K141599 · Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc. · OVE · Jan 21, 2015 · Orthopedic
Device Facts
Record ID
K141599
Device Name
DIVERGENCE ANTERIOR CERVICAL FUSION SYSTEM
Applicant
Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc.
Product Code
OVE · Orthopedic
Decision Date
Jan 21, 2015
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 888.3080
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
The DIVERGENCE™ Anterior Cervical Fusion System consists of a stand-alone interbody device indicated for use in anterior cervical interbody fusion procedures in sketally mature patients with cervical disc disease at one level from the C2-C3 disc to the C7-T1 disc. Cervical disc disease is defined as intractable radiculopathy and/or myelopathy with herniated disc and/or osteophyte formation on posterior vertebral endplates producing symptomatic nerve root and/or spinal cord compression confirmed by radiographic studies. The DIVERGENCE™ stand-alone cervical interbody device must be used with internal screw fixation. The DIVERGENCE™ stand-alone cervical interbody device is also required to be used with autogenous bone graft and is to be implanted via an open, anterior approach. This cervical device is to be used in patients who have had six weeks of non-operative treatment. Patients with previous non-fusion spinal surgery at involved level may be treated with the device.
Device Story
DIVERGENCE™ Anterior Cervical Fusion System is a stand-alone interbody fusion device for single-level cervical spine procedures. System comprises PEEK interbody cage and titanium alloy bone screws. Cage features built-in rotary locking mechanism and radiopaque titanium markers. Screws are self-drilling/self-tapping. Implanted via open, anterior approach by surgeons. Device contains autogenous bone graft to facilitate fusion between vertebral bodies. Provides internal fixation to stabilize cervical segment. Benefits patients by promoting spinal fusion in cases of symptomatic nerve root or spinal cord compression.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Testing included static and dynamic compression, compression shear, and torsion per ASTM F2077-11, and subsidence testing per ASTM F2267-04(2011). All results met pre-determined acceptance criteria.
Indicated for skeletally mature patients with cervical disc disease (intractable radiculopathy/myelopathy, herniated disc, or osteophyte formation) at one level from C2-C3 to C7-T1, following six weeks of failed non-operative treatment. Includes patients with prior non-fusion spinal surgery at the involved level.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An intervertebral body fusion device is an implanted single or multiple component spinal device made from a variety of materials, including titanium and polymers. The device is inserted into the intervertebral body space of the cervical or lumbosacral spine, and is intended for intervertebral body fusion.
Special Controls
*Classification.* (1) Class II (special controls) for intervertebral body fusion devices that contain bone grafting material. The special control is the FDA guidance document entitled “Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Intervertebral Body Fusion Device.” See § 888.1(e) for the availability of this guidance document.(2) Class III (premarket approval) for intervertebral body fusion devices that include any therapeutic biologic (e.g., bone morphogenic protein). Intervertebral body fusion devices that contain any therapeutic biologic require premarket approval.
(c)
*Date premarket approval application (PMA) or notice of product development protocol (PDP) is required.* Devices described in paragraph (b)(2) of this section shall have an approved PMA or a declared completed PDP in effect before being placed in commercial distribution.
ATLANTIS® Anterior Cervical Plate System (K130640)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo features a stylized depiction of a human figure in profile, with three faces overlapping to represent the department's focus on people. The logo is encircled by the words "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" in a circular arrangement.
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
January 21, 2015
Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Incorporated Ms. Shweta Sharma Senior Regulatory Affairs Specialist 1800 Pyramid Place Memphis, Tennessee 38132
Re: K141599
Trade/Device Name: DIVERGENCE™ Anterior Cervical Fusion System Regulation Number: 21 CFR 888.3080 Regulation Name: Intervertebral body fusion device Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: OVE Dated: December 23, 2014 Received: December 24, 2014
Dear Ms. Sharma:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration. listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set
{1}------------------------------------------------
Page 2 - Ms. Shweta Sharma
forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Resourcesfor You/Industry/default.htm. Also, please note the regulation entitled. "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely yours,
## Vincent J. Devlin -S
for Mark N. Melkerson Director Division of Orthopedic Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
Form Approved: OMB No. 0910-0120
Expiration Date: January 31, 2017
See PRA Statement below.
## DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration
# Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known) K141599
### Device Name
DIVERGENCE™ Anterior Cervical Fusion System (For Stand-Alone Interbody Device Only)
### Indications for Use (Describe)
The DIVERGENCE™ Anterior Cervical Fusion System consists of a stand-alone interbody device indicated for use in anterior cervical interbody fusion procedures in sketally mature patients with cervical disc disease at one level from the C2-C3 disc to the C7-T1 disc. Cervical disc disease is defined as intractable radiculopathy and/or myelopathy with herniated disc and/or osteophyte formation on posterior vertebral endplates producing symptomatic nerve root and/or spinal cord compression confirmed by radiographic studies. The DIVERGENCE™ stand-alone cervical interbody device must be used with internal screw fixation. The DIVERGENCE™ stand-alone cervical interbody device is also required to be used with autogenous bone graft and is to be implanted via an open, anterior approach. This cervical device is to be used in patients who have had six weeks of non-operative treatment. Patients with previous non-fusion spinal surgery at involved level may be treated with the device.
Type of Use (Select *one* or *both*, as applicable)X Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
## CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
## *DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.*
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
> Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
{3}------------------------------------------------
# DIVERGENCE™ Anterior Cervical Fusion System 510(k) Summary
# January 2015
| I. | Company | Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc.<br>1800 Pyramid Place<br>Memphis, TN 38132<br>(901) 396-3133 |
|------|------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| II. | Contact | Shweta Sharma<br>Senior Regulatory Affairs Specialist |
| III. | Proprietary Trade Name | DIVERGENCETM Anterior Cervical<br>Fusion System |
| IV. | Common Name | Cervical Intervertebral Fusion Device<br>with Bone Graft |
| V. | Classification Name | 21 CFR 888.3080 - Intervertebral Body<br>Fusion Device |
| | Classification | Class II |
| | Product Codes | OVE |
| | Primary Predicate | PEEK PREVAIL® Cervical Interbody<br>Device (K113252, SE 01/17/2012) |
| | Secondary Predicates | •CORNERSTONE® PSR Cervical<br>Fusion System (K111264; K100214)<br>•AFFINITY® Anterior Cervical Cage<br>System (P000028, down-classified to<br>Class II special controls, Date of Final<br>Order 06/12/2007)<br>•ZEPHIR® Anterior Cervical System<br>(K030327)<br>•ATLANTIS® Anterior Cervical Plate |
{4}------------------------------------------------
## System (K130640)
#### Product Description VI.
The DIVERGENCE™ Anterior Cervical Fusion System consists of a stand-alone interbody fusion device with internal screw fixation. The DIVERGENCE™ Anterior Cervical Fusion System is indicated for anterior cervical interbody fusion procedures in skeletally mature patients with cervical disc disease at one level from the C2-C3 disc to the C7-T1 disc. This system is indicated for single-level use only in the C2-T1 anterior spine. The system is comprised of a PEEK interbody cage and screws.
The DIVERGENCE™ anterior cervical cages are provided in 0 and 6 degrees of lordosis, 5-12mm heights, 15-20mm widths and 12-16mm depths. This device is intended to be radiolucent, and the interior space of the product is to be used with autogenous bone graft. The DIVERGENCE™ stand-alone cervical interbody device is manufactured from medical grade polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and contains radiopaque markers made from medical grade titanium alloy. The PEEK interbody cage also comes preassembled with a titanium alloy, built-in rotary locking mechanism.
The bone screws used with this device are provided in self-drilling and self-tapping options and are manufactured from medical grade titanium alloy. The bone screws are provided in 3.5mm and 4.0mm diameters and 9-17mm lengths.
