K191838 · Motor City Lab Works · NXC · Mar 20, 2020 · Dental
Device Facts
Record ID
K191838
Device Name
Clearform Aligners
Applicant
Motor City Lab Works
Product Code
NXC · Dental
Decision Date
Mar 20, 2020
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 872.5470
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
ClearForm Aligners are indicated for the alignment of teeth in patients with permanent dentition (i.e. all second molars) during orthodontic treatment of malocclusions. The aligners position teeth by way of continuous gentle forces.
Device Story
ClearForm Aligners are custom-made, removable thermoplastic orthodontic appliances; used to sequentially reposition teeth. Process begins with dental professional providing digital or traditional tooth impressions. Specialized CAD/CAM software (3Shape Ortho System) processes digital data to create treatment plan and intermediate digital models; dental professional reviews and approves plan. Physical models are 3D printed; aligner trays are thermoformed over these models. Trays are delivered to dental professional, who monitors patient treatment; patient wears trays in sequence to apply continuous gentle forces to teeth. Aligners are removable by patient. Benefit is gradual tooth alignment for malocclusion correction.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical performance data provided. Evidence consists of non-clinical bench testing, including dimensional accuracy assessment of the manufacturing process (digital models, 3D printed molds, and thermoformed aligners) using 3rd party inspection software, and biocompatibility testing per ISO 10993-1 and ISO 10993-5.
Technological Characteristics
Custom-fabricated, non-sterile, removable thermoplastic aligners. Materials are biocompatible (ISO 10993-1/5). Fabrication involves 3D printing of molds followed by thermoforming. Software-driven treatment planning using CAD/CAM. No internal energy source; passive mechanical force application.
Indications for Use
Indicated for alignment of teeth in patients with permanent dentition (all second molars) during orthodontic treatment of malocclusions.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An orthodontic plastic bracket is a plastic device intended to be bonded to a tooth to apply pressure to a tooth from a flexible orthodontic wire to alter its position.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On the left is the Department of Health & Human Services logo. To the right of that is the FDA logo, which is a blue square with the letters "FDA" in white. To the right of the blue square is the text "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue.
March 20, 2020
Motor City Lab Works % Chris Brown Manager Aclivi. LLC 6455 Farley Road Pinckney, Michigan 48169
Re: K191838
Trade/Device Name: Clearform Aligners Regulation Number: 21 CFR 872.5470 Regulation Name: Orthodontic Plastic Bracket Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: NXC Dated: February 10, 2020 Received: February 18, 2020
Dear Chris Brown:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's
{1}------------------------------------------------
requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (OS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
for Srinivas "Nandu" Nandkumar, Ph.D. Director DHT1B: Division of Dental Devices OHT1: Office of Ophthalmic, Anesthesia, Respiratory, ENT and Dental Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K191838
Device Name ClearForm Aligners
Indications for Use (Describe)
ClearForm Aligners are indicated for the alignment of teeth in patients with permanent dentition (i.e. all second molars) during orthodontic treatment of malocclusions. The aligners position teeth by way of continuous gentle forces.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
X Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
| Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
#### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
## *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
# K191838 510(k) Summary Motor City Lab Works ClearForm Aligners
#### ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION
| Manufacturer Name | Motor City Lab Works<br>2200 Holland St<br>Birmingham, Michigan 48009<br>USA |
|-------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| | Telephone: +1 (248) 250-9519<br>Fax: n/a |
| Official Contact | Dr. Christian Groth, President<br>Telephone: +1 (248) 250-9519 |
| Email: | Info@motorcitylabworks.com |
| Date Submitted: | 2/10/2020 |
#### DEVICE NAME AND CLASSIFICATION
| Trade/Proprietary Name: | ClearForm Aligners |
|-----------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Common Name: | Aligners, sequential |
| Classification Name: | Orthodontic Plastic Bracket |
| Classification Regulations: | 21 CFR 872.5470 |
| Device Class: | Class II |
| Product Code: | NXC |
| Review Panel: | Dental |
| Reviewing Branch: | Ophthalmic, Anesthesia, Respiratory, ENT and Dental Devices (OHT1)<br>Dental Devices (DHT1B) |
#### PREDICATE DEVICE INFORMATION
The devices within this submission are substantially equivalent in indications, intended use and design principles to the following predicate device:
| 510(k) | Predicate Device Name | Company Name |
|-----------------------|-----------------------|-----------------|
| K180241 | Twin Aligner | Ortho Caps GmbH |
| Reference Device Name | | |
| K180941 | Ortho System | 3Shape A/S |
| K062828 | Essix | Dentsply |
#### DEVICE DESCRIPTION
ClearForm Aligners consist of a series of customized removable plastic orthodontic appliances which sequentially reposition teeth by way of continuous gentle force.
