The Orthocaps TwinAligner® System is indicated for the alignment of teeth during orthodontic treatment of malocclusions by way of continuous gentle forces.
Device Story
The Orthocaps TwinAligner® System consists of custom-made, removable, clear thermoplastic aligners designed to move teeth sequentially. The process begins with a dental professional providing an electronic scan or mold impression of the patient's teeth. Using specialized orthodontic CAD/CAM software, technicians design intermediate tooth models representing stages of treatment. The prescribing physician reviews and approves these digital treatment plans. Once approved, the system produces 3D-printed models used to thermoform the clear plastic aligner trays. The patient wears these trays in a prescribed sequence to apply continuous gentle forces to the dentition, gradually realigning teeth. The physician monitors progress throughout the treatment. The device is used in a clinical setting under the direction of a dental practitioner, with the patient self-administering the aligners by wearing and removing them as instructed.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data was included in this submission. Device safety and performance were supported by biocompatibility testing (cytotoxicity, irritation, sensitization per ISO 10993-5/10) and verification/validation of the digital-to-physical model workflow. Bench testing was not performed due to the nature of the device; reliance was placed on established scientific literature regarding thermoplastic aligner forces.
Technological Characteristics
Thermoplastic material; sequential removable aligner form factor. Operates via CAD/CAM software for treatment planning and 3D printing of models for thermoforming. No energy source; non-sterile. Biocompatibility per ISO 10993-1. Software-driven design process.
Indications for Use
Indicated for the alignment of teeth during orthodontic treatment of malocclusions in patients requiring orthodontic correction.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An orthodontic plastic bracket is a plastic device intended to be bonded to a tooth to apply pressure to a tooth from a flexible orthodontic wire to alter its position.
{0}------------------------------------------------
September 28, 2018
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image contains the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On the left is the Department of Health & Human Services logo. To the right of that is the FDA logo, which is a blue square with the letters "FDA" in white. To the right of the blue square is the text "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue.
Ortho Caps GmbH % Angelica Ayala Regulatory Affairs Specialist RMO, Inc. 650 W. Colfax Ave Denver, Colorado 80204
# Re: K180241
Trade/Device Name: Orthocaps Twinaligner® Regulation Number: 21 CFR 872.5470 Regulation Name: Orthodontic Plastic Bracket Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: NXC Dated: August 28, 2018 Received: August 29, 2018
Dear Angelica Ayala:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/ofdocs/ofpmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for
{1}------------------------------------------------
devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4. Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/CombinationProducts/GuidanceRegulatoryInformation/ucm597488.html; good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (OS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803). please go to http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical on-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/) and CDRH Learn (http://www.fda.gov/Training/CDRHLearn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (http://www.fda.gov/DICE) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
# Mary S. Runner -S3
For Tina Kiang, Ph.D. Acting Director Division of Anesthesiology, General Hospital, Respiratory, Infection Control, and Dental Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K180241
Device Name Orthocaps TwinAligner® System
Indications for Use (Describe)
The Orthocaps TwinAligner® System is indicated for the alignment of teeth during orthodontic treatment of malocclusions by way of continuous gentle forces.
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) | |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| <span style="font-size:12pt">☑</span> Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) | <span style="font-size:12pt">☐</span> Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) |
CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
#### 510(k) Summary
- Date Prepared: September 27, 2018 1.
#### 2. Submitter Information:
Ortho Caps GmbH An der Bewer 8 59069 Hamm Germany
| Contact Person: | Wajeeh Khan |
|-------------------|-------------------------|
| Telephone Number: | +49 2385 92190 |
| Fax Number: | +49 2385 9219080 |
| Email: | wajeehkhan@orthocaps.de |
### 3. Submission Correspondent:
RMO, Inc 650 W. Colfax Avenue Denver, CO 80204
| Contact Person: | Angelica Ayala |
|-------------------|--------------------|
| Telephone Number: | (303) 592-8217 |
| Fax Number: | (303) 592-8257 |
| Email: | aayala@rmortho.com |
#### 4. Device Information:
| Trade/Proprietary Name: | Orthocaps TwinAligner® System |
|----------------------------|-------------------------------|
| Common Name: | Aligner, Sequential |
| Classification Name: | Orthodontic plastic bracket |
| Classification Regulation: | 872.5470 |
| Device Classification: | Class II |
| Product Code: | NXC |
#### 5. Predicate Devices:
| Invisalign® System | Primary Predicate | K081960 | Align Technology, Inc |
|----------------------|---------------------|---------|-----------------------|
| ClearCorrect System | Reference Predicate | K113618 | ClearCorrect LLC |
| 3Shape Ortho System™ | Reference Predicate | K152086 | 3Shape A/S |
#### 6. Device Description:
Orthocaps TwinAligner® System consists of a series of custom made removable clear plastic orthodontic aligners that sequentially positions teeth by way of continuous gentle force.
