The hip prosthesis is designed for cementless use in total hip arthroplasty in primary or revision surgery. The patient should be skeletally mature. The patient's condition should be due to one or more of: - Severely painful and/or disabled joint: as a result of osteoarthritis, posttraumatic arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis or psoriatic arthritis, congenital hip dysplasia, ankylosing spondylitis. - Avascular necrosis of the femoral head. - Acute traumatic fracture of the femoral head or neck. - Failure of previous hip surgery: joint reconstruction, internal fixation, arthrodesis, hemiarthroplasty, surface replacement arthroplasty, or total hip replacement where sufficient bone stock is present.
Device Story
Mpact Extension is a modular acetabular hip prosthesis component system for cementless total hip arthroplasty. System includes multi-hole or rim-hole metal shells, fixed liners (UHMWPE or HighCross highly crosslinked UHMWPE), and cortical bone screws. Used by orthopedic surgeons in clinical settings for primary or revision hip surgery. Components are implanted to replace damaged joint surfaces, restoring hip function and reducing pain. Design verification testing confirms mechanical stability, including pull-out, lever-out, and torsional stability of modular connections, shell deformation resistance, and range of motion. Device provides structural support for hip joint reconstruction.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data. Bench testing only. Design verification testing included pull-out, lever-out, and torsional stability of the modular connection, coating validation, metal shell deformation resistance, range of motion, wear, and bone screw testing. All tests met pre-defined acceptance criteria.
Technological Characteristics
Materials: Ti-6Al-4V (ASTM F136), Ti (ASTM F1580 porous coating), UHMWPE (ISO 5834-2 Type 1), HXUHMWPE, Ti-6Al-4V (ISO 5832-3) screws. Components: Multi-hole/rim-hole shell, fixed liner, cortical bone screw. Cementless fixation. Mechanical assembly.
Indications for Use
Indicated for skeletally mature patients requiring cementless total hip arthroplasty (primary or revision) due to osteoarthritis, posttraumatic/rheumatoid/psoriatic arthritis, congenital hip dysplasia, ankylosing spondylitis, avascular necrosis, acute traumatic fracture, or failure of previous hip surgery (reconstruction, fixation, arthrodesis, hemiarthroplasty, surface replacement, or total hip replacement) with sufficient bone stock.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A hip joint metal/ceramic/polymer semi-constrained cemented or nonporous uncemented prosthesis is a device intended to be implanted to replace a hip joint. This device limits translation and rotation in one or more planes via the geometry of its articulating surfaces. It has no linkage across-the-joint. The two-part femoral component consists of a femoral stem made of alloys to be fixed in the intramedullary canal of the femur by impaction with or without use of bone cement. The proximal end of the femoral stem is tapered with a surface that ensures positive locking with the spherical ceramic (aluminium oxide, A12 03 ) head of the femoral component. The acetabular component is made of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene or ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene reinforced with nonporous metal alloys, and used with or without bone cement.
{0}------------------------------------------------
# K122641 (pg 1/37
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for Medacta International. The logo consists of two black triangles pointing upwards, followed by the word "edacta" in lowercase letters. Below the logo is the word "International" and a small cross symbol.
SEP 28 2012
#### 510(k) Summary
Applicant/Sponsor: Medacta International SA Strada Regina 6874 Castel San Pietro (CH) Switzerland Phone (+41) 91 696 60 60 Fax (+41) 91 696 60 66
Contact Person: Mr. Adam Gross Director of Regulatory and Quality Medacta USA 4725 Calle Quetzal, Unit B Camarillo, CA, 93012 Phone: (805)437-7085 Fax: (805)437-7553 Email: AGross@medacta.us.com
Date Prepared: 08/31/2012
### DEVICE INFORMATION
Trade/Proprietary Name: Mpact Extension Common Name: Total Hip Acetabular Components Class II
Classification Name: 21 CFR 888.3358 - Hip joint, femoral metal/polymer/metal semiconstrained porouscoated uncemented prosthesis Device Product Code: LPH
21 CFR 888.3353 - Hip joint metal/ceramic/polymer semi-constrained cemented or nonporous uncemented prosthesis Device Product Code: LZO
Predicate Devices: K103721 Mpact Acetabular System, Medacta International K033338 Pinnacle Revision System, Depuy Orthopaedics
Mpact Extension 510(k)
Section 5 - Page 2004
{1}------------------------------------------------
#### Product Description
The Mpact Extension components are designed to be used with the Medacta Total Hip Prosthesis System. The Mpact Extension acetabular components that are the subject of this 510(k) consist of a multi-hole or rim-hole shell (Ti-6Al-4V, ASTM F136 and Ti, ASTM F1580 porous coating), a fixed liner in sizes "J" and "K" that is made of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE ISO 5834-2 Type1) or HighCross® highly crosslinked ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (HXUHMWPE), and a cortical bone screw, flat head (Ti-6AJ-4V, ISO 5832-3).
