Aristotle 18 Guidewire, 200cm, Soft Profile ; Aristotle 18 Guidewire, 200cm, Standard Profile ; Aristotle 18 Guidewire, 200cm, Support Profile
K183608 · Scientia Vascular, LLC · MOF · Mar 22, 2019 · Cardiovascular
Device Facts
Record ID
K183608
Device Name
Aristotle 18 Guidewire, 200cm, Soft Profile ; Aristotle 18 Guidewire, 200cm, Standard Profile ; Aristotle 18 Guidewire, 200cm, Support Profile
Applicant
Scientia Vascular, LLC
Product Code
MOF · Cardiovascular
Decision Date
Mar 22, 2019
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 870.1330
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
The Aristotle 18 Guidewire is intended for general vascular use within the neuro and peripheral vasculatures to introduce and position catheters and other interventional devices. The guidewire is not intended for use in the coronary vasculature.
Device Story
Aristotle 18 Guidewire is a 0.018" diameter steerable guidewire; used to introduce/position catheters and interventional devices in neuro and peripheral vasculatures. Features shapeable nitinol distal tip; platinum wire marker coil for fluoroscopic visualization; hydrophilic distal coating; PTFE proximal coating; stainless steel core wire; stainless steel centering coil. Supplied sterile for single use; includes introducer and torque device accessories. Operated by physicians in clinical settings. Provides tactile feedback and maneuverability for navigation through tortuous anatomy; facilitates catheter placement; aids in interventional procedures.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Performance evaluated per ISO 11070:2014 and FDA Coronary and Cerebrovascular Guidewire Guidance. Tests included visual inspection, dimensional verification, tensile strength, flexing, fracture, torqueability, torque strength, tip flexibility, tip shape retention, particulate analysis, coating lubricity/durability/integrity, simulated use in tortuous anatomical models, corrosion resistance, and packaging integrity. Usability and radiopacity were evaluated in a human cadaver model. Results confirmed performance comparable to the predicate device.
Technological Characteristics
0.018" O.D. steerable guidewire; 200cm length. Materials: stainless steel core/centering coil, nitinol distal tip, platinum marker coil. Coatings: hydrophilic (distal), PTFE (proximal). Sterilization: 100% Ethylene Oxide (EO) per AAMI TIR 28:2016. Standards: ISO 11070:2014, ASTM D 4169:16 (packaging), EN ISO 14971:2012 (risk management).
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients requiring catheter introduction and positioning within neuro and peripheral vasculatures. Not for use in coronary vasculature.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A catheter guide wire is a coiled wire that is designed to fit inside a percutaneous catheter for the purpose of directing the catheter through a blood vessel.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The device, when it is a torque device that is manually operated, non-patient contacting, and intended to manipulate non-cerebral vascular guide wires, is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 870.9.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logos of the Department of Health & Human Services and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The Department of Health & Human Services logo is on the left, and the FDA logo is on the right. The FDA logo includes the FDA acronym in a blue square, followed by the words "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue text.
March 22, 2019
Scientia Vascular LLC David Sabodski Director of Quality Assurance 3487 West 2100 South. Suite 100 West Valley City, Utah 84119
#### Re: K183608
Device Name: Aristotle 18 Guidewire Regulation Number: 21 CFR 870.1330 Regulation Name: Catheter Guide Wire Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: MOF, DQX Dated: December 20, 2018 Received: December 26, 2018
#### Dear David Sabodski:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part
{1}------------------------------------------------
801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/CombinationProducts/GuidanceRegulatoryInformation/ucm597488.htm); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (OS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/) and CDRH Learn (http://www.fda.gov/Training/CDRHLearn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (http://www.fda.gov/DICE) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone
(1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
Lin Zheng
Digitally signed by
Xiaolin Zheng -S
Date: 2019.03.22
10:44:47 -04'00'
for Carlos L. Peña, PhD, MS Director Division of Neurological and Physical Medicine Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
## Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K183608
Device Name Aristotle 18 Guidewire
Indications for Use (Describe)
The Aristotle 18 Guidewire is intended for general vascular use within the neuro and peripheral vasculatures to introduce and position catheters and other interventional devices. The guidewire is not intended for use in the coronary vasculature.
X Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
| Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
#### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
Scientia Vascular LLC Traditional 510(k) Aristotle 18 Guidewire
Image /page/3/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for Scientia. The logo consists of a stylized, interconnected blue symbol above the word "SCIENTIA" in a futuristic-looking font. The symbol is composed of two curved lines that appear to be intertwined, creating a sense of connection or flow. The word "SCIENTIA" is written in capital letters with a font that has sharp angles and a modern aesthetic.
