K172511 · C.R. Bard, Inc. · LJS · Apr 20, 2018 · General Hospital
Device Facts
Record ID
K172511
Device Name
Hickman TriFusion Catheter
Applicant
C.R. Bard, Inc.
Product Code
LJS · General Hospital
Decision Date
Apr 20, 2018
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 880.5970
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
The Hickman® TriFusion™ Triple Lumen Long-Term Central Venous Catheter is indicated for use in attaining short term or long term vascular access for intravenous infusion therapy and blood sampling via the internal jugular vein, external jugular vein, and subclavian vein. All Hickman® TriFusion™ catheters are designed for apheresis, and the administration of I.V. fluids, blood products, drugs, and parenteral nutrition solutions, as well as blood withdrawal. The Hickman® TriFusion™ catheter incorporates three large, equal size lumens appropriate for apheresis.
Device Story
Hickman® TriFusion™ Catheter is a triple-lumen, radiopaque, polyurethane central venous catheter; designed for long-term vascular access (>30 days). Device features three equal-sized lumens with a stepped atraumatic tip; proximal end includes Luer connectors, occlusion clamps, and priming volume ID tags. Used in clinical settings for apheresis, blood withdrawal, and infusion of fluids/medications. Operated by healthcare professionals. Device provides stable venous access; facilitates multi-therapy administration and blood sampling. Subject device utilizes different material formulations for Luer connectors compared to predicate; otherwise maintains identical design and function.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. No clinical data presented. Performance verified via mechanical testing (burst strength, tensile, leak, flow rates, radiopacity) per ISO 10555-1, ISO 594-1/2, and ASTM F640. Biocompatibility confirmed per ISO 10993 series (cytotoxicity, sensitization, toxicity, genotoxicity, implantation, hemocompatibility). Sterilization validated per ANSI/AAMI/ISO 11135.
Technological Characteristics
Triple-lumen, radiopaque polyurethane catheter; 12 Fr size; up to 27 cm length. Materials: Isoplast® 2510 Polyurethane with PolyOne Gray colorant (Luer connectors). Standards: ISO 10555-1 (tensile/general), ISO 594-1/2 (Luer fittings), ASTM F640 (radiopacity), ISO 10993 (biocompatibility). Sterilization: Ethylene Oxide (ANSI/AAMI/ISO 11135).
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients requiring short or long-term vascular access for IV infusion therapy, blood sampling, apheresis, administration of IV fluids, blood products, drugs, and parenteral nutrition via internal jugular, external jugular, or subclavian veins.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A percutaneous, implanted, long-term intravascular catheter is a device that consists of a slender tube and any necessary connecting fittings, such as luer hubs, and accessories that facilitate the placement of the device. The device allows for repeated access to the vascular system for long-term use of 30 days or more, and it is intended for administration of fluids, medications, and nutrients; the sampling of blood; and monitoring blood pressure and temperature. The device may be constructed of metal, rubber, plastic, composite materials, or any combination of these materials and may be of single or multiple lumen design.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls) Guidance Document: “Guidance on Premarket Notification [510(k)] Submission for Short-Term and Long-Term Intravascular Catheters.”
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On the left is the Department of Health & Human Services logo. To the right of that is the FDA logo in blue. Underneath the FDA logo is the text "U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION".
April 20, 2018
C.R. Bard, Inc Mona Shahrebani Regulatory Affairs Specialist 605 North 5600 West Salt Lake City, Utah 84116
Re: K172511
Trade/Device Name: Hickman® TriFusion™ Catheter Regulation Number: 21 CFR 880.5970 Regulation Name: Percutaneous, Implanted, Long-Term Intravascular Catheter Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: LJS Dated: March 23, 2018 Received: March 26, 2018
Dear Mona Shahrebani:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
{1}------------------------------------------------
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (OS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
For comprehensive regulatory information about mediation-emitting products, including information about labeling regulations, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/) and CDRH Learn (http://www.fda.gov/Training/CDRHLearn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (http://www.fda.gov/DICE) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
Sincerely.
