K041444 · Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. · LCP · Jun 9, 2004 · Hematology
Device Facts
Record ID
K041444
Device Name
BIO-RAD D-10 DUAL PROGRAM
Applicant
Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.
Product Code
LCP · Hematology
Decision Date
Jun 9, 2004
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 864.7470
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
3rd-Party Reviewed
Indications for Use
The Bio-Rad D-10™ Dual Program is intended for the percent determination of hemoglobin A₁c, A₂ and F, and for the detection of abnormal hemoglobins in human whole blood using ion-exchange high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The measurement of the percent hemoglobin A₁c is effective in monitoring long-term glucose control in individuals with diabetes mellitus, and measurement of the percent HbA₂ and HbF are effective in long-term monitoring of β-thalassemias (i.e., hereditary hemolytic anemias characterized by decreased synthesis of one or more types of abnormal hemoglobin polypeptide chains). Detection of hemoglobin thalassemia variants such as hemoglobins S, C, D and E by HPLC is effective in presumptive identification of these variants. The Bio-Rad D-10™ Dual Program is intended for Professional Use Only. For in vitro diagnostic use.
Device Story
The Bio-Rad D-10 Dual Program is an HPLC-based diagnostic system for human whole blood analysis. It utilizes ion-exchange chromatography to separate and quantify hemoglobin fractions (HbA1c, HbA2, HbF) and identify abnormal hemoglobin variants. The system operates via two selectable programs: a 3-minute short program for HbA1c and a 6.5-minute extended program for HbA1c, HbA2, and HbF. Used in clinical laboratories by professional staff, the system processes EDTA-anticoagulated whole blood samples. The device provides quantitative area percentage results for hemoglobin fractions, which clinicians use to monitor long-term glycemic control in diabetic patients and manage beta-thalassemia. By automating the separation and identification of hemoglobin variants, the system aids in the presumptive diagnosis of hemoglobinopathies, facilitating timely clinical intervention and patient management.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Precision evaluated over 20 days (n=80); total CVs ranged 0.9-5.3%. Linearity confirmed across reportable ranges for HbA1c, HbA2, and HbF. Interference studies showed no significant impact from bilirubin (20 mg/dL), lipids (5680 mg/dL), or high EDTA. Method comparison against predicates using 40-148 patient samples showed strong correlation (r² > 0.98 for all analytes). Reference ranges established via non-parametric analysis of 53 healthy subjects.
Technological Characteristics
Ion-exchange high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) system. Uses cation exchange cartridges. Visible detection at 415 nm. Sample type: EDTA-anticoagulated human whole blood. Connectivity: Standalone system with software-driven program parameters (via floppy diskette). Standardization: HbA1c traceable to DCCT/IFCC and NGSP certified. Software-controlled automated analysis.
Indications for Use
Indicated for individuals with diabetes mellitus for long-term glucose monitoring and individuals with β-thalassemias for long-term monitoring of hemoglobin levels. Used for presumptive identification of hemoglobin variants (S, C, D, E) in human whole blood. For professional use in clinical chemistry laboratories.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A glycosylated hemoglobin assay is a device used to measure the glycosylated hemoglobins (A1a , A1b , and A1c ) in a patient's blood by a column chromatographic procedure. Measurement of glycosylated hemoglobin is used to assess the level of control of a patient's diabetes and to determine the proper insulin dosage for a patient. Elevated levels of glycosylated hemoglobin indicate uncontrolled diabetes in a patient.
{0}
510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION
DECISION SUMMARY
DEVICE AND INSTRUMENT TEMPLATE
A. 510(k) Number:
K041444
B. Purpose for Submission:
Clearance of device that combines the functions of three predicate devices
C. Analyte:
Hemoglobin A₁c (HbA₁c), Hemoglobin A₂ (HbA2), and Hemoglobin F (HbF)
D. Type of Test:
Quantitative HPLC assay
E. Applicant:
Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.
