MRI COMPATIBLE PATIENT MONITORING SYSTEM, MODEL 865214
Applicant
Invivo Corp.
Product Code
MWI · Cardiovascular
Decision Date
Dec 15, 2009
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Special
Regulation
21 CFR 870.2300
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Pediatric
Indications for Use
The MRI Patient Monitoring System (Model 865214) is intended to monitor vital signs for patients undergoing MRI procedures and to provide signals for synchronization for the MRI scanner. The MRI Patient Monitoring System (Model 865214) is intended for use by healthcare professionals.
Device Story
Expression MRI Patient Monitoring System (Model 865214) monitors vital signs during MRI procedures; provides synchronization signals for MRI scanners. Inputs: wireless ECG, wireless SpO2, NIBP, IBP, temperature, respiration, EtCO2, O2, anesthetic agents. System uses wireless communication, RF shielding, and digital signal processing (DSP) to function within high-field (1.5T/3.0T) magnetic environments. Operated by healthcare professionals in clinical settings. Output: real-time vital sign data and synchronization signals displayed for clinician review to guide patient management. Benefits: enables continuous patient monitoring and scanner synchronization during MRI, improving patient safety and diagnostic quality.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. No clinical data required. Verification included performance specification testing (SpO2 accuracy, temperature, anesthetic agents, CO2, respiration), MR compatibility (1.5T and 3.0T), and HALT. SpO2 accuracy validated against arterial blood CO-oximetry (ARMS specification of 3 for 70-100% range).
Technological Characteristics
Multi-parameter monitor with wireless ECG, SpO2, NIBP, IBP, temperature, respiration, EtCO2, O2, and anesthetic agent monitoring. Features RF shielding and DSP for MR compatibility. Pediatric NIBP mode uses same algorithm as adult mode. Complies with IEC 60601-1, IEC 60601-1-2, ANSI/AAMI BP22, EC13, EC38, EC53, SP10, ASTM E1112, F1456, ISO 9919, ISO 21647, and ISO 14971.
Indications for Use
Indicated for monitoring vital signs of patients undergoing MRI procedures and providing synchronization signals for MRI scanners. Intended for use by healthcare professionals on adult, pediatric, and neonatal populations.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A cardiac monitor (including cardiotachometer and rate alarm) is a device used to measure the heart rate from an analog signal produced by an electrocardiograph, vectorcardiograph, or blood pressure monitor. This device may sound an alarm when the heart rate falls outside preset upper and lower limits.
{0}------------------------------------------------
K090785 pg iofs
## 510(K) SUMMARY OF SAFETY AND EFFECTIVENESS
.
# SUBMITTER INFORMATION
| Establishment / Sponsor Name:<br>Establishment / Sponsor Address: | Invivo Corporation<br>12501 Research Parkway<br>Orlando, FL 32826 USA | DEC 1 5 2009 |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------|
| Manufacturer Name:<br>Manufacturer Address: | Philips Medical Systems<br>3000 Minuteman Road<br>Andover, MA 01810 | |
| Company Phone: | (407) 275-3220 | |
| Company Fax: | (407) 249-2022 | |
| Person to contact regarding<br>questions: | Rusty Kelly<br>Quality & Regulatory Manager, Invivo Corporation<br>(407) 455-6166<br>Rusty.Kelly@philips.com | |
| Establishment Registration<br>Number: | 1051786 (Sponsor)<br>1217116 (Manufacturer) | |
| Date Summary Prepared: | March 18, 2009 | |
Date Summary Prepared:
# DEVICE IDENTIFICATION
Generic Device Name: Trade / Proprietary Name:
Classification:
MRI multi-parameter patient monitor Expression MRI Patient Monitoring System (Model 865214) Class II
{1}------------------------------------------------
K090785 pg 2 of 8
# 510(K) SUMMARY OF SAFETY AND EFFECTIVENESS
## CLASSIFICATION
| Device Panel | Description | Product<br>Code | CFR<br>Section | Classification |
|---------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------|----------------|----------------|
| | Monitor, Physiological, Patient (without<br>arrhythmia detection or alarms) | MWI | 870.2300 | II |
| Cardiovascular | Alarm, Blood Pressure | DSJ | 870.1100 | II |
