K090633 · Lensar, Inc. · OOE · May 13, 2010 · Ophthalmic
Device Facts
Record ID
K090633
Device Name
LENSAR LASER SYSTEM
Applicant
Lensar, Inc.
Product Code
OOE · Ophthalmic
Decision Date
May 13, 2010
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 886.4390
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
The LensAR Laser System is indicated for anterior capsulotomy in cataract surgery.
Device Story
LensAR Laser System is an ophthalmic surgical laser for anterior capsulotomy during cataract surgery. It uses a mode-locked Nd:YVO4 laser (1064 nm) to deliver ultrashort, low-energy pulses. The system employs plasma-mediated ablation and photodisruption to cut lens capsular tissue with minimal collateral damage. A disposable Index Matched Eye Docking (IMED) device interfaces with the eye to optimize beam targeting. A computer-controlled optical scanning system moves the laser beam focus in three dimensions to create a precise, contiguous capsulotomy. Used in clinical settings by surgeons, the device provides automated, repeatable cuts compared to manual continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis (CCC). Surgeons monitor the procedure via an operating microscope. The device benefits patients by providing highly accurate, centered, and reproducible capsulotomies, facilitating subsequent cataract removal and IOL placement.
Clinical Evidence
Clinical trial included a prospective, single-center study comparing the LensAR Laser to a contralateral control group undergoing manual continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis (CCC). Primary endpoints included capsulotomy dimension, circularity, and ease of capsule removal. Results showed successful anterior capsulotomy and IOL placement in all study eyes. Capsulotomies were well-centered; ease of removal scores were 5 or better (scale 1-10, with 10 being easiest). Removed capsules were equivalent or superior to manual CCC in dimension and circularity. No significant differences in clinical outcomes were observed between treatment and control groups.
Technological Characteristics
Nd:YVO4 mode-locked laser; 1064 nm wavelength; ultrashort pulse duration. Employs plasma-mediated ablation and photodisruption. Features a computer-controlled 3D optical scanning system. Includes a disposable Index Matched Eye Docking (IMED) device for refractive index matching. System is standalone, operated via computer control. No specific ASTM materials or software architecture class provided.
Indications for Use
Indicated for anterior capsulotomy in patients undergoing cataract surgery.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An ophthalmic laser is an AC-powered device intended to coagulate or cut tissue of the eye, orbit, or surrounding skin by a laser beam.
{0}------------------------------------------------
K090633
# Premarket Notification 510(k) Summary
This 510(k) summary of safety and effectiveness information is being submitted in accordance with the requirements of 21 CFR 807.92(a).
# SUBMITTER'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE NUMBER, CONTACT PERSON, AND DATE SUMMARY PREPARED
| Applicant: | LensAR, Inc.<br>250 South Park Avenue, Suite 310<br>Winter Park, FL 32789 | MAY 1 3 2010 |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------|
| Contact Person: | Keith Edwards<br>Director, Clinical/Regulatory Affairs<br>Tel: (888) 892-5171<br>Fax: (407) 386-7228 | |
Date Summary Prepared: November 16, 2009
### NAME OF DEVICE, INCLUDING TRADE NAME AND CLASSIFICATION NAME
| Trade/Proprietary Name: | TBD |
|-------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Common/Usual Name: | LensAR Laser System for Anterior Capsulotomy |
| Device Classification: | Nd:YAG Laser for Posterior Capsulotomy and Peripheral Iridotomy, Class II, 21 CFR 886.4392 Radiofrequency Electrosurgical Cautery Apparatus, Class II, 21 CFR 886.4100 Ophthalmic Femtosecond Laser, Class II, 21 CFR 886.4390 |
| Product Code(s): | NCR, LXS, OOE |
{1}------------------------------------------------
# PREDICATE DEVICES:
| 510(K) Number | TRADE NAME | MANUFACTURER |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------|
| K892058 | ISL QC 2000 | Intelligent Surgical Lasers |
| K001498 | The Fugo Blade | Medisurg Research and<br>Management Corp. |