A digital or traditional mold impression of the patient's teeth is provided by a dental health professional (e.g. orthodontist or dentist). From the digital data created of the patient's teeth, specialized
{4}------------------------------------------------
orthodontic CAD/CAM software is used to develop an orthodontic treatment plan. Using the software dental technicians produce a series of intermediate digital models corresponding to each stage of treatment, gradually aligning the patient's teeth according to the dental health professional's prescriptions.
The specialized orthodontic treatment planning software has a 510k clearance for the intended use under FDA Classification Product Code PNN, regulation 872.5470.
The prescribing doctor reviews and approves the treatment plan before the models/molds are produced.
Once approved, physical models are produced from the digital model files. The aligner trays are formed over the physical models by using thermal forming equipment and a thermoplastic sheet. The aligner trays are sent to the dental health professional who then delivers them to the patient, confirming fit and design. Over a period of time, additional trays are provided sequentially to the dental health professional to gradually move the teeth to the desired position. The dental health professional monitors treatment from the moment the first aligner is delivered to when the final aligner is delivered and treatment complete. The aligners are held in place by pressure and can be removed by the patient at any time.
## INDICATIONS FOR USE
ClearForm Aligners are indicated for the alignment of teeth in patients with permanent dentition (i.e. all second molars) during orthodontic treatment of malocclusions. The aligners position teeth by way of continuous gentle forces.
### EQUIVALENCE TO MARKETED DEVICE
The Subject device is highly similar to the Predicate device with respect to Indications for Use and technological principles. Slight differences in the wording of the Indications for Use only changes the intended use of the Subject device to include patients with permanent dentition (i.e all second molars). The Comparison table below compares parameters and characteristics of the subject device and predicate/reference devices.
| Parameter | Subject Device | Predicate Device |
|----------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Regulation # | 21 CFR 872.5470 | 21 CFR 872.5470 |
| Device<br>Classification<br>Name | Orthodontic Plastic<br>Bracket | Orthodontic Plastic<br>Bracket |
| Product Code | NXC | NXC |
| Classification | Class II | Class II |
| Indications for Use | ClearForm Aligners are indicated for the alignment of teeth in patients with permanent dentition (i.e. all second molars) during orthodontic treatment of malocclusions. The aligners position teeth by way of continuous gentle forces. | The Orthocaps TwinAligner® System is indicated for the alignment of teeth during orthodontic treatment of malocclusions by way of continuous gentle forces. |
| Mode of action | Orthodontic movement occurs through continuous gentle forces applied to the dentition as each tooth follows the programmed displacement based on a doctor's prescription. | Orthodontic movement occurs through continuous gentle forces applied to the dentition as each tooth follows the programmed displacement based on a doctor's prescription. |
| Method of use | Each preformed plastic tray is worn in sequence by the patient as prescribed by the dental practitioner. | Each preformed plastic tray is worn in sequence by the patient as prescribed by the dental practitioner. |
# Predicate Device Comparison Table
{5}------------------------------------------------
| Parameter | Subject Device | Predicate Device |
