K183583 · Zimmer, Inc. · JWH · May 10, 2019 · Orthopedic
Device Facts
Record ID
K183583
Device Name
Vanguard Complete Knee System
Applicant
Zimmer, Inc.
Product Code
JWH · Orthopedic
Decision Date
May 10, 2019
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 888.3560
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
1. Painful and disabled knee joint resulting from osteoarthritis traumatic arthritis where one or more compartments are involved; 2. Correction of varus, valgus, or posttraumatic deformity; 3. Correction or revision of unsuccessful osteotomy, arthrodesis, or failure of previous total joint replacement procedure. Femoral components and tibial tray components with porous coatings are indicated for cemented biological fixation application. Non-coated (interlok®) devices and all polyethylene patellar components are indicated for cemented application only.
Device Story
Vanguard Complete Knee System is a modular total knee replacement system for primary or revision arthroplasty. Components include Co-Cr-Mo or Ti alloy femoral components (porous plasma spray or Interlok finish), Co-Cr-Mo or Ti alloy tibial trays, UHMWPE patellar components, Ti alloy locking bars, and Vitamin-E Highly Crosslinked polyethylene (VEHXPE) tibial bearings. Device is implanted by orthopedic surgeons in an operating room setting. System replaces damaged knee joint surfaces to alleviate pain and restore function. Modification introduces new tibial bearing material (VEHXPE) to existing system. Surgeon selects appropriate components based on patient anatomy and pathology; device provides mechanical articulation to restore joint kinematics.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data was deemed necessary. Evidence consists of non-clinical bench testing, including material characterization (Vivacit-E), dimensional comparison to E1 bearings, finite element analysis of stress in manufacturing slots, laser etching evaluation, MRI compatibility, and pyrogenicity testing.
Technological Characteristics
Modular knee prosthesis. Materials: Co-Cr-Mo or Ti alloy (femoral/tibial components), UHMWPE (patellar), Ti alloy (locking bar), Vitamin-E Highly Crosslinked polyethylene (VEHXPE) (tibial bearings). Fixation: Cemented or uncemented (porous coated). Sterilization: Identical to Persona system. No software or electronic components.
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients with painful, disabled knee joints due to osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, or traumatic arthritis involving one or more compartments; patients requiring correction of varus, valgus, or posttraumatic deformity; and patients requiring correction or revision of failed osteotomy, arthrodesis, or previous total joint replacement.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A knee joint patellofemorotibial polymer/metal/polymer semi-constrained cemented prosthesis is a device intended to be implanted to replace a knee joint. The device limits translation and rotation in one or more planes via the geometry of its articulating surfaces. It has no linkage across-the-joint. This generic type of device includes prostheses that have a femoral component made of alloys, such as cobalt-chromium-molybdenum, and a tibial component or components and a retropatellar resurfacing component made of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene. This generic type of device is limited to those prostheses intended for use with bone cement (§ 888.3027).
{0}------------------------------------------------
May 10, 2019
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image contains the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On the left is the Department of Health & Human Services logo. To the right of that is the FDA logo, which includes the letters "FDA" in a blue square, followed by the words "U.S. FOOD & DRUG" in blue, and then the word "ADMINISTRATION" in a smaller font size below.
Zimmer Inc. Charles Neitzel Senior Regulatory Affairs Specialist P.O. Box 708 Warsaw, Indiana 46581-0708
Re: K183583
Trade/Device Name: Vanguard Complete Knee System Regulation Number: 21 CFR 888.3560 Regulation Name: Knee Joint Patellofemorotibial Polymer Semi-Constrained Cemented Prosthesis Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: JWH, MBH, OIY Dated: April 4, 2019 Received: April 5, 2019
Dear Charles Neitzel:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part
{1}------------------------------------------------
801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/CombinationProducts/GuidanceRegulatoryInformation/ucm597488.htm); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (OS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/) and CDRH Learn (http://www.fda.gov/Training/CDRHLearn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (http://www.fda.gov/DICE) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
CAPT Raquel Peat, PhD, MPH, USPHS FOR Director DHT6A: Division of Joint Arthroplasty Devices OHT6: Office of Orthopedic Devices Office of Product Evaluation and Quality Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known)
K183583
Device Name
Vanguard Complete Knee System
#### Indications for Use (Describe)
1. Painful and disabled knee joint resulting from osteoarthritis traumatic arthritis where one or more compartments are involved;
2. Correction of varus, valgus, or posttraumatic deformity;
3. Correction or revision of unsuccessful osteotomy, arthrodesis, or failure of previous total joint replacement procedure.
Femoral components and tibial tray components with porous coatings are indicated for cemented biological fixation application. Non-coated (interlok®) devices and all polyethylene patellar components are indicated for cemented application only.
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) | |
|-------------------------------------------------|--|
|-------------------------------------------------|--|
X Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/3/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for Zimmer Biomet. The logo consists of a blue circle with a stylized letter "Z" inside. Below the circle, the word "zimmer" is written in lowercase blue letters. The font used for the word "zimmer" is sans-serif and appears to be a custom design.
