The VARIANT™ II Hemoglobin A1c Program is intended for the determination of hemoglobin A1c in human whole blood using ion-exchange high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The VARIANT™ II Hemoglobin A1c Program is intended for use only with the Bio-Rad VARIANT™ II Hemoglobin Testing System. For in vitro diagnostic use only.
Device Story
The VARIANT™ II Hemoglobin A1c Program is an automated HPLC system for quantitative measurement of Hemoglobin A1c in human whole blood. It utilizes cation exchange chromatography to separate hemoglobin variants and glycated hemoglobin fractions. The system processes primary sample tubes via front-end automation, diluting whole blood in an aqueous medium. Unlike the predicate, which used a hemolysis reagent to remove Schiff base, this system separates the Schiff base from HbA1c during the analytical chromatographic step. The system measures absorbance at 415nm and 690nm. Results are provided as a quantitative area percent, reflecting mean blood glucose levels over the preceding ~120 days. Used in clinical laboratory settings, the system assists healthcare providers in monitoring long-term glycemic control in patients. Clinical Data Management Software facilitates result processing and reporting.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Precision evaluated per NCCLS EP5-T2 using low, medium, and high patient samples; within-run %CV ranged 1.04-1.93%, between-run %CV 0.92-2.40%, and total precision 2.00-4.10%. Accuracy correlation study against the predicate device (NCCLS EP9-T) yielded an r² of 0.9885. The system meets National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program (NGSP) precision requirements.
Technological Characteristics
Cation exchange chromatography; quantitative area percent measurement; 415nm/690nm detection wavelengths. Features front-end automation for primary sample tubes. Includes Clinical Data Management Software. System is networked/integrated for laboratory use.
Indications for Use
Indicated for the determination of hemoglobin A1c in human whole blood for the assessment of glycemic control. For in vitro diagnostic use.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A glycosylated hemoglobin assay is a device used to measure the glycosylated hemoglobins (A1a , A1b , and A1c ) in a patient's blood by a column chromatographic procedure. Measurement of glycosylated hemoglobin is used to assess the level of control of a patient's diabetes and to determine the proper insulin dosage for a patient. Elevated levels of glycosylated hemoglobin indicate uncontrolled diabetes in a patient.
{0}------------------------------------------------
K984268
DEC 1 7 1998
# 510(k) Summary of Safety and Effectiveness
Submitter:
Hercules, California 94547 Phone: 1-510-741-6188 1-510-741-6471 FAX:
> Juliet Carrara Regulatory Affairs/Quality Assurance Manager
Date of Summary Preparation:
Device Name:
Contact Person:
Classification Name:
Predicate Device:
Statement of Intended Use:
November 23, 1998
Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.
4000 Alfred Nobel Drive
VARIANT™ II HbA1c Program
Assay, Glycosylated Hemoglobin, 81 LCP
VARIANT™ HbA1c Program K926469 Bio-Rad Laboratories Hercules, CA 94547
The VARIANT™ II Hemoglobin AJc Program is intended for the determination of hemoglobin A1c in human whole blood using ion-exchange high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC).
The VARIANT™ II Hemoglobin A1c Program is intended for use only with the Bio-Rad VARIANT™ II Hemoglobin Testing System.
For in vitro diagnostic use only.
### Description of Device
The VARIANT™ II Hemoglobin A1c Program is based on chromatographic separation of HbAr on a cation exchange cartridge. The analytical system of instrument and reagent kit provides a means of measuring Hemoglobin A1c, formed by the non-enzymatic attachment of circulating blood glucose to the N terminal valine of the B-chain of the hemoglobin molecule (HbAo). Attachment of glucose to hemoglobin is achieved in a two
{1}------------------------------------------------
step process. The first step is the formation of an unstable aldimine (Schiff base, labile, or pre-A1c), a reversible reaction between the carbonyl group of glucose and the N terminal valine of the ß-chain of hemoglobin. The amount of Schiff base formed is directly proportional to the blood glucose concentration. The second step is the much slower and irreversible conversion of the Schiff base intermediate to the stable "ketoamine" product (Hemoglobin Alc). The percentage of Hemoglobin A1c in whole blood is dependent on the level of sustained blood glucose and indicative of mean blood glucose over the lifetime of red blood cells (~ 120 days).
# Testing To Establish Substantial Equivalence
To establish substantial equivalence to an existing device, and thus establish the safety and effectiveness, the VARIANT™ II HbAlc Program has been compared to the VARIANT™ HbA1c Program (K926469). A review of the intended use of each system shows them to be the same, in that, they both measure Hemoglobin A1c in a sample of whole blood using cation exchange high performance liquid chromatography.
