The ATTUNE Revision LPS Insert is intended for use in prosthetic constructs for replacement of distal femur and resurfacing of the proximal tibia, especially in cases that require extensive resection and replacement. Specific diagnostic indications for use include: malignant tumors (e.g., osteosarcomas, giant cell tumors, bone tumors) requiring extensive resection and replacement; patient conditions of non-inflammatory degenerative joint disease (NIDJ), e.g. avascular necrosis, osteoarthritis, and inflammatory joint disease (IJD), e.g., rheumatoid arthritis, requiring extensive resection and replacement; revision cases for a failed previous prosthesis requiring extensive resection and replacement; severe trauma requiring extensive resection and replacement. post-infection bone loss, where the surgeon has elected to excise the bone and replacement is required.
Device Story
ATTUNE Revision LPS Insert replaces tibio-femoral articular surface; used in conjunction with femoral, tibial, and patellar prostheses. Components include AOX antioxidant polyethylene bearing, AOX antioxidant polyethylene bushings, and forged cobalt chrome molybdenum hinge post. Used by orthopedic surgeons in clinical settings for patients requiring extensive bone resection and replacement. Device provides structural support and articulation for knee joint reconstruction; benefits patients by restoring joint function following severe trauma, tumor resection, or revision of failed implants.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data; substantial equivalence determined via bench testing. Non-clinical testing included A/P shear fatigue, insert subluxation, hinge post disassembly, hinge post fatigue, hinge post assembly, hinge post micromotion, and bacterial endotoxin testing per ANSI AAMI ST-72:2011.
Technological Characteristics
Components: AOX antioxidant polyethylene bearing/bushings, forged cobalt chrome molybdenum hinge post. Design: Constrained cemented knee prosthesis. Sterilization: Not specified. Connectivity: None. Software: None.
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients requiring extensive knee resection and replacement due to malignant tumors, non-inflammatory degenerative joint disease (e.g., avascular necrosis, osteoarthritis), inflammatory joint disease (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis), failed previous prosthesis, severe trauma, or post-infection bone loss.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A knee joint femorotibial metal/polymer constrained cemented prosthesis is a device intended to be implanted to replace part of a knee joint. The device limits translation or rotation in one or more planes and has components that are linked together or affined. This generic type of device includes prostheses composed of a ball-and-socket joint located between a stemmed femoral and a stemmed tibial component and a runner and track joint between each pair of femoral and tibial condyles. The ball-and-socket joint is composed of a ball at the head of a column rising from the stemmed tibial component. The ball, the column, the tibial plateau, and the stem for fixation of the tibial component are made of an alloy, such as cobalt-chromium-molybdenum. The ball of the tibial component is held within the socket of the femoral component by the femoral component's flat outer surface. The flat outer surface of the tibial component abuts both a reciprocal flat surface within the cavity of the femoral component and flanges on the femoral component designed to prevent distal displacement. The stem of the femoral component is made of an alloy, such as cobalt-chromium-molybdenum, but the socket of the component is made of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene. The femoral component has metallic runners which align with the ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene tracks that press-fit into the metallic tibial component. The generic class also includes devices whose upper and lower components are linked with a solid bolt passing through a journal bearing of greater radius, permitting some rotation in the transverse plane, a minimal arc of abduction/adduction. This generic type of device is limited to those prostheses intended for use with bone cement (§ 888.3027).
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image contains the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The logo consists of two parts: the Department of Health & Human Services logo on the left and the FDA logo on the right. The FDA logo features the letters 'FDA' in a blue square, followed by the words 'U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION' in blue text.
October 8, 2019
Depuy (Ireland) % Soraya Hori Sr. Regulatory Affairs Associate Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. 700 Orthopaedic Drive Warsaw, Indiana 46582
Re: K191779
Trade/Device Name: Attune Revision LPS Inserts Regulation Number: 21 CFR 888.3510 Regulation Name: Knee Joint Femorotibial Metal/Polymer Constrained Cemented Prosthesis Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: KRO Dated: July 1, 2019 Received: July 2, 2019
Dear Soraya Hori:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
{1}------------------------------------------------
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reportingcombination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-safety/medical-device-reportingmdr-how-report-medical-device-problems.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
Ting Song Acting Assistant Director DHT6A: Division of Joint Arthroplasty Devices OHT6: Office of Orthopedic Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
## Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K191779
Device Name ATTUNE® Revision LPSTM Inserts
#### Indications for Use (Describe)
The ATTUNE Revision LPS Insert is intended for use in prosthetic constructs for replacement of distal femur and resurfacing of the proximal tibia, especially in cases that require extensive resection and replacement. Specific diagnostic indications for use include:
· malignant tumors (e.g., osteosarcomas, giant cell tumors, bone tumors) requiring extensive resection and replacement;
· patient conditions of non-inflammatory degenerative joint disease (NIDJ), e.g. avascular necrosis, osteoarthritis, and inflammatory joint disease (IJD), e.g., rheumatoid arthritis, requiring extensive resection and replacement;
· revision cases for a failed previous prosthesis requiring extensive resection and replacement;
· severe trauma requiring extensive resection and replacement.