#### Indications for Use
The hip prosthesis is designed for cementless use in total hip arthroplasty in primary or revision surgery.
The patient should be skeletally mature.
The patient's condition should be due to one or more of:
- Severely painful and/or disabled joint: as a result of osteoarthritis, posttraumatic t arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis or psoriatic arthritis, congenital hip dysplasia. ankylosing spondvlitis.
- Avascular necrosis of the femoral head. .
- . Acute traumatic fracture of the femoral head or neck.
- Failure of previous hip surgery: joint reconstruction, internal fixation, arthrodesis, . hemiarthroplasty, surface replacement arthroplasty, or total hip replacement where sufficient bone stock is present.
#### Comparison to Predicate Devices
The indications for use of the Mpact Extension are identical to the previously cleared predicate devices. The design features and materials of the subject devices are substantially equivalent to those of the predicate devices. The fundamental scientific technology of the modified devices has not changed relative to the predicate devices. The safety and effectiveness of the Mpact Extension are adequately supported by the substantial equivalence information, materials information, and analysis data provided within this Premarket Notification.
#### Performance Testing
No performance standards applicable to this device have been adopted under Section 514 of the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act. Performance testing of the Mpact Extension was conducted in accordance with various international standards and FDA guidance documents. The Mpact Extension was tested as part of design verification to written protocols with pre-
Mpact Extension 510(k)
{2}------------------------------------------------
defined acceptance criteria. The Mpact Extension testing was conducted on the worst case component size and option/design. The design verification testing included pull-out, lever-out and torsional stability of the modular connection of the fixed liner to the metal shell, coating validation, metal shell deformation resistance during impaction, range of motion, wear, and bone screw testing. The testing met all acceptance criteria and verifies that the performance of the Mpact Extension is substantially equivalent to the predicate devices.
K122641 (pg 313)
#### Conclusion:
Based on the above information, the Mpact Extension can be considered as substantially equivalent to its predicate devices.
### Mpact Extension 510(k)
Section 5 - Page 4 A
{3}------------------------------------------------
#### DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
Image /page/3/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The logo consists of a circular seal with the text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES • USA" arranged around the perimeter. Inside the circle is a stylized image of an eagle with its wings spread, symbolizing the department's mission to protect the health of all Americans.
#### Public Health Service
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Room -WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
SEP 28 2012
Medacta International % Medacta USA Mr. Adam Gross 4725 Calle Quetzal, Unit B Camarillo, CA 93012
Re: K122641
Trade/Device Name: Mpact Extension Regulation Number: 21 CFR 888.3353 Regulation Name: Hip joint metal/ceramic/polymer semi-constrained cemented or nonporous uncemented prosthesis Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: LZO, LPH Dated: August 29, 2012 Received: August 29, 2012
Dear Mr. Gross:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The I va may, alcreater, mains of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it If your device is eadditional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean i lease be activities that i Drivistian that your device complies with other requirements of the Act that I DA has made a acterinalitions administered by other Federal agencies. You must
{4}------------------------------------------------
#### Page 2 - Mr. Adam Gross
comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (OS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act): 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please go to http://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/CentersOffices/CDRH/CDRHOffices/ucm115809.htm for the Center for Devices and Radiological Health's (CDRH's) Office of Compliance. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance:
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely yours,
Mark McMullen
Mark N. Melkerson Director Division of Surgical, Orthopedic and Restorative Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{5}------------------------------------------------
## Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known): K(22641 (pa 1/1)
Device Name: Mpact Extension
Indications for Use:
The hip prosthesis is designed for cementless use in total hip arthroplasty in primary or revision surgery.
The patient should be skeletally mature.
The patient's condition should be due to one or more of:
- Severely painful and/or disabled joint: as a result of osteoarthritis, posttraumatic . arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis or psoriatic arthritis, congenital hip dysplasia, ankylosing spondylitis.
- Avascular necrosis of the femoral head. .
- Acute traumatic fracture of the femoral head or neck. ●
- Failure of previous hip surgery: joint reconstruction, internal fixation, arthrodesis, ● hemiarthroplasty: surface replacement arthroplasty, or total hip replacement where sufficient bone stock is present.
Prescription Use × (21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
AND/OR
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED) Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
Af
(Division Sign-Oft) Division of Surgical, Orthopedic, and Restorative Devices
Mpact Extension 510(k) August 27, 2012
K122641 510(k) Number
Section 4 - Page 2 of 2
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.