General Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKR) Indications: Painful, disabling joint disease of the knee resulting from: noninflammatory degenerative joint disease (including osteoarthritis, traumatic arthritis, or avascular necrosis), rheumatoid arthritis or post-traumatic arthritis. Post-traumatic loss of knee joint configuration and function. Moderate varus, valgus, or flexion deformity in which the ligamentous structures can be returned to adequate function and stability. Revision of previous unsuccessful knee replacement or other procedure. Fracture of the distal femur and/or proximal tibia that cannot be standard fracture -management techniques. The Triathlon® Tritanium® Total Knee System components are indicated for both uncemented use. The Triathlon® Total Knee System beaded and beaded with Peri-Apatite components are intended for uncemented use only. The Triathlon® All Polyethylene tibial components are indicated for cemented use only. Additional Indications for Posterior Stabilized (PS) and Total Stabilizer (TS) Components: Ligamentous instability requiring implant bearing surface geometries with increased constraint. Absent or non-functioning posterior cruciate ligament. Severe anteroposterior instability of the knee joint. Additional Indications for Total Stabilizer (TS) Components: Severe instability of the knee secondary to compromised collateral ligament integrity or function. Indications for Bone Augments: Painful, disabling joint disease of the knee secondary to: degenerative arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, or post-traumatic arthritis, complicated by the presence of bone loss. Salvage of previous unsuccessful total knee replacement or other surgical procedure, accompanied by bone loss. Additional Indications for Cone Augments: Severe degeneration or trauma requiring extensive resection and replacement. Femoral and Tibial bone voids. Metaphyseal reconstruction. The Triathlon TS Cone Augments are intended for cemented or cementless use.
Device Story
Triathlon Total Knee System provides orthopedic knee joint replacement components; includes intermediate thickness tibial inserts (10mm, 12mm, 14mm) for Cruciate Retaining (CR), Cruciate Substituting (CS), and Posterior Stabilizing (PS) configurations. Components function as mechanical implants to restore joint function; inserts interface with existing femoral and tibial baseplate components via established locking wire features. Used in surgical settings by orthopedic surgeons for total knee arthroplasty. Output is a reconstructed knee joint; benefits include pain relief, restored joint stability, and improved mobility. Subject devices include MR Conditional labeling for intermediate inserts and previously cleared X3 ETO components.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data. Substantial equivalence based on non-clinical bench testing, including material characterization (ASTM F648, F2565), biocompatibility (ISO 10993-1), sterilization validation (ISO 11135), wear testing (ISO/DIS 14243-3), static shear/locking mechanism testing, and fatigue testing (single and multi-axis). MR safety evaluated per ASTM F2052, F2213, F2119, and F2182.
Technological Characteristics
Materials: UHMWPE (X3 ETO and N2Vac). Design: Tibial inserts with condylar geometry and locking wire features. Sterilization: Ethylene Oxide. Connectivity: None. MR Conditional status per ASTM F2052, F2213, F2119, F2182. Testing standards: ASTM F648, ASTM F2565, EN ISO 10993-1, EN ISO 11135, ISO/DIS 14243-3, ANSI/AAMI ST72.
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients with painful, disabling knee joint disease (osteoarthritis, traumatic/rheumatoid arthritis, avascular necrosis), post-traumatic loss of function, deformity (varus, valgus, flexion), revision needs, or distal femur/proximal tibia fractures. PS/TS components indicated for ligamentous instability, absent posterior cruciate ligament, or severe anteroposterior/collateral instability. Bone/cone augments indicated for bone loss or metaphyseal reconstruction.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A knee joint patellofemorotibial metal/polymer porous-coated uncemented prosthesis is a device intended to be implanted to replace a knee joint. The device limits translation and rotation in one or more planes via the geometry of its articulating surfaces. It has no linkage across-the-joint. This generic type of device is designed to achieve biological fixation to bone without the use of bone cement. This identification includes fixed-bearing knee prostheses where the ultra high molecular weight polyethylene tibial bearing is rigidly secured to the metal tibial base plate.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The special control is FDA's guidance: “Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Knee Joint Patellofemorotibial and Femorotibial Metal/Polymer Porous-Coated Uncemented Prostheses; Guidance for Industry and FDA.” See § 888.1 for the availability of this guidance.