| | Computer, Blood Pressure | DSK | 870.1110 | II |
| | System, Measurement, Blood Pressure, Non-<br>Invasive | DXN | 870.1130 | II |
| | Monitor, Cardiac (incl. Cardiotachometer & Rate<br>Alarm) | DRT | 870.2300 | II |
| | Cable, Transducer and Electrode, Patient<br>(including connector) | DSA | 870.2900 | II |
| | Oximeter | DQA | 870.2700 | II |
| | Analyzer, Gas, Carbon-dioxide, Gaseous-phase | CCK | 868.1400 | II |
| | Monitor, Breathing Frequency | BZQ | 868.2375 | II |
| Anesthesiology | Analyzer, Gas, Enflurane, Gaseous Phase<br>(anesthetic concentration) | CBQ | 868.1500 | II |
| | Analyzer, Gas, Halothane, Gaseous Phase<br>(anesthetic concentration) | CBS | 868.1620 | II |
| | Analyzer, Gas, Nitrous Oxide, Gaseous Phase<br>(anesthetic concentration) | CBR | 868.1700 | II |
| | Analyzer, Gas, Oxygen, Gaseous Phase | CCL | 868.1720 | II |
| | Analyzer, Gas, Desflurane, Gaseous-Phase<br>(anesthetic concentration) | NHO | 868.1500 | II |
| | Analyzer, Gas, Isoflurane, Gaseous-Phase<br>(anesthetic concentration) | NHQ | 868.1500 | II |
| | Analyzer, Gas, Sevoflurane, Gaseous-Phase<br>(anesthetic concentration) | NHP | 868.1500 | II |
| General<br>Hospital | Thermometer, Electronic, Clinical | FLL | 880.2910 | II |
## INTENDED USE
The Expression MRI Patient Monitoring System (Model 865214) is intended to monitor vital The Expression NRTP anders MRI procedures and to provide signals for synchronization for the signs for patients andergoing Mrch Proceent Monitoring System (Model 865214) is intended for use by healthcare professionals.
{2}------------------------------------------------
K090785 pg 3 of 8
#### · 510(K) SUMMARY OF SAFETY AND EFFECTIVENESS
## DEVICE DESCRIPTION
The device description of the modified device has not changed from that of the predicate device as a result of the modification.
The Expression MRI Patient Monitoring System (Model 865214) is designed to assist clinicians in monitoring patient vital signs in the midst of the dynamic and evolving magnetic resonance (MR) environment.
A combination of wireless communication, radio frequency (RF) shielding, digital signal r recessing (DSP), and adaptable mounting technologies address the challenges associated with patient monitoring in the MR environment.
The Expression MRI Patient Monitoring System (Model 865214) includes monitoring capabilities for wireless electrocardiogram (ECG), wireless pulse oximetry (SpO2), non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP), invasive blood pressure (IBP), temperature, respiration, end-tidal CO2 (EtCO2), oxygen, and anesthetic agents.
## SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE
The Expression MRI Patient Monitoring System (Model 865214) is of comparable type and is substantially equivalent to the following predicate devices:
| Predicate Device | Manufacturer | 510(K) No. | Clearance Date |
|------------------------------------------|----------------------------|------------|------------------|
| 3160 MRI Patient Monitoring System | Invivo Corporation | K053462 | January 18, 2006 |
| PICOSAT II SpO2 Pulse Oximetry<br>Module | Philips Medical<br>Systems | K081937 | August 29, 2008 |
#### COMPARISON TO PREDICATE DEVICE
The Expression MRI Patient Monitoring System (Model 865214) and the primary predicate device, the 3160 MRI Patient Monitoring System which received clearance to market under 510(k) K053462 on January 18, 2006, are identical with respect to indications for use, intended J ro(x) 1005 102 of valian it is the devices are multi-parameter patient monitors use, and fundantenal betenis for patients undergoing MRI procedures and to provide signals for synchronization for the MRI scanner.
The primary differences between the Expression MRI Patient Monitoring System (Model 865214) and the predicate device are listed below:
{3}------------------------------------------------
K090785 pg 4of8
#### 510(K) SUMMARY OF SAFETY AND EFFECTIVENESS
- Minor hardware and cosmetic modifications were implemented to the external . appearance of the device.
- SpO2 detection and measurement is completed with the Philips Medical Systems . PICOSAT II SpO2 Pulse Oximetry Module, which was cleared to market under 510(k) K081937 on August 29, 2008.