F. Proprietary and Established Names:
Bio-Rad D-10™ Dual Program
Bio-Rad D-10™ Dual Program Calibrator Set
G. Regulatory Information:
1. Regulation section:
21 CFR § 864.7470, Assay, glycosylated hemoglobin
§ 864.7400, Hemoglobin A₂ Quantitation
§ 862.1150, Calibrator
2. Classification:
Class II
3. Product Code:
LCP, Glycosylated hemoglobin assay
JPD, Hemoglobin A2 assay
JIT, Calibrator, secondary
4. Panel:
Clinical Chemistry (75)
H. Intended Use:
1. Intended use(s):
The Bio-Rad D-10™ Dual Program is intended for the percent determination of hemoglobin A₁c, A₂ and F, and for the detection of abnormal hemoglobins in human whole blood using ion-exchange high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC).
{1}
Page 2 of 11
The measurement of the percent hemoglobin $\mathrm{A}_{1\mathrm{c}}$ is effective in monitoring long-term glucose control in individuals with diabetes mellitus, and measurement of the percent $\mathrm{HbA}_2$ and $\mathrm{HbF}$ are effective in long-term monitoring of $\beta$ -thalassemias (i.e., hereditary hemolytic anemias characterized by decreased synthesis of one or more types of abnormal hemoglobin polypeptide chains).
Detection of hemoglobin thalassemia variants such as hemoglobins S, C, D and E by HPLC is effective in presumptive identification of these variants. The Bio-Rad D-10™ Dual Program is intended for Professional Use Only. For in vitro diagnostic use.
2. Indication(s) for use:
See Intended Use above.
3. Special condition for use statement(s):
For professional use only in clinical chemistry laboratories.
4. Special instrument Requirements:
Bio-Rad D-10™ Hemoglobin Testing System
I. Device Description:
The Bio-Rad D-10™ Dual Program is a testing system that uses HPLC for the chromatographic separation of Hemoglobins A1c, A2, F and related hemoglobins that may be present in human blood. The kit contains supplies for 400 tests for hemoglobin A1c or 200 tests for hemoglobins A1c, A2 and F and consists of an analytical cartridge, elution buffers, wash/diluent solutions, specific calibrators, calibrator diluent, whole blood primer and program parameters.
This Bio-Rad D-10™ Dual Program system is run on the Bio-Rad D-10™ Hemoglobin Testing System that utilizes ion-exchange high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). A dual-piston, low pulsation HPLC pump and a proportioning valve deliver the buffer solution to the analytical cartridge and detector. The samples are automatically diluted on a sampling rack. Whole blood samples undergo an automatic two-step dilution process in the sample rack and then are introduced into the analytical flow path of the HPLC.
J. Substantial Equivalence Information:
1. Predicate device name(s):
Bio-Rad Dual-10 Hemoglobin A1c
VARIANT™ II Hemoglobin A1c Program
VARIANT™ II β-thalassemia Short Program
{2}
2. Predicate K number(s):
K031043
K984268
K991127
# 3. Comparison with predicate:
The device and its predicate(s) share similar assay principle, use of controls, traceability, column type, sample type, and sample volume.
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device | Predicate |
| Intended Use | The Bio-Rad D-10TM Dual Program is intended for the percent determination of hemoglobin A1c, A2, and F, and for the detection of abnormal hemoglobins in human whole blood using ion-exchange high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The Bio-Rad D-10TM Dual Program is intended for Professional Use only. For in vitro diagnostic use. | The Bio-Rad VARIANT™ II Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) Program is intended for percent determination of HbA1c in human whole blood using ion-exchange high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The VARIANT™ β-Thalassemia (HbA2) Program is intended for the percent determination of HbA2 and HbF in human whole blood using ion-exchange high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). For in vitro diagnostic use. |
| Differences | | |
| Item | Device | Predicate |
| Analyte Measured | % Hemoglobin A1c, % Hemoglobin A2, % Hemoglobin F, and related hemoglobin variants that may be present in human blood in one combined device | % Hemoglobin A1c and % Hemoglobin A2 and % Hemoglobin F in separate devices |
| Analytes Reported | Hemoglobin A1a, A1b, A1c, F, AO, S, C, A2, CHb/ LA1c, P3 windows. | Hemoglobin A1a, A1b, A1c, F, AO, C, LA1c, P3 and S window. |
| Time to process sample | 6.5 minutes | 3 minutes or 6.5 minutes |
{3}
Page 4 of 11
| Calibration | 2 point calibration, once every 24 hrs. or if the program is switched between the “3.0 Minute” and “6.5 Minutes” Programs. | 1 point calibration, once every run. |
| --- | --- | --- |
K. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):
NGSP (National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program)
IFCC HbA₁c Calibrators
FDA Guidance Document for 510(k) Submission of Glycohemoglobin (Glycated or Glycosylated) Hemoglobin for IVDs
FDA Guidance for Software Contained in Medical Devices
NCCLS C28-A2 - How to Define and Determine Reference Interval in the Clinical Laboratory
L. Test Principle:
The Bio-Rad D-10™ Dual Program system utilizes the principles of ion-exchange high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). A dual -piston, low pulsation HPLC pump and a proportioning valve deliver the buffer solution to the analytical cartridge and detector. Samples are automatically diluted on a sampling rack and injected into an analytical cartridge. Whole blood samples undergo an automatic two-step dilution process in the sample rack and then are introduced into the HPLC analytical flow path.