Predicate Devices
Triathlon X3 ETO Tibial Inserts and Patellar Components (K172634)
Triathlon CS Total Knee System X3 and N2Vac Tibial Inserts (K063423, K141056, K172326)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The logo consists of two parts: the Department of Health and Human Services logo on the left and the FDA logo on the right. The FDA logo is a blue square with the letters "FDA" in white, followed by the words "U.S. FOOD & DRUG" in blue and "ADMINISTRATION" in a smaller font size.
February 2, 2018
Stryker Orthopaedics Margaret Crowe Klippel Sr. Principal Regulatory Affairs Project Manager 325 Corporate Drive Mahwah, New Jersey 07430
### Re: K173849
Trade/Device Name: Triathlon Total Knee System Regulation Number: 21 CFR 888.3565 Regulation Name: Knee Joint Patellofemorotibial Metal/Polymer Porous-Coated Uncemented Prosthesis Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: MBH, JWH Dated: December 18, 2017 Received: December 19, 2017
## Dear Margaret Klippel:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food. Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820);
{1}------------------------------------------------
and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/) and CDRH Learn (http://www.fda.gov/Training/CDRHLearn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (http://www.fda.gov/DICE) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely,
# Katherine D. Kavlock -S
for Mark N. Melkerson Director Division of Orthopedic Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
## Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K173849
Device Name Triathlon Total Knee System
#### Indications for Use (Describe)
General Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKR) Indications:
· Painful, disabling joint disease of the knee resulting from: noninflammatory degenerative joint disease (including osteoarthritis, traumatic arthritis, or avascular necrosis), rheumatoid arthritis or post-traumatic arthritis.
- · Post-traumatic loss of knee joint configuration and function.
- · Moderate varus, valgus, or flexion deformity in which the ligamentous structures can be returned to adequate function and stability.
- · Revision of previous unsuccessful knee replacement or other procedure.
- · Fracture of the distal femur and/or proximal tibia that cannot be standard fracture -management techniques.
The Triathlon® Tritanium® Total Knee System components are indicated for both uncemented use.
The Triathlon® Total Knee System beaded and beaded with Peri-Apatite components are intended for uncemented use only.
The Triathlon® All Polyethylene tibial components are indicated for cemented use only.
Additional Indications for Posterior Stabilized (PS) and Total Stabilizer (TS) Components:
- · Ligamentous instability requiring implant bearing surface geometries with increased constraint.
- · Absent or non-functioning posterior cruciate ligament.
- · Severe anteroposterior instability of the knee joint.
Additional Indications for Total Stabilizer (TS) Components:
- · Severe instability of the knee secondary to compromised collateral ligament integrity or function.
Indications for Bone Augments:
• Painful, disabling joint disease of the knee secondary to: degenerative arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, or post-traumatic arthritis, complicated by the presence of bone loss.
- · Salvage of previous unsuccessful total knee replacement or other surgical procedure, accompanied by bone loss.
Additional Indications for Cone Augments:
- · Severe degeneration or trauma requiring extensive resection and replacement
- · Femoral and Tibial bone voids
- Metaphyseal reconstruction
The Triathlon TS Cone Augments are intended for cemented or cementless use.