# 510(K) SUMMARY (Per 21 CFR 807.92)
# SCIENTIA VASCULAR LLC
## Aristotle 18 Guidewire
| 510(k) Sponsor: | Scientia Vascular LLC<br>3487 West 2100 South Suite 100<br>West Valley City, UT 84119<br>Tel: (775) 657-6330 |
|-------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Contact Person: | David Sabodski, Director of Quality Assurance<br>Tel: 801.573.5897<br>E-mail: dsabodski@scientiavascular.com |
| Date Prepared: | March 11, 2019 |
| Prepared by: | Ryan O'Callaghan, MS, RAC<br>Phil Triolo and Associates LC<br>Tel: 801.699.9846<br>Fax: 801.328.2399<br>E-mail: ryano@philt.com |
| Trade Name: | Aristotle 18 Guidewire |
| Common Name: | Guidewire |
| Classification Name | Catheter Guide Wire per 21 CFR 870.1330 |
| Primary Product Code: | MOF |
| Secondary Product Code: | DQX |
| Predicate Device: | Aristotle 14 Guidewire (K173235) |
{4}------------------------------------------------
Scientia Vascular LLC Traditional 510(k) Aristotle 18 Guidewire
#### DEVICE DESCRIPTION
The Aristotle 18 Guidewire is a modification of Scientia Vascular's Aristotle 14 Guidewire. It is a 0.018" diameter steerable guidewire with a shapeable tip to aid in accessing vasculature. The guidewire is supplied sterile and is for single use only. It is provided in a range of stiffness profiles: soft, standard, and support. The product is provided in one overall length of 200cm.
The distal portion of the guidewire tip includes a radiopaque platinum wire marker coil to facilitate fluoroscopic visualization. The guidewire has a hydrophilic polymer coating on the distal portion and a polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) coating on the proximal portion to reduce friction during manipulation in vessels.
The guidewire is provided with an introducer (to aid with the insertion of the guidewire into a catheter hub and/or a hemostasis valve) and a torque device (to attach to the proximal portion to facilitate gripping and manipulation of the guidewire during use). The introducer and torque accessory devices are included to facilitate use of the guidewire and are not intended to contact the patient's body.
The Aristotle 18 Guidewire is substantially equivalent with respect to technological characteristics, indications for use, design and materials to the previously cleared Aristotle 14 Guidewire.
#### INTENDED USE/INDICATIONS FOR USE
The Aristotle 18 Guidewire is intended for general vascular use within the neuro and peripheral vasculatures to introduce and position catheters and other interventional devices. The guidewire is not intended for use in the coronary vasculature.
### TECHNOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS
The Aristotle 18 Guidewire has the following similarities to the previously cleared Aristotle 14 Guidewire:
- Both devices have the same indicated use,
- Both devices use the same operating principle, ●
- Both devices incorporate the same basic guidewire design, ●
- Both devices incorporate the same materials, and ●
- Both devices are packaged and sterilized using the same materials and processes. .
{5}------------------------------------------------
| Comparison between Subject & Predicate Device Technological Characteristics | | | |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Characteristic | Subject Device<br>Aristotle 18 Guidewire | Predicate<br>Aristotle 14 Guidewire<br>(K173235) | Comparison |
| Anatomical<br>Location | Neuro and peripheral<br>vasculature | Neuro and peripheral<br>vasculature | Same |
| Dimensions | <i>O.D.:</i> 0.018" (0.46mm)<br><i>Length:</i> 200cm | <i>O.D.:</i> 0.014" (0.36mm)<br><i>Length:</i> 200cm to 300cm<br>range | The diameter of the<br>subject device is<br>larger than the<br>diameter of the<br>predicate device |
| Core Wire | Stainless Steel | Stainless Steel | Same |
| Distal Tip | Shapeable<br><i>Length:</i> 35cm<br><i>Material:</i> Nitinol | Shapeable<br><i>Length:</i> 35cm<br><i>Material:</i> Nitinol | Same |
| Stiffness Profiles | Range from support (stiff),<br>standard (middle) to soft<br>(flex) | Range from support (stiff)<br>to soft (flex) | Equivalent |
| Coatings | <i>Distal End:</i> Hydrophilic<br><i>Proximal End:</i> PTFE | <i>Distal End:</i> Hydrophilic<br><i>Proximal End:</i> PTFE | Equivalent |
| Radiopaque<br>Marker | 1 radiopaque marker at<br>distal tip | 1 radiopaque marker at<br>distal tip | Same |
| Centering Coil | 1 stainless steel centering<br>coil | None | The subject device<br>includes a centering<br>coil component that<br>is not included in<br>the predicate<br>device. |
| | | | |
| Comparison between Subject & Predicate Device Technological Characteristics | | | |