- Body temperature measurement is completed with the Lumasense Technologies, Inc. . Multichannel Fluoroptic Thermometer.
- Labeling was modified to instruct the user of the proper patient application of the . Multichannel Fluoroptic Thermometer.
- Anesthetic agents monitoring parameters were improved. .
- Oxygen (02) monitoring parameters were improved. .
- Labeling was modified to include the improved performance specifications of pulse . oximetry, temperature monitoring, anesthetic agents monitoring, and oxygen monitoring.
Additional modifications to the predicate device that have been implemented since the predicate device's clearance to market in 510(k) K053462 on January 18, 2006 are listed below. All modifications were documented in the Invivo Corporation Quality System and are implemented in the modified Expression MRI Patient Monitoring System (Model 865214).
- Minor software modifications were implemented to permit the operator to choose a . distinct Pediatric menu option for non-invasive blood pressure monitoring. (The predicate device was cleared to market on January 18, 2006 with the ability to measure NIBP for adult, pediatric, and neonatal patients using adult mode with an adult cuff, or neonatal mode with a neonatal cuff.) The modification added a distinct menu option for "pediatric" patients. The pediatric mode is intended for use on patients who have low pulse amplitude sensitivity and therefore, cannot achieve NIBP detection in adult mode, as described in the operations manual. Pediatric mode uses the same measurement algorithm and technology as adult mode, but improves the measurement acquisition consistency on this patient population with low pulse amplitude sensitivity. Verification and validation testing completed on patient simulators did not raise any issues regarding the safety and effectiveness of the device and clinical data was not required to substantiate claims of safety and effectiveness.
- A non-invasive blood pressure cuff measuring 9-25cm was introduced. The cuff is . available for use on patients that are categorized by the FDA as part of the pediatric population. However, final determination of whether the cuff should be used on a particular patient is dependent on the trained clinician who should consider the patient's limb size and body weight per the instructions in the operations manual. The cuff is constructed of the same material as the adult and neonatal cuffs which were distributed with the predicate device and have been in marketing distribution since 1994 by the cuff manufacturer. Therefore, biocompatibility testing to ISO 10993 was not required. Verification and validation testing completed on patient simulators did not raise any issues regarding the safety and effectiveness of the predicate device and clinical data was not required to substantiate claims of safety and effectiveness.
{4}------------------------------------------------
K090785
Pg Sof8
## 510(K) SUMMARY OF SAFETY AND EFFECTIVENESS
- Minor modifications to the operations manual were implemented to define and explain . the pediatric mode for non-invasive blood pressure.
- Minor modifications were implemented to the off-the-shelf radio in the Display Control . Unit and Wireless Processing Unit to reduce ferrous materials for improved communication in the MRI environment, permitting closer proximity of the device to the magnet bore.
# FUNDAMENTAL SCIENTIFIC TECHNOLOGY
The fundamental scientific technology employed in the Expression MRI Patient Monitoring System (Model 865214) as modified, has not changed from that of the predicate device as a result of the modification.
# PERFORMANCE DATA
The performance data included in this notification establishes substantial equivalence of the modified device, the Expression MRI Patient Monitoring System (Model 865214), to the predicate device which received market clearance in 510(k) K053462 on January 18, 2006. The modified device was evaluated to the following safety and performance tests:
- Voluntary standards .
- Verification and validation of performance specifications .
- Verification and validation of MR compatibility .
- Validation of SpO2 Accuracy .
- Quality demonstration through HALT .
In all testing, the device was verified using a worst-case environment.
#### Voluntary Standards
The Expression MRI Patient Monitoring System (Model 865214) was evaluated to the following I the expression result where applicable per FDA Guidance titled "Use of Standards in Substantial Equivalence Determination. "
### General Requirements for Safety
- IEC 60601-1 .
- IEC 60601-1-1 .
- IEC 60601-1-2 ●
- IEC 60601-1-4 ●
- IEC 60601-1-8 .
# Particular Requirements for Safety and Performance
- ANSI / AAMI BP22 ●
- ANSI / AAMI EC13 .
{5}------------------------------------------------
K090785
pg 6 of 8
# 510(K) SUMMARY OF SAFETY AND EFFECTIVENESS
- ANSI / AAMI EC38 ●
- ANSI / AAMI EC53 .
- ANSI / AAMI SP10 .
- ASTM E1112 .
- ASTM F1456 .