{3}------------------------------------------------
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
x | Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
#### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
#### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{4}------------------------------------------------
#### 510(k) Summary
| Sponsor | Stryker Orthopaedics<br>325 Corporate Drive<br>Mahwah, NJ 07430 |
|----------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Contact Person | Margaret Klippel<br>Senior Principal Regulatory Affairs Project Manager<br>Howmedica Osteonics Corp<br>325 Corporate Drive<br>Mahwah, NJ 07430<br>Phone: (201) 831-5559 |
| Alternate Contact | Kristen Meany<br>Sr. Manager, Regulatory Affairs<br>Howmedica Osteonics Corp<br>325 Corporate Drive<br>Mahwah, NJ 07430<br>Phone: (201) 972-9164 |
| Date Prepared: | December 15, 2017 |
| Proprietary Name: | Triathlon Total Knee System |
| Common Name: | Total Knee Joint Replacement |
| Classification Name: | Knee joint patellofemorotibial metal/polymer porous-coated<br>uncemented prosthesis. (888.3565)<br>Knee joint patellofemorotibial polymer/metal/polymer semi-<br>constrained cemented prosthesis (888.3560) |
Product Codes: MBH, JWH
## Legally Marketed Device to Which Substantial Equivalence is Claimed:
- Triathlon X3 ETO Tibial Inserts and Patellar Components K172634 ●
- Triathlon CR N2Vac Tibial Inserts K040267, K042883, K051380, K141056, K172326 ●
- . Triathlon PS N2Vac Tibial Inserts - K031729, K051380, K141056, K172326
- Triathlon CS Total Knee System X3 and N2Vac Tibial Inserts - K063423, K141056, K172326
### Device Description:
The subject Triathlon Intermediate Tibial Inserts will be available in the following configurations:
- Cruciate Retaining (CR) intermediate thicknesses of inserts (10mm, 12m, 14mm) will . be added to the previously cleared size range of 9mm, 13mm, 16mm and 19mm
{5}------------------------------------------------
- Cruciate Substituting (CS) intermediate thicknesses of inserts (10mm, 12mm and ● 14mm) will be added to the previously cleared size range of 9mm, 11mm, 13mm, 16mm, 19mm, 22mm and 25mm
- Posterior Stabilizing (PS) intermediate thicknesses of inserts (10mm. 12mm and . 14mm) will be added to the previously cleared size range of 9mm, 11mm, 13mm, 16mm, 19mm, 22mm and 25mm
The design of these inserts are identical to the predicate devices in terms of condylar geometry. post dimensions (in PS design) and locking wire feature. The inserts will be available in X3 ETO, and N2Vac styles.
Additionally. MR Conditional labeling is being added for the subject intermediate thickness inserts as well as those X3 ETO tibial inserts and patellar components previously cleared in premarket notification K172634.
### Intended Use:
The subject devices have the same intended use as those specified in the 510(k) submissions for the predicate devices listed.
## Indications:
General Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKR) Indications:
- Painful, disabling joint disease of the knee resulting from: noninflammatory degenerative 0 joint disease (including osteoarthritis, traumatic arthritis, or avascular necrosis), rheumatoid arthritis or post-traumatic arthritis.
- Post-traumatic loss of knee joint configuration and function. ●
- Moderate varus, valgus, or flexion deformity in which the ligamentous structures can be returned to adequate function and stability.
- Revision of previous unsuccessful knee replacement or other procedure. ●
- Fracture of the distal femur and/or proximal tibia that cannot be stabilized by standard ● fracture -management techniques.
The Triathlon® Tritanium® Total Knee System components are indicated for both uncemented and cemented use.
The Triathlon® Total Knee System beaded and beaded with Peri-Apatite components are intended for uncemented use only.
The Triathlon® All Polyethylene tibial components are indicated for cemented use only.
Additional Indications for Posterior Stabilized (PS) and Total Stabilizer (TS) Components:
- . Ligamentous instability requiring implant bearing surface geometries with increased constraint.
- Absent or non-functioning posterior cruciate ligament. ●
- Severe anteroposterior instability of the knee joint. o
{6}------------------------------------------------
Additional Indications for Total Stabilizer (TS) Components:
- Severe instability of the knee secondary to compromised collateral ligament integrity or function.
Indications for Bone Augments:
- Painful, disabling joint disease of the knee secondary to: degenerative arthritis, o rheumatoid arthritis, or post-traumatic arthritis, complicated by the presence of bone loss.