K183583 - Page 1 of 3
P.O. Box 708 Warsaw, IN 46581-0708 574 267-6131
# 510(k) Summary
In accordance with 21 CFR \$807.92 and the Safe Medical Devices Act of 1990, the following information is provided for the Vanguard® Complete Knee System 510(k) premarket notification. The submission was prepared in accordance with the FDA guidance document, 'Format for Traditional and Abbreviated 510(k)s', issued on August 12, 2005.
| Sponsor: | Zimmer, Inc.<br>P.O. Box 708<br>Warsaw, IN 46581-0708 |
|-----------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Contact Person: | Charles Neitzel<br>Senior Specialist, Regulatory Affairs<br>Telephone: (262) 716-3243<br>Fax: (574) 372-4605 |
| Date: | December 21, 2018 |
| Trade Name: | Vanguard® Complete Knee System |
| Common Name: | Knee Bearing |
| Classification Names<br>and References: | <ul><li>JWH – Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer (21 CFR 888.3560)</li><li>MBH – Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Porous Coated, Polymer/Metal/Polymer (21 CFR 888.3565)</li><li>OIY – Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer + Additive/Metal/Polymer + Additive (21 CFR 888.3560)</li></ul> |
| Classification Panel: | Orthopedics/87 |
| Predicate Device(s): | Design Predicates: <ul><li>Vanguard® CR Knee System, manufactured by Biomet, K023546, cleared 01/17/2003</li><li>Vanguard® PS+ Knee System, manufactured by Biomet, K041046, cleared 05/21/2004</li><li>Vanguard® AS Tibial Bearings, manufactured by Biomet, K050222, cleared 08/16/2005</li><li>E1 Tibial Components (previously E-poly), manufactured by Biomet, K080528, cleared 06/17/2008</li></ul> |
{4}------------------------------------------------
- Vanguard® Complete Knee System, manufactured by Biomet, K113550, cleared 02/29/2012
## Material Predicate:
- Persona® Personalized Knee System. manufactured by Zimmer, K121771, cleared 11/07/2012
- Persona® Personalized Knee System, manufactured by Zimmer, K150090, cleared 05/20/2015
The purpose of this subject 510(k) is to introduce a modification to the tibial bearings within the Vanguard® Complete Knee System. There are no changes to the other components within the system.
The Vanguard® Complete Knee System is a total knee replacement system for either primary or revision knee arthroplasty. It is modular in design consisting of five components: a cobalt-chromium-molybdenum (Co-Cr-Mo) or Titanium (Ti) alloy femoral component, with either a porous plasma spray (PPS) or Interlok® surface finish; a cobalt-chromium-molybdenum (Co-Cr-Mo) or Titanium (Ti) alloy tibial tray; a patellar component, manufactured from polyethylene (UHMWPE); a locking bar, manufactured from a Titanium (Ti) alloy; and tibial bearings, manufactured from a Vitamin-E Highly Crosslinked polyethylene (VEHXPE).
1. Painful and disabled knee joint resulting from osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis traumatic arthritis where one or more compartments are involved; 2. Correction of varus, valgus, or posttraumatic deformity:
3. Correction or revision of unsuccessful osteotomy, arthrodesis, or failure of previous total joint replacement procedure.
Femoral components and tibial tray components with porous coatings are indicated for cemented and uncemented biological fixation application. Non-coated (interlok®) devices and all polyethylene patellar components are indicated for cemented application only.
Purpose and Device Description:
Intended Use:
{5}------------------------------------------------
## Summary of Technological Characteristics:
Summarv of Performance Data (Nonclinical and/or Clinical)
· Materials: Identical to the Persona Personalized Knee System predicate
- · Design Features: Similar to the Vanguard Complete Knee System predicate
The rationale for substantial equivalence is based on
· Intended Use: Identical to the predicates · Indications for Use: Identical to the Vanguard
Complete Knee System predicate
consideration of the following characteristics:
- · Sterilization: Identical to the Persona Personalized Knee System predicate
#### . Non-Clinical Tests:
Engineering analysis was conducted to demonstrate that the modifications did not adversely affect safety and efficacy, and to demonstrate substantial equivalence to the predicate components. The test reports are listed below:
- o Vivacit-E material characteristics presented in MAF-1868
- o Material and dimensional comparison of Vivacit-E to E1 tibial bearings
- 0 Evaluation of stress in manufacturing slots of Vivacit-E tibial bearings use finite element analysis
- o Laser etching of Vanguard Vivacit-E material
- o Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) compatibility
- o Pyrogenicity Testing
- Clinical Tests:
- o Clinical data was not deemed necessary for the subject device.
The subject device has the same intended use and indications for use as the Vanguard Complete Knee System predicate device. The subject device has similar technological characteristics to the predicates, and the performance data and analyses demonstrate that:
- any differences do not raise new questions of safety ● and effectiveness; and
- the proposed device is at least as safe and effective as o the legally marketed predicate devices.
# Substantial Equivalence Conclusion
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.