance was evaluated by comparing segmentation accuracy with expert manual segmentations and by measuring segmentation reproducibility between same subject scans. The system yields reproducible results that are well correlated with computer-aided expert manual segmentations.
NeuroQuant's segmentation accuracy compared to expert manual segmentations of 3D T1 MRI scans was evaluated using Dice's coefficient metric. For major subcortical brain structures Dice's coefficients are in the range of 80-90% and for major cortical regions are in the range of 75-85%. For lesion segmentations evaluated separately using 3D T1 and T2 FLAIR MRI scan pairs of subjects with brain lesions, Dice's coefficient exceeds 80%.
Brain structure segmentation reproducibility of repeated 3D T1 MRI scans for same subjects was evaluated by using the percentage absolute volume differences. The mean percentage absolute volume differences for all major subcortical structures were in the range1-5%. Brain lesion seqmentation reproducibility was evaluated separately using 3D T1 and T2 FLAIR MRI repeated scan pairs of subjects with brain lesions. The mean absolute lesion volume difference was less than 0.25cc, while the mean percentage lesion absolute volume difference was less than 2.5%.
### 8. Conclusions
The performance testing presented above shows that the device is as safe, as effective and performs as well as the predicate device, and as well as gold standard - computer-aided expert manual segmentation.
By virtue of the physical characteristics and intended use, NeuroQuant® is substantially equivalent to its predicate device and its technological improvements do not raise new questions of safety and effectiveness.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.