K121771 · Zimmer, Inc. · MBH · Nov 7, 2012 · Orthopedic
Device Facts
Record ID
K121771
Device Name
ZIMMER PERSONA THE PERSONALIZED KNEE SYSTEM
Applicant
Zimmer, Inc.
Product Code
MBH · Orthopedic
Decision Date
Nov 7, 2012
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 888.3565
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
This device is indicated for patients with severe knee pain and disability due to: - Rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, traumatic arthritis, polyarthritis. - Collagen disorders, and/or avascular necrosis of the femoral condyle. - Post-traumatic loss of joint configuration, particularly when there is patellofemoral erosion, dysfunction or prior patellectomy. - Moderate valgus, varus, or flexion deformities. - The salvage of previously failed surgical attempts or for a knee in which satisfactory stability in flexion cannot be obtained at the time of surgery. Porous coated tibial baseplate components may be used cemented or uncemented (biological fixation). All other femoral, tibial baseplates and all-polyethylene (UHMWPE and VEXLPE) patella components are indicated for cemented use only.
Device Story
The Zimmer Persona Personalized Knee System is a semi-constrained modular knee prosthesis designed to resurface articulating surfaces of femoral, tibial, and patellar bones. It utilizes a modular design between tibial plates and articular surfaces. Components include femoral, tibial, and patellar implants made of metal and polymer (UHMWPE/VEXLPE). Porous-coated tibial baseplates allow for cemented or uncemented (biological) fixation; other components are cemented. The device is used by orthopedic surgeons in a clinical/surgical setting to restore joint function and stability in patients with severe knee pain or deformity. It benefits patients by replacing damaged joint surfaces, reducing pain, and improving mobility. The system is compatible with MRI environments.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data was required or provided for this device. Substantial equivalence was established through non-clinical bench testing, including cantilever fatigue, wear testing per ISO 14243, spine fatigue, tibiofemoral constraint, contact area/pressure evaluations, and locking mechanism strength testing.
Technological Characteristics
Modular semi-constrained knee prosthesis. Materials: Trabecular Metal, Tivanium, UHMWPE, and Vivacit-E (Vitamin E highly crosslinked polyethylene). Fixation: Cemented or uncemented (porous-coated). Connectivity: None. Sterilization: Not specified. Software: None.
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients with severe knee pain and disability due to rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, traumatic arthritis, polyarthritis, collagen disorders, avascular necrosis of the femoral condyle, post-traumatic joint loss, or moderate valgus/varus/flexion deformities. Also indicated for salvage of failed surgical attempts or knee instability.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A knee joint patellofemorotibial metal/polymer porous-coated uncemented prosthesis is a device intended to be implanted to replace a knee joint. The device limits translation and rotation in one or more planes via the geometry of its articulating surfaces. It has no linkage across-the-joint. This generic type of device is designed to achieve biological fixation to bone without the use of bone cement. This identification includes fixed-bearing knee prostheses where the ultra high molecular weight polyethylene tibial bearing is rigidly secured to the metal tibial base plate.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The special control is FDA's guidance: “Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Knee Joint Patellofemorotibial and Femorotibial Metal/Polymer Porous-Coated Uncemented Prostheses; Guidance for Industry and FDA.” See § 888.1 for the availability of this guidance.
{0}------------------------------------------------
## K121771 (44)
P.O. Box 708 Warsaw. IN 46581-0708 574 267-6131
Image /page/0/Picture/2 description: The image shows the logo for Zimmer. The logo consists of a circle with a stylized "Z" inside, and the word "zimmer" is written in lowercase letters below the circle. The "Z" is bold and appears to be made of two curved lines.