| Characteristic | Subject Device<br>Aristotle 18 Guidewire | Predicate<br>Aristotle 14 Guidewire<br>(K173235) | Comparison |
| Introducer<br>(Accessory) | Provided with each<br>guidewire | Provided with each<br>guidewire | Equivalent |
| Torque Device<br>(Accessory) | Provided with each<br>guidewire | Provided with each<br>guidewire | Same |
| Sterilization<br>Method | 100% Ethylene Oxide<br>(EO) | 100% Ethylene Oxide<br>(EO) | Same |
{6}------------------------------------------------
The two differences between Aristotle 18 Guidewire and Aristotle 14 Guidewire is in the outer dimensions and the addition of a centering coil. The outer dimension of the Aristotle 18 Guidewire is 0.018" whereas the outer dimension of the Aristotle 14 Guidewires is 0.014". A centering coil made of stainless steel is added to the Aristotle 18 Guidewire whereas the Aristotle 14 Guidewire does not have a centering coil. However, the core wire and the centering coil are made from the same stainless steel material. Thus, no new materials were added to the Aristotle 18 Guidewire that were not present in the Aristotle 14.
### NON-CLINICAL PERFORMANCE TESTS
### Biocompatibility
The materials used in the manufacture of the subject Aristotle 18 Guidewire are identical to those used in the manufacture of the Aristotle 14 Guidewire also manufactured by Scientia Vascular LLC, cleared January 22, 2018 after review of K173235; in formulation, processing, sterilization, and no other chemicals have been added (e.g., plasticizers, fillers, color additives, cleaning agents, mold release agents).
Due to the increased diameter of the subject device compared to the predicate device and the risk assessment of these design differences, new biocompatibility testing was conducted including an in vitro blood flow loop thrombogenicity study, MEM elution, toxicological risk assessment, ASTM hemolysis (direct contact), ASTM hemolysis (extract), partial thromboplastin time (PTT), and complement activation to establish that the increased surface area of the Aristotle 18 Guidewire would not result in an increased thrombogenic potential compared to the Aristotle 14 Guidewire predicate device. and further demonstrate the biocompatibility profile of the subject device is equivalent to the predicate device.
{7}------------------------------------------------
Scientia Vascular LLC Traditional 510(k) Aristotle 18 Guidewire
#### Sterilization
100% EO is used to sterilize the device to achieve a SAL of at least 10-9. The device was adopted into an EO sterilization processing group in accordance with AAMI TIR 28:2016. Completion of the review performed to the requirements of AAMI TIR 28:2016 indicate the Aristotle 18 and the Aristotle 14 are similar with regards to all device and packaging characteristics that could affect the ability to sterilize the devices.
#### Functional Testing
Performance testing on the subject device was performed after conducting a risk assessment in accordance with EN ISO 14971:2012 Medical Devices – Risk Management. Functional testing was performed in accordance with ISO 11070:2014 Sterile single-use intravascular introducers, dilators and guidewires and the FDA Guidance Document Coronary and Cerebrovascular Guidewire Guidance (January 1995). The following table summarizes the functional tests performed and test results obtained to demonstrate substantial equivalence to the predicate device:
| Summaries of Functional Tests Conducted to Support this Premarket Notification<br>for the Modified (Subject) Device, Aristotle 18 Guidewire | | | |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|
| Test | Test Method Summary | Results | |
| Visual<br>Inspection | Tests per ISO 11070:<br>Visual inspection for extraneous<br>matter, process and surface defects<br>or defects that may cause trauma<br>to vessels during use. | No extraneous matter, surface<br>defects or visible droplets of coating<br>are present on the Aristotle 18<br>Guidewires | |
| Dimensional<br>Verification | Tests per ISO 11070:<br>Dimensional inspection per<br>engineering drawings. | All Aristotle 18 guidewires met<br>dimensional specifications. | |
| Tensile<br>Strength | Tensile testing per ISO 11070. | All Aristotle 18 guidewires meet<br>minimum force breakage<br>requirements specified in ISO<br>11070. | |
| Flexing Test | Tests per ISO 11070:<br>Inspection for defects and damage<br>or flaking of the coating after<br>flexing. | No defects or damage / flaking of<br>the coating were observed after<br>flexing. | |