- IEC 60601-2-27
- IEC 60601-2-30
- IEC 60601-2-34
- ISO 9919
- ISO 21647
# Hazard Analysis / Risk Management
- ISO 14971 .
# Verification and Validation of Performance Specifications
Verlication and Vanuation of the Expression MRI Patient Monitoring System (Model All patient monitoring parameters of the Expressions. The conclusions of all test 60.214) Welc Vernice accoraing to ne performing to as intended within the performance specifications.
results indicate "pass"; the device operates as intended within the perf Tesults of design verification and validation do not raise issues regarding the safety and Results of design verification and vindation as not required to substantiate claims of safety and effectiveness.
A summary of the verification and validation protocol and conclusion for parameters which A summary of the vertheation and vanualities processes included in the following tables:
| Pulse Oximetry (SpO2) | | |
|-----------------------|-----------------------------------------|------------|
| Parameter | Specification | Conclusion |
| Saturation Range | 1-100% | Pass |
| Saturation Accuracy | $\pm$ 3% at 70-100% | Pass |
| Pulse Rate Range | 30-250 BPM | Pass |
| Pulse Rate Accuracy | $\pm$ 2% or 1 BPM, whichever is greater | Pass |
| Temperature | | |
|-------------------|---------------|------------|
| Parameter | Specification | Conclusion |
| Measurement Range | 20-44°C | Pass |
| Accuracy | ±0.5°C | Pass |
| Anesthetic Agents Monitoring | | |
|------------------------------|-------------------------|------------|
| Parameter | Specification | Conclusion |
| Measurement Range | Halothane: 0.50 Vol% | Pass |
| | Enflurane: 0-5.0 Vol% | Pass |
| | Isoflurane: 0-5.0 Vol% | Pass |
| | Sevoflurane: 0-8.0 Vol% | Pass |
Page 6 of 8
{6}------------------------------------------------
K090785
pg 7 of 8
| Anesthetic Agents Monitoring | | |
|-------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------|
| Accuracy | Desflurane: 0-18.0 Vol% | Pass |
| | CO2: 0-10.0 Vol% | Pass |
| | Nitrous Oxide: 0-100% | Pass |
| | Halothane: ±0.15 Vol% at 0-1.00 Vol% | Pass |
| | Halothane: ±0.20 Vol% at 1.00-5.00 Vol% | Pass |
| | Enflurane: ±0.15 Vol% at 0-1.00 Vol% | Pass |
| | Enflurane: ±0.20 Vol% at 1.00-5.00 Vol% | Pass |
| | Isoflurane: ±0.15 Vol% at 0-1.00 Vol% | Pass |
| | Isoflurane: ±0.20 Vol% at 1.00-5.00 Vol% | Pass |
| | Sevoflurane: ±0.15 Vol% at 0-1.00 Vol% | Pass |
| | Sevoflurane: ±0.20 Vol% at 1.00-5.00 Vol% | Pass |
| | Sevoflurane: ±0.40 Vol% at 5.00-8.00 Vol% | Pass |
| | Desflurane: ±0.15 Vol% at 0-1.00 Vol% | Pass |
| | Desflurane: ±0.20 Vol% at 1.00-5.00 Vol% | Pass |
| | Desflurane: ±0.40 Vol% at 5.00-10.00 Vol% | Pass |
| | Desflurane: ±0.60 Vol% at 10.0-15.0 Vol% | Pass |
| | Desflurane: ±1.0 Vol% at 15.0-18.0 Vol% | Pass |
| | CO2: ±0.10 Vol% at 0-1.00 Vol% | Pass |
| CO2: ±0.20 Vol% at 1.00-5.00 Vol% | Pass | |
| CO2: ±0.30 Vol% at 5.00-7.00 Vol% | Pass | |
| CO2: ±0.50 Vol% at 7.00-10.00 Vol% | Pass | |
| Adult mode: 200mL/min (+/-20mL/min) | Pass | |
| Flow rate | Neonatal mode: 150mL/min (+/-15mL/min) | Pass |
| Respiration Rate | 2 - 60 rpm (+/-1 rpm) | Pass |
| Auto ID Threshold | (Primary agent ID) 0.15% | Pass |
| Zero Drift Rate | Automatically zeroes at least every four hours or for every ±1°C temperature change from the last stored stable operating temperature | Pass |
| Display Resolution | 0.1% Volume | Pass |
| Multiple Agents Alarm Threshold | Upon detection of more than one agent of >0.15 Vol% | Pass |
## 510(K) SUMMARY OF SAFETY AND EFFECTIVENESS
# Verification and Validation of MR Susceptibility
The Expression MRI Patient Monitoring System (Model 865214) was verified using a 3.0T MRI The Expression Article as a 1.5T MRI system. These devices were verified by documention within the performance specifications while being subjected to 3.0T and 1.5T magnetic fields using simulators and test equipment under actual use conditions. The following scans were used to simulate normal and worst-case scenario conditions:
- 1.5T MR Imaging System
- T1W FFFE
{7}------------------------------------------------
K090785 pg 8 of 8
# 510(K) SUMMARY OF SAFETY AND EFFECTIVENESS
- TIW IR
- T2W SE EPI
3.0T MR Imaging System
- · TIW FFE
- · TIW IR TSE
- · T2W SE EPI
All test results indicate "pass"; the Expression MRI Patient Monitoring System (Model 865214) met the performance specifications as stated in the device labeling for use in the 1.5T and 3.0T MRI environments.