· post-infection bone loss, where the surgeon has elected to excise the bone and replacement is required.
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) |
|-------------------------------------------------|
|-------------------------------------------------|
X | Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
| | Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
## CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
## *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
# 510(k) Summary
(As required by 21 CFR 807.92 and 21 CFR 807.93)
| Submitter Information | |
|------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Name | DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. |
| Address | 700 Orthopaedic Drive |
| | Warsaw, IN 46582 |
| Phone number | 574-372-7491 |
| Fax number | 574- 371-4987 |
| Establishment Registration<br>Number | 1818910 |
| Name of contact person | Soraya L. Hori |
| Date prepared | July 1, 2019 |
| Name of device | |
| Trade or proprietary name | ATTUNE® Revision LPSTM Inserts |
| Common or usual name | Prosthesis, knee, femorotibial, constrained, cemented, metal/polymer |
| Classification name | Knee joint femorotibial metal/polymer constrained cemented prosthesis |
| Class | II |
| Classification panel | 87 Orthopedics |
| Regulation | 21 CFR 888.3510 |
| Product Code(s) | KRO |
| Legally marketed device(s) | Primary: LPS Universal Hinge Tibial Inserts, K091453 |
| to which equivalence is<br>claimed | Secondary: ATTUNE Knee System AOX Tibial Inserts, K101433,<br>K111433, K160700 |
| Device description | The ATTUNE Revision LPS Inserts are designed to replace the tibio-<br>femoral articular surface of the knee joint when used in conjunction with<br>a femoral, tibial, patellar, and other associated prostheses as required.<br>The ATTUNE Revision LPS Insert consists of an AOX™ Antioxidant<br>Polyethylene bearing, AOX Antioxidant Polyethylene bushings, and a<br>forged cobalt chrome molybdenum hinge post. |
| Intended Use and<br>Indications for use: | The ATTUNE Revision LPS Insert is intended for use in prosthetic<br>constructs for replacement of distal and/or total femur and resurfacing of<br>the proximal tibia, especially in cases that require extensive resection<br>and replacement. Specific diagnostic indications for use include:<br>malignant tumors (e.g., osteosarcomas, chondrosarcomas, giant cell<br>tumors, bone tumors) requiring extensive resection and<br>replacement;patient conditions of non-inflammatory degenerative joint disease<br>(NIDJD), e.g. avascular necrosis, osteoarthritis, and inflammatory |
| | joint disease (IJD), e.g., rheumatoid arthritis, requiring extensive resection and replacement; |
| • | revision cases for a failed previous prosthesis requiring extensive resection and replacement; |
| • | severe trauma requiring extensive resection and replacement. |
| • | post-infection bone loss, where the surgeon has elected to excise the bone and replacement is required. |
{4}------------------------------------------------
## Summary of Technologies / Substantial Equivalence Discussion:
The subject ATTUNE Revision LPS Insert has the same intended use, indications, manufacturing and sterilization methods as the previously cleared LPS Universal Hinge Tibial Inserts (K091453). The subject ATTUNE Revision LPS Insert has the same intended use, materials, biocompatibility, packaging configurations, and sterilization methods as the previously cleared ATTUNE Knee System AOX Tibial Inserts (K101433, K111433, K160700).
The testing provided below was used to support equivalence to the predicate devices.
| Non-Clinical<br>Testing | Functional testing was conducted in compliance with FDA Guidance, Class II Special<br>Controls Guidance Document: Knee Joint Patellofemorotibial and Femorotibial<br>Metal/Polymer Porous-Coated Uncemented Prostheses: Guidance for Industry and<br>FDA, to verify that the implant performance is substantially equivalent to predicate<br>devices for anticipated in-vivo loading with the following tests:<br>• Anterior/Posterior (A/P) Shear Fatigue Verification Test<br>• Insert Subluxation Verification Test<br>• Hinge Post Disassembly Test<br>• Hinge Post Fatigue Verification Test<br>• Hinge Post Assembly Test<br>• Hinge Post Micromotion Test<br>The subject devices also meet the requirement of:<br>• Bacterial endotoxin testing as specified in ANSI AAMI ST-72:2011. |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Clinical<br>Testing: | Clinical testing was not necessary to determine substantial equivalence between the<br>subject and predicate devices. |
| Conclusions<br>drawn from<br>Clinical and<br>Non-clinical<br>data: | The subject ATTUNE Revision LPS Insert is substantially equivalent to the predicate<br>LPS Universal Hinge Tibial Inserts and ATTUNE Knee System AOX Tibial Inserts<br>regarding intended use, overall indications, design features, materials, sterilization, and<br>manufacturing.<br>Clinical data and conclusions were not needed for this device. |
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.