A programmed buffer gradient of increasing ionic strength delivers the sample to the analytical cartridge, where the hemoglobins are separated based upon their ionic interactions with the cartridge material. The separated hemoglobins then pass through the filter photometer flow cell where changes in the absorbance are measured. The absorbance at 415 nm is measured. An additional filter at 690 nm corrects the background absorbance. The software performs a reduction of raw data collected from each analysis that may include use of a calibrator factor. A sample report and chromatogram are generated for each sample. Two-level calibration is used for adjustment of the calculated values.
M. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
1. Analytical performance:
a. Precision/Reproducibility:
Assay imprecision was evaluated by running two patient samples in duplicate twice per day for 20 days (for n = 80 determinations). In each duplicate daily run, duplicate aliquots of low HbA₁c and of high HbA₁c patient samples were each analyzed per run. Results are summarized below.
{4}
Page 5 of 11
| Sample | HbA1c (6.5 Min.) | | HbA2 | | HbF | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | Normal | Diabetic | Low | High | Low | High |
| Mean (%Hb) | 5.9 | 13.1 | 2.2 | 5.4 | 2.1 | 8.7 |
| Within run (%CV) | 0.8 | 0.3 | 4.5 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 1.4 |
| Total Precision (%CV) | 1.8 | 0.9 | 5.3 | 3.1 | 3.3 | 2.0 |
b. Linearity/assay reportable range:
To assess assay linearity, high and low samples were spiked to the following levels and mixed together in the ratios below (high and low sample values determined on the predicate assay):
$\mathrm{HbA_{1c}}$ - Normal (Low) $(4.0\%)$ and Diabetic (High) $(19\%)$ at 4:1, 2:1, 1:1, 1:2, 1:4, and 1:9
$\mathrm{HbA}_2$ - Low $(1.8\%)$ and High $(9.7\%)$ at 4:1, 2:1, 1:1, 1:2, 1:4, and 1:9
HbF - Low (0.1%) and High (19.3%) at 4:1, 2:1, 1:1, 1:2, 1:4, 1:9, and 1:20
The mixtures were then measured in duplicate and observed values and calculated expected values are summarized below. (units = % Hb)
| % Contribution | | HbA1c (6.5 Mins) | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Normal | Diabetic | Theoretical | Observed | % Recovery |
| 100 | 0 | 3.8 | 3.8 | 100 |
| 90 | 10 | 5.3 | 5.3 | 100 |
| 80 | 20 | 6.8 | 6.7 | 98.5 |
| 67 | 33 | 8.8 | 8.6 | 97.7 |
| 50 | 50 | 11.3 | 11.1 | 98.2 |
| 33 | 67 | 13.8 | 13.7 | 99.3 |
| 20 | 80 | 15.7 | 15.7 | 100 |
| 0 | 100 | 18.6 | 18.6 | 100 |
| % Contribution | | HbA2 | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Low | High | Theoretical | Observed | % Recovery |
| 100 | 0 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 100 |
| 90 | 10 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 100 |
| 80 | 20 | 3.4 | 3.1 | 91.2 |
| 67 | 33 | 4.5 | 4.2 | 93.3 |
| 50 | 50 | 6.0 | 5.8 | 96.7 |
| 33 | 67 | 7.4 | 7.2 | 97.3 |
| 20 | 80 | 8.6 | 8.5 | 98.8 |
| 0 | 100 | 10.3 | 10.3 | 100 |
| | | | | |
{5}
Page 6 of 11
| % Contribution | | HbF | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Low | High | Theoretical | Observed | % Recovery |
| 100 | 0 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 100 |