| K082947 | LenSx | LenSx Lasers, Inc.<br>33 Journey, Suite 175<br>Aliso Viejo, CA 92656 |
| And by LenSx reference the following devices: | | |
| K033354 | FEMTEC Laser<br>Microkeratome | 20/10 Perfect Vision Optische<br>Gerät GMBH |
| K993153, K001211,<br>K002890, K013941,<br>K031960, K041893,<br>K060372, K063682,<br>and<br>K073404 | IntraLase FS Lasers | IntraLase Corp. |
# DEVICE DESCRIPTION:
The LensAR Laser System is an ophthalmic surgical laser intended for use in anterior capsulotomy in cataract surgery. The System employs a mode-locked Nd: Y VO4 laser which generates a high frequency series of ultrashort, low energy pulses at a wavelength of 1064 nm. The system is designed to cut the lens capsular tissue, with minimal collateral damage, by the mechanisms of plasma mediated ablation and photodisruption of targeted tissue at the beam focus. The precision capsulotomy is generated by computer-controlled scanning of the position of the laser beam focus in three dimensions at the target location of the anterior capsulotomy. The laser energy is delivered to the eye through a disposable, patient interface device consisting of an Index Matched Eye Docking device (IMED) designed to match the refractive index of the cornea to optimize beam targeting accuracy. The IMED device is docked to the eye via an accessory component comparable to those used with other ophthalmic lasers used as keratomes.
### INDICATIONS FOR USE:
The LensAR Laser System is intended for use in anterior capsulotomy during cataract surgery.
### TECHNOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS COMPARISON
As with the other ultrashort pulse lasers, the LensAR uses a mode-locked lasing technology rather than the Q-switched technology used for nanosecond or longer pulse lasers. The ultrashort pulses ionize target tissue molecules, creating free electrons through
{2}------------------------------------------------
a multi-photon absorption process rather than thermionic emission, the prevalent mechanism for somewhat longer pulse lasers. The electron avalanche and optical breakdown initiated by the free electron generation causes plasma formation and plasma mediated ablation as one of the cutting mechanisms.
The LensAR laser, like the LenSx, ISL QC 2000, Intralase (and others such as the FemTec laser), has laser beam and optical delivery system characteristics designed to generate a beam fluence at the beam waist that is enough above the laser induced optical breakdown (LIOB) threshold that the mechanical effects of shock waves and cavitation bubbles which are caused by the rapid plasma expansion constitute a substantial portion of the overall cutting process. The cutting of tissue by lasers via the aforementioned mechanical forces is termed photodisruption. The combination of substantial contributions to the cutting phenomenon from both plasma mediated ablation and photodisruption, as with the LensAR and other ultrashort pulse ophthalmic lasers cited above contrasts with the primarily laser mediated ablation mechanism utilized by ultrashort pulse lasers operating just above the LIOB or primarily photodisruption utilized by longer pulse Q-switched lasers.
Finally, like the other ultrashort pulse predicate devices, the LensAR laser uses a series of high frequency pulses which are scanned in three dimensions through the target tissue, by a computer-controlled optical scanning system, to create a contiguous cut. The ability to create a contiguous cut depends on matching the pulse-to-pulse spacings in three dimensions, to the three dimensional spatial extent of the plasma mediated ablation and photodisruption for the particular laser pulse width, pulse energy and optical delivery system characteristics.
The laser photodisruption plasma and the subsequent gas bubble are much smaller and more precise than an RF excited filament can achieve. If the focal spot is moved through the tissue in the appropriate pattern, macroscopic cuts can be performed that mimic those achieved with the Fugo Blade in the device-assisted anterior capsulotomy procedure in quality, but are much more controllable and repeatable in their key parameters since the cut is completely computer-controlled.
The LensAR Laser is, therefore, substantially equivalent to these legally marketed predicate devices.
