Immunoturbidometric assay for the in vitro quantitative determination of transferrin in human serum and plasma on automated clinical chemistry analyzers. A transferrin immunological test system is a device that consists of the reagents used to measure by immunochemical techniques the transferrin (an iron-binding and transporting serum protein) in serum and plasma. Measurement of transferrin levels aids in the diagnosis of malnutrition, acute inflammation, infection, and red blood cell disorders, such as iron deficiency anemia.
Device Story
Tina-quant Transferrin ver.2 is an in vitro diagnostic immunoturbidimetric assay for use on automated clinical chemistry analyzers. The device utilizes rabbit anti-transferrin antibodies to react with transferrin in human serum or plasma samples, forming antigen/antibody complexes. Polyethylene glycol (PEG) is added to accelerate the reaction and enhance sensitivity. The resulting agglutination is measured turbidimetrically. The assay is performed in clinical laboratory settings by trained technicians. Results are provided to physicians to assist in diagnosing conditions related to iron metabolism, such as malnutrition, inflammation, infection, and anemia. The device provides quantitative measurements of transferrin levels, which are compared against reference ranges to inform clinical decision-making.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Performance evaluated via precision studies (intra-assay CV 1.0-2.7%, between-day CV 0.0-1.7%), analytical sensitivity (0.007-0.02 g/l), and method comparison against the predicate (Passing/Bablock regression: y = 0.01 + 0.97x, r = 0.990). Interference testing performed for icterus, hemolysis, lipemia, and rheumatoid factors.
Technological Characteristics
Immunoturbidimetric assay; reagents include rabbit anti-transferrin antibodies and PEG. Standardized against CRM 470/RPPHS. Designed for use on automated clinical chemistry analyzers (e.g., Roche/Hitachi series). Measuring range 0.007-7.80 g/l depending on instrument. Software-controlled automated analysis.
Indications for Use
Indicated for the quantitative determination of transferrin in human serum and plasma to aid in the diagnosis of malnutrition, acute inflammation, infection, and red blood cell disorders (e.g., iron deficiency anemia).
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A transferrin immunological test system is a device that consists of the reagents used to measure by immunochemical techniques the transferrin (an iron-binding and transporting serum protein) in serum, plasma, and other body fluids. Measurement of transferrin levels aids in the diagnosis of malnutrition, acute inflammation, infection, and red blood cell disorders, such as iron deficiency anemia.
{0}------------------------------------------------
#### 510(k) Summary
#### SEP 1 9 2001
According to the requirements of 21 CFR 807.92, the following information Introduction provides sufficient detail to understand the basis for a determination of substantial equivalence. Submitter Roche Diagnostics Corporation name, address, 9115 Hague Road contact Indianapolis, IN 46250 (317) 576 - 3544 Contact Person: Sherri L. Coenen Date Prepared: July 26, 2001 Device Name Proprietary name: Tina-quant Transferrin ver.2 Common name: Transferrin Classification name: Transferrin immunological test system The Tina-quant Transferrin ver.2 Assay is based on the principle of Device Description immunological agglutination. Anti-transferrin antibodies react with the antigen in the sample to form an antigen/antibody complex. Following agglutination, this is measured turbidimetrically. Addition of PEG allows the
reaction to progress rapidly to the end point and increases sensitivity.
{1}------------------------------------------------
Substantial equivalence similarities
:
:
: .
The following table compares the Tina-quant Transferrin ver.2 Assay with the predicate device.