| 95 | 5 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 107.1 |
| 90 | 10 | 2.4 | 2.7 | 112.5 |
| 80 | 20 | 4.5 | 4.8 | 106.7 |
| 67 | 33 | 7.2 | 7.7 | 106.9 |
| 50 | 50 | 10.8 | 11.1 | 102.8 |
| 33 | 67 | 14.4 | 14.6 | 101.4 |
| 20 | 80 | 17.4 | 17.5 | 100.6 |
| 0 | 100 | 22.0 | 22.0 | 100 |
c. Traceability (controls, calibrators, or method):
The $\mathrm{HbA_{1c}}$ Calibrators provided with the D-10™ Dual Program are traceable to the IFCC reference standard. The calibrators are value-assigned by multiple runs which include calibrators, controls, and 5 IFCC calibration standard samples. The set consists of 2 levels of calibration materials with targeted values in the low and upper-to-mid range. Assigned values for each lot are described in the calibrator package insert.
The Joint Committee on Traceability in Laboratory Medicine [JCTLM] has not identified a higher order reference method or reference material for quantitation of $\mathrm{HbA}_2$ and HbF. Until recognized reference materials and methods for $\mathrm{HbA}_2$ and HbF are created and approved that meet the criteria established in European harmonized standards (ISO 15193 and ISO 15194), the sponsor uses an existing calibrator value assignment process for these analytes. The calibrators are value-assigned by multiple runs which include calibrators, controls, and 5 internal master calibration samples. For these analytes, internal master calibrators are created by measurement on the predicate assay. The set consists of 2 levels of calibration materials with targeted values in the low and upper-to-mid range. Assigned values for each lot are described in the calibrator package insert.
d. Detection limit:
The upper and lower detection limits for this assay were determined by the linear range of the assay (as follows).
HbA1c - 3.8% - 18.5% (short program)
3.7% - 18.4% (long program)
HbA2 - 1.5% - 11.4%
HbF - 0.8% - 16.5%
Users are instructed to report values above or below the reportable range of the assays as $>$ or $<$ the highest and lowest reportable values, respectively.
{6}
# e. Analytical specificity:
# $\mathbf{HbA}_{1c}$
In evaluating the specificity of the D-10™ Dual Program for $\% \mathrm{HbA}_{1\mathrm{c}}$ in EDTA-treated blood samples, two closely related but chemical derived analogs of $\mathrm{HbA}_{1\mathrm{c}}$ where evaluated as part of a detailed analytical specificity study. The influence of carbamylated hemoglobin was studied by spiking specimens with sodium cyanate until the carbamylated hemoglobin levels increased to a range of $2.0\%$ . Also, influence of unstable labile hemoglobin $\mathrm{A}_{1\mathrm{c}}$ was studied by spiking samples with glucose until unstable labile $\mathrm{A}_{1\mathrm{c}}$ in hemoglobin reached $3.5\%$ . As was the case for the predicate BioRad VARIANT™ II $\mathrm{HbA}_{1\mathrm{c}}$ system, the results with this new Rad D-10™ Dual Program system demonstrated that the final measurement of $\% \mathrm{HbA}_{1\mathrm{c}}$ at normal and diabetic levels was not significantly influenced by either added carbamylated hemoglobin or added glucose-labile hemoglobin $\mathrm{A}_{1\mathrm{c}}$ at the above indicated limits.
