The MRI Patient Monitoring System (Model 865214) is intended to monitor vital signs for patients undergoing MRI procedures and to provide signals for synchronization for the MRI scanner. The MRI Patient Monitoring System (Model 865214) is intended for use by healthcare professionals.
Device Story
Multi-parameter patient monitor for MRI environment; inputs include ECG, SpO2, respiration, NIBP, IBP, temperature, O2, EtCO2, and anesthetic agents; provides vital sign data and synchronization signals for MRI scanners. Operated by healthcare professionals in clinical settings. Modification involves replacing single-use EO-sterilized temperature sensor with reusable sensor using gamma-irradiated single-use sterile jackets. Device provides real-time monitoring to assist clinical decision-making during MRI procedures; benefits include patient safety and monitoring continuity during imaging.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Evaluated against voluntary standards (IEC 60601 series, ISO 10993, ASTM E1112, ASTM F2503, ASTM F2052, BS EN 12470-4). Verification and validation of performance specifications and MR conditions of use (displacement force, proton emissions, image artifact, RF heating) performed in worst-case environment. No clinical data required.
Technological Characteristics
Multi-parameter patient monitor. Temperature sensor: reusable with gamma-irradiated single-use sterile jacket. Standards: IEC 60601-1, IEC 60601-1-2, IEC 60601-1-6, IEC 60601-2-49, ASTM E1112-00, ISO 14971, ASTM F2503-08, ASTM F2052-06, BS EN 12470-4, ISO 10993-1/5/10. Connectivity: provides signals for MRI scanner synchronization.
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients undergoing MRI procedures requiring vital sign monitoring and scanner synchronization. Intended for use by healthcare professionals.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A cardiac monitor (including cardiotachometer and rate alarm) is a device used to measure the heart rate from an analog signal produced by an electrocardiograph, vectorcardiograph, or blood pressure monitor. This device may sound an alarm when the heart rate falls outside preset upper and lower limits.
Predicate Devices
MRI Patient Monitoring System (Model 865214) (K090785)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}------------------------------------------------
K124061 Page 1 of 5
FEB 2 2 2013
## Section 5
## 510(k) Summary
#### SUBMITTER INFORMATION 1.
| Establishment / Sponsor Name:<br>Establishment / Sponsor Address: | Invivo Corporation<br>12151 Research Parkway<br>Orlando, FL 32826 USA |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Manufacturer Name:<br>Manufacturer Address: | Philips Medical Systems<br>3000 Minuteman Road<br>Andover, MA 01810 |
| Company Phone: | (407) 275-3220 |
| Company Fax: | (407) 249-2022 |
| Person to contact<br>regarding questions: | Rusty Kelly<br>Sr. Quality & Regulatory Manager, Invivo Corporation<br>(407) 455-6166<br>Rusty.Kelly@philips.com |
| Establishment<br>Registration Number: | 1051786 (Sponsor)<br>1217116 (Manufacturer) |
| Date Summary Prepared: | August 16th, 2012 |
### MODIFIED DEVICE IDENTIFICATION 2.
| Trade / Proprietary Name: | MRI Patient Monitoring System (Model 865214) |
|---------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Common name: | MRI Patient Monitoring System |
| Classification name: | Cardiac monitor (including cardiotachometer and rate alarm<br>(21 CFR 870.2300, Product Code MWI)) |
Page 5-1
.
{1}------------------------------------------------
#### IDENTIFICATION OF LEGALLY MARKETED CLEARED DEVICE 3.
The MRI Patient Monitoring System (Model 865214) is substantially equivalent to the following cleared device:
| Cleared Device | Manufacturer | 510(k) No. | Clearance Date |
|-------------------------------|--------------------|------------|----------------|
| MRI Patient Monitoring System | Invivo Corporation | K090785 | Dec 15, 2009 |
| (Model 865214) | | | |
#### MODIFIED DEVICE DESCRIPTION 4.
:
The modified device, MRI Patient Monitoring System (Model 865214), is substantially equivalent to the cleared device.
Invivo has marketed the cleared device. MRI Patient Monitoring System (Model 865214), since 2009. Invivo identified the opportunity to reduce healthcare costs by replacing the current temperature option which is an Ethylene Oxide (EO) sterilized single-use temperature sensor with a reusable temperature sensor that utilizes single-use gamma irradiated sterilized jackets (sheath).