NOV 7 2012
TX Summary of Safety and Effectiveness
Sponsor:
Contact Person:
Date:
Trade Name:
Product Codes / Device:
Regulation Numbers / Description:
Predicate Device:
Zimmer, Inc. P.O. Box 708 Warsaw, IN 46581-0708
Kelli Anderson Project Manager, Regulatory Affairs Telephone: (574) 371-8087 Fax: (574) 372-4605
June 12, 2012
Zimmer® Persona™ Personalized Knee System
MBH, OIY, JWH
21 CFR § 888.3565 - Knee joint patellofemorotibial metal/polymer porous-coated uncemented prosthesis
21 CFR & 888.3560 -- Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer + Additive/Metal/Polymer + Additive
21 CFR § 888.3560 - Knee joint patellofemorotibial polymer/metal/polymer semi-constrained cemented
PersonaTM Personalized Knee System (K113369, cleared March 27, 2012)
NexGen® Trabecular Metal™ Metal Tibial Tray (K072160, cleared September 5, 2007)
Vivacit-E® Vitamin E Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene Liners, manufactured by Zimmer, Inc. (K120370, cleared June 4, 2012)
EITM Antioxidant Infused Technology, Manufactured by Biomet Manufacturing Corp. (K100048, cleared March 9, 2010)
DePuy Attune Knee System, manufactured by DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. (K101433, cleared December 10, 2010)
{1}------------------------------------------------
K121771 (²/₄)
Device Description:
Intended Use:
The Zimmer® Persona™ Personalized Knee System is a semi-constrained modular knee prosthesis designed to resurface the articulating surface of the femoral, tibial and patellar bones. The Persona Knee System utilizes a modular design between the tibial plates and articular surfaces.
This device is indicated for patients with severe knee pain and disability due to:
- Rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, traumatic arthritis, । polyarthritis.
- Collagen disorders, and/or avascular necrosis of the ເ · femoral condyle.
- Post-traumatic loss of joint configuration, particularly when there is patellofemoral erosion, dysfunction or prior patellectomy.
- Moderate valgus, varus, or flexion deformities. —
- The salvage of previously failed surgical attempts or for l a knee in which satisfactory stability in flexion cannot be obtained at the time of surgery.
Porous coated tibial baseplate components may be used cemented or uncemented (biological fixation). All other femoral, tibial baseplates and all-polyethylene (UHMWPE and VEXLPE) patella components are indicated for cemented use only.
The proposed Zimmer® Persona™ Personalized Knee System components are similar or identical in intended use, materials, sterility, and performance characteristics to the predicate devices.
Clinical Performance and Conclusions:
Clinical data and conclusions were not needed for this device.
Non-Clinical Performance and Conclusions:
Vivacit-E material characteristics for the Persona Knee System are identical to the predicate Zimmer Vivacit-E Acetabular Polyethylene Liners (K120370). In contrast to conventional polyethylene, the Vivacit-E material is delamination resistant and exhibits a reduction in wear according to knee simulator bench testing.
# Comparison to Predicate Device:
Performance Data (Nonclinical and/or Clinical):
{2}------------------------------------------------
Bench testing outlined below was conducted according to FDA guidance documents:
| Property or<br>Characteristic | Test Results |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Cantilever Fatigue Test of the<br>Persona Trabecular Metal Tibia | Demonstrated adequate fatigue strength in the cantilever<br>loading condition. |
| Wear Testing of Persona CR<br>Vivacit-E UHMWPE Articular<br>Surfaces Under Load and Motion<br>Curves From the ISO 14243<br>Standard | Demonstrated that the wear characteristics of the Persona<br>CR articular surfaces, when articulated against the Persona<br>CR femoral component, are sufficient to survive expected in<br>vivo loading conditions. |
| Wear Testing of Persona PS Vivacit-<br>E UHMWPE Articular Surfaces<br>Under Load and Motion Curves<br>from the ISO 14243 Standard | Demonstrated that the wear characteristics of the Persona PS<br>and UC articular surfaces, when articulated against a<br>Persona femoral component, are sufficient to survive<br>expected in vivo loading conditions. |
| Spine Fatigue Evaluation of the<br>Persona PS Vivacit-E Articular<br>Surfaces | Demonstrated that the spine of the Persona PS Vivacit-E<br>articular surfaces has sufficient strength to survive expected<br>in vivo stress/strain loading conditions. |
| Tibiofemoral Constraint Evaluation<br>of the Persona CR/PS/UC Vivacit-E<br>UHMWPE Articular Surface | Demonstrated that constraint values for the Persona Vivacit-<br>E articular surfaces are comparable to data from the Persona<br>Conventional UHMWPE articular surfaces. Therefore, the<br>Persona Vivacit-E articular surfaces provide adequate<br>constraint through the needed tibiofemoral flexion angles. |