An electronic scan or mold impression of the patient's teeth in an untreated state is provided by a dental or orthodontic professional. From the digital scan, Orthocaps technicians design a series of intermediate models corresponding to each stage of treatment intended to gradually realign the patient's teeth in accordance with the physician's prescription using a standard dental software used for tooth alignment. The prescribing physician reviews and approves the model scheme before the molds are produced. Once approved, Orthocaps produces the aligner trays formed from clear, thin thermoformed
{4}------------------------------------------------
plastic. The trays are sent back to the physician for patient fit and treatment. Additional trays are provided sequentially to gradually move the target teeth to the designed position, which is monitored throughout treatment by the physician. The aligner trays are held in place by pressure and can be removed by the patient at any time. Specialized orthodontic CAD/CAM software will be used to develop the treatment plans and to produce standard 3D printed files that will facilitate the manufacturing of each sequential aligner in the treatment plan. The software application used for the manufacturing validation for this subject device is the 3Shape reference predicate.
## 7. Intended Use:
The Orthocaps TwinAligner® System is indicated for the alignment of teeth during orthodontic treatment of malocclusions by way of continuous gentle forces.
## 8. Substantial Equivalence:
The Orthocaps TwinAligner® System is substantially equivalent to the predicate devices with respect to indications for use, technological characteristics, principles of operation, and materials, as demonstrated in the comparison below:
| Element | Subject Device | Primary Predicate | Reference Predicate |
|----------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Device Name | Orthocaps TwinAligner®<br>System | Invisalign® System | ClearCorrect |
| Manufacturer | Ortho Caps GmbH | Align Technology, Inc. | ClearCorrect LLC |
| 510(k)<br>Number | K180241 | K081960 | K113618 |
| Regulation<br>Number | 21 CFR 872.5470 | 21 CFR 872.5470 | 21 CFR 872.5470 |
| Device<br>Classification<br>Name | Orthodontic Plastic Bracket | Orthodontic Plastic Bracket | Orthodontic Plastic Bracket |
| Device<br>Classification | Class II | Class II | Class II |
| Product Code | NXC | NXC | NXC |
| Indications<br>for use | Orthocaps TwinAligner®<br>System is indicated for the<br>alignment of teeth during<br>orthodontic treatment of<br>malocclusions by way of<br>continuous gentle forces. | The Invisalign System is<br>indicated for the alignment<br>of teeth during orthodontic<br>treatment of malocclusion. | ClearCorrect System is<br>indicated for the treatment<br>of tooth malocclusion in<br>patients with permanent<br>dentition (i.e. all second<br>molars), The ClearCorrect<br>System positions teeth by<br>way of continuous gentle<br>force. |
| Mode of<br>Action | Orthodontic movement<br>occurs through continuous<br>gentle forces applied to the<br>dentition as each tooth<br>follows the programmed<br>displacement based on a<br>doctor's prescription | Orthodontic movement<br>occurs through continuous<br>gentle forces applied to the<br>dentition as each tooth<br>follows the programmed<br>displacement based on a<br>doctor's prescription | Orthodontic movement<br>occurs through continuous<br>gentle forces applied to the<br>dentition as each tooth<br>follows the programmed<br>displacement based on a<br>doctor's prescription |
{5}------------------------------------------------
| Method of<br>Use | Each preformed plastic tray<br>is worn in sequence by the<br>patient as prescribed by the<br>dental practitioner | Each preformed plastic tray<br>is worn in sequence by the<br>patient as prescribed by the<br>dental practitioner | Each preformed plastic tray<br>is worn in sequence by the<br>patient as prescribed by the<br>dental practitioner |
|--------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Software<br>Description<br>for tooth<br>movement | Standard dental software for<br>tooth alignment uses digital<br>scan (untreated state) to<br>generate the image of a<br>final, provisional treated<br>state and then interprets a<br>series of images that<br>represent intermediate<br>teeth states. The dental<br>practitioner then reviews<br>these images and has the<br>option to reject or request<br>modifications to the set-up<br>prior to approving it for<br>aligner fabrication. Once the<br>dental practitioner approves<br>the treatment plan, the<br>software converts the files<br>to produce the series of 3D<br>models used to produce<br>thermoformed