Additional normal and diabetic blood samples were obtained as patient bloods that were anticoagulated with EDTA in the standard manner. In three separate trials of patient pools or individual blood samples: a) concentrated bilirubin was added to a final level of $20\mathrm{mg / dL}$ ; b) concentrated lipids were added to a final level of $5680\mathrm{mg / dL}$ ; and c) additional dipotassium EDTA was added to a concentration of $\sim 1980\mathrm{mg / dL}$ (11x the normal level) to determine the effect of high concentrations of EDTA that can occur in cases of "short draws." For the measurement of normal and high diabetic $\mathrm{HbA_{1c}}$ in blood samples, the device was not influenced by these excess endogenous substances or excess EDTA anticoagulant, as illustrated below in the interference evaluation table.
| Interfering Substances | D-10™ Dual Program (6.5 Minutes) HbA1c |
| --- | --- |
| Bilirubin | No interference up to 20 mg/dL |
| Lipids (Triglycerides) | No interference up to 5680 mg/dL |
| EDTA | No interference up to 11X EDTA |
# $\mathbf{HbA}_2$
In evaluating for specificity of the D-10™ Dual Program for $\% \mathrm{HbA}_2$ in EDTA-treated blood samples, additional normal, moderate and high blood $\% \mathrm{HbA}_2$ samples were obtained as patient bloods that were anticoagulated with EDTA in the standard manner. In three separate trials of patient pools or individual blood samples: a) concentrated bilirubin was added to a final level of $20\mathrm{mg / dL}$ ; b) concentrated lipids were added to a final level between $5680\mathrm{mg / dL}$ ; and c) additional dipotassium EDTA was added to a concentration of $\sim 1980\mathrm{mg / dL}$ (11x the normal level) to determine the effect of high concentrations of EDTA that can occur in cases of "short draws." For the final measurement of normal, moderate and high $\mathrm{HbA}_2$ in blood samples, the device was not influenced by these excess endogenous substances or excess EDTA anticoagulant, as illustrated below in the interference evaluation table.
{7}
| Interfering Substances | D-10TM Dual Program (HbA2) |
| --- | --- |
| Bilirubin | No interference up to 20 mg/dL |
| Lipids (Triglycerides) | No interference up to 5680 mg/dL |
| EDTA | No interference up to 11X EDTA |
# HbF
The HbF assay was evaluated using the D-10™ Dual Program system as part of a detailed analytical specificity study. First the influence of an unstable complex of glucose & hemoglobin known as labile Hemoglobin $\mathrm{A_{1c}}$ (which elutes in proximity to HbF) was studied by spiking samples with glucose until labile $\mathrm{A_{1c}}$ in Hemoglobin reached 0-2.6%. Final measurement of HbF in these blood-based human specimens was not influenced significantly by labile Hemoglobin $\mathrm{A_{1c}}$ at the above-indicated limits.
In evaluating for specificity of this D-10™ Dual Program system for $\% \mathrm{HbF}$ in EDTA-treated blood samples, additional normal, moderate and high blood samples were obtained as patient bloods that were anticoagulated with EDTA in the standard manner. In three separate trials of patient pools or individual blood samples: a) concentrated bilirubin was added to a final level of $20\mathrm{mg / dL}$ ; b) concentrated lipids were added to a final level between 5680 and $6000\mathrm{mg / dL}$ ; and c) additional dipotassium EDTA was added to a concentration of $\sim 1980\mathrm{mg / dL}$ (11x the normal level) to determine the effect of high concentrations of EDTA that can occur in cases of "short draws." For the final measurement of HbF, and $\mathrm{HbA_{1c}}$ & $\mathrm{HbA_2}$ , the device was not influenced by these excess endogenous substances or excess EDTA anticoagulant, as illustrated below in the interference evaluation table.
| Interfering Substance | D-10TM Dual Program (Extended) (HbA1c & HbA2/F) |
| --- | --- |
| Potential Labile Hb (glucose + Hb) Interference | No significant interference up to 3.5% Labile Hb on HbA1c |
| Potential Labile Hb (glucose + Hb) Interference | No significant interference up to 2.6% Labile Hb on HbF |
| Bilirubin | No interference up to 20 mg/dL |
| Lipids (Triglycerides) | No interference up to 5680 mg/dL |
| EDTA | No interference up to 11X EDTA |
f. Assay cut-off: Not applicable
# 2. Comparison studies:
a. Method comparison with predicate device:
{8}
Page 9 of 11
**HbA₁c**
Method correlation between D-10™ Dual Program system and the predicate was evaluated using 40 EDTA whole blood patient samples (measured in duplicate) that ranged from 4.7% to 11.2% HbA₁c. By this comparison, a linear regression equation was obtained as: Y = 0.9906*X + 0.4310, and an r² = 0.9843, showing substantial equivalence between the new device and the predicate for HbA₁c analyses from human blood. Similar results were also seen at two additional sites using a total of 148 additional samples.