| Feature | Tina-quant Transferrin<br>ver.2 | Tina-quant Transferrin |
|-----------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Intended Use | Immunoturbidometric<br>assay for the in vitro<br>quantitative determination<br>of transferrin in human<br>serum and plasma on<br>automated clinical<br>chemistry analyzers. | Immunoturbidometric<br>assay for the in vitro<br>quantitative determination<br>of transferrin in human<br>serum and plasma on<br>automated clinical<br>chemistry analyzers. |
| Indication for Use | A transferrin<br>immunological test system<br>is a device that consists of<br>the reagents used to<br>measure by<br>immunological<br>techniques the transferrin<br>(an iron-binding and<br>transporting serum protein)<br>in serum and plasma.<br>Measurement of<br>transferrin levels aids in<br>the diagnosis of<br>malnutrition, acute<br>inflammation, infection,<br>and red blood cell<br>disorders,such as iron<br>deficiency anemia. | A transferrin<br>immunological test system<br>is a device that consists of<br>the reagents used to<br>measure by<br>immunochemical<br>techniques the transferrin<br>(an iron-binding and<br>transporting serum<br>protein) in serum, plasma,<br>and other body fluids.<br>Measurement of<br>transferrin levels aids in<br>the diagnosis of<br>malnutrition, acute<br>inflammation, infection,<br>and red blood cell<br>disorders, such as iron<br>deficiency anemia. |
| Assay Protocol<br>Instrument | Immunoturbidimetric<br>Roche/Hitachi Clinical<br>Chemistry Analyzers | Immunoturbidimetric<br>Roche/Hitachi Clinical<br>Chemistry Analyzers |
| Sample Type | Human serum and plasma | Human serum and plasma |
| Traceability /<br>Standardization | Standardized against the<br>reference preparation<br>CRM 470, corresponding<br>to RPPHS (Reference<br>Preparation Protein in<br>Human Serum) | Standardized against the<br>reference preparation<br>CRM 470, corresponding<br>to RPPHS (Reference<br>Preparation Protein in<br>Human Serum) |
| Feature | Tina-quant Transferrin ver.2 | Tina-quant Transferrin |
| Antibody source | rabbit | goat |
| Measuring Range | Roche/Hitachi 704/902<br>0.02 - 5.00 g/l<br>(1 - 500 mg/dl)<br>Maximum reportable range is dependent on the highest<br>standard concentration. | Roche/Hitachi 704/902<br>80 - 500 mg/dl<br>Maximum reportable range is<br>dependent on the highest<br>standard concentration. |
| | Roche/Hitachi 717/747<br>0.02 - 5.00 g/l<br>(1 - 500 mg/dl)<br>Extended measuring<br>range with rerun<br>0.02 - 7.50 g/l<br>(1 - 750 mg/dl)<br>Maximum reportable range<br>is dependent on the highest<br>standard concentration. | Roche/Hitachi<br>717/747/914<br>80 - 500 mg/dl<br>Extended measuring<br>range with rerun<br>80 - 1000 mg/dl<br>Maximum reportable range is<br>dependent on the highest<br>standard concentration. |
| | Roche/Hitachi<br>904/911/912/917/<br>Modular P<br>0.007 - 5.20 g/l<br>(0.7 - 520<br>mg/dl)<br>Extended measuring<br>range with rerun<br>0.007 - 7.80 g/l<br>(0.7 - 780<br>mg/dl)<br>Maximum reportable range<br>is dependent on the highest<br>standard concentration | Roche/Hitachi<br>904/911/912/917/<br>Modular P<br>15 - 500 mg/dl<br>Maximum reportable range is<br>dependent on the highest<br>standard concentration. |
{2}------------------------------------------------
Substantial equivalence differences
The following table compares the Tina-quant Transferrin ver.2 assay with the predicate device.
{3}------------------------------------------------
#### Substantial equivalence – performance characteristics
The performance characteristics of the Tina-quant Transferrin ver.2 Assay and the predicate device are compared in the table below.
| Feature | Tina-quant Transferrin<br>ver.2 | Tina-quant Transferrin |
|------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------|----------------------------------|
| Intra-assay<br>precision (%<br>CV) | Human sera:<br>1.0% at 1.36 g/l (136 mg/dl) | Human sera:<br>0.8% at 169 mg/dl |
| | 2.7% at 3.59 g/l (359 mg/dl) | |
| | Controls:<br>2.1% at 2.90 g/l (290 mg/dl) | Controls:<br>0.8% at 217 mg/dl |
| | 1.0% at 4.31 g/l (431 mg/dl) | 0.8% at 403 mg/dl |
| Between Day<br>Precision (%<br>CV) | Human sera:<br>0.0% at 1.60 g/l (160 mg/dl) | Human sera:<br>3.0% at 169 mg/dl |
| | 1.4% at 3.38 g/l (338 mg/dl) | |
| | Controls:<br>1.7% at 2.88 g/l (288 mg/dl) | Controls:<br>1.4% at 217 mg/dl |
| | 1.4% at 4.35 g/l (435 mg/dl) | 1.5% at 403 mg/dl |
{4}------------------------------------------------
Substantial equivalence – performance characteristics, cont.
The performance characteristics of the Tina-quant Transferrin ver.2 Assay and the predicate device are compared in the table below.
