K180249 · Matrix Surgical Holdings, LLC/Matrix Surgical USA · JEY · Oct 11, 2018 · Dental
Device Facts
Record ID
K180249
Device Name
OmniPore DUROMAX Surgical Implants
Applicant
Matrix Surgical Holdings, LLC/Matrix Surgical USA
Product Code
JEY · Dental
Decision Date
Oct 11, 2018
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 872.4760
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
OmniPore® DUROMAX® Surgical Implants are intended for non-weight bearing applications of maxillofacial and orbital reconstruction, cosmetic surgery and repair of maxillofacial and orbital trauma.
Device Story
OmniPore DUROMAX Surgical Implants consist of porous high-density polyethylene (HDPE) embedded with pure titanium; designed for non-weight bearing maxillofacial and orbital reconstruction/trauma repair. Implants feature interconnecting open pore structure to facilitate fibrovascular tissue ingrowth. Titanium component allows surgeon to curve/round the implant to fit patient anatomy; provides radiopacity for post-operative CT visualization. Implants are single-use, provided sterile via ethylene oxide. Used by surgeons in clinical settings; secured via sutures, wires, or 1.5 mm titanium screws. Device provides structural support for orbital skeletal framework; benefits patient through restoration of contour and skeletal integrity.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Biocompatibility testing per ISO 10993-1 (cytotoxicity, irritation, material-mediated pyrogenicity). Sterilization validation per ISO 11135 (SAL 10^-6). EO residuals per ISO 10993-7. Non-pyrogenic per USP <161>, <85>, <151>. Mechanical testing included impact (ASTM D5420), purity (USP <661>), porosity/ingrowth (ASTM D4284), and performance testing (bend, trim/cut, globe support, fixation).
Technological Characteristics
Materials: Porous high-density polyethylene (HDPE) and pure titanium (ASTM F67, ISO 5832-2). Principle: Structural implant with interconnecting open pore structure for tissue ingrowth. Form factor: Various sizes, trimmable/shapeable. Fixation: Sutures, wires, or 1.5 mm titanium screws. Radiopaque. Sterilization: Ethylene oxide. No software/algorithm.
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients requiring non-weight bearing maxillofacial and orbital reconstruction, cosmetic surgery, or repair of maxillofacial and orbital trauma.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A bone plate is a metal device intended to stabilize fractured bone structures in the oral cavity. The bone segments are attached to the plate with screws to prevent movement of the segments.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image contains the logos of the Department of Health & Human Services and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The Department of Health & Human Services logo is on the left, featuring a stylized symbol. To the right is the FDA logo, with the letters "FDA" in a blue square, followed by the words "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" in blue text.
Matrix Surgical Holdings, LLC/Matrix Surgical USA John O'Shaughnessy President/CEO
October 11, 2018
4025 Welcome All Road - Suite 120 Atlanta, GA 30349
Re: K180249
Trade/Device Name: OmniPore® DUROMAX® Surgical Implants Regulation Number: 21 CFR 872.4760 Regulation Name: Bone Plate Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: JEY Dated: October 10, 2018 Received: September 13, 2018
Dear Julie Stephens:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some cleared products may instead be combination products. The 510(k) Premarket Notification Database located at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm identifies combination product submissions. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's
{1}------------------------------------------------
requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/CombinationProducts/GuidanceRegulatoryInformation/ucm597488.htm); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (OS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and, if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/) and CDRH Learn (http://www.fda.gov/Training/CDRHLearn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (http://www.fda.gov/DICE) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
Mary S. Runner -S3
For Tina Kiang, Ph.D. Acting Director Division of Anesthesiology, General Hospital, Respiratory, Infection Control, and Dental Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K180249
Device Name OmniPore® DUROMAX® Surgical Implants
Indications for Use (Describe)
OmniPore® DUROMAX® Surgical Implants are intended for non-weight bearing applications of maxillofacial and orbital reconstruction, cosmetic surgery and repair of maxillofacial and orbital trauma.
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
| <div style="display:flex; align-items:center;"> <input checked="true" type="checkbox"/> <span>Repetitive Use (Part 21 CFR 321 Subpart B)</span> </div> |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| <div style="display:flex; align-items:center;"> <input type="checkbox"/> <span>One-Time Contact Use (21 CFR 361.1)</span> </div> |
> Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
| | Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
### Matrix Surgical USA Traditional 510(k) K180249 - OmniPore® DUROMAX® Surgical Implants
# 510(k) Summarv
This 510(k) summary of safety and effectiveness information is being submitted in accordance with the requirements under 21 CFR 807.92.