# BRIEF SUMMARY OF NON-CLINICAL TESTS AND RESULTS:
LensAR has developed the LensAR Laser for use in anterior capsulotomy, employing the precision and control of ultrashort pulse lasers for this procedure. Pre-clinical and clinical testing has included bench testing and a prospective, single-center, multiple surgeon clinical trial.
# Summary of Pre-Clinical Testing
Testing and analyses performed included accuracy and reproducibility of capsulotomy size and depth in porcine eyes and plastic substrates. The data demonstrated the LensAR produces anterior capsulotomies that are uniform, accurate and predictable in size.
{3}------------------------------------------------
Additional safety testing was provided that addressed the acoustic and thermal profile of the device. Evaluation on ex vivo porcine eyes confirmed the safety with respect to corneal endothelium.
### Summary of Clinical Testing
A clinical trial of the LensAR Laser was conducted to evaluate the performance of this laser system in the creation of anterior capsulotomy during cataract/10L surgery, followed by conventional cataract removal. A contralateral control population which underwent continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis (CCC) and conventional cataract removal served as the comparative control, although not all fellow eyes underwent cataract surgery in the context of the clinical study. Clinical analysis included the pointing accuracy of the device, as well as the performance characteristics required to achieve an effective anterior capsulotomy cut.
Anterior capsulotomy was successfully performed in eyes using the LensAR Laser, with intraocular lenses successfully placed. Postoperatively, the course of follow-up through 3 months in the study population was unremarkable. The intraccular lens was centered in all study eyes. All capsulotomies were judged to be well centered by the surgeon using visual inspection in the operating microscope.
The ease of removal of the capsules was judged (on a scale of 1 to 10), with 1 being assigned as the score for Continuous Curvilinear Capsulorhexis (i.e., manual removal) and 10 being easiest to remove. All scores were 5 or better with the most common score being 10.
The removed anterior capsules from the laser treated eyes were demonstrated to be equivalent or better with respect to dimension and conformance to circularity than those done manually.
No significant difference in clinical outcomes from the sequelae of cataract surgery was demonstrated between the Treatment and Treated Control populations.
{4}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/4/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo features a stylized eagle with three stripes forming its body and wing. The eagle is positioned within a circular border that contains the text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" in a sans-serif font.
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Mail Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
LensAR, Inc. c/o Ms. Shirley McGarvey Consultant to LensAR 250 South Park Avenue Winter Park, FL 32789
MAY 1 8 2010
Re: K090633
Trade Name: LensAR Laser System for Anterior Capsulotomy Regulation Number: 21 CFR 886.4392 Regulation Name: Nd: YAG laser for posterior capsulotomy and peripheral iridotomy Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: OOE Dated: April 22, 2010 Received: April 23, 2010
Dear Ms. McGarvey:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In' addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Eederal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration
{5}------------------------------------------------
#### Page 2 - Ms. Shirley McGarvey
and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/CentersOffices/CDRH/CDRHOffices/ucm115809.html for the Center for Devices and Radiological Health's (CDRH's) Office of Compliance. Also, please note the regulation cntitled, "Misbranding by reforence to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely yours,
Kesia Alexander
Malvina B. Eydelman, M.D.
Director
Division of Ophthalmic, Neurological,
and Ear, Nose and Throat Devices
Office of Device Evaluation
Center for Devices and
Radiological Health
{6}------------------------------------------------
| Indications for Use Statement | |
|-------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 510(k) Number (if known): | K090633 |
| Device Name: | LensAR Laser System for Anterior Capsulotomy |
| Indications for Use: | The LensAR Laser System is indicated for anterior capsulotomy in cataract surgery. |
### Indications for Use Ct.
Prescription Use: X And/Or (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
Over-the-Counter Use: (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE – CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED) Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
Aem.
(Division Sign-Off) Division of Ophthalmic, Neurological and Ear. Nose and Throat Devices
510(k) Number K090633
. ·
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.