**HbA₂**
Method correlation between D-10™ Dual Program system and the predicate was evaluated using 40 EDTA whole blood patient samples (measured in duplicate) that ranged from 1.9% to 8.9% for HbA₂. Samples used in this study were both spiked and normal coded (stored) patient samples. By this comparison, a linear regression equation was obtained as: Y = 1.0898*X - 0.2407, and an r² = 0.9832, showing substantial equivalence between the device and the predicate for HbA₂ analyses from human blood.
**HbF**
Method correlation between D-10™ Dual Program system and the predicate was evaluated using 40 EDTA whole blood patient samples (measured in duplicate) that ranged from 0% to 12.9% for HbF. Samples used in this study were both spiked and normal coded (stored) patient samples. By this comparison, a linear regression equation was obtained as: Y = 0.9497*X - 0.1785, and an r² = 0.9959, showing substantial equivalence between the device and the predicate for HbF analyses from human blood.
**b. Matrix comparison:**
EDTA whole blood is the only sample type indicated.
3. Clinical studies:
a. Clinical sensitivity: Not applicable
b. Clinical specificity: Not applicable
c. Other clinical supportive data (when a and b are not applicable): Not applicable
4. Clinical cut-off: Not applicable
5. Expected values/Reference range:
**HbA₁c**
The Expected Value range was established in the article by Rohlfing et al, as published in a reference article entitled “Use of GHb (HbA1c) in Screening for Undiagnosed Diabetes in the U.S. Population”. The recommended weighted mean the %HbA₁c for patients with normal fasting plasma glucose (n=5,694) was 5.17% with the standard deviation of 0.45%, while the 95% confidence limits (mean ±2SD) were 4.27%-6.07 HbA₁c. The D-
{9}
Page 10 of 11
$10^{\mathrm{TM}}$ Dual Program system matched this expected result range and has been so certified by the NGSP.
## HbA₂ and HbF
The Expected Value range for the D-10™ Dual Program system was established from a modified version of NCCLS C28-A2. The protocol did not follow the sample acquisition and identification requirements, since this was a non-clinical evaluation. A total of 53 EDTA whole blood samples from apparently healthy male and females in Northern America were analyzed for HbA₂ and HbF using the D-10™ Dual Program system. The range is a 95% non-parametric range obtained by eliminating the highest and lowest 2.5% of values. The mean HbA₂ value was 3.0%. The 95% confidence interval for HbA₂ was 2.2% to 3.7%. The mean hemoglobin F value was 0.2%. The 95% confidence interval for hemoglobin F was 0% to 0.8%.
## N. Instrument Name:
Bio-Rad D-10™ Hemoglobin Testing System
## O. System Descriptions:
1. Modes of Operation: Automatic
2. Software: see K031043 – no additional functional requirements or software were added
FDA has reviewed applicant’s Hazard Analysis and software development processes for this line of product types:
Yes 3 (see K031043) or No
3. Sample Identification: Barcode
4. Specimen Sampling and Handling: No sample preparation necessary. Whole blood (EDTA) tubes are used for sampling
5. Assay Types: Chemistry (ion exchange chromatographic separation)
6. Reaction Types: Photometric detection of elution peaks
7. Calibration: Two levels of calibration materials are supplied for each analyte. See traceability section above for more information on the calibrators.
8. Quality Control: The sponsor recommends that users perform quality control using low and high specimens once per 24 hours or when expected control values are not obtained.
{10}
Page 11 of 11
P. Other Supportive Instrument Performance Characteristics Data Not Covered In The "L. Performance Characteristics" Section Of The SE Determination Decision Summary:
The instrument and software for the two devices that were combined to result in this device were previously cleared. The sponsor states that no changes were made to the cleared software (K031043) to accommodate the new analytes as the cleared version was designed and validated to support the addition of these additional analytes.
Q. Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.