The PEEK material (PEEK OPTIMA™ LT-1) used conforms to ASTM F2026 and the titanium alloy material (Ti-6Al-4V ELI) used conforms to ASTM F136 standards. These devices are offered in sterile form.
### Indications for Use VII.
The DIVERGENCE™ Anterior Cervical Fusion System consists of a stand-alone interbody device indicated for use in anterior cervical interbody fusion procedures in skeletally mature patients with cervical disc disease at one level from the C2-C3 disc
{5}------------------------------------------------
to the C7-T1 disc. Cervical disc disease is defined as intractable radiculopathy and/or myelopathy with herniated disc and/or osteophyte formation on posterior vertebral endplates producing symptomatic nerve root and/or spinal cord compression confirmed by radiographic studies. The DIVERGENCE™ stand-alone cervical interbody device must be used with internal screw fixation. The DIVERGENCE™ stand-alone cervical interbody device is also required to be used with autogenous bone graft and is to be implanted via an open, anterior approach. This cervical device is to be used in patients who have had six weeks of non-operative treatment. Patients with previous non-fusion spinal surgery at involved level may be treated with the device.
#### Summary of Technological Characteristics VIII.
The subject DIVERGENCE™ Anterior Cervical Fusion System interbody cage component has the same fundamental scientific technology as the predicate PEEK PREVAIL® Cervical Interbody Device. CORNERSTONE® PSR Cervical Fusion System and AFFINITY® Anterior Cervical Cage System. The subject interbody cage is manufactured from the same PEEK and titanium alloy material as the predicate devices. The predicate and subject devices are also both interbody devices designed to contain graft material and facilitate a fusion between two vertebral bodies.
The subject DIVERGENCE™ Anterior Cervical Fusion System bone screws have the same fundamental scientific technology as the predicate ZEPHIR® Anterior Cervical System and ATLANTIS® Anterior Cervical Plate System screws. The subject devices are manufactured from the same titanium alloy material as the predicates. In both predicate and subject devices, fixation is provided by bone screws inserted into the vertebral body of the cervical spine.
### Identification of Legally Marketed Predicate Devices Used to Claim Substantial IX. Equivalence
The subject interbody cage is substantially equivalent to the predicates:
{6}------------------------------------------------
- PEEK PREVAIL® Cervical Interbody Device (K113252, SE 01/17/2012; . K094042, SE 06/30/2010)
- CORNERSTONE® PSR Cervical Fusion System (K111264, SE 10/12/2011; . K100214, SE 06/25/2010)
- AFFINITY® Anterior Cervical Cage System (P000028, Approval Date . 06/13/2002, down-classified to Class II special controls, Date of Final Order 06/12/2007)
The subject bone screw is substantially equivalent to the predicates:
- ZEPHIR® Anterior Cervical System (K030327, SE 02/26/2003) .
- ATLANTIS® Anterior Cervical Plate System (K130640, SE 06/04/2013) .
#### X. Brief Discussion of the Non-Clinical Tests Submitted
The subject DIVERGENCE™ Anterior Cervical Fusion System devices were tested in accordance with ASTM F2077-11 "Test Methods For Intervertebral Body Fusion Devices" for static and dynamic compression, static and dynamic compression shear, and static and dynamic torsion testing, and ASTM F2267-04(2011) "Standard Test Method for Measuring Load Induced Subsidence of Intervertebral Body Fusion Device Under Static Axial Compression" for subsidence testing.
The subject devices met the pre-determined acceptance criteria for all the tests. The test results are provided to demonstrate that the subject devices are substantially equivalent to the predicate devices.
#### XI. Conclusions Drawn from the Non-Clinical Tests
Based on the non-clinical test results and additional supporting documentation provided in this pre-market notification, the subject devices demonstrated substantial equivalence to the listed predicate devices.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.