| Submitted By: | Matrix Surgical Holdings, LLC dba Matrix Surgical USA<br>4025 Welcome All Road - Suite 120<br>Atlanta, GA 30349<br>Phone: (404) 869-3794 |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Contact Person: | Julie Stephens, President/Consultant<br>Regulatory Resources Group, Inc.<br>Phone: (678) 513-0693 |
| Date Submitted: | REVISED - October 10, 2018 |
Device Name and Classification:
| Trade/Proprietary Name: | OmniPore® DUROMAX® Surgical Implants |
|-------------------------|--------------------------------------|
| Common Name: | Bone Plate |
| Classification Name: | Bone Plate |
| Regulation: | 21 CFR 872.4760 |
| Class: | II |
| Product Code: | JEY |
# Legally Marketed Predicate Devices:
Predicate: Synthes USA New Sterile Orbital Plates - 510(k) # K031761 Reference: OmniPore® Surgical Implants - 510(k) # K123908 Synthes [SynPOR] Porous Polyethylene Implants - 510(k) # K051879
# Device Description:
The OmniPore DUROMAX Surgical Implants are an extension within the family of OmniPore Surgical Implants. OmniPore DUROMAX Surgical Implants include the addition of pure titanium within the porous high-density polyethylene. They are marketed as single use sterile implants with various sizes.
The material used for the OmniPore DUROMAX Surgical Implants is a porous high-density (HD) polyethylene. Polyethylene has a long history of use in surgical implantable products. The interconnecting open pore structure of the implants allow for tissue ingrowth. Both of the materials used to manufacture the OmniPore DUROMAX Surgical Implants, the porous HD polyethylene and pure titanium, have been utilized in reconstruction and soft tissue repair for many years. There is a long history of the use of porous polyethylene and titanium implants for enucleation and evisceration, as well as for reconstruction/cosmetic surgery and repair of the orbital skeletal framework, including orbital floors, walls, rims and roof, with a history of safety and performance. The interconnecting open pore structure of the OmniPore DUROMAX Surgical Implants allow for tissue ingrowth. Additionally, animal histology has shown fibrovascular ingrowth occurs into the open pore structure of porous surgical implants. The other advantage to the OmniPore DUROMAX Surgical Implants is that the titanium structure can be curved or rounded and will hold that shape in the internal orbital skeletal framework. The titanium material contained in OmniPore DUROMAX Surgical Implant is also radiopaque
{4}------------------------------------------------
# Matrix Surqical USA Traditional 510(k) K180249 - OmniPore® DUROMAX® Surgical Implants
# 510(k) Summarv
on post-operative CT (computed tomography) scans. The implants are single use and provided sterile by ethylene oxide (EO) terminal sterilization.
Indications for Use:
OmniPore® DUROMAX® Surgical Implants are intended for non-weight bearing applications of maxillofacial and orbital reconstruction, cosmetic surgery and repair of maxillofacial and orbital trauma.
| Predicate Device<br>510(k) #: K031761 | Reference Predicate Device<br>510(k) #: K123908 | Reference Predicate Device<br>510(k) #: K051879 |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Synthes USA New / Sterile<br>Orbital Plates | OmniPore® Surgical Implants | Synthes [SynPOR] Porous<br>Polyethylene Implants |
| The Synthes Craniofacial<br>Plates are intended for use<br>in selective trauma of the<br>midface and craniofacial<br>skeleton; craniofacial<br>surgery; reconstructive<br>procedures; and selective<br>orthognathic surgery of the<br>maxilla and chin. | OmniPore Surgical Implants in block,<br>sheet, and anatomical shapes are<br>intended for non-weight bearing<br>applications of craniofacial<br>reconstruction/cosmetic surgery and<br>repair of craniofacial trauma.<br>OmniPore Surgical Implants are also<br>intended for the augmentation or<br>restoration of contour in the<br>craniomaxillofacial skeleton. | Synthes Porous<br>Polyethylene implants are<br>intended for use in non-load<br>bearing applications in<br>craniofacial reconstruction,<br>cosmetic surgery, and repair<br>of craniofacial trauma. |
Comparison of Indications of Use to the Predicate Devices
The Indications for Use statement for OmniPore DUROMAX are equivalent to the predicate and reference predicate devices except for the difference of anatomical locations. This 510(k) submission includes the OmniPore DUROMAX Surgical Implants as a subset of the OmniPore Surgical Implants and are currently specific to "maxillofacial and orbital" anatomical locations and the Synthes 510(k)s, predicate and reference, included implants that were indicated for the cranial locations.