| Feature | Tina-quant Transferrin<br>ver.2 | Tina-quant Transferrin |
|------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Limitations | Icterus: No significant interference with up to an I index of 60 Hemolysis: No significant interference up to an H index of 1000 Lipemia (Intralipid): No significant interference up to an L index of 500 Rheumatoid factors < 1200 IU/ml do not interfere Gammopathy type IgM sera (Waldenstroem's macroglobulinemia) interfere with the assay | Icterus: No significant interference from bilirubin up to an I index of 60 Hemolysis: No significant interference from hemoglobin up to an H index of 1000 Lipemia (Intralipid): No significant interference from lipemia up to an L index of 600 Rheumatoid factors < 350 IU/ml do not interfere |
| Analytical<br>sensitivity<br>(LDL) | Roche/Hitachi<br>704/717/747/902<br>0.02 g/l (1 mg/dl)<br><br>Roche/Hitachi<br>904/911/912/917/Modular P<br>0.007 g/l (0.7 mg/dl) | 15 mg/dl |
| Method<br>comparison | Tina-quant Transferrin ver.2 (Y) / Tina-quant Transferrin (X):<br>Passing/Bablock:<br>$y = 0.01 + 0.97x$<br>$r = 0.990$ | Tina-quant Transferrin on Roche/Hitachi 917 (Y)/<br>Tina-quant Transferrin on Roche/Hitachi 911 (X):<br>Passing/Bablock:<br>$y = 1.141 + 0.989x$<br>$r = 0.998$ |
{5}------------------------------------------------
Substantial equivalence performance characteristics, cont.
,
The performance characteristics of the Tina-quant Transferrin ver.2 Assay and the predicate device are compared in the table below.
·············································································································································································
| Feature | Tina-quant Transferrin<br>ver.2 | Tina-quant Transferrin |
|--------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Calibration<br>frequency | • after reagent lot change<br>• as required following<br>quality control procedures | • after reagent lot<br>change<br>• as required following<br>quality control<br>procedures |
| Expected values | 2.0 – 3.6 g/l (200 – 360 mg/dl) | IFCC/CRM 470:<br>200 – 360 mg/dl<br>Roche:<br>200 – 400 mg/dl |
{6}------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
Image /page/6/Picture/1 description: The image shows the seal of the Department of Health & Human Services - USA. The seal is circular and contains the words "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" around the perimeter. In the center of the seal is an abstract image of three human profiles facing right, with wavy lines extending from the bottom of the profiles.
### SEP 1 9 2001
Food and Drug Administration 2098 Gaither Road Rockville MD 20850
Ms. Sherri L. Coenen Regulatory Submissions, Centralized Diagnostics Roche Diagnostics Corporation 9115 Hague Road P.O. Box 50457 Indianapolis, Indiana 46250-0457
K012371 Re:
Trade Name: Roche Diagnostics Tina-quant® Transferrin ver.2 Regulatory Class: 21 CFR § 866.5880 Regulatory Class: II Product Code: DDG Dated: July 26, 2001 Received: July 26, 2001
Dear Ms. Coenen:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) notification of intent to market the device referenced we have teviewed your becally be is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use above and we nave acteriner actived predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce stated in the citems. To logally manote of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that provision in the may 20, 1910, the encounters. with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls Cosment Act (1100). Tou may) accessors) sprovisions of the Act include requirements for annual provisions of the Fee. "The est, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (Premarket Approval), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations (1 remarket rippt vary of the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 895. arretung your as novelent determination assumes compliance with the Current Good A substantanty equirements, as set forth in the Quality System Regulation (QS) for Medical Devices: General regulation (21 CFR Part 820) and that, through periodic QS inspections, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) will verify such assumptions. Failure to mispections, the Food and Dating may result in regulatory action. In addition, FDA may publish comply with also Cricerning your device in the Federal Register. Please note: this response to your premarks betification submission does not affect any obligation you might have under sections 531 through 542 of the Act for devices under the Electronic Product Radiation Control provisions, or other Federal laws or regulations.
{7}------------------------------------------------
#### Page 2
This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your 510(k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801 and additionally 809.10 for in vitro diagnostic devices), please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4588. Additionally, for questions on the promotion and advertising of your device, please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4639. Also, please note the regulation entitled. "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR 807.97). Other general information on your responsibilities under the Act may be obtained from the Division of Small Manufacturers International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 443-6597 or at its internet address "http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/dsma/dsmamain.html".
Sincerely yours.
Steven Toutman
Steven I. Gutman, M.D., M.B.A. Director Division of Clinical Laboratory Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{8}------------------------------------------------
## Indications for Use Statement
# Roche Diagnostics Corp
510(k) Number (if known): K012371
Device Name: Tina-quant Transferrin ver.2
Indications For Use:
Immunoturbidometric assay for the in vitro quantitative determination of transferrin in human serum and plasma on automated clinical chemistry analyzers. A transferrin immunological test system is a device that consists of the reagents used to measure by immunochemical techniques the transferrin (an iron-binding and transporting serum protein) in serum and plasma. Measurement of transferrin levels aids in the diagnosis of malnutrition, acute inflammation, infection, and red blood cell disorders, such as iron deficiency anemia.
Prescription Use _ (Per 21 CFR 801.109)
OR
Over-The-Counter Use _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
(Optional Format 1-2-96)
Susan S. Albane
(Division Sign-Off) Division of Clinical Laboratory Devices
510(k) Number k012371
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.