Tina Kiang
-s
Tina Kiang, Ph.D. Acting Director Division of Anesthesiology, General Hospital, Respiratory, Infection Control, and Dental Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
#### DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration
# Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known)
### K172511
Device Name Hickman® TriFusion™ Catheter
### Indications for Use (Describe)
The Hickman® TriFusion™ Triple Lumen Long-Term Central Venous Catheter is indicated for use in attaining short term or long term vascular access for intravenous infusion therapy and blood sampling via the internal jugular vein, external jugular yein, and subclavian vein. All Hickman® TriFusion™ catheters are designed for apheresis, and the administration of I.V. fluids, blood products, drugs, and parenteral nutrition solutions, as well as blood withdrawal. The Hickman® TriFusion™ catheter incorporates three large, equal size lumens appropriate for apheres.
| Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable) | |
|-------------------------------------------------|--|
|-------------------------------------------------|--|
> Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
### CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
### *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW."
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff(@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
Form Approved: OMB No. 0910-0120 Expiration Date: 06/30/2020 See PRA Statement below.
{3}------------------------------------------------
K172511 Hickman TriFusion Catheter 510(k) Summary 21 CFR 807.92
As required by the Safe Medical Devices Act of 1990, coded under Section 513, Part (I)(3)(A) of the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, a 510(k) summary upon which substantial equivalence determination is based is as follows:
Submitter Information: Bard Access Systems, Inc. (BAS) 605 North 5600 West Salt Lake City, Utah 84116 Phone: (801) 522-5967 Fax: (801) 522-4907 Contact Person: Mona Shahrebani, Regulatory Affairs Specialist April 13, 2018 Date of Submission: Subject Device: Hickman® TriFusion™ Catheter Common or Usual Name: Long-Term Intravascular Catheter Classification Name: Catheter, Intravascular, Therapeutic, Long-Term greater than 30 days Regulatory Class: Class II Requlation Number: 21 CFR 880.5970 FDA Product Code: LIS Hickman® TriFusion™ Catheter Predicate Device: Common or Usual Name: Long-Term Intravascular Catheter Premarket Notification: K041088 Classification Name: Catheter, Intravascular, Therapeutic, Long-Term Greater Than 30 days Regulatory Class: Class II Requlation Number: 21 CFR 880.5970 FDA Product Code: പട
{4}------------------------------------------------
# Device Description:
The device description of the subject Hickman TriFusion Catheter is as follows:
- The Hickman® TriFusion™ Catheters are open-ended triple lumen radiopague polyurethane . catheters.
- The Hickman® TriFusion™ Catheters are 12 Fr triple lumen catheters with up to 27 cm insertion . lenath.
- . The Hickman® TriFusion™ Catheters have three equal sized lumens with the distal lumen extending beyond the proximal lumens.
- The proximal end of the Hickman® TriFusion™ Catheter consists of three Luer connectors, ● occlusion clamps, and priming volume ID tags.
- . Catheters are provided sterile in two kit configurations, an Intermediate Tray and a Microintroducer (MI) Tray.
# Indications for Use of Device:
The Hickman® TriFusion™ Triple Lumen Long-Term Central Venous Catheter is indicated for use in attaining short term or long term vascular access for intravenous infusion therapy and blood sampling via the internal jugular vein, external jugular vein, All Hickman® TriFusion™ catheters are designed for apheresis, and the administration of I.V. fluids, blood products, drugs, and parenteral nutrition solutions, as well as blood withdrawal. The Hickman® TriFusion™ catheter incorporates three large, equal size lumens appropriate for apheresis procedures.
# Technological Comparison to Predicate Devices:
Technological characteristics of the subject Hickman® TriFusion™ Catheter are substantially equivalent with regard to the basic design and function of the predicate device. Hickman® TriFusion™ Catheter (K041088). The subject device differs in technological characteristics when compared to the predicate device in that the Luer connector of the subject devices are manufactured from a different material formulation of the base resin and colorant. These differences do not alter the subject device and do not raise any new questions regarding safety or effectiveness when compared to the predicate device.