| Fracture | Tests per ISO 11070:<br>Inspection for fracture, loosening,<br>or failure after wrapping around<br>mandrel. | No Aristotle 18 guidewires showed<br>signs of fracture, loosening, or<br>failure after wrapping them 8 times<br>around a mandrel. | |
| Summaries of Functional Tests Conducted to Support this Premarket Notification<br>for the Modified (Subject) Device, Aristotle 18 Guidewire | | | |
| Test | Test Method Summary | Results | |
| Torqueability | Measurement of torque response<br>(average input to output lag) in an<br>anatomical model. | All Aristotle 18 guidewires<br>demonstrated acceptable torque<br>responses. The torque response of<br>the subject device was comparable<br>to that of the predicate device. | |
| Torque<br>Strength | Torque turns to failure in an<br>anatomical model. | All Aristotle 18 guidewires<br>demonstrated acceptable torque<br>strength. The torque strength of the<br>subject device was comparable to<br>that of the predicate device. | |
| Tip<br>Flexibility | Measure force to deflect guidewire<br>tips to 45 and 90 degrees at 5mm,<br>10mm, and 20mm test lengths. | The forces required to deflect the<br>Aristotle 18 guidewire tips were<br>acceptable. The flexibility of the<br>tips of all subject devices was<br>comparable to the tip flexibility of<br>the predicate guidewire. | |
| Tip Shape,<br>Retention | Guidewires must be shapeable and<br>must retain shaped angle after<br>simulated use. | All tips met shaping and shape<br>retention requirements after<br>simulated use. | |
| Particulate | Particulates of various size ranges<br>counted after simulated use in a<br>tortuous path. | A comparable number of<br>particulates was recovered from<br>subject and predicate device<br>following simulated use. | |
| Coating<br>Lubricity and<br>Durability | Frictional force of coated<br>guidewires was determined after<br>simulated use in a tortuous path. | All Aristotle 18 guidewires met<br>specified frictional force<br>requirements. | |
| Summaries of Functional Tests Conducted to Support this Premarket Notification<br>for the Modified (Subject) Device, Aristotle 18 Guidewire | | | |
| Test | Test Method Summary | Results | |
| Coating<br>Integrity | Coating uniformity and integrity<br>visually examined on dyed<br>samples after simulated use in a<br>tortuous path. | All Aristotle 18 guidewires showed<br>acceptable coating coverage after<br>simulated use. | |
| Simulated<br>Use Model<br>Testing and<br>Product<br>Compatibility | Anatomical model designed to<br>simulate the tortuous anatomy of<br>the neurovasculature used for<br>simulated use testing. | Aristotle 18 Guidewires and<br>predicate devices were found to<br>perform acceptably in evaluations<br>of: Torqueability in tortuous<br>vasculature, Lubricity,<br>Microcatheter Support & Tracking,<br>Compatibility with Introducer,<br>Compatibility with Torque Device,<br>and Compatibility with<br>Microcatheter. | |
| Usability<br>Evaluation | Physicians evaluated subject and<br>predicate guidewires for various<br>performance characteristics in a<br>human cadaver. | Subject and predicate guidewires<br>both exhibited acceptable<br>performance. | |
| Radiopacity | Subject and predicate guidewires<br>evaluated by physicians during<br>simulated use in a human cadaver. | Both subject and predicate<br>guidewires exhibited acceptable<br>radiopacity. | |
| Summaries of Functional Tests Conducted to Support this Premarket Notification<br>for the Modified (Subject) Device, Aristotle 18 Guidewire | | | |
| Test | Test Method Summary | Results | |
| Corrosion<br>Resistance | Test for corrosion resistance per<br>ISO 11070. | There were no signs of corrosion on<br>guidewires after soaking in typical<br>end-use solutions. | |
| Compatibility<br>with Agents | Guidewires were exposed to<br>saline, contrast agents, and DMSO<br>and then examined for<br>degradation. | All Aristotle 18 guidewires showed<br>no signs of degradation, corrosion<br>or physical decomposition after<br>exposure. | |
| Packaging | Simulated transportation test per<br>ASTM D 4169:16. | Following exposure to typical<br>storage and transportation<br>conditions, product remained<br>secured and labeling remained<br>affixed and legible. | |
{8}------------------------------------------------
{9}------------------------------------------------
{10}------------------------------------------------
## CONCLUSION:
Scientia Vascular, LLC has presented information in this premarket notification supporting its contention that the Aristotle 18 Guidewire is substantially equivalent with respect to technological characteristics and indications for use to the predicate device.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.