The modified device. MRI Patient Monitoring System (Model 865214) and the previously cleared device, also identified as MRI Patient Monitoring System (Model 865214) which received clearance to market under 510(k) K090785 on December, 15 2009, are identical with respect to indications for use, intended use, fundamental scientific technology, software architecture and design. Both devices are multi-parameter patient monitors intended for use by healthcare professionals to monitor vital signs for patients undergoing MRI procedures and to provide signals for synchronization for the MRI scanner. Both devices provide patient monitoring data for ECG, SpO2, respiration, non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP), invasive blood pressure (IBP), temperature, oxygen (02), end-tidal carbon dioxide (EtCO2), and anesthetic agents.
The modifications to the previously cleared device are only in regards to the temperature parameter. The primary differences between the MRI Patient Monitoring System (Model 865214) and the previously cleared device are listed below:
- Body temperature measurement is completed with a reusable sensor that is . covered with a sterilized jacket (sheath)(rather than a single-use sterilized sensor).
- Sterilization method is Gamma Radiation (rather than Ethylene Oxide (EO)). ●
- The reusable sensor is not sterilized. Labeling of the sensor including the . instructions for use (IFU) identify the need to use a sterile jacket (sheath).
- Product labeling and the IFU have been updated to reflect the modifications . accordingly
The differences between the modified device. MRI Patient Monitoring System (Model 865214) and the previously cleared device are explained in greater detail in Section 12, the Substantial Equivalence Discussion, which includes a comparison table.
{2}------------------------------------------------
#### . 5. INTENDED USE
The intended use of the modified device, as described in its labeling, has not changed from that of the cleared device as a result of the modification.
The MRI Patient Monitoring System (Model 865214) is intended to monitor vital signs for patients undergoing MRI procedures and to provide signals for synchronization for the MRI scanner. The MRI Patient Monitoring System (Model 865214) is intended for use by healthcare professionals.
#### FUNDAMENTAL SCIENTIFIC TECHNOLOGY SUMMARY 6.
The fundamental scientific technology employed in the operation of the MRI Patient Monitoring System (Model 865214) as modified, has not changed from that of the previously cleared device as a result of the modification. A detailed explanation of the fundamental scientific technology is provided in Section 11 of this submission.
#### NON-CLINICAL PERFORMANCE DATA SUMMARY 7.
The performance data referenced in this submission establishes substantial equivalence of the modified device, the MRI Patient Monitoring System (Model 865214), to the previously cleared device which received market clearance on December 15th, 2009 in 510(k) K090785. The modified device was evaluated to the following safety and performance tests:
- Voluntary standards I.
- II. Verification and validation of performance specifications
- Verification and validation of MR conditions of use III.
In all testing, the device was verified using a worst-case environment.
#### I. Voluntary Standards
The MRI Patient Monitoring System (Model 865214) was evaluated to the following voluntary standards where applicable to the modifications per FDA Guidance titled "Use of Standards in Substantial Equivalence Determination". Standards are listed in Section 1 of the CDRH Premarket Review Submission Cover Sheet included in this submission. A declaration of conformity to the recognized consensus standards is included in Section 9 of this submission with a Standards Summary Report Table noting deviations and adaptions. Additionally, the Standards Data Reports for 510(k) for each voluntary standard (based on Form FDA 3654 (09/07)) is included in Section 21 of this submission.
- IEC 60601-1, Medical Electrical Equipment Part 1: General . Requirements for Safety
- IEC 60601-1-2, Medical Electrical Equipment Part 1-2: General . Requirements for Safety - Collateral Standard: Electromagnetic Compatibility -- Requirements and Tests
{3}------------------------------------------------
- IEC 60601-1-6, Medical electrical equipment Part 1-4: General . requirements for safety -- Collateral standard: Usability
- IEC 60601-2-49. Medical electrical equipment Part 2-49: Particular . requirements for the basic safety and essential performance of multifunction patient monitoring equipment
- ASTM E1112-00. Standard specification for electronic thermometer ● for intermittent determination of patient temperature
- ISO 14971. Medical devices Application of risk management to . medical devices
- . ASTM F2503-08. Standard Practice for Marking Medical Devices and Other Items for Safety in the Magnetic Resonance Environment
- ASTM F2052-06, Standard Test Method for Measurement of . Magnetically Induced Displacement Force on Medical Devices in the Magnetic Resonance Environment .