### Technical Characteristics Compared to Predicate
| | VARIANT™ II HbA1c | VARIANT™ HbA1c |
|---------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------|
| Separation Mechanism | Cation exchange<br>chromatography | Cation exchange<br>chromatography |
| Sample Preparation | Direct dilution of whole<br>blood in aqueous medium | Direct dilution of whole<br>blood in aqueous medium |
| Measurement Type | Quantitative area percent | Quantitative area percent |
| Use of Controls | Two levels of control per<br>run | Two levels of control per<br>run |
| Visible Detection<br>Wavelength | 415nm / 690nm | 415nm / 690nm |
Both systems have the same technical characteristic as presented in the table below:
The VARIANT™ II HbA1c Program has added front end automation and Clinical Data Management Software capabilities. The front end automation allows sampling from primary sample tubes. The predicate used a hemolysis reagent during sample preparation to remove Schiff base. The VARIANT™ II HbA1c Program separates Schiff base from HbAlc in the analysis step.
{2}------------------------------------------------
The performance of the VARIANT™ II HbA Ic Program was evaluated for precision, measuring range, and accuracy. The precision studies were done using a modified protocol based on the NCCLS Evaluation protocol, Vol. 12, No 4, EP5-T2. Using this protocol, precision of the system was determined using a low, medium, and high patient whole blood sample. The Within-run %CV for the low was 1.51%, for the medium 1.93%, and for the high patient 1.04%. The Between run %CV for the low was 2.40%, for the medium 2.01%, and for the high patient 0.92%. Total precision was 4.10% for the low, 3.36% for the medium, and 2.00% for the high patient. The VARIANT™ II HbA1c Program meets the precision requirements of the National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program (NGSP).
A correlation study, to determine accuracy of the VARIANT™ II HbA1c Program, was done against the VARIANT™ HbA1c Program. The study followed NCCLS Document EP9-T. The "r2" for the correlation was 0.9885.
When considering the similarities of the intended use, general characteristics of the two assays, the use of the same technology and the excellent correlation between the two methods, it can be concluded that the VARIANT™ II HbA1c Program and the VARIANT™ HbA 1c Program are substantially equivalent. Based on the establishment of substantial equivalence, the safety and effectiveness of the VARIANT™ II HbA1c Program is confirmed.
7
{3}------------------------------------------------
## DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
Image /page/3/Picture/2 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The logo consists of a stylized eagle with three tail feathers, representing the department's commitment to health, human services, and well-being. The words "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES • USA" are arranged in a circular pattern around the eagle.
DEC 17 1998
Ms. Juliet Carrara Manager, Regulatory Affairs and Quality Assurance Bio-Rad Laboratories, Diagnostic Group 4000 Alfred Nobel Drive Hercules, California 94547-1803
Re : K984268 Trade Name: VARIANT II HbAlc Program Regulatory Class: II Product Code: LCP Dated: November 23, 1998 November 30, 1998 Received:
Dear Ms. Carrara:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) notification of intent to market the device referenced above and we have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (Premarket Approval), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Requlations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 895. A substantially equivalent determination assumes compliance with the Current Good Manufacturing Practice requirements, as set forth in the Quality System Regulation (QS) for Medical Devices: General regulation (21 CFR Part 820) and that, through periodic QS inspections, the Food and Druq Administration (FDA) will verify such assumptions. Failure to comply with the GMP regulation may result in regulatory action. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Reqister. Please note: this response to your premarket notification submission does not affect any obligation you might have under sections 531 through 542 of the Act for devices under the Electronic Product Radiation Control provisions, or other Federal laws or regulations.
Food and Drug Administration 2098 Gaither Road Rockville MD 20850
{4}------------------------------------------------
#### Page 2
This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your 510(k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801 and additionally 809.10 for in vitro diagnostic devices), please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4588. Additionally, for questions on the promotion and advertising of your device, please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4639. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). Other general information on your responsibilities under the Act may be obtained from the Division of Small Manufacturers Assistance, at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 443-6597, or at its internet address "http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/dsma/dsmamain.html".
Sincerely yours,
Steven Putman
Steven I. Gutman, M.D., M.B.A. Director Division of Clinical Laboratory Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{5}------------------------------------------------
# Statement of Indications for Use
510(k) Number:
Device Name:
Indications for Use:
K984268
Bio-Rad VARIANT™II Hemoglobin A16 Program
The VARIANT™ II Hemoglobin A1c Program is intended for the determination of hemoglobin Ate in human whole blood using ion-exchange high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC).
The VARIANT™ II Hemoglobin A16 Program is intended for use only with the Bio-Rad VARIANT™ II Hemoglobin Testing System.
For in vitro diagnostic use only.
(Division Sign-Off)
Division of Clinical Laboratory Devides
510(k) Number. K984268
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED) Concurrence of CDHR, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
Prescriptive Use
(Per 21 CFR 801.109)
OR Over-The-Counter Use
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.