| Persona Vivacit-E Patella Contact<br>Area, Contact Pressure, and<br>Constraint Evaluation | Evaluated material properties of Vivacit-E and demonstrated<br>that when mated with a Persona femoral component, it has<br>sufficient mechanical strength to survive expected in-vivo<br>loading conditions and provide adequate constraint. |
| Tibiofemoral Contact Area and<br>Contact Pressure Evaluation of the<br>Persona CR/UC/PS Vivacit-E<br>UHMWPE Articular Surfaces | Demonstrated that the contact area and contact pressure of<br>the Persona Vivacit-E articular surfaces are comparable to<br>data from previous testing on Persona Conventional<br>UHMWPE articular surfaces. |
| Property or<br>Characteristic | Test Results |
| Anterior Liftoff Testing of the<br>Persona Vivacit-E Articular<br>Surfaces | Demonstrated sufficient locking mechanism strength to<br>survive potential worst case anterior liftoff loading<br>conditions during deep flexion. |
| Posterior Liftoff Fatigue Strength of<br>the Persona Vivacit-E Articular<br>Surfaces | Demonstrated sufficient locking mechanism strength to<br>survive potential worst case shear loading conditions. |
| Static Shear Strength of the Persona<br>Tibia Locking Mechanism | Demonstrated adequate resistance of the modular articular<br>surfaces to disassembly. |
| Modified Metallic Surface<br>Characterization for the Persona<br>Porous Two Peg Tibia Component<br>with Trabecular Metal | Evaluated the Trabecular Metal material according to<br>applicable mechanical, physical and chemical analyses listed<br>in the guidance document. |
| Static Tensile, Static Shear and<br>Shear Fatigue of Trabecular Metal<br>Diffusion Bonded to Tivanium -<br>One Hour Cycles | Demonstrated that one hour diffusion bonding cycles<br>produces a bond that meets the 20 MPa static tensile test<br>requirement. |
| Evaluation of Interactions of the<br>Zimmer Legacy Knee and Persona<br>Primary Implant Systems with the<br>Magnetic Fields in the Magnetic<br>Resonance Imaging (MRI)<br>Environment | Demonstrated safety and compatibility within the MRI<br>environment. |
{3}------------------------------------------------
.
{4}------------------------------------------------
#### DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
Public Health Service
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-002
NOV 7 2012
Zimmer. Inc. % Ms. Kelli J. Anderson Project Manager, Regulatory Affairs P.O. Box 708 Warsaw, Indiana 46581-0708
Re: K121771
Trade/Device Name: Persona™ Knee System Regulation Number: 21 CFR 888.3565 Regulation Name: Knee joint patellofemorotibial metal/polymer porous-coated uncemented prosthesis Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: MBH, JWH, OIY Dated: September 21, 2012 Received: September 24, 2012
Dear Ms. Anderson:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical
{5}------------------------------------------------
Page 2 - Ms. Kelli J. Anderson
device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please go to http://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/CentersOffices/CDRH/CDRHOffices/ucm115809.htm for the Center for Devices and Radiological Health's (CDRH's) Office of Compliance. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Resourcesfor You/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely yours,
# Erin | Keith
Mark N. Melkerson Director Division of Orthopedic Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{6}------------------------------------------------
#### Indications for Use
### 510(k) Number (if known): Unknown K |2177 |
#### Device Name:
Persona™ Knee System
#### Indications for Use:
This device is indicated for patients with severe knee pain and disability due to:
- Rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, traumatic arthritis, polyarthritis. —
- Collagen disorders, and/or avascular necrosis of the femoral condyle.
- Post-traumatic loss of joint configuration, particularly when there is patellofemoral erosion, dysfunction or prior patellectomy.
- Moderate valgus, varus, or flexion deformities. -
- The salvage of previously failed surgical attempts or for a knee in which satisfactory stability ー in flexion cannot be obtained at the time of surgery.
Porous coated tibial baseplate components may be used cemented (biological fixation). All other femoral, tibial baseplates and all-polyethylene (UHMWPE and VEXLPE) patella components are indicated for cemented use only.
Prescription Use _ X (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) AND/OR
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 807 Subpart C)
(Please do not write below this line - Continue on another page if needed)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
(Division Sign-Off) Division of Surgical, Orthopedic, and Restorative Devices
510(k) Number K121771
Page 1 of 1
CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY INFORMATION EXEMPT FROM DISCLOSURE UNDER FOI
ા ર
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.