|--------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Function of the software | ClearForm Aligner<br>Standard dental software for tooth alignment uses<br>digital scan (untreated state) to generate the image<br>of a final, provisional treated state and then<br>interprets a series of images that represent<br>intermediate teeth states. The dental practitioner<br>then reviews these images and has the option to<br>reject or request modifications to the set-up prior to<br>approving it for aligner fabrication. Once the dental<br>practitioner approves the treatment plan, the<br>software converts the files to produce the series of<br>3D models used to produce thermoformed aligners. | Ortho Caps Twin Aligner<br>K180241<br>Standard dental software for tooth alignment uses<br>digital scan (untreated state) to generate the image<br>of a final, provisional treated state and then<br>interprets a series of images that represent<br>intermediate teeth states. The dental practitioner<br>then reviews these images and has the option to<br>reject or request modifications to the set-up prior to<br>approving it for aligner fabrication. Once the dental<br>practitioner approves the treatment plan, the<br>software converts the files to produce the series of<br>3D models used to produce thermoformed aligners. |
| Material | Essix thermoplastic | Thermoplastic |
| Material<br>Properties | Demonstrates sufficient tensile strength, elasticity,<br>ductility, chemical resistance, and clarity for use as a<br>clear tray aligner | Demonstrates sufficient tensile strength, elasticity,<br>ductility, chemical resistance, and clarity for use as a<br>clear tray aligner. |
| Design | Image: clear aligner | Image: clear aligner |
| Biocompatible | Yes | Yes |
| OTC or Rx | Rx | Rx |
| Sterile | Non-sterile | Non-sterile |
# TECHNOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS
The Subject device mechanism of action is identical to the Predicate device and supports a determination of substantial equivalence. The Subject device use of Software is identical to the Predicate device and supports a determination of substantial equivalence. The Subject and Predicate devices are both fabricated of a non-sterile, biocompatible thermoplastic material which supports a determination of substantial equivalence. The Subject device is fabricated of the Reference device material which is indicated for the intended use.
# Non-clinical Performance Data
Due to the difficulty in evaluating this type of dental device in a laboratory environment, no direct performance bench testing of the aligners was performed. The use of thermoplastic materials for sequential aligners intended to treat malocclusions have been well documented in scientific literature regarding incremental tooth moving forces.
Software used for treatment planning and creation of models/casts for ClearForm Aligners is manufactured by 3Shape A/S under the name Ortho System. It has a 510(k) clearance (K180941) under the PNN product code and is indicated for the intended use.
An internal manufacturing validation was performed to demonstrate the dimensional accuracy of the manufacturing process for ClearForm Aligners. Three critical aspects of the manufacturing process were assessed for accuracy: digital dentition models from treatment planning, 3D printed molds, and the final thermoformed aligners.
Independent 3rd party reverse engineering/inspection software was used to perform point-to-point and critical displacement measurements.
Translational measurements were within 0.150 microns) of the target input value, the predefined tolerance of the manufacturing process. There were no significant differences in the
{6}------------------------------------------------
difference in the intended and measured values observed from any of the groups. This test has met the pre-established acceptance criteria to demonstrate dimensional accuracy.
An additional qualitative assessment of device fit was performed meeting the acceptance criteria.
The material used for ClearForm Aligners has a 510(k) clearance (K062828) for use as an aligner material. Biocompatibility testing for the aligner material, the only patient contacting material, has been conducted by the 510(k) holder in accordance with International Standard ISO 10993-1, "Biological evaluation of medical devices – Part 1: Evaluation and testing within a risk management process".
Additional cytotoxicity testing according to ISO 10993-5:2009 was performed on the final, finished Subject device.
# CLINICAL TESTING
Clinical performance data was not provided for ClearForm Aligners.
# CONCLUSION
Based on similarities in Indications for Use and technology, as well as non-clinical performance testing, we believe that ClearForm Aligners are substantially equivalent to the Orthocaps TwinAligner® System.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.