aligners. | A digital scan of the<br>patient's teeth. From the<br>digital model, following a<br>dental practitioner's<br>prescription, the software<br>generates model<br>transforms describing the<br>final, treated state and then<br>interpolates a series of<br>model transforms that<br>represent intermediate<br>states of alignment. The<br>resulting computer<br>"setups" relay this<br>information to rapid<br>prototyping machines that<br>produce physical positive<br>models. The aligners are<br>produced by<br>thermoforming on each<br>physical model to fabricate<br>the sequence of aligners. | Standard dental software<br>for tooth alignment uses<br>digital scan (untreated<br>state) to generate the image<br>of a final, provisional<br>treated state and then<br>interprets a series of images<br>that represent intermediate<br>teeth states. The dental<br>practitioner then reviews<br>these images and has the<br>option to reject or request<br>modifications to the set-up<br>prior to approving it for<br>aligner fabrication. Once the<br>dental practitioner approves<br>the treatment plan, the<br>software converts the files<br>to produce the series of 3D<br>models used to produce<br>thermoformed aligners. |
| Material | Thermoplastic | Thermoplastic | Thermoplastic |
| OTC or Rx | Rx | Rx | Rx |
| Sterilization | No | No | No |
| Design | Image: clear aligner | Image: clear aligner | Image: clear aligner |
The Indications for Use of the subject device are essentially the same as currently marketed predicate devices. The verbiage of the Indications of Use of the subject device is slightly different than predicate devices; however, these slight differences do not affect the intended therapeutic treatment of malocclusions as compared to the predicates.
The technological characteristics of the subject device regarding the design, materials, and treatment of malocclusions through sequential thermoplastic aligners follow the same technological principles as predicate devices. While there are different trays worn during daytime and nighttime, these slight differences from predicate devices do not alter the intended therapeutic treatment of malocclusions using clear aligners.
The mode of action for the subject device is fundamentally the same to predicate devices and supports the determination of substantial equivalence. Orthodontic tooth movement
{6}------------------------------------------------
occurs through continuous gentle forces applied to dentition using sequential removable thermoplastic aligners.
The use of dental software to translate tooth movements in developing the model scheme in the subject device is essentially the same to predicate devices. The subject and reference predicate devices allow the dental practitioner to review and approve the model scheme before aligner fabrication.
# 9. Non-Clinical Performance Data
# Biocompatibility Testing:
The biocompatibility testing for the device was conducted in accordance to ISO 10993-1 and its applicable parts. The results of the testing satisfy the requirements of the study protocols and comply with ISO 10993-1 for the intended use. The results of the studies further support a determination of substantial equivalence. The battery of testing included the following tests:
| Test | Standard | Result |
|---------------|-----------------------|--------|
| Cytotoxicity | ANSI/AAMI/ISO 10993-5 | PASS |
| Irritation | ISO 10993-10 | PASS |
| Sensitization | ISO 10993-10 | PASS |
Verification and Validation Testing:
Results of verification and validation testing demonstrate device conformity with preestablished specifications using a physical model cast impression. There was no measurable deviation between physical and digital models established in the process workflow.
Bench testing was not performed due to the difficulty in evaluating this type of dental device in a laboratory setting. The use of thermoplastic materials for sequential aligners intended to treat malocclusions have been well documented in scientific literature regarding incremental tooth moving forces.
# 10. Clinical Performance Data:
Clinical data was not included in this submission.
# 11. Conclusion
The Orthocaps TwinAligner® System has substantially equivalent Indications for Use and technological characteristics to the previously cleared predicate devices.
The conclusions drawn from the data included in this submission demonstrate that Orthocaps TwinAligner® System is substantially equivalent to the predicate devices in indications for use, design, technological characteristics, mode of action, method of use, performance, materials, and biocompatibility.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.