{5}------------------------------------------------
| Subject and Predicate Device Comparison Table | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|-----------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|
| | Subject Device- Hickman TriFusion Catheter | Predicate Device- Hickman TriFusion Catheter | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Owner | Same as Predicate | Bard Access Systems, Inc. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Classification | Same as Predicate | LJS- 21 CFR 880.5970- Long-Term-Intravascular Catheter | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 510(k) Status | Subject of this Premarket Notification | K041088- Concurrence date November 01, 2004 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Indications for Use | Same as Predicate | The Hickman® TriFusion™ Triple Lumen Long-Term Central<br>Venous Catheter is indicated for use in attaining short term or<br>long term vascular access for intravenous infusion therapy and<br>blood sampling via the internal jugular vein, external jugular<br>vein, and subclavian vein. All Hickman® TriFusion™ catheters<br>are designed for apheresis, and the administration of I.V. fluids,<br>blood products, drugs, and parenteral nutrition solutions, as well<br>as blood withdrawal. The Hickman® TriFusion™ catheter<br>incorporates three large, equal size lumens appropriate for<br>apheresis procedures | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Catheter<br>Configurations | Same as predicate | French Size Length<br>(Tip to Cuff) Total<br>Length Insertion<br>Length 12 Fr 19 cm 24 cm 12 Fr 23 cm 28 cm 12 Fr 27 cm 32 cm | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Catheter Material | Catheter Shaft | Catheter Shaft | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Same as predicate | Polycarbonate Polyurethane | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Catheter Shaft Tip | Catheter Shaft Tip | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Same as predicate | | Polycarbonate Polyurethane | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Trifurcation | | Trifurcation | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
{6}------------------------------------------------
| Subject and Predicate Device Comparison Table | | | | | | | | |
|-----------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--|--|--|--|
| | Subject Device- Hickman TriFusion Catheter | Predicate Device- Hickman TriFusion Catheter | | | | | | |
| | Same as predicate | Polycarbonate Polyurethane | | | | | | |
| | Extension Legs | Extension Legs | | | | | | |
| | Same as predicate | Polyurethane | | | | | | |
| | Luer Connectors | Luer Connectors | | | | | | |
| | Isoplast® 2510 Polyurethane with PolyOne Gray colorant | Isoplast®2530 Polyurethane with Americhem Gray colorant | | | | | | |
| Proximal<br>Configuration | Luer Connectors – same as predicate<br>Priming Volume ID Tags – same as predicate<br>Occlusion Clamps - Small Size and Mini size<br>Note: An additional clamp (i.e., "Small Size") was added as an<br>option for the subject device with the only difference being a<br>proportional dimension change. Please note the "small" size is<br>larger than the “mini” size cleared with the predicate device. | Luer Connectors – three Luer connectors<br>Priming Volume ID Tags<br>Occlusion clamps – Mini size | | | | | | |
| Distal Configuration | Same as predicate. | Stepped atraumatic tip, a stepped-tip configuration with the<br>distal lumen extending beyond the two proximal lumens. The<br>proximal lumens terminate at the same distance from the<br>trifurcation. | | | | | | |
| Gravity Flow Rates | Same as predicate | Lumen with White<br>Clamp Lumen with Blue<br>Clamp Lumen with Red<br>Clamp 115 ml/min 110 ml/min 114 ml/min | | | | | | |
{7}------------------------------------------------
# Performance Data:
Verification tests were designed and performed in accordance with Design Controls as per 21 CFR §820.30. The following tests were conducted per guidance documents and standards in conjunction with in-house protocols to establish the performance of the device.