- BS EN 12470-4. Clinical thermometers. Performance of electrical . thermometers for continuous measurement
- ISO 10993-1. Biological evaluation of medical devices Part 1: . Evaluation and testing in the risk management process
- ISO 10993-5, Biological evaluation of medical devices Part 5: Tests . for in vitro cytotoxicity
- ISO 10993-10, Biological evaluation of medical devices Part 10: Tests . for irritation and delayed-type hypersensitivity
The results of the testing performed in accordance with the Voluntary Standards listed above demonstrated that the modified device is as safe and effective as the previously cleared device. Evidence of this is documented in Section 18 of this submission.
#### II. Verification and Validation of Performance Specifications
Temperature measurement parameters of the MRI Patient Monitoring System (Model 865214) were verified according to the performance specifications defined by Invivo Corporation according to national standards, international standards, market needs, risk management, and intended use. The Verification and Validation Protocol for the specifications which are modified from the cleared device are provided in Section 18 of this submission.
Results of the complete verification and validation indicate that the modified device operates as intended within the performance specifications. The results do not raise issues regarding the safety and effectiveness of the device and clinical data was not required to substantiate claims of safety and effectiveness.
Verification and validation of the other vital sign measuring parameters were not required because the modifications made to the cleared device were only in regards to the temperature parameter.
{4}------------------------------------------------
#### III. Verification and Validation of MRI Conditions of Use
The MR conditions of use of the modified device are defined by Invivo Corporation according to national standards, international standards, intended use, risk management, and market needs. The modified device's reusable temperature sensor was evaluated for magnetically induced displacement force, proton emissions, image artifact, and RF heating. Details are provided in Section 18.
Test results demonstrate that the MRI Patient Monitoring System (Model 865214) meets the MR conditions of use as defined in the modified device labeling.
#### CONCLUSION OF SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE 8.
The modified device, described in this submission is substantially equivalent to the previously cleared device. This conclusion is based on the guidance provided in the FDA Guidance Documents:
- Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device (Issued . January 10, 1997),
- Draft Guidance: 510(k) Device Modifications: Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) . for a Change to an Existing Device (Issued July 27, 2011), and
- 510(k) "Substantial Equivalence" Decision Making Process (last updated April . 25, 2009)
- Guidance on the Content of Premarket Notification [510(K)] Submissions for . Clinical Electronic Thermometers
The modifications do not affect the indications for use. Clinical data was not necessary to establish safety and effectiveness for the purpose of substantial equivalence of the previously cleared device, and design validation did not raise new questions regarding the safety and effectiveness of the modified device. Design and labeling modifications do not raise new safety or effectiveness questions. Performance data is available throughout Section 18 to support our claims of safety and effectiveness, and determination of substantial equivalence.
{5}------------------------------------------------
### DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
Image /page/5/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo consists of a stylized eagle-like symbol with three curved lines representing wings or feathers. The text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" is arranged in a circular fashion around the symbol.
### Public Health Service
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
February 22, 2013
Invivo Corporation c/o Mr. Jeff D. Rongero Underwriters Laboratories, Inc. 12 Laboratory Dr. Research Triangle Park, NC 27709
Re: K124061
Trade/Device Name: MRI Patient Monitoring System (Model 865214) Regulation Number: 21 CFR §870.2300 Regulation Name: Cardiac Monitor (including cardiotachometer and rate alarm) Regulatory Class: Class II (two) Product Code: MWI Dated: January 30, 2013 Received: February 6, 2013
Dear Mr. Jeff D. Rongero:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food. Drug. and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you; however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must
{6}------------------------------------------------
Page 2 - Mr. Jeff D. Rongero
comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please go to http://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/CentersOffices/CDRH/CDRHOffices/ucm115809.htm for the Center for Devices and Radiological Health's (CDRH's) Office of Compliance. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Resourcesfor You/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely vours.
Owen P. Faris -S
for
Bram Zuckerman Director of Division of Cardiovascular Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{7}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
K124061 510(k) Number (if known):
Device Name: MRI Patient Monitoring System (Model 865214)
Indications for Use: The MRI Patient Monitoring System (Model 865214) is intended to monitor vital signs for patients undergoing MRI procedures and to provide signals for synchronization for the MRI scanner.
The MRI Patient Monitoring System (Model 865214) is intended for use by healthcare professionals.
Prescription Use: AND/OR Over-the Counter Use: X (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
(21 CFR 807 Subpart C)
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE - CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED) Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
Image /page/7/Picture/8 description: The image shows the name "Owen P. Faris -S" in a stylized font. The name "Owen" is written in a simple, bold font, while the letters "P" and "F" are stylized with concentric lines. The rest of the name is written in a simple, bold font.
Page
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.