Additional testing to verify the performance of the Expression MRI Patient Monitoring System in the following conditions of use was also completed:
- static magnetic field strength .
- specific absorption rate .
- scan duration .
- gradient field switching rate .
- device proximity to the magnet bore .
All test results indicate "pass"; the Expression MRI Patient Monitoring System (Model 865214) met the MR conditions of use as stated in the device labeling.
## Validation of SpO2 Accuracy
Pulse oximetry (SpO2) accuracy of the Expression MRI Patient Monitoring System (Model I unse oximely (OPOD) are the specified measurement range of 70-100% of arterial blood oxygen saturation as compared to arterial blood CO-oximetry for validation. Test results show that the Expression MRI Patient Monitoring System (Model 865214) passes an ARMS specification of 3 for the range of 70-100% oxygen saturation.
## Quality Demonstration Through HALT
Quality demonstration testing is being performed using highly accelerated life tests to show Quality domoner requirement specifications and ensure longevity of the Expression MRI Patient Monitoring System (Model 865214) within the use model. Preliminary test results I anonstrate that the device meets the mechanical customer requirement specifications over the use life of the device.
#### Conclusion
The conclusion of all safety and performance testing confirms that all identified risks have been mitigated and the Expression MRI Patient Monitoring System (Model 865214) operates as designed and intended within the performance specifications.
The test results demonstrate that the modified Expression MRI Patient Monitoring System (Model 865214) is substantially equivalent to the predicate device cleared to market via 510(k) K053462 on January 18, 2006.
{8}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/8/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The logo consists of a circular seal with the text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" around the perimeter. Inside the circle is a stylized image of a human figure with outstretched arms, resembling a bird in flight.
#### DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Room W-O66-0609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
Invivo Corporation c/o Mr. Rusty Kelly Quality & Regulatory Manager 12501 Research Parkway Orlando, FL 32826
# DEC 1 5 2009
Re: K090785
> Trade/Device Name: MRI Patient Monitoring System, Model 865214 Regulatory Number: 21 CFR 870.2300 Regulation Name: Cardiac Monitor (Including Cardiotachometer and Rate Alarm) Regulatory Class: Class II (Two) Product Code: MWI Dated: November 18, 2009 Received: November 20, 2009
Dear Mr. Kelly:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations; Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
{9}------------------------------------------------
Page 2 - Mr. Rusty Kelly
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please go to http://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/CentersOffices/CDRH/CDRHOffices/ucm115809.htm for the Center for Devices and Radiological Health's (CDRH's) Office of Compliance. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportalProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely yours,
Bram D. Zuckerman, M.D. Director Division of Cardiovascular Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{10}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known):_K090785
Device Name: MRI Patient Monitoring System (Model 865214)
Indications for Use: The MRI Patient Monitoring System (Model 865214) is intended to monitor vital signs for patients undergoing MRI procedures and to provide signals for synchronization for the MRI scanner.
The MRI Patient Monitoring System (Model 865214) is intended for use by healthcare professionals.
Prescription Use:
X (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
AND/OR Over-the Counter Use:
(21 CFR 807 Subpart C)
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE - CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
W.M.P
Page l of 1_
Division of Cardiovascular Devices
(Division Sign-Off)
510(k) Number
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.