| Verification Test | Standard Utilized |
|-------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Catheter Assembly Burst<br>Strength | Bard internal standards and procedures |
| Catheter Assembly Tensile | ISO 10555-1: 2013, Intravascular catheters -- Sterile and single-use<br>catheters - Part 1: General Requirements |
| Catheter Joint Durability Leak<br>Test | |
| Luer Configuration: Luer<br>Gauging | |
| Luer Configuration: Liquid Leak | |
| Luer Configuration: Air Leak | |
| Luer Configuration: Unscrewing<br>Torque | ISO 594-1: 1986, Conical fittings with 6% luer taper for syringes,<br>needles and certain other medical equipment-Part 1: General<br>Requirements |
| Luer Configuration: Ease of<br>Assembly | |
| Luer Configuration: Resistance<br>to Overriding | ISO 594-2: 1998, Conical fittings with 6% luer taper for syringes,<br>needles and certain other medical equipment- Part 2: Lock Fittings |
| Luer Configuration: Stress<br>Cracking | |
| Luer Configuration: Separation<br>Force | |
| Cuff Tensile | ISO 10555-1: 2013, Intravascular catheters -- Sterile and single-use<br>catheters - Part 1: General Requirements |
| Tip Tensile | |
| Gravity Flow | |
| Catheter Stiffness | |
| Priming Volume | FDA Guidance 1995, Guidance on Premarket Notification [510(k)]<br>Submission for Short-Term and Long-Term Intravascular Catheters |
| Catheter Collapse | |
| Radiopacity | ASTM F640: 2012, Standard test methods for determining radiopacity<br>for medical use<br>ISO 10555-1: 2013, Intravascular catheters -- Sterile and single-use<br>catheters - Part 1: General Requirements<br>FDA Guidance 1995, Guidance on Premarket Notification [510(k)]<br>Submission for Short-Term and Long-Term Intravascular Catheters |
{8}------------------------------------------------
Biocompatibility evaluation and testing was conducted in accordance with ISO10993-1, Biological evaluation of medical devices- Part 1: Evaluation and testing within a risk management process.
| The following tests were performed per ISO 10993, Biological evaluation of medical devices: | | | |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--|
| | | | |
| Biocompatibility Test | Standard Utilized |
|--------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Cytotoxicity | ISO 10993-5:2009, Biological evaluation of medical<br>devices -- Part 5: Tests for in vitro cytotoxicity |
| Sensitization | ISO 10993-10:2010, Biological evaluation of<br>medical devices -- Part 10: Tests for irritation and<br>skin sensitization |
| Intracutaneous Reactivity | |
| Acute Systemic Toxicity | ISO 10993-11:2006, Biological evaluation of<br>medical devices -- Part 11: Tests for systemic<br>toxicity |
| Material-Mediated Pyrogencitiy | |
| Subchronic Toxicity | ISO 10993-11:2006, Biological evaluation of<br>medical devices -- Part 11: Tests for systemic<br>toxicity |
| Genotoxicity | ISO 10993-3:2003, Biological evaluation of medical<br>devices -- Part 3: Tests for genotoxicity,<br>carcinogenicity and reproductive toxicity |
| Implantation | ISO 10993-6:2007, Biological evaluation of medical<br>devices -- Part 6: Tests for local effects after<br>implantation |
| Hemocompatibility | ISO 10993-4:(2002, amended 2006), Biological<br>evaluation of medical devices -- Part 4: Selection of<br>tests for interactions with blood |
The subject Hickman TriFusion Catheter was adopted into the sterilization cycle per AAMI TIR28:2016, Product adoption and process equivalence for ethylene oxide sterilization. The sterilization cycle has been validated by half-cycle over-kill method in accordance with ANSI/AAMI/ISO 11135, Sterilization of Healthcare Products. Ethylene Oxide sterilization testing was conducted per ISO 10993-7:2008, Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices – Part 7: Ethylene Oxide Sterilization Residuals. Additionally, LAL bacterial endotoxin testing was performed per ANSI/AAMI ST72. Bacterial Endotoxins – Test methodologies, routine monitoring, and alternatives to batch testing, and USP<161> for bacterial endotoxin limits.
# Conclusions:
Based on the indications for use, technological characteristics, and performance testing, the subject Hickman® TriFusion™ Catheter meets the requirements that are considered sufficient for its intended use and demonstrate substantial equivalence to the cited predicate device.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.