- Salvage of previous unsuccessful total knee replacement or other surgical procedure, ● accompanied by bone loss.
Additional Indications for Cone Augments:
- Severe degeneration or trauma requiring extensive resection and replacement ●
- Femoral and Tibial bone voids ●
- Metaphyseal reconstruction
The Triathlon TS Cone Augment components are intended for cemented or cementless use.
#### Summary of Technological Characteristics:
The subject Triathlon X3 ETO and N2Vac Intermediate Tibial Inserts are identical in intended use, indications, materials, terminal sterilization method and operational principles as the predicate devices. The subject intermediate tibial inserts are different from the predicate device in terms of thicknesses – these intermediate inserts will be available in 10mm, 12mm, and 14mm.
#### Non-Clinical Testing:
Material characterization of the X3 ETO material and the N2Vac material has been previously presented in premarket notifications for predicate devices. The material properties are unchanged for these predicates - this previous characterization was provided in support of substantial equivalence.
The design of the subject Triathlon intermediate insert thicknesses was analyzed, and it was concluded that these new insert thicknesses do not create a new worst case for minimum or maximum material thickness, contact area/stress, moments and forces required for disassociation. Previous testing performed for the predicate devices is representative of the subject intermediate thicknesses. These tests include:
- 1) Material Testing per ASTM F648, ASTM F2565, and FDA Guidance, "Characterization of Ultrahigh Molecular Weight Polyethylene (UHMWPE) Used in Orthopedic Devices" (February 12, 2016).
- 2) Biocompatibility Testing per EN ISO 10993-1:2010 and FDA Guidance, "Use of International Standard ISO 10993-1. "Biological evaluation of medical devices - Part 1: Evaluation and testing within a risk management process" (June 16, 2016)
- 3) Ethylene Oxide Sterilization Validation per EN ISO 11135:2014
{7}------------------------------------------------
- 4) Wear Test based on ISO/DIS 14243-3:2014
- 5) Static Shear Insert Baseplate Locking Mechanism Test
- 6) Single Axis Fatigue Test
- 7) Multi-Axis Fatigue Test
The subject Triathlon intermediate thickness tibial inserts, as well as the Triathlon X3 ETO tibial inserts and patellar components cleared in K172634, were evaluated to determine if these devices created a new worst case for image artifact, magnetically induced torque, magnetically induced displacement, and RF induced heating. These subject devices do not create a new worst case as compared to those Triathlon Total Knee components previously cleared in K172326. The subject devices are considered to be MR Conditional. This analysis reviewed testing performed to the following ASTM standards:
- . Magnetically Inducted Displacement Force – performed per ASTM F2052-15, Standard Test Method for Measurement of Magnetically Induced Displacement Force on Medical Devices in the MR Environment
- Magnetically Induced Torque - performed per ASTM F2213-06 (Reapproved 2011), Standard Test Method for Measurement of Magnetically Induced Torque on Medical Devices in the MR Environment
- Image Artifact performed per ASTM F2119-07 (Reapproved 2013). Standard Test Method ● for Evaluation of MR Image Artifacts from passive Implants
- Heating by RF Fields per ASTM F2182-11a, Standard Test Method for Measurement of Radio Frequency Induced Heating near Passive Implants during MR Imaging
Bacterial endotoxin testing (BET) as specified in ANSVAAMI ST72:2011 was used for pyrogenicity testing on the subject devices to achieve an Endotoxin limit of <20 EU/Device.
Clinical Testing: Clinical testing was not required as a basis for substantial equivalence.
Conclusion: The Triathlon® Knee System X3 ETO and N2Vac Tibial Inserts are substantially equivalent to the predicate devices identified in this premarket notification.
Device comparison showed that the proposed device is substantially equivalent in intended use, materials, and performance characteristics to the predicate device. The proposed modifications do not affect safety or effectiveness.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.