# Technological Characteristics:
Comparison of Technological Characteristics to the Predicate Devices
The OmniPore DUROMAX Surgical Implants and the predicate devices have the same principles of operation to reconstruct the orbital floor and/or medial wall. The OmniPore DUROMAX Surgical Implants and the Synthes [SynPOR] Implants use the same materials, pure titanium embedded within porous high-density polyethylene. The Synthes Orbital plates include only pure titanium and the OmniPore Surgical Implants include only porous highdensity polyethylene. The dimensions of the implants are similar. The proposed and predicate implants can all be trimmed and shaped to fit specific curvature and shapes of the individual patient's anatomy. The proposed and predicate implants can all be used with the same fixation methods such as suture, wire, and/or fixation screws. Synthes recommends using the fixation screws they market and OmniPore recommends 1.5 mm titanium screws marketed by Biomet within their Facial and Neuro plate systems cleared under 510(k) # K121589 and # K121624. The proposed and predicate implants are permanent implants, provided sterile, single patient use only, and have non-pyrogenic claims. See Comparison Table on next page.
{5}------------------------------------------------
# Matrix Surgical USA Traditional 510(k) K180249 - OmniPore® DUROMAX® Surgical Implants
# 510(k) Summarv
# Comparison of Technological Characteristics to the Predicate Devices (Continued)
| Proposed Device<br>510(k) #: K180249 | Predicate Device<br>510(k) #: K031761 | Reference Predicate<br>Device<br>510(k) #: K123908 | Reference Predicate<br>Device<br>510(k) #: K051879 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------|
| OmniPore DUROMAX<br>Surgical Implants | Synthes USA New /<br>Sterile Orbital Plates | OmniPore® Surgical<br>Implants | Synthes [SynPOR]<br>Porous Polyethylene<br>Implants |
| Anatomical Locations:<br>Implants for orbital or maxillofacial skeleton | | Anatomical Locations:<br>Implants for craniofacial skeleton which includes<br>orbital and maxillofacial skeleton | |
| Materials:<br>• HDPE<br>• Pure titanium | Materials:<br>• Pure titanium | Materials:<br>• HDPE | Materials:<br>• HDPE<br>• Pure titanium |
| Dimensions:<br>Titanium Material: Thickness - 0.2, 0.3 and 0.4 mm<br>HDPE Material: Thickness - 0.8, 1.0, 1.5, and 1.6 mm; Height (over Titanium) - 35 to 38 mm<br>Implant: Height - 43 to 50 mm; Width - 43 to 79 mm | | | |
| Fixation Methods:<br>For use with sutures,<br>K-wire, or 1.5 mm<br>titanium screws | Fixation Methods:<br>For use with 1.0 mm<br>or 1.3 mm titanium<br>screws | Fixation Methods:<br>For use with sutures,<br>K-wire, or surgical<br>fixation screws | Fixation Methods:<br>Compatible with 1.3<br>mm titanium screws |
Summary of Testing:
The biocompatibility risk assessment was completed as directed by FDA quidance under ISO 10993-1 and Parts 5, 10, and 11 biocompatibility requirements. Cytotoxicity, Irritation, and Material-Mediated Pyrogenicity testing was completed to demonstrate and support justification that the known biocompatible materials, HDPE reviewed under OmniPore Surgical Implants 510(k) # 123908, and the addition of pure titanium per ASTM F67 and ISO 5832-2 standards maintained compliance through manufacturing and sterilization for the final implants. Compliance was iustified for the OmniPore DUROMAX Surgical Implants against previous sterilization validation per ISO 11135 with Sterility Assurance Level (SAL) at 108 and EO Residuals requirements per ISO 10993-7 were met. The OmniPore DUROMAX Surgical Implants are non-pyrogenic per USP <161>, USP <85>, and USP <151>. Compliance was justified aqainst previous five (5) year shelf life testing and previous mechanical testing specific to impact testing per ASTM D5420, purity testing per USP <661>, porosity and ingrowth testing per ASTM D4284 to the OmniPore Surgical Implants. Additional bench testing including bend, trim/cut, globe support, and fixation was completed to demonstrate that the addition of the titanium material supports substantial equivalence for the OmniPore DURÓMAX Surgical Implants [proposed device] to the OmniPore Surgical Implants [reference predicate device].
# Substantial Equivalence Conclusions:
The OmniPore DUROMAX Surgical Implants [proposed device] have the same principles of operation, an anatomical subpart of the general Indications for Use, and technological characteristics as the predicate devices.
The term "substantial equivalence" as used in this 510(k) notification is limited to the definition of substantial equivalence found in the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, as amended and as applied under 21CFR 807, Subpat E under which a device can be market without premarket approval or reclassification. A determination of substantial equivalence under this notification is not intended to nor does it have any bearing whatsoever on the resolution of patent infringement or any other patent matters. No statements related to or in support of substantial equivalence herein shall be construed as an admission against interest under the US Patent Laws or their application by the courts.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.